So Wrong, But So Cool...
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 6,053
Bikes: 2015 Charge Plug, 2007 Dahon Boardwalk, 1997 Nishiki Blazer, 1984 Nishiki International, 2006 Felt F65, 1989 Dahon Getaway V
Liked 1,761 Times
in
873 Posts
So Wrong, But So Cool...
Stumbled on this this morning. I can't condone riding like this in this kind of traffic, but it sure is thrilling to watch.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 25 miles northwest of Boston
Posts: 29,662
Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint, GT Timberline 29r, Marin Muirwoods 29er, Trek FX Alpha 7.0
Liked 3,685 Times
in
2,385 Posts
holy mother of God
Likes For Ridinglurker:
#6
Disco Infiltrator
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom CA
Posts: 13,524
Bikes: Stormchaser, Paramount, Tilt, Samba tandem
Liked 2,163 Times
in
1,410 Posts
And yeah the WSBK road race someone posted a couple of days ago is way more. Can't find it right this second
__________________
Genesis 49:16-17
Genesis 49:16-17
#8
Tinker-er
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Mid-Atlantic
Posts: 704
Bikes: 1956 Rudge Sports; 1983 Univega Alpina Uno; 1981 Miyata 610; 1973 Raleigh Twenty; 1994 Breezer Lightning XTR; V4 Yuba Mundo aka "The Schlepper"; 1987 Raleigh "The Edge" Mountain Trials; 1952 R.O. Harrison "Madison"; 1994 Concorde Aquila
Liked 452 Times
in
283 Posts
If he ever bites it while filming, he won't have to worry about road rash because his chase car will finish him off.
Likes For PhilFo:
#9
aka Tom Reingold
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 41,057
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Liked 3,052 Times
in
1,725 Posts
I assume the camera person was also on a bike, judging from the sounds.
I don't fault them for taking the lane. At that speed, it's appropriate, but if I knew I was about to do it, I might use a large array of tail lights.
I saw the speed peaked at 57 mph (91 km/h). I have never gone that fast on a bike. They were too comfortable getting close to cars.
I don't fault them for taking the lane. At that speed, it's appropriate, but if I knew I was about to do it, I might use a large array of tail lights.
I saw the speed peaked at 57 mph (91 km/h). I have never gone that fast on a bike. They were too comfortable getting close to cars.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
#10
Senior Member
At least thats the road to do it on no cross streets.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 3,886
Bikes: Too many bikes, too little time to ride
Liked 555 Times
in
381 Posts
What's "so wrong" about it? The tight passes? I don't know, at those speeds you've got to be able to move quickly to stay safe. That includes taking the best lines and getting around obstacles (other vehicles) to ensure your own safety. I've never gone that fast but if I was going that fast, I don't think pulling the brakes would even be an option. One false move on the brakes could have big consequences so I think one should just ride it out and try to get through it as quickly and safely as possible.