Do you always build bikes with complete originality?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,046
Bikes: 1989 Schwinn World Sport. 1994 Diamond Back Response Elite MTB. 1964 Schwinn Typhoon. 1974 Bridgestone Sprinter, 2015 Scott Sub 10 Citybike.
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1688 Post(s)
Liked 84 Times
in
37 Posts
Do you always build bikes with complete originality?
I've built one that was, as best as I could make it, completely original, as it was in 1977. Sold it for decent bucks, too. But most of my builds are a combination of lighter or more attractive parts, or actually what I have in the stash, while trying to keep in the same general era as the original bike. I also enjoy building cruisers with a '60s cool factor, but always gravitate back to lightweights.
You?
You?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bastrop Texas
Posts: 4,467
Bikes: Univega, Peu P6, Peu PR-10, Ted Williams, Peu UO-8, Peu UO-18 Mixte, Peu Dolomites
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 956 Post(s)
Liked 1,619 Times
in
1,039 Posts
Hats off to those who can actually "Restore" a vintage bicycle. Some of the restorations I have seen here are absolutely FANTASTIC! And they are well appreciated. I have to admit that all my builds have ended up as Franken Bikes one way or another...
__________________
No matter where you're at... There you are... Δf:=f(1/2)-f(-1/2)
No matter where you're at... There you are... Δf:=f(1/2)-f(-1/2)
#4
Banned.
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Snohomish, WA.
Posts: 2,866
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 469 Post(s)
Liked 2,442 Times
in
646 Posts
I've only had a couple of bikes that were/are kept "as built from the era. Those were purchased pretty much in 'original' condition. I only made handlebar or saddle changes, for comfort.
Most of the others, I'll substitute a part if it doesn't fit with the rest of the group, but not too worried about keeping everything from the same year.
And for the framesets that I've bought, they're pretty much mutts. I try to use whatever I have on hand to get em rolling.
A picture of my 'original' 1979 Michael Johnson(swapped out handlebars for wider Nittos)
Most of the others, I'll substitute a part if it doesn't fit with the rest of the group, but not too worried about keeping everything from the same year.
And for the framesets that I've bought, they're pretty much mutts. I try to use whatever I have on hand to get em rolling.
A picture of my 'original' 1979 Michael Johnson(swapped out handlebars for wider Nittos)
#5
Master Parts Rearranger
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Portlandia's Kuiper Belt, OR
Posts: 4,402
Bikes: 1982 Trek 720 - 1985 Trek 620 - 1984 Trek 620 - 1980 Trek 510 - Other luminaries past and present
Mentioned: 221 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1556 Post(s)
Liked 2,024 Times
in
989 Posts
I would say the desire is there, and I've done it before. If I'm feeling nostalgic or 'romantic' towards the era, then yeah. Otherwise, it's straight to modernization to get the most and best out of a frame, and to survive steep hills and crazy traffic (aka indexed gearing and dual pivot brakes).
Likes For RiddleOfSteel:
#6
Banned.
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: PAZ
Posts: 12,294
Mentioned: 255 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2588 Post(s)
Liked 4,823 Times
in
1,709 Posts
Mostly, yes. But I've upgraded to modern-ish, machined-sidewall rims (Mavic Open Pro, 4CD, and MA3) for improved braking performance and longevity. Vintage rims tended to be of softer alloys which seemed to go out of true fairly easily and the "brake tracks" were pretty rudimentary. Everything else (Campy NR and SR gruppos, Cinelli bars and stems, 3ttt or Concor saddles) generally matches the age range of my rides: 1973 to 1985.
This is the only bike completely built with original components - and it only became that way very recently when I finally decided to give tubulars a go again after a long hiatus:
Braking feel is pretty wishy-washy, but no matter. I don't do much high-speed descending on it because the current freewheel doesn't allow for much in the way of climbing!
DD
This is the only bike completely built with original components - and it only became that way very recently when I finally decided to give tubulars a go again after a long hiatus:
Braking feel is pretty wishy-washy, but no matter. I don't do much high-speed descending on it because the current freewheel doesn't allow for much in the way of climbing!
DD
Last edited by Drillium Dude; 01-11-22 at 01:36 AM.
#7
Mother Nature's Son
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Sussex County, Delaware
Posts: 3,107
Bikes: 2014 Orbea Avant MD30, 2004 Airborne Zeppelin TI, 2003 Lemond Poprad, 2001 Lemond Tourmalet, 2014? Soma Smoothie
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 852 Post(s)
Liked 1,433 Times
in
815 Posts
Never
Likes For delbiker1:
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 3,442
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 872 Post(s)
Liked 2,272 Times
in
1,274 Posts
If I buy a bike that is all original and it functions well, I leave it alone. Years ago I bought a 1973 Super Mondia Special and those bikes came with Campy Bar end shifters. I really don’t care for them but they work so when I reassembled the bike I left them. I have others that I have upgraded to my personal taste but keep the original components aside.
Likes For Kabuki12:
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 2,397
Mentioned: 93 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1104 Post(s)
Liked 1,824 Times
in
878 Posts
No.
Every bike in my fleet is a rider and has improvements to the pedals, saddle, bars, stems and gearing. I'm not 28 years old any more.
Every bike in my fleet is a rider and has improvements to the pedals, saddle, bars, stems and gearing. I'm not 28 years old any more.
__________________
Likes For nomadmax:
#10
Senior Member
I only have two display bikes left and they are all original with one exception. Tires on one of them are not original as the originals rotted to the point of ugliness. The vintage riders are set up to my preference as it is the ride quality of the frame that I am after.
#11
Edumacator
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Goose Creek, SC
Posts: 6,777
Bikes: '87 Crestdale, '87 Basso Gap, '92 Rossin Performance EL-OS, 1990 VanTuyl, 1980s Losa, 1985 Trek 670, 1982 AD SLE, 1987 PX10, etc...
Mentioned: 59 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2434 Post(s)
Liked 3,108 Times
in
1,957 Posts
If a bike has all of its original parts and you just clean and lube and replace consumables, it is original.
if you source parts to look like it’s original state with those parts, it’s not original since the parts were sourced elsewhere...it is “restored and era cognizant...”.
That said, you can keep groups together, update and upgrade, repaint, touch up, modernize...its what usually happened to bikes people owned over time anyhow. Replacing and upgrading.
if you source parts to look like it’s original state with those parts, it’s not original since the parts were sourced elsewhere...it is “restored and era cognizant...”.
That said, you can keep groups together, update and upgrade, repaint, touch up, modernize...its what usually happened to bikes people owned over time anyhow. Replacing and upgrading.
__________________
1987 Crest Cannondale, 1987 Basso Gap, 1992 Rossin Performance EL, 1990ish Van Tuyl, 1985 Trek 670, 1982 AD SLE, 2003 Pinarello Surprise, 1990ish MBK Atlantique, 1987 Peugeot Competition, 1987 Nishiki Tri-A, 1981 Faggin, 1996 Cannondale M500, 1984 Mercian, 1982 AD SuperLeicht, 1985 Massi (model unknown), 1988 Daccordi Griffe , 1989 Fauxsin MTB, 1981 Ciocc Mockba, 1992 Bianchi Giro, 1977 Colnago Super
1987 Crest Cannondale, 1987 Basso Gap, 1992 Rossin Performance EL, 1990ish Van Tuyl, 1985 Trek 670, 1982 AD SLE, 2003 Pinarello Surprise, 1990ish MBK Atlantique, 1987 Peugeot Competition, 1987 Nishiki Tri-A, 1981 Faggin, 1996 Cannondale M500, 1984 Mercian, 1982 AD SuperLeicht, 1985 Massi (model unknown), 1988 Daccordi Griffe , 1989 Fauxsin MTB, 1981 Ciocc Mockba, 1992 Bianchi Giro, 1977 Colnago Super
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Menomonee Falls, WI
Posts: 1,832
Bikes: 1984 Schwinn Supersport, 1988 Trek 400T, 1977 Trek TX900, 1982 Bianchi Champione del Mondo, 1978 Raleigh Supercourse, 1986 Trek 400 Elance, 1991 Waterford PDG OS Paramount, 1971 Schwinn Sports Tourer, 1985 Trek 670
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 603 Post(s)
Liked 1,062 Times
in
534 Posts
Nope, especially on a repaint, always change something, sometimes as small as a decal, usually a lot more. I don’t want anyone passing off one of my builds as an original, when my stewardship ends. I save the original components though.
Tim
Tim
#13
So it goes.
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: W. Tennessee
Posts: 964
Bikes: A few. Quite a few.
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 432 Post(s)
Liked 639 Times
in
261 Posts
I have an obsessive compulsive streak when it comes to components correctness, but I keep it under control with respect to budget and time. Certain bikes demand that treatment, others not so much.
__________________
Pohl's law: Nothing is so good that somebody, somewhere, will not hate it.
Pohl's law: Nothing is so good that somebody, somewhere, will not hate it.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,146
Mentioned: 481 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3804 Post(s)
Liked 6,643 Times
in
2,602 Posts
No, I’m not in the business of running a museum.
Likes For nlerner:
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,321
Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 767 Post(s)
Liked 1,898 Times
in
889 Posts
I don't really look at these things in the same way that car collectors view cars with regard to "factory original." Wasn't it common practice to upgrade as you went back in the day?
I have some bikes here that came with ho-hum parts originally. They are much better machines with upgrades. Perhaps the best example of this is my '88 Schwinn Premis. Originally Suntour Accushift 2x6 with average wheels. Now it is a 3x9 Ultegra setup with DA downtube shifters and Mavic Open Pros laced to R7000 hubs. Such a blast.
I have some bikes here that came with ho-hum parts originally. They are much better machines with upgrades. Perhaps the best example of this is my '88 Schwinn Premis. Originally Suntour Accushift 2x6 with average wheels. Now it is a 3x9 Ultegra setup with DA downtube shifters and Mavic Open Pros laced to R7000 hubs. Such a blast.
Last edited by BFisher; 01-11-22 at 08:22 AM.
Likes For BFisher:
#16
weapons-grade bolognium
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Across the street from Chicago
Posts: 6,344
Bikes: Battaglin Cromor, Ciocc Designer 84, Schwinn Superior 1981
Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 985 Post(s)
Liked 2,376 Times
in
891 Posts
Nope. I usually start with a bare frame, and then aim for cheap and practical.
This is the only original part on the whole bike.
This is the only original part on the whole bike.
Likes For thinktubes:
#17
feros ferio
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
Posts: 21,793
Bikes: 1959 Capo Modell Campagnolo; 1960 Capo Sieger (2); 1962 Carlton Franco Suisse; 1970 Peugeot UO-8; 1982 Bianchi Campione d'Italia; 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10;
Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1391 Post(s)
Liked 1,322 Times
in
835 Posts
I have custom-geared every bicycle I have owned, including changing most 2x5s to 2x6, 2x7, 3x5, 3x6, or 3x7. I am very particular about the top and bottom gear ratios I want and about maximum ratiometric progressions.
I always upgrade to KoolStop brake pads -- this is a no-brainer.
I like Brooks Pro saddles, whether they are original to a particular bicycle or not.
I need brake levers that fit my hands, which means Weinmann Vainqueur 999s, DiaCompes, or Shimanos. I can't execute a sudden emergency stop with long-reach levers, such as Mafacs, Modolos, or Campagnolos. To compensate for its mediocre Campag. sidepull calipers, the Bianchi has aero Shimano brake levers and KoolStop pads. Fortunately, Weinmann 999s were standard equipment on all three Capos and the Carlton, so no change needed there.
Since I built the UO-8 from a bare frame, I started with a blank canvas. As a result, it has a SunTour rear derailleur, Sugino alloy crankset, alloy rims, and of course DiaCompe brake levers. It also has SunTour ratchet barcons, my personal faves. Very non-French except for the Normandy Luxe Competition hubs, but it serves me well.
I always upgrade to KoolStop brake pads -- this is a no-brainer.
I like Brooks Pro saddles, whether they are original to a particular bicycle or not.
I need brake levers that fit my hands, which means Weinmann Vainqueur 999s, DiaCompes, or Shimanos. I can't execute a sudden emergency stop with long-reach levers, such as Mafacs, Modolos, or Campagnolos. To compensate for its mediocre Campag. sidepull calipers, the Bianchi has aero Shimano brake levers and KoolStop pads. Fortunately, Weinmann 999s were standard equipment on all three Capos and the Carlton, so no change needed there.
Since I built the UO-8 from a bare frame, I started with a blank canvas. As a result, it has a SunTour rear derailleur, Sugino alloy crankset, alloy rims, and of course DiaCompe brake levers. It also has SunTour ratchet barcons, my personal faves. Very non-French except for the Normandy Luxe Competition hubs, but it serves me well.
__________________
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
Likes For John E:
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NW Ohio
Posts: 3,411
Bikes: 1984 Miyata 310, 1986 Schwinn Sierra, 2011 Jamis Quest, 1980 Peugeot TH8 Tandem, 1992 Performance Parabola, 1987 Ross Mt. Hood, 1988 Schwinn LeTour, 1988 Trek 400T, 1981 Fuji S12-S LTD, 197? FW Evans
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 525 Post(s)
Liked 977 Times
in
509 Posts
I don't worry about keeping everything original, but I try to stay with the spirit of the era. It's not unusual for parts to be changed even before the bike leaves the shop for the first time, sometimes to fit the bike to the rider, sometimes to upgrade to a better performing part. Several people have shared their old receipts from their bike purchases BITD that had such changes listed. When rebuilding a bike, I look at it as if the owner had a mishap and needed a replacement part or was unhappy with the original part and installed a better version. I see that as part of the bikes history, just as much as the patina of the finish.
Accessories are part of the history, too. Sure, a racing bike looks good stripped to just the bare essentials, but most bikes a ridden by normal people who want to stay dry and be seen and who need to carry stuff.
Accessories are part of the history, too. Sure, a racing bike looks good stripped to just the bare essentials, but most bikes a ridden by normal people who want to stay dry and be seen and who need to carry stuff.
Likes For Pompiere:
#19
Thrifty Bill
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mountains of Western NC
Posts: 23,523
Bikes: 86 Katakura Silk, 87 Prologue X2, 88 Cimarron LE, 1975 Sekai 4000 Professional, 73 Paramount, plus more
Mentioned: 96 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1236 Post(s)
Liked 964 Times
in
628 Posts
Only my 1973 Paramount approaches originality. I have restored a couple of MTBs to original like a 1983 Stumpjumper.
The bikes I ride are not original. Many times they have come to me with components in very poor condition. Other times I think originally they were under built. My chrome Katakura Silk originally came with Suntour LePree. No thanks. Its now Superbe Pro.
Back in the day upgrading bikes was the norm. And stuff does wear out. Chasing after original parts is an expensive option. And when you have bins full of better stuff, why bother?
And realize, many OEM parts decisions were based on cost, not best performance. So a top notch frame could have come with mediocre/average parts. Continuing this practice to just maintain originality makes the bike a poorer performer.
The bikes I ride are not original. Many times they have come to me with components in very poor condition. Other times I think originally they were under built. My chrome Katakura Silk originally came with Suntour LePree. No thanks. Its now Superbe Pro.
Back in the day upgrading bikes was the norm. And stuff does wear out. Chasing after original parts is an expensive option. And when you have bins full of better stuff, why bother?
And realize, many OEM parts decisions were based on cost, not best performance. So a top notch frame could have come with mediocre/average parts. Continuing this practice to just maintain originality makes the bike a poorer performer.
Last edited by wrk101; 01-12-22 at 10:21 AM.
#20
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,779
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3583 Post(s)
Liked 3,395 Times
in
1,929 Posts
Nope. I've seen the kind of sausage-making that goes into spec'ing bikes for market, and how parts availability can lead to component changes that don't get reflected in the catalogs. I'll use whatever I can get, as long as it works.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Berkeley CA
Posts: 2,533
Bikes: 1981 Ron Cooper, 1974 Cinelli Speciale Corsa, 2000 Gary Fisher Sugar 1, 1986 Miyata 710, 1982 Raleigh "International"
Mentioned: 97 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 929 Post(s)
Liked 1,289 Times
in
486 Posts
What is "complete originality"? My three nicest bikes (Cooper, Cinelli, Raleigh) came as bare framesets where you either built up yourself or specified all the parts that should be attached to them. I do keep these bikes equipped with period-correct parts, though modern lined brake cables and Koolstop pads are required replacements in order to provide reliable braking for the hilly roads around here. Also, the Cooper and Cinelli were originally equipped with sewups and when replacing the worn out rims I switched over to clinchers. Is this considered "complete originality" or "extreme modification"? My garage is a riding machine storage area, not a museum.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 2,424
Bikes: Drysdale/Gitane/Zeus/Masi/Falcon/Palo Alto/Raleigh/Legnano
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 977 Post(s)
Liked 626 Times
in
400 Posts
So far, never. I run what I like and what seems era-and-bike "appropriate". Modern 'upgrades' so far have been acceptable to me as long as it does not ruin the bike's aesthetic. Then again, all of my bikes are ones I've owned a long time and were a mish-mash when I first bought/built them, and I never intend to sell any bikes.
__________________
Larry:1958 Drysdale, 1961 Gitane Gran Sport, 1974 Zeus track, 1988 Masi Gran Corsa, 1974 Falcon, 1980 Palo Alto, 1973 Raleigh Gran Sport, 1974 Legnano. Susan: 1976 Windsor Profesional.
Larry:1958 Drysdale, 1961 Gitane Gran Sport, 1974 Zeus track, 1988 Masi Gran Corsa, 1974 Falcon, 1980 Palo Alto, 1973 Raleigh Gran Sport, 1974 Legnano. Susan: 1976 Windsor Profesional.
#23
Newbie
Join Date: Oct 2021
Posts: 47
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
After many years of just riding and little or no wrenching, I have two 'winter projects', a 1995 and a 2005 Trek 520. I don't think either qualifies as vintage but maybe classic. The 1995 was purchased complete with (reportedly) less than 200 miles on it and was completely original except for significant paint scratches from a year in the back of a Kia Soul. I tore it completely down and cleaned and lubed everything and it's going back together as original (Deore LX grippe. The 2005 was purchased as a frame and fork. This bike was cannabalized by the original owner when shipping a bike to Europe became a problem and the components were used for a "screw-together (?) frame. As some of you who replied to my posts, I agonized over rebuilding with the original parts but finally decided to go with new Alivio grippe and this bike will essentially have specs identical to a 2021Trek 520 specifications. I'm NOT a bike flipper. I just want to build a few bikes that people can enjoy for what they are....good day tourers. Just my $0.02....
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Fredericksburg, Va
Posts: 9,579
Bikes: '65 Frejus TDF, '73 Bottecchia Giro d'Italia, '83 Colnago Superissimo, '84 Trek 610, '84 Trek 760, '88 Pinarello Veneto, '88 De Rosa Pro, '89 Pinarello Montello, '94 Burley Duet, 97 Specialized RockHopper, 2010 Langster, Tern Link D8
Mentioned: 73 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1607 Post(s)
Liked 2,214 Times
in
1,103 Posts
No. Two bikes come to mind that are close to original. The first is the Colnago which did not have all original parts so I replaced them with one or two exceptions, thanks to DD. Even the brake housing and cables are vintage correct but because it is ridden occasionally, it has Koolstops with the original pads in a ziplock. Many of the Colnagos were fame set sales so it is hard to say what is original but what can be said is what the preferrable parts were BITD. This bike conforms.
P1040498 on Flickr
The Bottecchia is labeled a Giro d'Italia. As it turns out, the Professional was the same frame with a different decal. Because it did not have the original parts and I did, it was outfitted as a professional. The year is about 1972/3. The parts came from my 1972 Motobecane Le Champion that was crashed. the head set and wheels are original. What isn't are the pedals, stem and handlebar. I have decals for the DT and ST.
P1040289 on Flickr
The 1988 De Rosa is definitely not period correct! I cannot bring myself to invest in C Record parts! When a 10v wheel set with tubies, record hubs, cassette, with black spokes (not a preference), showed up on CL for $130, the path was set. I ventured into black parts too.
P1050288 on Flickr
The Pinarello was purchased with all original parts and stayed that way for several years. Recently it was modified by replacing all the DA with Campy and now sport 3x9 mix of Triple T, Record and Chorus parts. I needed the gearing until I get back in shape.
P1050224 on Flickr
For those of you who are getting bored with my pics of the same set of bikes, I am trying to use different pics. Some are not the best, but the good ones can be found in so many different threads! I really don't care if you are rolling your eyes, I don't see it and I can't explain why I enjoy sharing them so much!
P1040498 on Flickr
The Bottecchia is labeled a Giro d'Italia. As it turns out, the Professional was the same frame with a different decal. Because it did not have the original parts and I did, it was outfitted as a professional. The year is about 1972/3. The parts came from my 1972 Motobecane Le Champion that was crashed. the head set and wheels are original. What isn't are the pedals, stem and handlebar. I have decals for the DT and ST.
P1040289 on Flickr
The 1988 De Rosa is definitely not period correct! I cannot bring myself to invest in C Record parts! When a 10v wheel set with tubies, record hubs, cassette, with black spokes (not a preference), showed up on CL for $130, the path was set. I ventured into black parts too.
P1050288 on Flickr
The Pinarello was purchased with all original parts and stayed that way for several years. Recently it was modified by replacing all the DA with Campy and now sport 3x9 mix of Triple T, Record and Chorus parts. I needed the gearing until I get back in shape.
P1050224 on Flickr
For those of you who are getting bored with my pics of the same set of bikes, I am trying to use different pics. Some are not the best, but the good ones can be found in so many different threads! I really don't care if you are rolling your eyes, I don't see it and I can't explain why I enjoy sharing them so much!
__________________
Bikes don't stand alone. They are two tired.
Bikes don't stand alone. They are two tired.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 3,283
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1135 Post(s)
Liked 1,727 Times
in
951 Posts
For me it depends on the original bike, a Torpado Superlight gets slightly changed from Universal brakes to Campy. Austro Inter Ten, that frame got upgrades on every part. I do have a '77 SBDU Raleigh that one is getting close to original spec, and a Mercian that will get updates. A De Rosa gets original Campy a Romic gets coldset for newer Dura Ace.
I keep things original, unless I don't.
I keep things original, unless I don't.