Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Commuting
Reload this Page >

You know who you are- Stop giving cyclists a bad name

Search
Notices
Commuting Bicycle commuting is easier than you think, before you know it, you'll be hooked. Learn the tips, hints, equipment, safety requirements for safely riding your bike to work.

You know who you are- Stop giving cyclists a bad name

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-01-11, 11:39 AM
  #26  
dmcdmc
Senior Member
 
dmcdmc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: nyc
Posts: 155

Bikes: gary fisher kaitai, se draft, raleigh record, all pro 3 speed, schwinn cofee, trek 2300, cannondale synapse

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
it's the same with the rest of life...stereotypes are everywhere..cycling is no different.

all you can do is do what you think is right.

I think of it more as idiots vs normal people...whether they're walking, driving or biking
dmcdmc is offline  
Old 11-01-11, 11:56 AM
  #27  
machinestatic
Member
 
machinestatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Cambridge/Boston, MA
Posts: 26
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dmcdmc
it's the same with the rest of life...stereotypes are everywhere..cycling is no different.

all you can do is do what you think is right.
THIS is exactly how I feel. I started bike commuting to work a few months ago, and I can't tell you how many times I've started to write a post on this forum like "I'm so mad that a dozen people ran red lights past me today", and "they're giving cyclists a bad name in the minds of car drivers", etc. But I always stop myself from posting, because when it comes down to it, all I have control over -- read as: all I really care about --is my own riding habits. If I don't want to get killed at an intersection I stop at the red light, end of story. Even if those 12 people I saw read this forum and thought, "Hey, I think I'll stop at the light from now on" the motorists would still think we're all a bunch of anarchist road hogging daredevil jerks. Haha

I get a sense that sub-consciously I (and maybe other folks) wanted to write all of those posts to tell everyone here, "Hey, look at me, I'm a law-abiding cyclist, whoop dee doo", but at the end of the day, who cares. All that really affects is me, and my lower chances of getting turned into paste by the tires of a bus. Yay for me.

Oh, and to the OP, I sit and wait at a red light in a left-turn only lane every night on my way home from work, so regardless of my cynical soapbox comment, I know what you mean.
machinestatic is offline  
Old 11-01-11, 12:03 PM
  #28  
cyclocello
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Central Valley, CA
Posts: 99
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Most cyclists in my neighboring city either salmon up the roads, or ride on sidewalks, and both have unwritten erratic rules with negotiating traffic or "lanes" (i.e. cut across a 6 lane intersection to get to the other sidewalk). Motorists have no choice but to treat them as erratic pedestrians, as they are a constant disruption.

Ironically, hipsters are generally the most consistent and traffic-law following cyclists in this area! So are recreational roadies, but they generally are off on country roads, and would rather drive their cars in-town.
cyclocello is offline  
Old 11-01-11, 12:23 PM
  #29  
Hippiebrian
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Long Beach, Ca.
Posts: 591

Bikes: Raleigh Sojourn, '67 Raleigh Super Course, old Gary Fisher Mamba, and a generic Chinese folder

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by chipcom
remind me to go out to Portland for the Pretty Dress ride next year!


ew!
Hippiebrian is offline  
Old 11-01-11, 12:38 PM
  #30  
alan s 
Senior Member
 
alan s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 6,977
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1496 Post(s)
Liked 189 Times in 128 Posts
Originally Posted by Hippiebrian
ew!
Come on, it's not that bad . . . at least they shaved their legs.
alan s is offline  
Old 11-01-11, 12:42 PM
  #31  
Kojak
Senior Member
 
Kojak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: PNW - Victoria, BC
Posts: 1,486

Bikes: 2002 Litespeed Vortex - 2007 Trek Madone 5.9 - 2004 Redline Conquest Pro - Specialized S-Works Festina Team Model - 93 Cannondale M 800 Beast of the East

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by alan s
. . . at least they shaved their legs.
That ain't helping.
Kojak is offline  
Old 11-01-11, 12:51 PM
  #32  
chipcom 
Infamous Member
 
chipcom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 24,360

Bikes: Surly Big Dummy, Fuji World, 80ish Bianchi

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Mithrandir
Not necessarily. They merely are under the impression that most cyclists break traffic rules. In my experience, most cyclists I've met on the roads seem to be obeying them. Of course, the plural of anecdote is not data, so I can't say with certainty that's the case, but I personally have not witnessed cyclists at large wantonly breaking laws.
Kinda hard to say for certain what any driver's impression of cyclists is unless they have stated them. I would speculate that if a driver's impression is that cyclists wantonly break the law, one of the following is probably true:

1. the majority of cyclists they have observed have been breaking the law
2. the last cyclist they observed was breaking the law
3. they are merely parroting what they have read of heard
__________________
"Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey
chipcom is offline  
Old 11-01-11, 01:14 PM
  #33  
fastbartender
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 141
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I ride like I'm invisible. That means sometimes I might break the law. If I can safely make it through an intersection, I will. I don't care about what anybody thinks about me as long as I live to ride another day. I would rather make aggressive decisions and live with the results, than get smashed by a car from behind while I am stopped waiting for a light. Having a "good name" isn't going to save your life. I am all for being courteous and sharing the road but I'm going to look out for myself first.
fastbartender is offline  
Old 11-01-11, 01:15 PM
  #34  
alan s 
Senior Member
 
alan s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 6,977
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1496 Post(s)
Liked 189 Times in 128 Posts
Most negative opinions of bikes "at large" are based on the fact that bikes are slow, in the way, move unpredictably, fall over, are hard to see and are a general nuisance. Not much you can do to change that. Following traffic laws could help, but could make things worse, such as getting in the way more often.

Last edited by alan s; 11-01-11 at 01:23 PM.
alan s is offline  
Old 11-01-11, 01:20 PM
  #35  
rebel1916
Senior Member
 
rebel1916's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 3,138
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 67 Post(s)
Liked 83 Times in 44 Posts
These scofflaws disgust me.
rebel1916 is offline  
Old 11-01-11, 01:26 PM
  #36  
robberry
Senior Member
 
robberry's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Brooklyn, New York
Posts: 386

Bikes: Trek 3900, Trek 2.3

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
What's wrong with having red tires or carrying a lock with you? I've recently learned that if you get hit by a car in NYC, the ambulance and police will force you to just leave your bike on the side of the road. I'd rather carry a lock so at least there's a chance my bike will still be there.
robberry is offline  
Old 11-01-11, 01:41 PM
  #37  
HappyStuffing
6 miles per taco, w00t!
 
HappyStuffing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 255
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'm with the OP. I can't stand cyclists who flagrantly disobey the law. It really does give other cyclists a bad name. Yes, someone said Darwin will catch up to these people, but that isn't soon enough as far as I'm concerned. They need to die NOW.

Screw those cyclists who bike as if they can do what they want and screw anyone reading this who advocates this mentality in the slightest.

Damn I'm pis.sed off.
HappyStuffing is offline  
Old 11-01-11, 01:42 PM
  #38  
neil
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Edmonton, Canada
Posts: 737
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by blakcloud
I hear this kind of crap all the time and really it is mind boggling. Do you know that car that cut me off yesterday, well did he give all cars a bad name? Do you know that the police have all whole traffic sections dedicated to bad car and truck drivers, at least they do in my city. They even have red light cameras and photo radar for vehicles that break the law. But nowhere do I see vehicles getting a bad name because of these infractions.
It's unfortunate, but it all has to do with our status as "others." When car driver #1 sees car driver #2 behaving badly, driver 1 puts driver 2 into the category of "bad drivers." Because driver 1 isn't a bad driver (in his/her mind), so good and bad drivers are clearly distinct groups.

When that same driver sees a cyclist behaving badly, the cyclist isn't part of some "bad cyclist" group, unless the driver also rides a bike in traffic sometimes. They're just another cyclist, and therefore cyclists don't follow the rules.

Is it a pain? Sure. But it's how peoples minds work, and we're not going to change that. What we can do is complain about bad cyclists and - given the opportunity - try to educate them to be better ambassadors of cycling.
neil is offline  
Old 11-01-11, 02:15 PM
  #39  
Rob_E
Senior Member
 
Rob_E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 2,709

Bikes: Downtube 8H, Surly Troll

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 303 Post(s)
Liked 22 Times in 21 Posts
Originally Posted by chipcom
1. the majority of cyclists they have observed have been breaking the law
2. the last cyclist they observed was breaking the law
3. they are merely parroting what they have read of heard
I would say that the last cyclist they noticed or remember was breaking the law. When you easily overtake a cyclist, you think nothing of it. When you slam on your brakes because someone ran the light in front of you, it scares the **** out of you, and you remember it. Cars, on the other hand, are everywhere. You pay particular attention to them when they are driving badly, but it can hardly escape your notice that you're sharing the road with them almost constantly. I seem to remember studies showing that cars are no more or less law-abiding then bikes, that their rate of traffic infractions are about the same. But cyclists still get the bad rap, which means something other than a simple trend towards lawlessness is at work.

For this reason, rants about "giving cyclists a bad name" strike me as counter productive. There's already no evidence to suggest that cyclists are less law-abiding, so drivers making those arguments are either pre-disposed against cyclists or pre-disposed to remember law-breaking cyclists. In either case, nothing short full compliance from all cyclists paired with full knowledge of proper cycling from all motorists will solve the problem. Neither seems likely,but ranting against law-breaking cyclists one at a time does not seem like a path towards the general public's acceptance of our place on the road.
Rob_E is offline  
Old 11-01-11, 02:31 PM
  #40  
gecho
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,528

Bikes: 2009 Trek 520

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 155 Post(s)
Liked 167 Times in 130 Posts
No matter how many cyclists obey the law, there will always be people upset with us. Currently the popular excuse is how cyclists are breaking the law. If we all obeyed the law, then they'd just change their excuse (too slow, endangering themselves, just don't belong on the road), its sort of like politics in that regard. Many people just feel awkward driving near cyclists. That feels bad, its therefore your fault for making them feel bad.

I think cycling also catches some of the pent up frustrations of society in general. Political correctness means that it is no longer socially acceptable to hate groupings of people based on a wide variety of categorizations (race, gender, etc). Though its perfectly acceptable to hate based on political affiliation, smoking, type of vehicle you drive, being a cyclist and your favorite sports teams.
gecho is offline  
Old 11-01-11, 02:41 PM
  #41  
cellery
Senior Member
 
cellery's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 816
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 59 Post(s)
Liked 31 Times in 12 Posts
Originally Posted by chipcom
Does my riding in a black evening gown without shaving give cyclists a bad name too?
Yes.
cellery is offline  
Old 11-01-11, 03:35 PM
  #42  
matimeo
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
matimeo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 808

Bikes: It's the motor, not the bike, right?

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 39 Post(s)
Liked 16 Times in 13 Posts
Thanks to all who have responded. So I can clarify my original post, I wasn't trying to have a holier than thou attitude, although I hesitated in publishing the post because I knew it might come across that way. And maybe I was a little irked because I waited like a good boy and he cheated and got away with it (this time). Just like if I was taking a test and saw people cheating while the teacher was out of the room. You can bet your biscuits I'm going to tell on each and every one of them if their cheating is going to have a negative impact on my bottom line. I know the offender in question is unlikely to read this, or change their behavior even if they do- but I was hoping it would spark a debate about how we act out there on the road, and I think it has at least done that. Hopefully it makes each of us think a little more carefully about our riding habits. I'm not always a saint when I ride, so I don't mean to be hypocritical- but as my awareness grows I try to be more responsible.
matimeo is offline  
Old 11-01-11, 04:07 PM
  #43  
GriddleCakes
Tawp Dawg
 
GriddleCakes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Anchorage, AK
Posts: 1,221

Bikes: '06 Surly Pugsley, '14 Surly Straggler, '88 Kuwahara Xtracycle, '10 Motobecane Outcast 29er, '?? Surly Cross Check (wife's), '00 Trek 4500 (wife's), '12 Windsor Oxford 3-speed (dogs')

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'm with gecho on this one; even if we all followed the letter of the law tomorrow, motorists wouldn't accept us on the roads. We're too slow, and our presence requires them to pay more attention. We are an extreme and (in the motorists' minds) inconvenient minority, and no amount of putting your foot down at every stop sign is going to change that.

This is what many a law-abiding cyclist thinks when seeing a scofflaw cyclist:
Originally Posted by HappyStuffing
I can't stand cyclists who flagrantly disobey the law. It really does give other cyclists a bad name. Yes, someone said Darwin will catch up to these people, but that isn't soon enough as far as I'm concerned. They need to die NOW.

Screw those cyclists who bike as if they can do what they want and screw anyone reading this who advocates this mentality in the slightest.

Damn I'm pis.sed off.
And this what many a motorist thinks when seeing even a law-abiding cyclist:
I can't stand cyclists. Yes, someone said Darwin will catch up to these people, but that isn't soon enough as far as I'm concerned. They need to die NOW.

Screw those cyclists and screw anyone reading this who advocates this activity in the slightest.

Damn I'm pis.sed off.
neil points out in post #38 that we are viewed as "others", and he's right. The problem is that we will always be others no matter how we ride, because even law abiding cyclists stick out in a modern traffic system like a sore thumb. Until a whole hell of a lot more people start using bikes as transportation, this is going to remain the case.
GriddleCakes is offline  
Old 11-01-11, 04:08 PM
  #44  
Seattle Forrest
Senior Member
 
Seattle Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times in 6,054 Posts
Originally Posted by matimeo
And maybe I was a little irked because I waited like a good boy and he cheated and got away with it (this time).
Don't worry; it's not just this time. He got away with it every day for the past few years, and will continue to.
Seattle Forrest is offline  
Old 11-01-11, 04:46 PM
  #45  
weshigh
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 600

Bikes: All-City Space Horse!

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by matimeo
And maybe I was a little irked because I waited like a good boy and he cheated and got away with it (this time).
I'm a little confused on what was sooo bad about this? I ride in pretty heavy traffic most of my commute. There are times in the left turn lane situation where I will filter between lanes up to the front of the left turn. I usually try to stay in the left turn lane while doing so, but sometimes I have to go into the straight lane for a moment. I'm going the same, or close to the same speed as the cars in the straight lane and don't pull out in front of anyone. Lane filtering is legal, as in, there is no law restricting in CA.
weshigh is offline  
Old 11-01-11, 04:56 PM
  #46  
GriddleCakes
Tawp Dawg
 
GriddleCakes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Anchorage, AK
Posts: 1,221

Bikes: '06 Surly Pugsley, '14 Surly Straggler, '88 Kuwahara Xtracycle, '10 Motobecane Outcast 29er, '?? Surly Cross Check (wife's), '00 Trek 4500 (wife's), '12 Windsor Oxford 3-speed (dogs')

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by weshigh
I'm a little confused on what was sooo bad about this?
It's perceived as a form of cutting in line. Even if it isn't illegal, it's still considered rude. Whether or not you let that bother you is up to you.
GriddleCakes is offline  
Old 11-01-11, 04:56 PM
  #47  
chipcom 
Infamous Member
 
chipcom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 24,360

Bikes: Surly Big Dummy, Fuji World, 80ish Bianchi

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by fastbartender
I ride like I'm invisible. That means sometimes I might break the law. If I can safely make it through an intersection, I will. I don't care about what anybody thinks about me as long as I live to ride another day. I would rather make aggressive decisions and live with the results, than get smashed by a car from behind while I am stopped waiting for a light. Having a "good name" isn't going to save your life. I am all for being courteous and sharing the road but I'm going to look out for myself first.
In over 40 years I have never been smashed by a car from behind while waiting at a light. I have seen more than a few cyclists smashed from a car from the side running a light tho.
__________________
"Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey
chipcom is offline  
Old 11-01-11, 04:57 PM
  #48  
chipcom 
Infamous Member
 
chipcom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 24,360

Bikes: Surly Big Dummy, Fuji World, 80ish Bianchi

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by HappyStuffing
Damn I'm pis.sed off.
Look at the bright side...you ain't being pissed on.
__________________
"Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey
chipcom is offline  
Old 11-01-11, 04:59 PM
  #49  
chipcom 
Infamous Member
 
chipcom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 24,360

Bikes: Surly Big Dummy, Fuji World, 80ish Bianchi

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by matimeo
Thanks to all who have responded. So I can clarify my original post, I wasn't trying to have a holier than thou attitude, although I hesitated in publishing the post because I knew it might come across that way. And maybe I was a little irked because I waited like a good boy and he cheated and got away with it (this time). Just like if I was taking a test and saw people cheating while the teacher was out of the room. You can bet your biscuits I'm going to tell on each and every one of them if their cheating is going to have a negative impact on my bottom line. I know the offender in question is unlikely to read this, or change their behavior even if they do- but I was hoping it would spark a debate about how we act out there on the road, and I think it has at least done that. Hopefully it makes each of us think a little more carefully about our riding habits. I'm not always a saint when I ride, so I don't mean to be hypocritical- but as my awareness grows I try to be more responsible.
Well one point that nobody has made....there outta be a law against red tires.
__________________
"Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey
chipcom is offline  
Old 11-01-11, 05:01 PM
  #50  
weshigh
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 600

Bikes: All-City Space Horse!

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by GriddleCakes
It's perceived as a form of cutting in line. Even if it isn't illegal, it's still considered rude. Whether or not you let that bother you is up to you.
I can see that, I've just never consider it to be rude as a driver or rider. I am usually almost all the way across the intersection of the left turn by the time the next car behind me even starts to turn. All the streets that I would do it on, I also make sure that I am out of the way of the cars behind once through the turn. I guess as usual, it all comes down to individual circumstance.
weshigh is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.