heavy rider, spoke tension
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: /dev/null
Posts: 689
Bikes: Soma Double Cross Disc (2017), Surly DT (2023), red Hardrock FS (circa 1996)
Liked 163 Times
in
107 Posts
heavy rider, spoke tension
Hi
I have recently rebuilt the rear 32H 700c wheel on my Bianchi hybrid because of upgrading the hub from Shimano RM-30 to Deore T-610. The rims are Alex SSP220, double wall. The bike is Bianchi c-sport 1, it is similar to Trek FX or Specialized Sirrus series. I am 250 lbs. I would be greatful for any advice on the DS/NDS spoke tension. I have seen some people saying not go beyond 110 kgf DS.
On the other hand, a LBS my friend bought another bike from (one of the few LBS's which actually do tighten the spokes when assembling the bike) has tensioned them to 150-160 kgf DS rear and 110-120 kgf front. Is it too much? The latter bike is Bianchi Torino, a city hybrid with 36H 700c wheel and rims slightly wider and heavier than mine.
Is about 120-130kgf on the rear DS typically acceptable? I am going to ask LBS as well.
Thanks for any help.
I have recently rebuilt the rear 32H 700c wheel on my Bianchi hybrid because of upgrading the hub from Shimano RM-30 to Deore T-610. The rims are Alex SSP220, double wall. The bike is Bianchi c-sport 1, it is similar to Trek FX or Specialized Sirrus series. I am 250 lbs. I would be greatful for any advice on the DS/NDS spoke tension. I have seen some people saying not go beyond 110 kgf DS.
On the other hand, a LBS my friend bought another bike from (one of the few LBS's which actually do tighten the spokes when assembling the bike) has tensioned them to 150-160 kgf DS rear and 110-120 kgf front. Is it too much? The latter bike is Bianchi Torino, a city hybrid with 36H 700c wheel and rims slightly wider and heavier than mine.
Is about 120-130kgf on the rear DS typically acceptable? I am going to ask LBS as well.
Thanks for any help.
#2
Senior Member
It all depends on the rim! Most of the rims I'm familiar with suggest 110-120 kgf as the maximum spoke tension. 150-160 kgf sounds quite high!
You can use the DT Swiss Spoke Calculator:
https://spokes-calculator.dtswiss.com/en/
Or Damon Rinard's spocalc spreadsheet:
Damon Rinard's free spoke length calculator
To figure out what the NDS tension should be based on the DS tension.
You can use the DT Swiss Spoke Calculator:
https://spokes-calculator.dtswiss.com/en/
Or Damon Rinard's spocalc spreadsheet:
Damon Rinard's free spoke length calculator
To figure out what the NDS tension should be based on the DS tension.
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: /dev/null
Posts: 689
Bikes: Soma Double Cross Disc (2017), Surly DT (2023), red Hardrock FS (circa 1996)
Liked 163 Times
in
107 Posts
Thanks for the reply! I have visited the LBS today, and the reading of their TM-1 is lower than that of mine by 0.5 to 1 unit (e.g., 24 where I have 24.5 or 25). Good to know as it means that my TM-1 is on the safe side. They have confirmed that the maximum is about 120 kgf (which means up to 25 is OK with 2mm spokes).
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 39,657
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Liked 3,491 Times
in
1,916 Posts
If you haven't rebuilt yet, you might consider using DB spokes, at least on the left flange.
Optimal spoke tension includes a number of considerations, including what the rim can tolerate. One of the most important ones is how much the spoke is stretched under tension. As the rim deflects under load, the spoke is stretched less and loses tension. It can only function while under tension, and once it loses tension down to the relaxed state it can't contribute any more.
So, you have options. You can use a deeper rim, which deflects less under radial loads, or you can use a thinner spoke where the tension won;t be as high, so it stretches more, and can continue to contribute as the rim deflects (or both).
You are capped on left side tension at 50-60% or so of right side tension, so assuming 120kgf on the right, you're looking at 60-70kgf on the left. A lighter spoke will make that tension adequate whereas it might be low for a heavier spoke. That added stretch under load is the real (and most misunderstood) benefit of butted spokes, and how when it comes to wheels, less is often more.
Optimal spoke tension includes a number of considerations, including what the rim can tolerate. One of the most important ones is how much the spoke is stretched under tension. As the rim deflects under load, the spoke is stretched less and loses tension. It can only function while under tension, and once it loses tension down to the relaxed state it can't contribute any more.
So, you have options. You can use a deeper rim, which deflects less under radial loads, or you can use a thinner spoke where the tension won;t be as high, so it stretches more, and can continue to contribute as the rim deflects (or both).
You are capped on left side tension at 50-60% or so of right side tension, so assuming 120kgf on the right, you're looking at 60-70kgf on the left. A lighter spoke will make that tension adequate whereas it might be low for a heavier spoke. That added stretch under load is the real (and most misunderstood) benefit of butted spokes, and how when it comes to wheels, less is often more.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#5
Senior Member
Agree that 150+ is too high. My DS with butted spokes and double-eyeletted rims run 115-120. Front is 100-105. I weigh about 230# and have had no problems at these tensions.
#6
Senior Member
You are capped on left side tension at 50-60% or so of right side tension, so assuming 120kgf on the right, you're looking at 60-70kgf on the left. A lighter spoke will make that tension adequate whereas it might be low for a heavier spoke. That added stretch under load is the real (and most misunderstood) benefit of butted spokes, and how when it comes to wheels, less is often more.
#7
Thread Killer
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 12,804
Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII, 23 3T Strada
Liked 1,931 Times
in
1,162 Posts
It has been addressed, but I think it's worth stating plainly that spoke tension is not to do with rider weight.
#8
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: /dev/null
Posts: 689
Bikes: Soma Double Cross Disc (2017), Surly DT (2023), red Hardrock FS (circa 1996)
Liked 163 Times
in
107 Posts
Thanks for the advice. I have already rebuilt, using the same rim and spokes (they were practically new, with about 300 miles on them). This was my second build. The first one was when I was trying to true and old MTB wheel without much success (anyway, the rim was bent). I am going to use the different spokes if I do a build myself some time in the future.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 39,657
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Liked 3,491 Times
in
1,916 Posts
If using the same rim for a light and heavier rider, I'll tension the heavier rider's wheel closer to or even exceeding the rim makers tension limit, while leaving more upside room for the lighter rider to spare the rim the stress of a high dead load.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
Last edited by FBinNY; 04-25-16 at 12:42 PM.
#10
Thread Killer
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 12,804
Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII, 23 3T Strada
Liked 1,931 Times
in
1,162 Posts
Not true. Rider weight is a consideration, though not the major one. Heavier riders mean more rim flex, and so must be considered in choosing rims, spokes, and tension. With wheels, as with any structure, dead load (unloaded), payload, and dynamic load must be considered in deciding what's required.
If using the same rim for a light and heavier rider, I'll tension the heavier rider's wheel closer to or even exceeding the rim makers tension limit, while leaving more upside room for the lighter rider to spare the rim the stress of a high dead load.
If using the same rim for a light and heavier rider, I'll tension the heavier rider's wheel closer to or even exceeding the rim makers tension limit, while leaving more upside room for the lighter rider to spare the rim the stress of a high dead load.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
WizardOfBoz
Bicycle Mechanics
28
06-10-19 07:12 PM
robow
Bicycle Mechanics
2
07-01-15 09:06 AM