Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Fatbikes
Reload this Page >

Considering a Fatbike - Questions?!

Search
Notices
Fatbikes Designed for use in sand, mud or snow, Fat bikes are the right choice for true all-terrain riding. Check here for the latest on these fun, adventurous two-wheeled machines.

Considering a Fatbike - Questions?!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-07-22, 08:09 AM
  #1  
Noonievut
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 946
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 286 Post(s)
Liked 261 Times in 129 Posts
Considering a Fatbike - Questions?!

Background
- have been a roadie for 15 years, and in the last 8 have had multiple all-road (gravel/cross) bikes and really enjoy multi-surface rides
- my Surly CC with 40mm tubeless is a lot of fun on non-technical trails, and I use it in the winter when the roads are free of snow/ice
- I live in Southwest Ontario (hour outside Toronto)
- have a ridden a fat bike on trails twice, two winters ago; first ride I guess the snow was ideal and I was smiling for 2-3 hours; next ride (just days later, but a snowfall or two) was a completely different experience as the show was less than ideal

Goal: if I were to buy a fat bike, would be for both winter and summer riding. Winter as often as the snow is good, as I hate riding indoors. Summer, maybe once every 1-2 weeks (I really like my Surly on the local trails, and a weekly road ride with a friend, so the fat bike would get some time on more mtb trails here and there...if I loved it, maybe more often...who knows!

New vs. Used
- with a budget around $2k (Canadian) I've found 3-4 year old fat bike's that seem well-maintained, have upgrades like suspension fork and dropper posts (bikes where current model is $3k or so)
- new, I can get bikes like Norco Bigfoot 3, Giant Yukon 2 (Yukon 1 is $2,600 + tax...that's a stretch)

Specs
- the used one's I've seen have a suspension fork, would be nice (I assume) when riding the trails in the summer, and perhaps during the winter too
- for winter, I would assume studded tires are the best, but so far no options in new/used I can source have these on the bike...anyone use one set in the summer and another in the winter?
- forks: rigid aluminium vs. carbon, or suspension (suspension needed when using 4.5-5" tires? if right psi)
- one of the new bikes I've looked at has mech discs (not necessarily a bad thing, but for technical mtb I know hydro has worked better for me in the past)

I welcome your thoughts, suggestions on any of the above and anything I missed. Thanks!
Noonievut is offline  
Old 06-07-22, 10:25 AM
  #2  
Bearhawker
Full Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Prince Edward Island, Canada
Posts: 311

Bikes: '23 Devinci Hatchet Carbon Apex1 '19 Norco Bigfoot 6.1 ,'12 Motobecane Turino (killed by dog crash), '12 Trek 3700 Disc

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 149 Post(s)
Liked 128 Times in 74 Posts
I ride my Bigfoot year round - the OEM 4.8" Jumbo Jims (I would love studded but don't have them yet) in the winter and el-cheapo 4.0" Kenda somethingorothers from Crappy Tire ($50 bucks - last forever... right around 2000 km on mine and the look new)

I tend to use the dropper post in one of 2 ways - in the winter it's an awesome way to put my feet down for ice or when waiting for someone & in the summer if I don't have my rear rack on it's *AWESOME* for steep highway descents up to 70 km/h or so. (Yay Cabot Trail!)

I've never ridden a fatty with a suspension fork: in the winter I think it would just be extra weight as with 6 PSI in teh tires there is a lot of compliance, and in the summer when I run at 30PSI (tire max) it is still *WAY* more comfortable than any road bike I've ever ridden. I've only taken mine on a Green MTB trail once in the summer and I don't MTB enough to know what I'm missing without a suspension fork.

Too bad you're so far away... my wife has an almost never used Bigfoot 6.1 (2018 maybe) she no longer wants. It's been ridden less than a couple hours in the winter and we spent a few days touring around Grand Manan the other year. I put more time into my bike each month than she has total.

My fatty is currently my only ride so it does commuting (16km each way), fun rides, touring (Grand Manan and Cabot trail) and in August will even do a Gran Fondo - lol

Not a good choice if you're in a hurry though. I average 20 km/h. 28T chainring...
Bearhawker is offline  
Old 06-07-22, 01:29 PM
  #3  
CrimsonEclipse
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,079
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 543 Post(s)
Liked 624 Times in 365 Posts
Originally Posted by Noonievut
Background
- have been a roadie for 15 years, and in the last 8 have had multiple all-road (gravel/cross) bikes and really enjoy multi-surface rides
- my Surly CC with 40mm tubeless is a lot of fun on non-technical trails, and I use it in the winter when the roads are free of snow/ice
- I live in Southwest Ontario (hour outside Toronto)
- have a ridden a fat bike on trails twice, two winters ago; first ride I guess the snow was ideal and I was smiling for 2-3 hours; next ride (just days later, but a snowfall or two) was a completely different experience as the show was less than ideal

Goal: if I were to buy a fat bike, would be for both winter and summer riding. Winter as often as the snow is good, as I hate riding indoors. Summer, maybe once every 1-2 weeks (I really like my Surly on the local trails, and a weekly road ride with a friend, so the fat bike would get some time on more mtb trails here and there...if I loved it, maybe more often...who knows!

New vs. Used
- with a budget around $2k (Canadian) I've found 3-4 year old fat bike's that seem well-maintained, have upgrades like suspension fork and dropper posts (bikes where current model is $3k or so)
- new, I can get bikes like Norco Bigfoot 3, Giant Yukon 2 (Yukon 1 is $2,600 + tax...that's a stretch)

Specs
- the used one's I've seen have a suspension fork, would be nice (I assume) when riding the trails in the summer, and perhaps during the winter too
- for winter, I would assume studded tires are the best, but so far no options in new/used I can source have these on the bike...anyone use one set in the summer and another in the winter?
- forks: rigid aluminium vs. carbon, or suspension (suspension needed when using 4.5-5" tires? if right psi)
- one of the new bikes I've looked at has mech discs (not necessarily a bad thing, but for technical mtb I know hydro has worked better for me in the past)

I welcome your thoughts, suggestions on any of the above and anything I missed. Thanks!
I run 5" tires are around 7psi on the back and 5psi up front.
I have an RST Renegade up front

The large tires soak up tree roots, and up to grapefruit sized rocks but any unexpected big bumps are absorbed by the suspension fork

I'm a BB7 person when it comes to mechanical disk brakes, with 203mm rotors.
I should eventually upgrade to hydraulic, but it's on the list.
CrimsonEclipse is offline  
Old 06-08-22, 08:53 AM
  #4  
prj71
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: North Central Wisconsin
Posts: 4,621
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2975 Post(s)
Liked 1,180 Times in 770 Posts
If you are going to ride MTB trails then you will want a front suspension fork. Fat tires do not replace suspension.

Studded tires are hard to find right now. If you find some they will be expensive. Expect to pay around $500 USD for studded fat bike tires.
prj71 is offline  
Old 06-08-22, 03:58 PM
  #5  
whipnet
Newbie
 
whipnet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: 127.0.0.1
Posts: 60

Bikes: Fat

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Liked 48 Times in 20 Posts
I can't speak on the snow factor living in Houston, but I do ride a fatty year round on MTB trails and I agree with prj71 that a front suspension is nice if you're riding on dirt and roots.
I have rigid and suspension fatties and I find I only ride the rigid on paved trails now.

You can get a Trek Farley 5 in your price range and a suspension Farley 7 for a little more than you want to spend.

*
whipnet is offline  
Old 06-14-22, 07:41 PM
  #6  
Chris!
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: upstate NY
Posts: 161

Bikes: Jamis renegade, surly big dummy, giant talon 29er

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 62 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 42 Times in 22 Posts
I just got my first fat bike, a kona wo. I live in upstate NY but haven't ridden it in winter yet. I took it to a local park with single and double track. Loved it! In some ways its more fun to ride than my 29er. I would agree that the fat tires cannot fully replace suspension but come pretty close. There are a lot of areas that are boggy and my 29er would sink and sometimes I'd have to hike a bike. The Wo floats right over. I'm hoping the 4.8 tires it came with can get me through most of the winter riding I'd be interested in. I originally went in to get a giant yukon but my shop couldn't get one. In the end don't wait get a fat bike now you won't regret it.
Chris! is offline  
Old 06-14-22, 08:32 PM
  #7  
whipnet
Newbie
 
whipnet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: 127.0.0.1
Posts: 60

Bikes: Fat

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Liked 48 Times in 20 Posts
Originally Posted by Chris!
I just got my first fat bike, a kona wo.
Congrats and welcome to fatty world.

*
whipnet is offline  
Old 06-15-22, 07:43 AM
  #8  
prj71
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: North Central Wisconsin
Posts: 4,621
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2975 Post(s)
Liked 1,180 Times in 770 Posts
Originally Posted by Chris!
would agree that the fat tires cannot fully replace suspension but come pretty close.
Unless your bike suspension is bottom of the barrel SunTour stuff....Fat tires are not even remotely close to having good suspension.
prj71 is offline  
Old 07-26-22, 09:04 AM
  #9  
Banzai
Jet Jockey
 
Banzai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: St. Paul, MN
Posts: 4,941

Bikes: Cannondale CAAD9, Ritchey Breakaway Cross, Nashbar X-frame bike, Bike Friday Haul-a-Day, Surly Pugsley.

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 382 Post(s)
Liked 29 Times in 25 Posts
If you plan to use your bike in the city in winter, (as I do), here are some pitfalls I found.

There is no greater impediment to winter cycling than having your drivetrain wrecked by salty slush, and fat tires kick it up into your chain, drivetrain, and face by the scoopful. Fenders we’re more necessary for the fat tires than for my 37mm tire bike because of this, and fenders for fat bikes just aren’t readily available.

Additionally, the sheer volume of salty crud immobilized my cassette and rear mech in short order. I transitioned to an IGH, which can only be done on a Pugsley frame.

If trail riding is all you want to do, then a fat bike should be fine, because conditions will be “clean” enough. Here in St. Paul MN, there are road conditions that require my fat bike, and at the same time almost preclude a fat bike because of the absolute need for fenders. Just facefulls of salty glop, and having those fat tires shovel it all over the bike and drivetrain, while also navigating hard frozen ice ruts at the very same time…I can’t imagine it being possible on an external gear, fender-less fat bike.
__________________
Good night...and good luck
Banzai is offline  
Old 07-28-22, 06:56 AM
  #10  
Kapusta
Advanced Slacker
 
Kapusta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,210

Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt

Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2761 Post(s)
Liked 2,534 Times in 1,433 Posts
Here in Upstate NY, I find my Fatty wonderful in the winter and the mud seasons flanking it. In other words… 7 months out of the year.

But once things dry up a bit, I rarely ride it.

It is nothing even close to having suspension IMO. Unless your idea of suspension is an undamped spring. Trying to run pressure low to simulate suspension if fine for slower speeds, but when things start picking up, it just bounces me all over the place like a beach ball. Why? Because… undamped spring. I ride my tires in the 3-6 psi range in the snow and mud, but in the summer its more like 8-10, otherwise it gets hard to control at higher speeds in rough terrain. And at that point, it kind of defeats the purpose of having 4” tires…. i may as well be running 3” (plus) tires.

The only time I ride it in the summer is when I am riding with people a lot slower than me.

If I were to ride it in the summer more regularly, I would want a suspension fork, and maybe go with plus sizes tires (2.8-3.0) and wheels… but at that point I’d just get a hardtail.
Kapusta is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.