Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
Reload this Page >

heavy rider, spoke tension

Search
Notices
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg) Looking to lose that spare tire? Ideal weight 200+? Frustrated being a large cyclist in a sport geared for the ultra-light? Learn about the bikes and parts that can take the abuse of a heavier cyclist, how to keep your body going while losing the weight, and get support from others who've been successful.

heavy rider, spoke tension

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-24-16, 01:05 AM
  #1  
csport
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: /dev/null
Posts: 689

Bikes: Soma Double Cross Disc (2017), Surly DT (2023), red Hardrock FS (circa 1996)

Liked 163 Times in 107 Posts
heavy rider, spoke tension

Hi
I have recently rebuilt the rear 32H 700c wheel on my Bianchi hybrid because of upgrading the hub from Shimano RM-30 to Deore T-610. The rims are Alex SSP220, double wall. The bike is Bianchi c-sport 1, it is similar to Trek FX or Specialized Sirrus series. I am 250 lbs. I would be greatful for any advice on the DS/NDS spoke tension. I have seen some people saying not go beyond 110 kgf DS.
On the other hand, a LBS my friend bought another bike from (one of the few LBS's which actually do tighten the spokes when assembling the bike) has tensioned them to 150-160 kgf DS rear and 110-120 kgf front. Is it too much? The latter bike is Bianchi Torino, a city hybrid with 36H 700c wheel and rims slightly wider and heavier than mine.
Is about 120-130kgf on the rear DS typically acceptable? I am going to ask LBS as well.
Thanks for any help.
csport is offline  
Old 04-24-16, 08:33 AM
  #2  
sstorkel
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,428

Bikes: Cervelo RS, Specialized Stumpjumper FSR Pro, Schwinn Typhoon, Nashbar touring, custom steel MTB

Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
It all depends on the rim! Most of the rims I'm familiar with suggest 110-120 kgf as the maximum spoke tension. 150-160 kgf sounds quite high!

You can use the DT Swiss Spoke Calculator:

https://spokes-calculator.dtswiss.com/en/

Or Damon Rinard's spocalc spreadsheet:

Damon Rinard's free spoke length calculator

To figure out what the NDS tension should be based on the DS tension.
sstorkel is offline  
Old 04-24-16, 09:35 PM
  #3  
csport
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: /dev/null
Posts: 689

Bikes: Soma Double Cross Disc (2017), Surly DT (2023), red Hardrock FS (circa 1996)

Liked 163 Times in 107 Posts
Thanks for the reply! I have visited the LBS today, and the reading of their TM-1 is lower than that of mine by 0.5 to 1 unit (e.g., 24 where I have 24.5 or 25). Good to know as it means that my TM-1 is on the safe side. They have confirmed that the maximum is about 120 kgf (which means up to 25 is OK with 2mm spokes).
csport is offline  
Old 04-24-16, 09:51 PM
  #4  
FBinNY 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 39,657

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Liked 3,491 Times in 1,916 Posts
If you haven't rebuilt yet, you might consider using DB spokes, at least on the left flange.

Optimal spoke tension includes a number of considerations, including what the rim can tolerate. One of the most important ones is how much the spoke is stretched under tension. As the rim deflects under load, the spoke is stretched less and loses tension. It can only function while under tension, and once it loses tension down to the relaxed state it can't contribute any more.

So, you have options. You can use a deeper rim, which deflects less under radial loads, or you can use a thinner spoke where the tension won;t be as high, so it stretches more, and can continue to contribute as the rim deflects (or both).

You are capped on left side tension at 50-60% or so of right side tension, so assuming 120kgf on the right, you're looking at 60-70kgf on the left. A lighter spoke will make that tension adequate whereas it might be low for a heavier spoke. That added stretch under load is the real (and most misunderstood) benefit of butted spokes, and how when it comes to wheels, less is often more.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline  
Old 04-25-16, 06:46 AM
  #5  
GravelMN
Senior Member
 
GravelMN's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Rural Minnesota
Posts: 1,604
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Agree that 150+ is too high. My DS with butted spokes and double-eyeletted rims run 115-120. Front is 100-105. I weigh about 230# and have had no problems at these tensions.
GravelMN is offline  
Old 04-25-16, 09:04 AM
  #6  
sstorkel
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,428

Bikes: Cervelo RS, Specialized Stumpjumper FSR Pro, Schwinn Typhoon, Nashbar touring, custom steel MTB

Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by FBinNY
You are capped on left side tension at 50-60% or so of right side tension, so assuming 120kgf on the right, you're looking at 60-70kgf on the left. A lighter spoke will make that tension adequate whereas it might be low for a heavier spoke. That added stretch under load is the real (and most misunderstood) benefit of butted spokes, and how when it comes to wheels, less is often more.
The other option for increasing tension on the NDS is to look for rims with an offset drilling. I used Velocity's Synergy OC wheels for my touring bike, which have a 4mm offset. On the rear wheel, NDS tension was 84% of DS tension. Sadly, the Synergy OC has been discontinued, but I believe Velocity is still selling an OC version of the A23.
sstorkel is offline  
Old 04-25-16, 09:07 AM
  #7  
chaadster
Thread Killer
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 12,804

Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII, 23 3T Strada

Liked 1,931 Times in 1,162 Posts
It has been addressed, but I think it's worth stating plainly that spoke tension is not to do with rider weight.
chaadster is offline  
Old 04-25-16, 12:27 PM
  #8  
csport
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: /dev/null
Posts: 689

Bikes: Soma Double Cross Disc (2017), Surly DT (2023), red Hardrock FS (circa 1996)

Liked 163 Times in 107 Posts
Thanks for the advice. I have already rebuilt, using the same rim and spokes (they were practically new, with about 300 miles on them). This was my second build. The first one was when I was trying to true and old MTB wheel without much success (anyway, the rim was bent). I am going to use the different spokes if I do a build myself some time in the future.
csport is offline  
Old 04-25-16, 12:38 PM
  #9  
FBinNY 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 39,657

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Liked 3,491 Times in 1,916 Posts
Originally Posted by chaadster
It has been addressed, but I think it's worth stating plainly that spoke tension is not to do with rider weight.
Not true. Rider weight is a consideration, though not the major one. Heavier riders mean more rim flex, and so must be considered in choosing rims, spokes, and tension. With wheels, as with any structure, dead load (unloaded), payload, and dynamic load must be considered in deciding what's required.

If using the same rim for a light and heavier rider, I'll tension the heavier rider's wheel closer to or even exceeding the rim makers tension limit, while leaving more upside room for the lighter rider to spare the rim the stress of a high dead load.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.

Last edited by FBinNY; 04-25-16 at 12:42 PM.
FBinNY is offline  
Old 04-27-16, 01:03 AM
  #10  
chaadster
Thread Killer
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 12,804

Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII, 23 3T Strada

Liked 1,931 Times in 1,162 Posts
Originally Posted by FBinNY
Not true. Rider weight is a consideration, though not the major one. Heavier riders mean more rim flex, and so must be considered in choosing rims, spokes, and tension. With wheels, as with any structure, dead load (unloaded), payload, and dynamic load must be considered in deciding what's required.

If using the same rim for a light and heavier rider, I'll tension the heavier rider's wheel closer to or even exceeding the rim makers tension limit, while leaving more upside room for the lighter rider to spare the rim the stress of a high dead load.
Yes, heavy riders can benefit from higher tension, but I meant simply to say that rider weight does not dictate DS/NDS tension variance as seemed to be expressed in the OP.
chaadster is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
agenkin
Bicycle Mechanics
4
09-23-15 08:16 AM
robow
Bicycle Mechanics
2
07-01-15 09:06 AM
RubeRad
Bicycle Mechanics
74
12-03-12 11:58 AM
squamish5
Road Cycling
1
02-18-11 10:56 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Your Privacy Choices -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.