Wheel weight - Do you expect more than advertised?
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 4
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Wheel weight - Do you expect more than advertised?
Hi,
I recently bought a pair of Token C55 Carbon Clinchers. Part of the reason was because the weight at 1448g seemed great value, but when I received them, they were nearly 200gs more (excluding rim tape and skewers). They were pretty up front about the true weight with a specs sheet in the box that said they actually weighed 739g front & 894g rear (which is 1633g total and roughly 12.7% more than advertised). After weighing them myself I can say that's fairly accurate.
Is this as normal as Token makes it appear to be or should I be a bit peeved off for being mislead?
Thanks
I recently bought a pair of Token C55 Carbon Clinchers. Part of the reason was because the weight at 1448g seemed great value, but when I received them, they were nearly 200gs more (excluding rim tape and skewers). They were pretty up front about the true weight with a specs sheet in the box that said they actually weighed 739g front & 894g rear (which is 1633g total and roughly 12.7% more than advertised). After weighing them myself I can say that's fairly accurate.
Is this as normal as Token makes it appear to be or should I be a bit peeved off for being mislead?
Thanks
#2
Should Be More Popular
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 43,052
Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix
Mentioned: 560 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22598 Post(s)
Liked 8,925 Times
in
4,158 Posts
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Somewhere in TX
Posts: 2,266
Bikes: BH, Cervelo, Cube, Canyon
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 212 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
6 Posts
They know you're not going to ship them back to Taiwan so they fudge the specs to get your money.
#4
Climbing: Ropes or Wheels
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Unied States, Maine
Posts: 384
Bikes: 2012 Scott Foil 30, Homebrew Windsor Fens Build, 2015 Fuji Touring, 1980 Univega
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I'd be mad.
Email them with a "What the hell?" inquiry. They'll probably have some half-assed excuse, but I'm curious to know what it is. I would also bet they'll just offer to accept a return.
Email them with a "What the hell?" inquiry. They'll probably have some half-assed excuse, but I'm curious to know what it is. I would also bet they'll just offer to accept a return.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 182
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 42 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 26 Times
in
10 Posts
I'd send them back, categorically. As much as we hate it, the norm is to fudge. We fudge, too, only it's in the direction of making sure no one gets a bad surprise.
If you've bought something based on weight, you must weigh it and confirm, and impose consequences if it comes in unacceptably heavier. Assuming you're comparing advertised specs to received product correctly, you've been lied to.
What constitutes unacceptably heavier? We see alloy rim weights vary +/- 15g/rim, carbon weight variance is more like +/- 10g/rim. Hubs and spokes do not vary by more than a gram or 3 per wheel. Our convention would be to create a stated weight based on the heaviest rim. Many do the median, many others find the lightest one ever made and use that. Again, if you are comparing specs correctly, there has never been a wheel set of that model that weighed anything close to what is stated, and that is definitely unacceptable.
And we don't really get too worked up over weight. It's spec-fudging that bothers us.
If you've bought something based on weight, you must weigh it and confirm, and impose consequences if it comes in unacceptably heavier. Assuming you're comparing advertised specs to received product correctly, you've been lied to.
What constitutes unacceptably heavier? We see alloy rim weights vary +/- 15g/rim, carbon weight variance is more like +/- 10g/rim. Hubs and spokes do not vary by more than a gram or 3 per wheel. Our convention would be to create a stated weight based on the heaviest rim. Many do the median, many others find the lightest one ever made and use that. Again, if you are comparing specs correctly, there has never been a wheel set of that model that weighed anything close to what is stated, and that is definitely unacceptable.
And we don't really get too worked up over weight. It's spec-fudging that bothers us.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 9,201
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1186 Post(s)
Liked 289 Times
in
177 Posts
Ultimately, the weight isn't going to make a difference to your riding, however, the wheels were mis-represented. You have two options: Cancel the sale and ask for a full refund or ask for a discount. If you want a refund they would need to oblige and if they didn't you could go through Visa. Personally, I would settle for a reasonable discount.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 493
Bikes: 2013 SuperSix Ultegra
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 13,445
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4234 Post(s)
Liked 2,949 Times
in
1,808 Posts
__________________
Bikes: 1996 Eddy Merckx Titanium EX, 1989/90 Colnago Super(issimo?) Piu(?),1990 Concorde Aquila(hit by car while riding), others in build queue "when I get the time"
Bikes: 1996 Eddy Merckx Titanium EX, 1989/90 Colnago Super(issimo?) Piu(?),
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,159
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 119 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
I'd send them back, categorically. As much as we hate it, the norm is to fudge. We fudge, too, only it's in the direction of making sure no one gets a bad surprise.
If you've bought something based on weight, you must weigh it and confirm, and impose consequences if it comes in unacceptably heavier. Assuming you're comparing advertised specs to received product correctly, you've been lied to.
What constitutes unacceptably heavier? We see alloy rim weights vary +/- 15g/rim, carbon weight variance is more like +/- 10g/rim. Hubs and spokes do not vary by more than a gram or 3 per wheel. Our convention would be to create a stated weight based on the heaviest rim. Many do the median, many others find the lightest one ever made and use that. Again, if you are comparing specs correctly, there has never been a wheel set of that model that weighed anything close to what is stated, and that is definitely unacceptable.
And we don't really get too worked up over weight. It's spec-fudging that bothers us.
If you've bought something based on weight, you must weigh it and confirm, and impose consequences if it comes in unacceptably heavier. Assuming you're comparing advertised specs to received product correctly, you've been lied to.
What constitutes unacceptably heavier? We see alloy rim weights vary +/- 15g/rim, carbon weight variance is more like +/- 10g/rim. Hubs and spokes do not vary by more than a gram or 3 per wheel. Our convention would be to create a stated weight based on the heaviest rim. Many do the median, many others find the lightest one ever made and use that. Again, if you are comparing specs correctly, there has never been a wheel set of that model that weighed anything close to what is stated, and that is definitely unacceptable.
And we don't really get too worked up over weight. It's spec-fudging that bothers us.
A few years back, I bought a set of aluminum rims from a small reputable company and they turned out to weigh 80 grams more than advertised (I won't say which, they've been great wheels and 80 grams wasn't a deal breaker). I called the owner to ask about the variance and he apologized stating that different batches of the rims tended to weigh differently sometimes and they were working on making sure they were closer to the claimed weight. With November having proprietary molds, I reckon they can better insure the weights of what they sell.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 28,682
Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build
Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 58 Times
in
36 Posts
Aluminum rims are extruded through a die which wears over time allowing the rim extrusions to grow in thickness and weight over time. Most aluminum rim makers start with dies that are on the small side so that a run of rims starts out on the light side of nominal and becomes heavier as the run progresses. The variation in rim thickness and weight is actually intended as a way of extending the life of the dies which are expensive to machine. Conscientious manufacturers will start the run only about 5% light and end it when the rims reach about 5% heavy. So the weight specification is about +/- 5% which is completely reasonable. Guys who are trying to save an extra few bucks will start out even lighter and keep running with the same dies until the rims become quite heavy. That isn't right. It is also wrong for the manufacturer to quote the lightest rim they ever make as the nominal.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Edmonds Wa
Posts: 645
Bikes: 2014 Felt F2 2015 Specialized Tarmac Sport
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
my Williams carbon clincher were slightly lighter about 20 grams. Right in line with tolerance I am sure. 200 grams is a lot and its unlikely they get many returns. Hopefully they meet your expectations on every thing else.
#14
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 4
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks guys, I think I found the answer, they gave me PSR1432 Spokes rather than the advertised CX-Ray spokes, which on some of the wheels they advertise accounts for nearly the exact 185g difference. Thanks for the help, I'll be looking to see if I can get these replaced.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 28,682
Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build
Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 58 Times
in
36 Posts
Thanks guys, I think I found the answer, they gave me PSR1432 Spokes rather than the advertised CX-Ray spokes, which on some of the wheels they advertise accounts for nearly the exact 185g difference. Thanks for the help, I'll be looking to see if I can get these replaced.
#16
Senior Member
While it seems OP has figured out his issue, here is a reference for what is typical in in advertised vs actual wheel weights. Many of the listings are old, but you can still spot trends on who is more honest:
Weight Weenies - Road Wheels
Weight Weenies - Road Wheels
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 28,682
Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build
Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 58 Times
in
36 Posts
While it seems OP has figured out his issue, here is a reference for what is typical in in advertised vs actual wheel weights. Many of the listings are old, but you can still spot trends on who is more honest:
Weight Weenies - Road Wheels
Weight Weenies - Road Wheels
#18
Senior Member
Sure, but it is not all honesty/dishonesty. There is normal manufacturing variation as discussed earlier in this thread. In any manufactured product it is normal and accepted practice to advertise only the average, saving the actual range of variation for a "Technical Specification Sheet". Most honest would be to quote the range over which one's wheels could be expected to vary, not only the average weight and certainly not only the lowest possible weight. I agree that the latter is dishonest.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 28,682
Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build
Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 58 Times
in
36 Posts
Exactly, I just meant that a list of one-off samples of product could suggest a supplier is "dishonest", when they are quite acceptably quoting the average of their production. That one sample tested could just be an outlier, one that you and I wouldn't want to receive, but still just part of the normal distribution of product.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BikeNube
Road Cycling
33
04-10-19 03:41 PM
JAX_11
Road Cycling
7
07-16-12 10:42 PM