Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

Inter ratio x tooth count

Search
Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

Inter ratio x tooth count

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-23-22, 11:11 PM
  #1  
Nofiltercycling
Mustard
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2022
Location: CA
Posts: 84
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 39 Post(s)
Liked 13 Times in 9 Posts
Inter ratio x tooth count

I have a nexus 3i and I’m currently using a 23 tooth and plan to switch to a 13 tooth.
The 3i ratios are 0.733 - 1 - 1.364
I have one question. What formula would one use to figure out what would be the “theoretical” tooth count With the 0.733 ratio and the 1.364 ratio?

13 teeth at 0.733 = ?
13 teeth at 1.000 = 13
13 teeth at 1.364 = ?
Nofiltercycling is offline  
Old 08-24-22, 05:12 PM
  #2  
Nofiltercycling
Mustard
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2022
Location: CA
Posts: 84
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 39 Post(s)
Liked 13 Times in 9 Posts
My research shows this


These results make me reconsider going from 23 to 13 tooth because from these results the 23 tooth cog on my nexus 3i will give me a 2.2 low a 3.0 in “neutral” which is the minimum value that is highlighted green on the ratio calculator and 4.1 in the high gear which is from what I’ve heard from YouTube is around what a Olympic track bike ratio is.

But these results put my 34 by 23 tooth ratio at a 1.48 ratio so I’m not really confident in my findings per say.
Nofiltercycling is offline  
Old 08-24-22, 05:53 PM
  #3  
HillRider
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656

Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!

Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times in 742 Posts
Assuming you are asking about a 13T rear cog, the values you want are:

A 13T rear cog at 0.733 ratio would be 13/0.733 = 17.7, say equivalent to an 18T rear cog
A 13T cog at 1.0 ratio is obviously a 13T cog
A 13T rear cog at 1.364 would be 13/1.364= 9.5 or between a 9T and 10T cog.

Are you sure you can adequately spin gears that high? What is your chainwheel size?
HillRider is offline  
Old 08-24-22, 06:26 PM
  #4  
Nofiltercycling
Mustard
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2022
Location: CA
Posts: 84
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 39 Post(s)
Liked 13 Times in 9 Posts
Originally Posted by HillRider
Assuming you are asking about a 13T rear cog, the values you want are:

A 13T rear cog at 0.733 ratio would be 13/0.733 = 17.7, say equivalent to an 18T rear cog
A 13T cog at 1.0 ratio is obviously a 13T cog
A 13T rear cog at 1.364 would be 13/1.364= 9.5 or between a 9T and 10T cog.

Are you sure you can adequately spin gears that high? What is your chainwheel size?
no 23 tooth
the images I shared include the numbers 23 and 34 referring to the tooth count that I am currently using.

23 tooth cog
34 tooth chainring

thanks in advance
Nofiltercycling is offline  
Old 08-24-22, 06:29 PM
  #5  
Nofiltercycling
Mustard
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2022
Location: CA
Posts: 84
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 39 Post(s)
Liked 13 Times in 9 Posts
Originally Posted by HillRider
Are you sure you can adequately spin gears that high? What is your chainwheel size?
no clue but I can return with feedback.
Nofiltercycling is offline  
Old 08-24-22, 06:55 PM
  #6  
Andrew R Stewart 
Senior Member
 
Andrew R Stewart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,073

Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4201 Post(s)
Liked 3,857 Times in 2,305 Posts
Originally Posted by Nofiltercycling
no clue but I can return with feedback.
Years ago, my cousin John Allen told me to pick a 3rd gear (for my SA AW bike back then) that I could spin easily on a flat with no wind aid. He also made side bars as to the combining IGHs with "high performance riding" in the same sentence was a no no. I have followed his advice on the various IGHed bikes I have/had and found it to be correct for me. But I live in a somewhat hilly area, I spin and don't care if I coast down a hill after spinning out. Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
Andrew R Stewart is offline  
Old 08-24-22, 07:46 PM
  #7  
Nofiltercycling
Mustard
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2022
Location: CA
Posts: 84
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 39 Post(s)
Liked 13 Times in 9 Posts
Originally Posted by Andrew R Stewart
Years ago, my cousin John Allen told me to pick a 3rd gear (for my SA AW bike back then) that I could spin easily on a flat with no wind aid. He also made side bars as to the combining IGHs with "high performance riding" in the same sentence was a no no. I have followed his advice on the various IGHed bikes I have/had and found it to be correct for me. But I live in a somewhat hilly area, I spin and don't care if I coast down a hill after spinning out. Andy
for sure. Thanks.

Would you be able to help me figure out what. The “theoretical” tooth count with the different ratios of my igh with a 23 tooth cog. With the ratios I have shared in images.

thanks in advance
Nofiltercycling is offline  
Old 08-24-22, 09:31 PM
  #8  
Nofiltercycling
Mustard
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2022
Location: CA
Posts: 84
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 39 Post(s)
Liked 13 Times in 9 Posts
I just rode it. It’s not bad. The high gear feels similar to a stock bc. Just slightly lower if a ratio I feel like. Tomorrow in the day I’ll see how fast I can go. In
rem getting somewhere over 25mph in the past with a 36t cog and 21t ring
Nofiltercycling is offline  
Old 08-25-22, 07:54 AM
  #9  
HillRider
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656

Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!

Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times in 742 Posts
Originally Posted by Nofiltercycling
no 23 tooth
the images I shared include the numbers 23 and 34 referring to the tooth count that I am currently using.

23 tooth cog
34 tooth chainring

thanks in advance
Now I have no clue what you are asking. In your OP you ask about switching from a 23T rear cog to a 13T rear cog and I gave you the equivalent cogs with your IGH. Now you are back to a 23T cog. What do you really want to know?
HillRider is offline  
Old 08-25-22, 10:12 AM
  #10  
Nofiltercycling
Mustard
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2022
Location: CA
Posts: 84
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 39 Post(s)
Liked 13 Times in 9 Posts
Originally Posted by HillRider
Now I have no clue what you are asking. In your OP you ask about switching from a 23T rear cog to a 13T rear cog and I gave you the equivalent cogs with your IGH. Now you are back to a 23T cog. What do you really want to know?
I can’t apologize enough I feel terrible for my inability to make sense to those reading this once again to everyone I’m am so very very sorry for confusing everyone.

at first I asked about about the 13 tooth
in the origin post

then in my second post I could have done nothing to make it more clear how i felt about the 23 tooth. To help those with adequate comprehension skills. I even did as much as to provide images that completely exclude “13 tooth” entirely.

I even directly replied to your post with a direct and clear “no” answer
no to your assumption and clarified what i was talking about to you directly and clearly. Assuming English is your preferred language. Here it is.

Quote:
Originally Posted by HillRider
Assuming you are asking about a 13T rear cog, the values you want are:

A 13T rear cog at 0.733 ratio would be 13/0.733 = 17.7, say equivalent to an 18T rear cog
A 13T cog at 1.0 ratio is obviously a 13T cog
A 13T rear cog at 1.364 would be 13/1.364= 9.5 or between a 9T and 10T cog.

Are you sure you can adequately spin gears that high? What is your chainwheel size?



MY RELY TO YOU WAS

no 23 tooth
the images I shared include the numbers 23 and 34 referring to the tooth count that I am currently using.

23 tooth cog
34 tooth chainring

thanks in advance



*THEN YOU COME BACK TO REPLY ONLY TO ADMIT THAT I HAVE PLACED YOU IN COMPLETE DISARRAY


here is the proof

quoting you*

Now I have no clue what you are asking. In your OP you ask about switching from a 23T rear cog to a 13T rear cog and I gave you the equivalent cogs with your IGH. Now you are back to a 23T cog. What do you really want to know?


My bad I guess I must be doing this English thing wrong.

its much more likely that I’m dealing with a degenerate simple because I’m your first reply you give me all this information

A 13T rear cog at 0.733 ratio would be 13/0.733 = 17.7, say equivalent to an 18T rear cog
A 13T cog at 1.0 ratio is obviously a 13T cog
A 13T rear cog at 1.364 would be 13/1.364= 9.5 or between a 9T and 10T cog.

all that from you

when in English
min my original post it clearly asks
I’ll just quote myself

I have one question. What formula would one use to figure out what would be the “theoretical” tooth count With the 0.733 ratio and the 1.364 ratio?


so you never answered what I asked.

maybe your doing this reading thing way wrong

l last words here

“What’s the formula”

clear enough

Last edited by Nofiltercycling; 08-25-22 at 10:32 AM.
Nofiltercycling is offline  
Old 08-25-22, 11:45 AM
  #11  
HillRider
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656

Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!

Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times in 742 Posts
Originally Posted by Nofiltercycling

so you never answered what I asked.

maybe your doing this reading thing way wrong

l last words here

“What’s the formula”

clear enough
I did indeed answer the original question and it should have been clear what the "formula" is from the numerical example in my first post. Just substitute the rear cog size of interest for the 13T cog you first asked about.
HillRider is offline  
Old 08-25-22, 12:15 PM
  #12  
Nofiltercycling
Mustard
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2022
Location: CA
Posts: 84
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 39 Post(s)
Liked 13 Times in 9 Posts
Originally Posted by HillRider
I did indeed answer the original question and it should have been clear what the "formula" is from the numerical example in my first post. Just substitute the rear cog size of interest for the 13T cog you first asked about.

This is fun
Nofiltercycling is offline  
Old 08-25-22, 01:16 PM
  #13  
bboy314
Senior Member
 
bboy314's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Pioneer Valley
Posts: 998
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 327 Post(s)
Liked 736 Times in 382 Posts
Originally Posted by Nofiltercycling
I can’t apologize enough I feel terrible for my inability to make sense to those reading this once again to everyone I’m am so very very sorry for confusing everyone.

at first I asked about about the 13 tooth
in the origin post

then in my second post I could have done nothing to make it more clear how i felt about the 23 tooth. To help those with adequate comprehension skills. I even did as much as to provide images that completely exclude “13 tooth” entirely.

I even directly replied to your post with a direct and clear “no” answer
no to your assumption and clarified what i was talking about to you directly and clearly. Assuming English is your preferred language. Here it is.

Quote:
Originally Posted by HillRider
Assuming you are asking about a 13T rear cog, the values you want are:

A 13T rear cog at 0.733 ratio would be 13/0.733 = 17.7, say equivalent to an 18T rear cog
A 13T cog at 1.0 ratio is obviously a 13T cog
A 13T rear cog at 1.364 would be 13/1.364= 9.5 or between a 9T and 10T cog.

Are you sure you can adequately spin gears that high? What is your chainwheel size?



MY RELY TO YOU WAS

no 23 tooth
the images I shared include the numbers 23 and 34 referring to the tooth count that I am currently using.

23 tooth cog
34 tooth chainring

thanks in advance



*THEN YOU COME BACK TO REPLY ONLY TO ADMIT THAT I HAVE PLACED YOU IN COMPLETE DISARRAY


here is the proof

quoting you*

Now I have no clue what you are asking. In your OP you ask about switching from a 23T rear cog to a 13T rear cog and I gave you the equivalent cogs with your IGH. Now you are back to a 23T cog. What do you really want to know?


My bad I guess I must be doing this English thing wrong.

its much more likely that I’m dealing with a degenerate simple because I’m your first reply you give me all this information

A 13T rear cog at 0.733 ratio would be 13/0.733 = 17.7, say equivalent to an 18T rear cog
A 13T cog at 1.0 ratio is obviously a 13T cog
A 13T rear cog at 1.364 would be 13/1.364= 9.5 or between a 9T and 10T cog.

all that from you

when in English
min my original post it clearly asks
I’ll just quote myself

I have one question. What formula would one use to figure out what would be the “theoretical” tooth count With the 0.733 ratio and the 1.364 ratio?


so you never answered what I asked.

maybe your doing this reading thing way wrong

l last words here

“What’s the formula”

clear enough
I think you have far too much confidence in your communication skills…
bboy314 is offline  
Old 08-25-22, 02:44 PM
  #14  
3alarmer 
Friendship is Magic
 
3alarmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,984

Bikes: old ones

Mentioned: 304 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26413 Post(s)
Liked 10,379 Times in 7,207 Posts
__________________
3alarmer is offline  
Old 08-25-22, 04:25 PM
  #15  
Nofiltercycling
Mustard
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2022
Location: CA
Posts: 84
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 39 Post(s)
Liked 13 Times in 9 Posts
Originally Posted by bboy314
I think you have far too much confidence in your communication skills…
for sure thanks. Moving on


i said I would return with feedback on mph not watts or cadence not sorry

with a 23T cog and 34T chainring I got to
in first gear 16mph
in second gear 20mph
in third gear up to 23
at a full sprint
I would say I am below average bike fitness and I actually did it in sandals. While I held my phone in one hand observing my speed on app.
I feel like I should go down a tooth on the cog. On the other hand I see the stats of group rides which id like to go on. Their average mph is 13-15 so we’ll see about going down teeth after I go on a group ride and see how I actually like the gearing.

Last edited by Nofiltercycling; 08-25-22 at 07:10 PM.
Nofiltercycling is offline  
Old 08-25-22, 05:59 PM
  #16  
3alarmer 
Friendship is Magic
 
3alarmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,984

Bikes: old ones

Mentioned: 304 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26413 Post(s)
Liked 10,379 Times in 7,207 Posts
Originally Posted by Nofiltercycling
for sure thanks. Moving on


i said I would return with feedback on mph not watts or cadence not sorry

with a 23T cog and 44T chainring I got to
in first gear 16mph
in second gear 20mph
in third gear up to 23
at a full sprint
I would say I am below average bike fitness and I actually did it in sandals. While I held my phone in one hand observing my speed on app.
I feel like I should go down a tooth on the cog. On the other hand I see the stats of group rides which id like to go on. Their average mph is 13-15 so we’ll see about going down teeth after I go on a group ride and see how I actually like the gearing.
...I am very impressed by your modesty. Kudos.
__________________
3alarmer is offline  
Old 08-31-22, 01:32 AM
  #17  
Nofiltercycling
Mustard
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2022
Location: CA
Posts: 84
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 39 Post(s)
Liked 13 Times in 9 Posts
Originally Posted by 3alarmer
...I am very impressed by your modesty. Kudos.
it was a 34 tooth chainring *actually

my bad
Nofiltercycling is offline  
Old 08-31-22, 01:42 AM
  #18  
Nofiltercycling
Mustard
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2022
Location: CA
Posts: 84
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 39 Post(s)
Liked 13 Times in 9 Posts
The gps app said I got to 23 mph
this says maybe I got to 148 rpm cadence
pretty cool too me. I liked math in school, still do




34x17 used in the calculator because in my third gears 1.364 ratio x my 23T cog = about a 17T cog

I did 26 miles with that 23 tooth cog not bad. I’ll try the 22T
Nofiltercycling is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.