Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

For the love of English 3 speeds...

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

For the love of English 3 speeds...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-16-19, 09:03 AM
  #19251  
browngw 
Senior Member
 
browngw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Port Dover Ontario Canada
Posts: 1,547

Bikes: 1965 Dilecta Le Blanc, 1956 Royal Nord, 1972 Raleigh Sports, 1972 CCM Turismo,1976 SuperCycle Excalibur, 2014 Salsa Vaya, 2017 Felt DD70, 2019 Giant Lafree and others

Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 351 Post(s)
Liked 614 Times in 232 Posts
Originally Posted by paulb_in_bkln
I wondered why a new shifter cable came with a full length housing when both my bikes run the housing just a short way to a fulcrum stop at the front of the bike. I see this bike has the housing run to the rear of the bike and no pulley. Is there any advantage? Because when I eventually set up my Peugeot mixte conversion, I could do it either way (but I won't need a pulley as the long diagonal tubes allow the shift cable to go straight to the dropout).
It would appear that a lot of

bikes intended for the Canadian market came with the full length cable and no pulley in the early seventies. I did is this way simply because it came that way and felt no need to change it. I have a '71 Robin Hood the same way and have rebuilt various Raleigh built variants like Supercycles that used the full cable.
__________________
We are what we reflect. We are the changes that we bring to this world. Ride often. -Geo.-
browngw is offline  
Old 02-16-19, 09:21 AM
  #19252  
gster
Senior Member
 
gster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,572

Bikes: 1971 Hercules, 1978 Raleigh Superbe, 1978 Raleigh Tourist, 1964 Glider 3 Speed, 1967 Raleigh Sprite 5 Speed, 1968 Hercules AMF 3 Speed, 1972 Raleigh Superbe, 1976 Raleigh Superbe, 1957 Flying Pigeon, 1967 Dunelt 3 Speed

Mentioned: 57 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1030 Post(s)
Liked 445 Times in 288 Posts
Originally Posted by browngw
It would appear that a lot of

bikes intended for the Canadian market came with the full length cable and no pulley in the early seventies. I did is this way simply because it came that way and felt no need to change it. I have a '71 Robin Hood the same way and have rebuilt various Raleigh built variants like Supercycles that used the full cable.
I prefer the pulley and exposed cable system.
I think it looks better and as stated, probably performs better.
I just cut and modify the new replacement cables to suit.
gster is offline  
Old 02-16-19, 10:00 AM
  #19253  
paulb_in_bkln
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 660

Bikes: 1983 Trek 600, 1972 Raleigh Sports Step Thru, 1963 Rudge Sports, 2007 Dahon MuP8, Dahon Speed, Public Mixte 8-speed IGH, mid-70s Peugeot Mixte AW conversion, Riv Platypus

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 350 Post(s)
Liked 24 Times in 17 Posts
Originally Posted by gster
I prefer the pulley and exposed cable system.
I think it looks better and as stated, probably performs better.
I just cut and modify the new replacement cables to suit.
That's what I did when I installed the new cable on my step thru and I wondered why the long housing and didn't actually get it until now.
paulb_in_bkln is offline  
Old 02-16-19, 11:04 AM
  #19254  
browngw 
Senior Member
 
browngw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Port Dover Ontario Canada
Posts: 1,547

Bikes: 1965 Dilecta Le Blanc, 1956 Royal Nord, 1972 Raleigh Sports, 1972 CCM Turismo,1976 SuperCycle Excalibur, 2014 Salsa Vaya, 2017 Felt DD70, 2019 Giant Lafree and others

Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 351 Post(s)
Liked 614 Times in 232 Posts
Originally Posted by gster
I prefer the pulley and exposed cable system.
I think it looks better and as stated, probably performs better.
I just cut and modify the new replacement cables to suit.
I have done that as well on other bikes including my DL1 and the gold Supercycle and it looks more "vintage" but not sure I like it better. The Supercycle was sold last year because the frame felt a little small for me.
__________________
We are what we reflect. We are the changes that we bring to this world. Ride often. -Geo.-
browngw is offline  
Old 02-16-19, 11:32 AM
  #19255  
BigChief
Senior Member
 
BigChief's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 3,240
Mentioned: 103 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1299 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 103 Times in 85 Posts
Originally Posted by paulb_in_bkln
That's what I did when I installed the new cable on my step thru and I wondered why the long housing and didn't actually get it until now.
Yeah, there's a whole bunch of different aftermarket cables out there for various bikes with 3 speed hubs. Different cable and housing lengths. Some with ball end ferrules, some with threaded ferrules. Some of them have crimped on ends that are too fat to fit properly into the shifters and can be stuck when you try to remove them. The newer ones have cast on ends that fit nicely in the shifter and plain ends intended for pinch bolt adapters to connect to the indicator pin.
BigChief is offline  
Old 02-17-19, 08:31 AM
  #19256  
sd5782 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Toledo Ohio
Posts: 1,515

Bikes: 1964 Huffy Sportsman, 1972 Fuji Newest, 1973 Schwinn Super Sport (3), 1982 Trek 412, 1983 Trek 700, 1989 Miyata 1000LT, 1991 Bianchi Boardwalk, plus others

Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 589 Post(s)
Liked 704 Times in 397 Posts
Loose bearing assembly at factory ????

I am doing bearing lube on a 64. Reassembly of the bottom bracket with the loose balls was fairly easily accomplished with laying the bike on one side, and dropping the balls into the fixed cup loaded with grease, and etc, etc, etc for head etc, etc, etc.

My question is, how did the factory do it? Kind of hard to envision workmen after a long day or a hard weekend showing the same concentration as a hobbyist working on his valued vintage ride. I kind of picture the factory floor littered with globs of greasy ball bearings and new bikes missing a few on occasion.
sd5782 is offline  
Old 02-17-19, 09:55 PM
  #19257  
BigChief
Senior Member
 
BigChief's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 3,240
Mentioned: 103 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1299 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 103 Times in 85 Posts
Originally Posted by sd5782
I am doing bearing lube on a 64. Reassembly of the bottom bracket with the loose balls was fairly easily accomplished with laying the bike on one side, and dropping the balls into the fixed cup loaded with grease, and etc, etc, etc for head etc, etc, etc.

My question is, how did the factory do it? Kind of hard to envision workmen after a long day or a hard weekend showing the same concentration as a hobbyist working on his valued vintage ride. I kind of picture the factory floor littered with globs of greasy ball bearings and new bikes missing a few on occasion.
Pretty sure both cups were packed with grease and bearings, the fixed cup screwed in, spindle set in place then the adjustable cup. What I do, since it's such a bear to remove the fixed cup, is to load grease and bearings in the adjustable cup, lay some grease in the fixed cup with a stick, put grease on the drive side of the spindle and lay the 11 bearings in the grease. The grease holds the bearings on the spindle. Then I thread the spindle through the fixed cub and hold the end in place after it comes through while I screw in the adjustable cup.
BigChief is offline  
Old 02-18-19, 07:20 AM
  #19258  
gster
Senior Member
 
gster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,572

Bikes: 1971 Hercules, 1978 Raleigh Superbe, 1978 Raleigh Tourist, 1964 Glider 3 Speed, 1967 Raleigh Sprite 5 Speed, 1968 Hercules AMF 3 Speed, 1972 Raleigh Superbe, 1976 Raleigh Superbe, 1957 Flying Pigeon, 1967 Dunelt 3 Speed

Mentioned: 57 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1030 Post(s)
Liked 445 Times in 288 Posts
Originally Posted by BigChief
Pretty sure both cups were packed with grease and bearings, the fixed cup screwed in, spindle set in place then the adjustable cup. What I do, since it's such a bear to remove the fixed cup, is to load grease and bearings in the adjustable cup, lay some grease in the fixed cup with a stick, put grease on the drive side of the spindle and lay the 11 bearings in the grease. The grease holds the bearings on the spindle. Then I thread the spindle through the fixed cub and hold the end in place after it comes through while I screw in the adjustable cup.
I'm sure they had a "system" at the factory that sped up the assembly.
I leave the fixed cup in place and lay the bike flat, fixed cup down with a black (t shirt) cloth underneath.
I load from underneath and the insert spindle and other cup.
It's a little time consuming but worth it.

A repacked BB should last another 30 years or so.

Or, just stuff an old sock in there as I found on my 1953 BSA..


This could be an example of the very rare "Sock Option" that was briefly offered in the early '50's.

Last edited by gster; 02-19-19 at 05:15 AM.
gster is offline  
Old 02-18-19, 07:29 AM
  #19259  
gster
Senior Member
 
gster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,572

Bikes: 1971 Hercules, 1978 Raleigh Superbe, 1978 Raleigh Tourist, 1964 Glider 3 Speed, 1967 Raleigh Sprite 5 Speed, 1968 Hercules AMF 3 Speed, 1972 Raleigh Superbe, 1976 Raleigh Superbe, 1957 Flying Pigeon, 1967 Dunelt 3 Speed

Mentioned: 57 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1030 Post(s)
Liked 445 Times in 288 Posts
Originally Posted by gster
I'm sure they had a "system" at the factory that sped up the assembly.
I leave the fixed cup in place and lay the bike flat, fixed cup down with a black (t shirt) clothe underneath.
I load from underneath and the insert spindle and other cup.
It's a little time consuming but worth it.
I repacked BB should last another 30 years or so.

Or, just stuff an old sock in there as I found on my 1953 BSA..


This could be an example of the very rare "Sock Option" that was briefly offered in the early '50's.
The BSA Factory Socks are a higher quality compared to the aftermarket socks which tend to be synthetic.
You really need a good wool sock in there.
It's worth the extra cost.
gster is offline  
Old 02-18-19, 08:11 AM
  #19260  
BigChief
Senior Member
 
BigChief's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 3,240
Mentioned: 103 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1299 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 103 Times in 85 Posts
Yes, a 100% wool argyle would be period correct here.
BigChief is offline  
Old 02-18-19, 08:32 AM
  #19261  
paulb_in_bkln
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 660

Bikes: 1983 Trek 600, 1972 Raleigh Sports Step Thru, 1963 Rudge Sports, 2007 Dahon MuP8, Dahon Speed, Public Mixte 8-speed IGH, mid-70s Peugeot Mixte AW conversion, Riv Platypus

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 350 Post(s)
Liked 24 Times in 17 Posts
Originally Posted by BigChief
Yes, a 100% wool argyle would be period correct here.
Whoever it was could have at least stuck both socks in there so there'd be a matched pair.
paulb_in_bkln is offline  
Old 02-21-19, 06:58 AM
  #19262  
gster
Senior Member
 
gster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,572

Bikes: 1971 Hercules, 1978 Raleigh Superbe, 1978 Raleigh Tourist, 1964 Glider 3 Speed, 1967 Raleigh Sprite 5 Speed, 1968 Hercules AMF 3 Speed, 1972 Raleigh Superbe, 1976 Raleigh Superbe, 1957 Flying Pigeon, 1967 Dunelt 3 Speed

Mentioned: 57 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1030 Post(s)
Liked 445 Times in 288 Posts
This Canadian Superbe is for sale again @ $200.00 here in Toronto.
The stamped eye on the heron would place it as a 1961 or earlier.
Hard to tell but the forks look a bit suspect...

gster is offline  
Old 02-21-19, 06:59 AM
  #19263  
sd5782 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Toledo Ohio
Posts: 1,515

Bikes: 1964 Huffy Sportsman, 1972 Fuji Newest, 1973 Schwinn Super Sport (3), 1982 Trek 412, 1983 Trek 700, 1989 Miyata 1000LT, 1991 Bianchi Boardwalk, plus others

Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 589 Post(s)
Liked 704 Times in 397 Posts
Handlebar bend choices

I searched this thread and didn't see much on the topic, but do see several pics. My 64 has the factory bars that were common to the era and kind of narrow and bent well back, so steering is kind of like a tiller. This doesn't seem to give as much control to me. From some of the pics I see, it looks as though Raleigh handlebars in the 70s were a bit more splayed out at an angle. I think I may look for some like that at my local bike co-op. They would need to have a bit of patina to match the rest of the bike.

I have other bikes to suit different jobs, but thought just a bit more bend and rise might be nice on this casual bike. What do others like, considering a vintage look too? Bike has a B72 saddle for somewhat upright riding position.
Steve
sd5782 is offline  
Old 02-21-19, 07:03 AM
  #19264  
gster
Senior Member
 
gster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,572

Bikes: 1971 Hercules, 1978 Raleigh Superbe, 1978 Raleigh Tourist, 1964 Glider 3 Speed, 1967 Raleigh Sprite 5 Speed, 1968 Hercules AMF 3 Speed, 1972 Raleigh Superbe, 1976 Raleigh Superbe, 1957 Flying Pigeon, 1967 Dunelt 3 Speed

Mentioned: 57 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1030 Post(s)
Liked 445 Times in 288 Posts
Here's a nice step through at a reasonable $125.00.
These forks look a little pushed in as well..

gster is offline  
Old 02-21-19, 11:24 AM
  #19265  
BigChief
Senior Member
 
BigChief's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 3,240
Mentioned: 103 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1299 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 103 Times in 85 Posts
Originally Posted by sd5782
I searched this thread and didn't see much on the topic, but do see several pics. My 64 has the factory bars that were common to the era and kind of narrow and bent well back, so steering is kind of like a tiller. This doesn't seem to give as much control to me. From some of the pics I see, it looks as though Raleigh handlebars in the 70s were a bit more splayed out at an angle. I think I may look for some like that at my local bike co-op. They would need to have a bit of patina to match the rest of the bike.

I have other bikes to suit different jobs, but thought just a bit more bend and rise might be nice on this casual bike. What do others like, considering a vintage look too? Bike has a B72 saddle for somewhat upright riding position.
Steve
As far as I know, Raleigh used the same shape handle bars on the Sports and other light roadster bikes since at least the early 50s. If you decide to change them, remember the stem is made for 15/16" bars and standard 1" bars won't fit. Any 22.2mm stem will fit the fork tube so it wouldn't be hard to modify.
BigChief is offline  
Old 02-21-19, 11:44 AM
  #19266  
dweenk
Senior Member
 
dweenk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Maryland
Posts: 3,803

Bikes: Lots of English 3-speeds, a couple of old road bikes, 3 mountain bikes, 1 hybrid, and a couple of mash-ups

Mentioned: 53 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 887 Post(s)
Liked 335 Times in 225 Posts
I think the person you responded to was talking bar width, not diameter. I have seen Sports bars from 21 to 25 inches wide.
dweenk is offline  
Old 02-21-19, 03:51 PM
  #19267  
Piff 
Senior Member
 
Piff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,472
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 802 Post(s)
Liked 760 Times in 413 Posts
sturmey archer aw3...

I am confused by IGH hubs. How does the hub's axle length work in regards to the bike's OLD?

I have a '74 raleigh supercourse that has been spread to 130mm and I'd like to put a 3speed hub on it. Is it simply a matter of spacers between the hub and the dropouts?

​​​​​​For example, this hub seems nice, but I have no idea if it would play well with 130mm (as I assume it was built for a 120mm bike?), and if it could be simply fixed by buying a 130mm axle and adding spacers.

Thanks.
​​
https://www.ebay.com/itm/NOS-1969-St...pe!92128!US!-1
Piff is offline  
Old 02-21-19, 04:29 PM
  #19268  
nlerner
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,219
Mentioned: 483 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3832 Post(s)
Liked 6,859 Times in 2,654 Posts
S-A axles came in two sizes: 5 3/4" for 115mm rear spacing and 6 1/4" for 120mm rear spacing. I don't think the latter will be long enough, i.e., you won't be able to get good purchase with axle nuts, in a frame spaced to 130mm. I'd suggest cold setting the SuperCourse rear triangle to 115 or 120mm and hope that the rear end of that frame hasn't been through lots of respacing over the years!
nlerner is offline  
Old 02-21-19, 05:07 PM
  #19269  
Piff 
Senior Member
 
Piff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,472
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 802 Post(s)
Liked 760 Times in 413 Posts
Originally Posted by nlerner
S-A axles came in two sizes: 5 3/4" for 115mm rear spacing and 6 1/4" for 120mm rear spacing. I don't think the latter will be long enough, i.e., you won't be able to get good purchase with axle nuts, in a frame spaced to 130mm. I'd suggest cold setting the SuperCourse rear triangle to 115 or 120mm and hope that the rear end of that frame hasn't been through lots of respacing over the years!
Thanks, this helps.

So there's no possibility of buying a replacement axle and building the hub around it? I guess for the frame's sake it's probably best for me to buy a newer hub based around a 130mm OLD rather than cold set it again.
Piff is offline  
Old 02-21-19, 07:19 PM
  #19270  
BigChief
Senior Member
 
BigChief's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 3,240
Mentioned: 103 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1299 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 103 Times in 85 Posts
I think the modern SA RX-RF5 would be a good choice.
BigChief is offline  
Old 02-21-19, 07:46 PM
  #19271  
browngw 
Senior Member
 
browngw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Port Dover Ontario Canada
Posts: 1,547

Bikes: 1965 Dilecta Le Blanc, 1956 Royal Nord, 1972 Raleigh Sports, 1972 CCM Turismo,1976 SuperCycle Excalibur, 2014 Salsa Vaya, 2017 Felt DD70, 2019 Giant Lafree and others

Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 351 Post(s)
Liked 614 Times in 232 Posts
Royal Nord President Brampton 3 Speed






The Belgium Royal Nord President is home as of this evening. What a mix of components, Spitfire mudguards with plane icon stamped in the alloy, Weinmann 810 brakes, Dunlop Imperial 28"x1 1/2" tires (made in Canada) Brampton hub and shifter and lots more to discover! Really thrilled to have this bike and intend to refurbish and treasure it. More to follow.
The rear rack is marble painted to match the frame. I believe it will polish up beautifully.
__________________
We are what we reflect. We are the changes that we bring to this world. Ride often. -Geo.-
browngw is offline  
Old 02-21-19, 08:13 PM
  #19272  
markk900
Senior Member
 
markk900's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ontario
Posts: 2,673
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 486 Post(s)
Liked 661 Times in 351 Posts
@browngw: just wow! What a treasure and so many details to draw the eye.....
markk900 is offline  
Old 02-21-19, 08:41 PM
  #19273  
sd5782 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Toledo Ohio
Posts: 1,515

Bikes: 1964 Huffy Sportsman, 1972 Fuji Newest, 1973 Schwinn Super Sport (3), 1982 Trek 412, 1983 Trek 700, 1989 Miyata 1000LT, 1991 Bianchi Boardwalk, plus others

Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 589 Post(s)
Liked 704 Times in 397 Posts
Yes, mine are narrow

Originally Posted by dweenk
I think the person you responded to was talking bar width, not diameter. I have seen Sports bars from 21 to 25 inches wide.
I just measured bar width on mine, and they were only 21” wide so I may look for some wider ones. Are the Raleigh bars a proprietary diameter then?
sd5782 is offline  
Old 02-22-19, 05:03 AM
  #19274  
BigChief
Senior Member
 
BigChief's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 3,240
Mentioned: 103 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1299 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 103 Times in 85 Posts
Originally Posted by sd5782

I just measured bar width on mine, and they were only 21” wide so I may look for some wider ones. Are the Raleigh bars a proprietary diameter then?
Yes, they are 15/16", Not only Raleigh. Many other older English bikes also. But there's plenty of 22.2mm (7/8") stems with 1 inch clamps to choose from. You might need to make up new cables if you move the shifter and brake levers too far from their original positions though.
BigChief is offline  
Old 02-22-19, 06:51 AM
  #19275  
sd5782 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Toledo Ohio
Posts: 1,515

Bikes: 1964 Huffy Sportsman, 1972 Fuji Newest, 1973 Schwinn Super Sport (3), 1982 Trek 412, 1983 Trek 700, 1989 Miyata 1000LT, 1991 Bianchi Boardwalk, plus others

Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 589 Post(s)
Liked 704 Times in 397 Posts
Might see what co-op has

Originally Posted by BigChief
Yes, they are 15/16", Not only Raleigh. Many other older English bikes also. But there's plenty of 22.2mm (7/8") stems with 1 inch clamps to choose from. You might need to make up new cables if you move the shifter and brake levers too far from their original positions though.
Thanks Big Chief for clarifying that a bit. As the other poster mentioned there are Raleigh bars up to 25" wide. I may see if the co-op has some. I didn't want to switch to 1" bars, as then the levers and shifter and grips wouldn't work. I would also like bars with a bit of patina to match the rest of the bike too, so nothing new. I have enough cable to get that bit of extra I need. It is the angle more than the width I think.
sd5782 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.