Is carbon 105 is as good as Ultegra?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Thomaston, Georgia
Posts: 217
Bikes: 2013 Raleigh Clubman, 2010 Schwinn LeTour, 2012 Raleigh Sojourn, 2011 Schwinn Voyaguer 7
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Let me stoke the fire cause I am curious. Exactly what is the difference between the 105 and the Ultegra that makes the Ultegra supposedly better than the 105?
#3
Banned.
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Upland Ca
Posts: 19,895
Bikes: Lemond Chambery/Cannondale R-900/Trek 8000 MTB/Burley Duet tandem
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
Depends on your ride style. If your style is to sprint to the finish line of a charity ride and can't afford a mis shift, then Ultegra is worth every penny when it comes to impressing your friends. Not to mention, it weighs about one less Benny and Jerry's, so it accelerates faster too.
#4
Senior Member
I must be out of the loop: what's "carbon 105"? As far as I know, there's just 105 (in either silver or black coloring) and Ultegra (in silver or grey coloring)... Some people can tell the difference between the two without a gram scale and some people can't. Honestly, in a blind test I'm not sure that I could tell the difference.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Thomaston, Georgia
Posts: 217
Bikes: 2013 Raleigh Clubman, 2010 Schwinn LeTour, 2012 Raleigh Sojourn, 2011 Schwinn Voyaguer 7
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Depends on your ride style. If your style is to sprint to the finish line of a charity ride and can't afford a mis shift, then Ultegra is worth every penny when it comes to impressing your friends. Not to mention, it weighs about one less Benny and Jerry's, so it accelerates faster too.
#6
Senior Member
As far as i can tell...
Ultegra: lighter weight, stiffer materials, more "substance" to it, slightly better shifting performance (quicker, more sure engagement).
105: more plastics, less stiff, less beefier "substance", leading to the less "crisp" shifting.
Ultegra: lighter weight, stiffer materials, more "substance" to it, slightly better shifting performance (quicker, more sure engagement).
105: more plastics, less stiff, less beefier "substance", leading to the less "crisp" shifting.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: NW Louisiana
Posts: 731
Bikes: 2011 Trek Madone 5.2 (RIP), 2013 Trek Domane 5.9
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm not familiar with the carbon 105, either. I've got Ultegra on my Madone but test rode several with 105. It's all good stuff. What differences there are are fairly negligible to the average rider. So, to answer your question, Yes. Maybe.
#8
Starting over
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 4,077
Bikes: 1990 Trek 1500; 2006 Gary Fisher Marlin; 2011 Cannondale Synapse Alloy 105; 2012 Catrike Trail
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Maybe it's supposed to mean "is a carbon bike with 105 better than a non-carbon bike with Ultegra?"
Is it supposed to mean that, or is it supposed to mean "carbon 105?" It depends.
Is it supposed to mean that, or is it supposed to mean "carbon 105?" It depends.
#9
Guest
Posts: n/a
I must be out of the loop: what's "carbon 105"? As far as I know, there's just 105 (in either silver or black coloring) and Ultegra (in silver or grey coloring)... Some people can tell the difference between the two without a gram scale and some people can't. Honestly, in a blind test I'm not sure that I could tell the difference.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Independence, MO
Posts: 78
Bikes: Salsa Vaya, Fuji Aloha, Giant OCR2, an older Giant XTC, and a couple of singlespeeds
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm torn between saying 'flip it' and posting a facepalm image. Oh bikeforums, what to do? (Better ask Pcad in the 41... Or Carleton in SSFG...)
#14
Getting a clue
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 408
Bikes: 2010 Trek Madone 4.7, Diamondback Wildwood
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts