Cyclist Average Speed Progression?
#26
Globo Gym lifetime member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Redmond, Oregon
Posts: 5,204
Bikes: Fast ones
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 410 Post(s)
Liked 614 Times
in
306 Posts
In reality, I've got a heck of a good aero tuck. The est avg was bumped by ~10 miles of 50+ and the mile or so of 60+mph. I didn't have power for the ride (as you noted), so Strava had to consider that I was in a "normal" riding position, hence the added power filling in the speed gap between a normal position and the aero tuck.
Aero tucking at 60+ is a whole different kind of pucker. A crash in lycra at 65 mph is an extended stay in the hospital (or worse), and that crossed my mind a few times on that descent.
__________________
#27
Senior Member
It's very regional dependent also. A Cat # in one region might be a somebody or a nobody in another region.
Power doesn't necessarily mean squat, but, for your #'s unless you weigh 55 kg I'd seriously check my power meter. Again, maybe regional, but you could probably TT for a win in our local 4/5 road race.
I've heard of people being eye watering strong on the bike, but not winning, but your #'s seem really really off for a 4/5 not being consistently top 5 or on the podium.
I could see a 4/5 having an hour power of a 4.3 or so hour power not winning. But not 4.8. I'm 70kg so that'd nearly be 330 for an hour. You could TT our local RR with that and they'd let you go.
Local guy lives a few houses down from me when he isn't off at college, he was a 4/5 super briefly with similar figures to yours and would just TT the local crit for the win. I didn't believe it, but checked out the Strava and sure enough........there's the finisher pic of him hammering solo across the line. Pan flat too.
But, for the original poster..........just suffer the workouts, do the hammer group rides, and go race. The charts and stuff are pointless.
Power doesn't necessarily mean squat, but, for your #'s unless you weigh 55 kg I'd seriously check my power meter. Again, maybe regional, but you could probably TT for a win in our local 4/5 road race.
I've heard of people being eye watering strong on the bike, but not winning, but your #'s seem really really off for a 4/5 not being consistently top 5 or on the podium.
I could see a 4/5 having an hour power of a 4.3 or so hour power not winning. But not 4.8. I'm 70kg so that'd nearly be 330 for an hour. You could TT our local RR with that and they'd let you go.
Local guy lives a few houses down from me when he isn't off at college, he was a 4/5 super briefly with similar figures to yours and would just TT the local crit for the win. I didn't believe it, but checked out the Strava and sure enough........there's the finisher pic of him hammering solo across the line. Pan flat too.
But, for the original poster..........just suffer the workouts, do the hammer group rides, and go race. The charts and stuff are pointless.
However, I'm lovin Zwift races!
Likes For firebird854:
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,520
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20810 Post(s)
Liked 9,456 Times
in
4,672 Posts
Likes For WhyFi:
#29
• —
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Land of Pleasant Living
Posts: 12,256
Bikes: Shmikes
Mentioned: 59 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10182 Post(s)
Liked 5,881 Times
in
3,169 Posts
#30
Should Be More Popular
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 43,071
Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix
Mentioned: 560 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22614 Post(s)
Liked 8,935 Times
in
4,164 Posts
#31
Not actually Tmonk
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 14,164
Bikes: road, track, mtb
Mentioned: 142 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2661 Post(s)
Liked 3,176 Times
in
1,672 Posts
I've been getting into TT as of late... so even though I'm an experienced (cat 2) racer, my average speed is now increasing significantly .
For the record I generally agree with what has been posted in this thread - speed is secondary. So is fitness too - once you're fit enough to be a player, racing is more about how you apply yourself rather than the numbers you're hitting during training. To this end it can be hugely beneficial to be part of a concerted team with equally capable "players", but that doesn't really come into play until you cat up.
For the record I generally agree with what has been posted in this thread - speed is secondary. So is fitness too - once you're fit enough to be a player, racing is more about how you apply yourself rather than the numbers you're hitting during training. To this end it can be hugely beneficial to be part of a concerted team with equally capable "players", but that doesn't really come into play until you cat up.
__________________
"Your beauty is an aeroplane;
so high, my heart cannot bear the strain." -A.C. Jobim, Triste
"Your beauty is an aeroplane;
so high, my heart cannot bear the strain." -A.C. Jobim, Triste
Likes For TMonk:
#32
• —
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Land of Pleasant Living
Posts: 12,256
Bikes: Shmikes
Mentioned: 59 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10182 Post(s)
Liked 5,881 Times
in
3,169 Posts
I've been getting into TT as of late... so even though I'm an experienced (cat 2) racer, my average speed is now increasing significantly .
For the record I generally agree with what has been posted in this thread - speed is secondary. So is fitness too - once you're fit enough to be a player, racing is more about how you apply yourself rather than the numbers you're hitting during training. To this end it can be hugely beneficial to be part of a concerted team with equally capable "players", but that doesn't really come into play until you cat up.
For the record I generally agree with what has been posted in this thread - speed is secondary. So is fitness too - once you're fit enough to be a player, racing is more about how you apply yourself rather than the numbers you're hitting during training. To this end it can be hugely beneficial to be part of a concerted team with equally capable "players", but that doesn't really come into play until you cat up.
Likes For MoAlpha:
#33
Blast from the Past
Agree with quite a bit here, in the end it's how you take what you have & use it to race well.
If you want a simple number, for a long time riding a flat 40k under an hour was sort of a benchmark for entry level racers. That was back before all of the Aero stuff came along so was more of a 1:1 comparison over time. I think that's still reasonable and translates well to the age of power meters as it would put you a little north of 300W or 4 w/Kg for FTP. If you develop other skills that would be solid Cat 4 or 3.
If you want a simple number, for a long time riding a flat 40k under an hour was sort of a benchmark for entry level racers. That was back before all of the Aero stuff came along so was more of a 1:1 comparison over time. I think that's still reasonable and translates well to the age of power meters as it would put you a little north of 300W or 4 w/Kg for FTP. If you develop other skills that would be solid Cat 4 or 3.
#34
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bristol, R. I.
Posts: 4,340
Bikes: Specialized Secteur, old Peugeot
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 663 Post(s)
Liked 496 Times
in
299 Posts
I read an article somewhere, once, that made the point that the main characteristic for success in an endurance sport is the capacity to recover. Once an athlete is fit enough to put in a significant effort it may be days before the body is recovered enough to repeat that effort. Consequently the capacity to recover governs the frequency of training efforts. Those who recover rapidly can then train harder and make greater advances in fitness.
I saw a video interview recently about a woman, Courtney Dauwalter, endurance racer who won the Moab 240 race. After running 240 hours or so, she beat the #2 finisher by 10 hours. This is enough time for a good meal and a good 8 hours of sleep. Running does not relate directly to cycling but training and recovery does. I'm too old to race but for you people who do, recovery is key. In the video I believe there is something to be learned. It is a long interview.
I saw a video interview recently about a woman, Courtney Dauwalter, endurance racer who won the Moab 240 race. After running 240 hours or so, she beat the #2 finisher by 10 hours. This is enough time for a good meal and a good 8 hours of sleep. Running does not relate directly to cycling but training and recovery does. I'm too old to race but for you people who do, recovery is key. In the video I believe there is something to be learned. It is a long interview.
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 6,016
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1814 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 923 Times
in
569 Posts
LOL. Who says 53x11 is dead???
In reality, I've got a heck of a good aero tuck. The est avg was bumped by ~10 miles of 50+ and the mile or so of 60+mph. I didn't have power for the ride (as you noted), so Strava had to consider that I was in a "normal" riding position, hence the added power filling in the speed gap between a normal position and the aero tuck.
Aero tucking at 60+ is a whole different kind of pucker. A crash in lycra at 65 mph is an extended stay in the hospital (or worse), and that crossed my mind a few times on that descent.
In reality, I've got a heck of a good aero tuck. The est avg was bumped by ~10 miles of 50+ and the mile or so of 60+mph. I didn't have power for the ride (as you noted), so Strava had to consider that I was in a "normal" riding position, hence the added power filling in the speed gap between a normal position and the aero tuck.
Aero tucking at 60+ is a whole different kind of pucker. A crash in lycra at 65 mph is an extended stay in the hospital (or worse), and that crossed my mind a few times on that descent.
I got speed wobble going down Tioga pass at 45mph for a peak-pucker experience. Kinda makes my hands sweat thinking about 60+
Likes For woodcraft:
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 6,016
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1814 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 923 Times
in
569 Posts
I read an article somewhere, once, that made the point that the main characteristic for success in an endurance sport is the capacity to recover. Once an athlete is fit enough to put in a significant effort it may be days before the body is recovered enough to repeat that effort. Consequently the capacity to recover governs the frequency of training efforts. Those who recover rapidly can then train harder and make greater advances in fitness.
I saw a video interview recently about a woman, Courtney Dauwalter, endurance racer who won the Moab 240 race. After running 240 hours or so, she beat the #2 finisher by 10 hours. This is enough time for a good meal and a good 8 hours of sleep. Running does not relate directly to cycling but training and recovery does. I'm too old to race but for you people who do, recovery is key. In the video I believe there is something to be learned. It is a long interview. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V8DfjXnIk6c
I saw a video interview recently about a woman, Courtney Dauwalter, endurance racer who won the Moab 240 race. After running 240 hours or so, she beat the #2 finisher by 10 hours. This is enough time for a good meal and a good 8 hours of sleep. Running does not relate directly to cycling but training and recovery does. I'm too old to race but for you people who do, recovery is key. In the video I believe there is something to be learned. It is a long interview. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V8DfjXnIk6c
Her finishing time was 58 hours.
She said that the oldest finisher was 69, and the interviewer knows an 80 year old who recently did a 6 hour marathon.
Worth watching but editing out the parts about dogs eating chickens, etc. would have been OK.
#38
Blazer of saddles, trails
And recover between hard efforts during the course of a ride/race. Cycling tips had an interesting article a month or so ago that argued that the best GT riders didn’t necessarily improve their FTPs during the course of their careers, they improved how long they could hold FTP and how often and for how long they could surge over it.
#39
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Portland
Posts: 1,115
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 451 Post(s)
Liked 364 Times
in
227 Posts
Agree with quite a bit here, in the end it's how you take what you have & use it to race well.
If you want a simple number, for a long time riding a flat 40k under an hour was sort of a benchmark for entry level racers. That was back before all of the Aero stuff came along so was more of a 1:1 comparison over time. I think that's still reasonable and translates well to the age of power meters as it would put you a little north of 300W or 4 w/Kg for FTP. If you develop other skills that would be solid Cat 4 or 3.
If you want a simple number, for a long time riding a flat 40k under an hour was sort of a benchmark for entry level racers. That was back before all of the Aero stuff came along so was more of a 1:1 comparison over time. I think that's still reasonable and translates well to the age of power meters as it would put you a little north of 300W or 4 w/Kg for FTP. If you develop other skills that would be solid Cat 4 or 3.
#40
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 2,433
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 741 Post(s)
Liked 412 Times
in
230 Posts
This is why speed guys at the velodrome don’t really use power to train with. The data isn’t that useful. The numbers really don’t relate to the intensity of the workout.
Likes For colnago62:
#41
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,520
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20810 Post(s)
Liked 9,456 Times
in
4,672 Posts
#42
Blast from the Past
What? Perhaps the average speed doesn't relate, but pretty much every other number in caloso's power file relates directly to the high intensity of the workout. Track has always been power based in a more controlled way than the road. Flat course, progression of fixed gear & cadence. Using power meter numbers for Anaerobic development isn't quite as far along as TSS, TSB, etc but there is a lot of interesting work going on. FRC measurement and sprint stress tracking being a couple of examples.
Last edited by Voodoo76; 12-07-19 at 10:01 AM.
Likes For Voodoo76:
#43
Version 7.0
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 13,130
Bikes: Too Many
Mentioned: 297 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1341 Post(s)
Liked 2,484 Times
in
1,459 Posts
What? Pretty much every other number in caloso's power file relates directly to the high intensity of the workout. 1's can be a puke fest Would agree using power meter numbers for anaerobic development isn't quite as far along as TSS, TSB, etc but there is a lot of interesting work going on. FRC measurement and sprint stress tracking being a couple of examples.
And I train with power at the track as well and many of my friends do as well but it is better for post ride analysis. I do not look at the head unit during a 500 meter time trial it is too technical to do anything other than look at the line of the track and it is a max effort for the entire race. Now, at the end, I want to know my time, my 1/2 lap time and full lap start time. If I am doing flying 100 meter sprints I want to know my time. And if I am doing motor work, I will ask the motor operator for the speed. In general, most trackies mount their head units under the saddle which is UCI compliant for UCI racing.
If I am doing a similar workout on the road or track as Caloso I will review the power profile post ride or look at the Garmin after an effort to see what the average power was for the effort and see if I can raise on the next effort.
The left side of my power curve is defined by results in 500 meter track races. I do not come close on the road. In reality, I should split my tracking power into road and track.
I developed a speed, power and time simulator in Excel and verified the model at Velo Sports Center. It predicts pursuit times based upon various variables including power so it has an aero formulation in it. It is very useful for training and predicting speeds and times for various velodromes at different elevations and testing equipment.
If one does not have power at the track then one needs another person who is good with a stopwatch for time checks.
I also have a couple of track friends who use a simple speedometer and note the finishing speed of an effort and write it down in a log after each effort. And that can be indicative of performance and over long periods of time quite accurate to determine progress. So speed matters.
#44
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
Exactly. On 1’ and shorter intervals I collect the data but I’m not looking at power, just the clock.
#45
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 6,016
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1814 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 923 Times
in
569 Posts
Word
And I train with power at the track as well and many of my friends do as well but it is better for post ride analysis. I do not look at the head unit during a 500 meter time trial it is too technical to do anything other than look at the line of the track and it is a max effort for the entire race. Now, at the end, I want to know my time, my 1/2 lap time and full lap start time. If I am doing flying 100 meter sprints I want to know my time. And if I am doing motor work, I will ask the motor operator for the speed. In general, most trackies mount their head units under the saddle which is UCI compliant for UCI racing.
If I am doing a similar workout on the road or track as Caloso I will review the power profile post ride or look at the Garmin after an effort to see what the average power was for the effort and see if I can raise on the next effort.
The left side of my power curve is defined by results in 500 meter track races. I do not come close on the road. In reality, I should split my tracking power into road and track.
I developed a speed, power and time simulator in Excel and verified the model at Velo Sports Center. It predicts pursuit times based upon various variables including power so it has an aero formulation in it. It is very useful for training and predicting speeds and times for various velodromes at different elevations and testing equipment.
If one does not have power at the track then one needs another person who is good with a stopwatch for time checks.
I also have a couple of track friends who use a simple speedometer and note the finishing speed of an effort and write it down in a log after each effort. And that can be indicative of performance and over long periods of time quite accurate to determine progress. So speed matters.
And I train with power at the track as well and many of my friends do as well but it is better for post ride analysis. I do not look at the head unit during a 500 meter time trial it is too technical to do anything other than look at the line of the track and it is a max effort for the entire race. Now, at the end, I want to know my time, my 1/2 lap time and full lap start time. If I am doing flying 100 meter sprints I want to know my time. And if I am doing motor work, I will ask the motor operator for the speed. In general, most trackies mount their head units under the saddle which is UCI compliant for UCI racing.
If I am doing a similar workout on the road or track as Caloso I will review the power profile post ride or look at the Garmin after an effort to see what the average power was for the effort and see if I can raise on the next effort.
The left side of my power curve is defined by results in 500 meter track races. I do not come close on the road. In reality, I should split my tracking power into road and track.
I developed a speed, power and time simulator in Excel and verified the model at Velo Sports Center. It predicts pursuit times based upon various variables including power so it has an aero formulation in it. It is very useful for training and predicting speeds and times for various velodromes at different elevations and testing equipment.
If one does not have power at the track then one needs another person who is good with a stopwatch for time checks.
I also have a couple of track friends who use a simple speedometer and note the finishing speed of an effort and write it down in a log after each effort. And that can be indicative of performance and over long periods of time quite accurate to determine progress. So speed matters.
Butt units?
#46
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 4,444
Bikes: bikes
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2622 Post(s)
Liked 1,429 Times
in
711 Posts
I'll be a dissenting voice and say that speed does matter. Even though I was already a cat 1 by that point, when I started focusing on speed, really focusing, it helped. I started podiuming way more. I got in more breaks, and I won from more breaks. And the name of the game when you're trying to win from breaks is to go as fast as possible with as little effort as possible.
A lot of that speed revolved around position, but tube/tire choice and aero clothing and equipment also played a part.
As far as going from a cat 5 to a cat 1, your ability to get to the pointy end, stay there, and sprint will determine that more than any other single variable. Some guys do it in two years, some in 6-7, the vast majority never do it. I reckon a category a year is pretty solid, but the proliferation of events in your area and how many you do will have a big impact on upgrade speed. The more you race, the better you get at racing. As a junior, that means as many junior races followed by categorized races as you can do. Get the upgrade to 4 as soon as possible and do jr 17/18, cat 4/5, and cat 3/4 races. Look for something to learn in every single race, and figure out how to put yourself into position to win at the end.
A lot of that speed revolved around position, but tube/tire choice and aero clothing and equipment also played a part.
As far as going from a cat 5 to a cat 1, your ability to get to the pointy end, stay there, and sprint will determine that more than any other single variable. Some guys do it in two years, some in 6-7, the vast majority never do it. I reckon a category a year is pretty solid, but the proliferation of events in your area and how many you do will have a big impact on upgrade speed. The more you race, the better you get at racing. As a junior, that means as many junior races followed by categorized races as you can do. Get the upgrade to 4 as soon as possible and do jr 17/18, cat 4/5, and cat 3/4 races. Look for something to learn in every single race, and figure out how to put yourself into position to win at the end.
#48
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 2,433
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 741 Post(s)
Liked 412 Times
in
230 Posts
What? Perhaps the average speed doesn't relate, but pretty much every other number in caloso's power file relates directly to the high intensity of the workout. Track has always been power based in a more controlled way than the road. Flat course, progression of fixed gear & cadence. Using power meter numbers for Anaerobic development isn't quite as far along as TSS, TSB, etc but there is a lot of interesting work going on. FRC measurement and sprint stress tracking being a couple of examples.
Last edited by colnago62; 12-07-19 at 08:32 PM.
#49
Blast from the Past
There are several threads on the Track forum talking about power meters. The speed guys who are posting talk more about the importance of heart rate, cadence and lap time.There are some inherent problems with sprinting and most power meters in general because of the way they operate, which is why SRM power meters are the gold standard on the track because they use a magnet. Go to the track forum read what the track specialists have to say.
Last edited by Voodoo76; 12-07-19 at 09:09 PM.