Inter ratio x tooth count
#1
Mustard
Thread Starter
Inter ratio x tooth count
I have a nexus 3i and I’m currently using a 23 tooth and plan to switch to a 13 tooth.
The 3i ratios are 0.733 - 1 - 1.364
I have one question. What formula would one use to figure out what would be the “theoretical” tooth count With the 0.733 ratio and the 1.364 ratio?
13 teeth at 0.733 = ?
13 teeth at 1.000 = 13
13 teeth at 1.364 = ?
The 3i ratios are 0.733 - 1 - 1.364
I have one question. What formula would one use to figure out what would be the “theoretical” tooth count With the 0.733 ratio and the 1.364 ratio?
13 teeth at 0.733 = ?
13 teeth at 1.000 = 13
13 teeth at 1.364 = ?
#2
Mustard
Thread Starter
My research shows this
These results make me reconsider going from 23 to 13 tooth because from these results the 23 tooth cog on my nexus 3i will give me a 2.2 low a 3.0 in “neutral” which is the minimum value that is highlighted green on the ratio calculator and 4.1 in the high gear which is from what I’ve heard from YouTube is around what a Olympic track bike ratio is.
But these results put my 34 by 23 tooth ratio at a 1.48 ratio so I’m not really confident in my findings per say.
These results make me reconsider going from 23 to 13 tooth because from these results the 23 tooth cog on my nexus 3i will give me a 2.2 low a 3.0 in “neutral” which is the minimum value that is highlighted green on the ratio calculator and 4.1 in the high gear which is from what I’ve heard from YouTube is around what a Olympic track bike ratio is.
But these results put my 34 by 23 tooth ratio at a 1.48 ratio so I’m not really confident in my findings per say.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times
in
742 Posts
Assuming you are asking about a 13T rear cog, the values you want are:
A 13T rear cog at 0.733 ratio would be 13/0.733 = 17.7, say equivalent to an 18T rear cog
A 13T cog at 1.0 ratio is obviously a 13T cog
A 13T rear cog at 1.364 would be 13/1.364= 9.5 or between a 9T and 10T cog.
Are you sure you can adequately spin gears that high? What is your chainwheel size?
A 13T rear cog at 0.733 ratio would be 13/0.733 = 17.7, say equivalent to an 18T rear cog
A 13T cog at 1.0 ratio is obviously a 13T cog
A 13T rear cog at 1.364 would be 13/1.364= 9.5 or between a 9T and 10T cog.
Are you sure you can adequately spin gears that high? What is your chainwheel size?
#4
Mustard
Thread Starter
Assuming you are asking about a 13T rear cog, the values you want are:
A 13T rear cog at 0.733 ratio would be 13/0.733 = 17.7, say equivalent to an 18T rear cog
A 13T cog at 1.0 ratio is obviously a 13T cog
A 13T rear cog at 1.364 would be 13/1.364= 9.5 or between a 9T and 10T cog.
Are you sure you can adequately spin gears that high? What is your chainwheel size?
A 13T rear cog at 0.733 ratio would be 13/0.733 = 17.7, say equivalent to an 18T rear cog
A 13T cog at 1.0 ratio is obviously a 13T cog
A 13T rear cog at 1.364 would be 13/1.364= 9.5 or between a 9T and 10T cog.
Are you sure you can adequately spin gears that high? What is your chainwheel size?
the images I shared include the numbers 23 and 34 referring to the tooth count that I am currently using.
23 tooth cog
34 tooth chainring
thanks in advance
#5
Mustard
Thread Starter
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,073
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4201 Post(s)
Liked 3,857 Times
in
2,305 Posts
Years ago, my cousin John Allen told me to pick a 3rd gear (for my SA AW bike back then) that I could spin easily on a flat with no wind aid. He also made side bars as to the combining IGHs with "high performance riding" in the same sentence was a no no. I have followed his advice on the various IGHed bikes I have/had and found it to be correct for me. But I live in a somewhat hilly area, I spin and don't care if I coast down a hill after spinning out. Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
#7
Mustard
Thread Starter
Years ago, my cousin John Allen told me to pick a 3rd gear (for my SA AW bike back then) that I could spin easily on a flat with no wind aid. He also made side bars as to the combining IGHs with "high performance riding" in the same sentence was a no no. I have followed his advice on the various IGHed bikes I have/had and found it to be correct for me. But I live in a somewhat hilly area, I spin and don't care if I coast down a hill after spinning out. Andy
Would you be able to help me figure out what. The “theoretical” tooth count with the different ratios of my igh with a 23 tooth cog. With the ratios I have shared in images.
thanks in advance
#8
Mustard
Thread Starter
I just rode it. It’s not bad. The high gear feels similar to a stock bc. Just slightly lower if a ratio I feel like. Tomorrow in the day I’ll see how fast I can go. In
rem getting somewhere over 25mph in the past with a 36t cog and 21t ring
rem getting somewhere over 25mph in the past with a 36t cog and 21t ring
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times
in
742 Posts
Now I have no clue what you are asking. In your OP you ask about switching from a 23T rear cog to a 13T rear cog and I gave you the equivalent cogs with your IGH. Now you are back to a 23T cog. What do you really want to know?
#10
Mustard
Thread Starter
at first I asked about about the 13 tooth
in the origin post
then in my second post I could have done nothing to make it more clear how i felt about the 23 tooth. To help those with adequate comprehension skills. I even did as much as to provide images that completely exclude “13 tooth” entirely.
I even directly replied to your post with a direct and clear “no” answer
no to your assumption and clarified what i was talking about to you directly and clearly. Assuming English is your preferred language. Here it is.
Quote:
Originally Posted by HillRider
Assuming you are asking about a 13T rear cog, the values you want are:
A 13T rear cog at 0.733 ratio would be 13/0.733 = 17.7, say equivalent to an 18T rear cog
A 13T cog at 1.0 ratio is obviously a 13T cog
A 13T rear cog at 1.364 would be 13/1.364= 9.5 or between a 9T and 10T cog.
Are you sure you can adequately spin gears that high? What is your chainwheel size?
MY RELY TO YOU WAS
no 23 tooth
the images I shared include the numbers 23 and 34 referring to the tooth count that I am currently using.
23 tooth cog
34 tooth chainring
thanks in advance
*THEN YOU COME BACK TO REPLY ONLY TO ADMIT THAT I HAVE PLACED YOU IN COMPLETE DISARRAY
here is the proof
quoting you*
Now I have no clue what you are asking. In your OP you ask about switching from a 23T rear cog to a 13T rear cog and I gave you the equivalent cogs with your IGH. Now you are back to a 23T cog. What do you really want to know?
My bad I guess I must be doing this English thing wrong.
its much more likely that I’m dealing with a degenerate simple because I’m your first reply you give me all this information
A 13T rear cog at 0.733 ratio would be 13/0.733 = 17.7, say equivalent to an 18T rear cog
A 13T cog at 1.0 ratio is obviously a 13T cog
A 13T rear cog at 1.364 would be 13/1.364= 9.5 or between a 9T and 10T cog.
all that from you
when in English
min my original post it clearly asks
I’ll just quote myself
I have one question. What formula would one use to figure out what would be the “theoretical” tooth count With the 0.733 ratio and the 1.364 ratio?
so you never answered what I asked.
maybe your doing this reading thing way wrong
l last words here
“What’s the formula”
clear enough
Last edited by Nofiltercycling; 08-25-22 at 10:32 AM.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times
in
742 Posts
I did indeed answer the original question and it should have been clear what the "formula" is from the numerical example in my first post. Just substitute the rear cog size of interest for the 13T cog you first asked about.
#12
Mustard
Thread Starter
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Pioneer Valley
Posts: 998
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 327 Post(s)
Liked 736 Times
in
382 Posts
I can’t apologize enough I feel terrible for my inability to make sense to those reading this once again to everyone I’m am so very very sorry for confusing everyone.
at first I asked about about the 13 tooth
in the origin post
then in my second post I could have done nothing to make it more clear how i felt about the 23 tooth. To help those with adequate comprehension skills. I even did as much as to provide images that completely exclude “13 tooth” entirely.
I even directly replied to your post with a direct and clear “no” answer
no to your assumption and clarified what i was talking about to you directly and clearly. Assuming English is your preferred language. Here it is.
Quote:
Originally Posted by HillRider
Assuming you are asking about a 13T rear cog, the values you want are:
A 13T rear cog at 0.733 ratio would be 13/0.733 = 17.7, say equivalent to an 18T rear cog
A 13T cog at 1.0 ratio is obviously a 13T cog
A 13T rear cog at 1.364 would be 13/1.364= 9.5 or between a 9T and 10T cog.
Are you sure you can adequately spin gears that high? What is your chainwheel size?
MY RELY TO YOU WAS
no 23 tooth
the images I shared include the numbers 23 and 34 referring to the tooth count that I am currently using.
23 tooth cog
34 tooth chainring
thanks in advance
*THEN YOU COME BACK TO REPLY ONLY TO ADMIT THAT I HAVE PLACED YOU IN COMPLETE DISARRAY
here is the proof
quoting you*
Now I have no clue what you are asking. In your OP you ask about switching from a 23T rear cog to a 13T rear cog and I gave you the equivalent cogs with your IGH. Now you are back to a 23T cog. What do you really want to know?
My bad I guess I must be doing this English thing wrong.
its much more likely that I’m dealing with a degenerate simple because I’m your first reply you give me all this information
A 13T rear cog at 0.733 ratio would be 13/0.733 = 17.7, say equivalent to an 18T rear cog
A 13T cog at 1.0 ratio is obviously a 13T cog
A 13T rear cog at 1.364 would be 13/1.364= 9.5 or between a 9T and 10T cog.
all that from you
when in English
min my original post it clearly asks
I’ll just quote myself
I have one question. What formula would one use to figure out what would be the “theoretical” tooth count With the 0.733 ratio and the 1.364 ratio?
so you never answered what I asked.
maybe your doing this reading thing way wrong
l last words here
“What’s the formula”
clear enough
at first I asked about about the 13 tooth
in the origin post
then in my second post I could have done nothing to make it more clear how i felt about the 23 tooth. To help those with adequate comprehension skills. I even did as much as to provide images that completely exclude “13 tooth” entirely.
I even directly replied to your post with a direct and clear “no” answer
no to your assumption and clarified what i was talking about to you directly and clearly. Assuming English is your preferred language. Here it is.
Quote:
Originally Posted by HillRider
Assuming you are asking about a 13T rear cog, the values you want are:
A 13T rear cog at 0.733 ratio would be 13/0.733 = 17.7, say equivalent to an 18T rear cog
A 13T cog at 1.0 ratio is obviously a 13T cog
A 13T rear cog at 1.364 would be 13/1.364= 9.5 or between a 9T and 10T cog.
Are you sure you can adequately spin gears that high? What is your chainwheel size?
MY RELY TO YOU WAS
no 23 tooth
the images I shared include the numbers 23 and 34 referring to the tooth count that I am currently using.
23 tooth cog
34 tooth chainring
thanks in advance
*THEN YOU COME BACK TO REPLY ONLY TO ADMIT THAT I HAVE PLACED YOU IN COMPLETE DISARRAY
here is the proof
quoting you*
Now I have no clue what you are asking. In your OP you ask about switching from a 23T rear cog to a 13T rear cog and I gave you the equivalent cogs with your IGH. Now you are back to a 23T cog. What do you really want to know?
My bad I guess I must be doing this English thing wrong.
its much more likely that I’m dealing with a degenerate simple because I’m your first reply you give me all this information
A 13T rear cog at 0.733 ratio would be 13/0.733 = 17.7, say equivalent to an 18T rear cog
A 13T cog at 1.0 ratio is obviously a 13T cog
A 13T rear cog at 1.364 would be 13/1.364= 9.5 or between a 9T and 10T cog.
all that from you
when in English
min my original post it clearly asks
I’ll just quote myself
I have one question. What formula would one use to figure out what would be the “theoretical” tooth count With the 0.733 ratio and the 1.364 ratio?
so you never answered what I asked.
maybe your doing this reading thing way wrong
l last words here
“What’s the formula”
clear enough
#14
Friendship is Magic
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,984
Bikes: old ones
Mentioned: 304 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26413 Post(s)
Liked 10,379 Times
in
7,207 Posts
__________________
#15
Mustard
Thread Starter
for sure thanks. Moving on
i said I would return with feedback on mph not watts or cadence not sorry
with a 23T cog and 34T chainring I got to
in first gear 16mph
in second gear 20mph
in third gear up to 23
at a full sprint
I would say I am below average bike fitness and I actually did it in sandals. While I held my phone in one hand observing my speed on app.
I feel like I should go down a tooth on the cog. On the other hand I see the stats of group rides which id like to go on. Their average mph is 13-15 so we’ll see about going down teeth after I go on a group ride and see how I actually like the gearing.
i said I would return with feedback on mph not watts or cadence not sorry
with a 23T cog and 34T chainring I got to
in first gear 16mph
in second gear 20mph
in third gear up to 23
at a full sprint
I would say I am below average bike fitness and I actually did it in sandals. While I held my phone in one hand observing my speed on app.
I feel like I should go down a tooth on the cog. On the other hand I see the stats of group rides which id like to go on. Their average mph is 13-15 so we’ll see about going down teeth after I go on a group ride and see how I actually like the gearing.
Last edited by Nofiltercycling; 08-25-22 at 07:10 PM.
#16
Friendship is Magic
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,984
Bikes: old ones
Mentioned: 304 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26413 Post(s)
Liked 10,379 Times
in
7,207 Posts
for sure thanks. Moving on
i said I would return with feedback on mph not watts or cadence not sorry
with a 23T cog and 44T chainring I got to
in first gear 16mph
in second gear 20mph
in third gear up to 23
at a full sprint
I would say I am below average bike fitness and I actually did it in sandals. While I held my phone in one hand observing my speed on app.
I feel like I should go down a tooth on the cog. On the other hand I see the stats of group rides which id like to go on. Their average mph is 13-15 so we’ll see about going down teeth after I go on a group ride and see how I actually like the gearing.
i said I would return with feedback on mph not watts or cadence not sorry
with a 23T cog and 44T chainring I got to
in first gear 16mph
in second gear 20mph
in third gear up to 23
at a full sprint
I would say I am below average bike fitness and I actually did it in sandals. While I held my phone in one hand observing my speed on app.
I feel like I should go down a tooth on the cog. On the other hand I see the stats of group rides which id like to go on. Their average mph is 13-15 so we’ll see about going down teeth after I go on a group ride and see how I actually like the gearing.
__________________
#17
Mustard
Thread Starter
#18
Mustard
Thread Starter
The gps app said I got to 23 mph
this says maybe I got to 148 rpm cadence
pretty cool too me. I liked math in school, still do
34x17 used in the calculator because in my third gears 1.364 ratio x my 23T cog = about a 17T cog
I did 26 miles with that 23 tooth cog not bad. I’ll try the 22T
this says maybe I got to 148 rpm cadence
pretty cool too me. I liked math in school, still do
34x17 used in the calculator because in my third gears 1.364 ratio x my 23T cog = about a 17T cog
I did 26 miles with that 23 tooth cog not bad. I’ll try the 22T