5'9" riders on 54cm frames?
#26
Wheelsuck
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,158
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Duh, I could have read farther down. Felt has a pretty tight head tube on their F series bikes and there's always the custom route like CDR. You guys get good deals through Specialized, though, right?
#27
moth -----> flame
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 5,916
Bikes: 11 CAAD 10-4, 07 Specialized Roubaix Comp, 98 Peugeot Horizon
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Another 5'9" guy with a 54 frame (roubaix)
__________________
BF, in a nutshell
BF, in a nutshell
#28
works for truffles
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,037
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
- 5'-10"
- 54 frame
- one 5mm spacer
- 8mm cone spacer
- 140mm IS HT
- 130mm stem
- 54 frame
- one 5mm spacer
- 8mm cone spacer
- 140mm IS HT
- 130mm stem
Last edited by pigmode; 09-22-10 at 12:01 AM.
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Kimpo, S. Korea
Posts: 696
Bikes: Specialized Roubaix Expert 09, Custom 2013 Bike Friday Pocket Rocket
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
5'8 and ride a 54 roubaix. 100mm stem but I want to switch it out to 120.
Think i would have liked a 52 at first but grew accustomed to 54. Still I'd consider a 52 more next time.
Think i would have liked a 52 at first but grew accustomed to 54. Still I'd consider a 52 more next time.
#31
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 226
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm 5'10" with a 34" cycling inseam (long legs). I ride a 56cm Tarmac and have exactly 9cm of saddle to bar drop (measured from top of saddle to top of bars) with all spacers in tact and the stem at -6*.
With a 32" inseam I would go with the 54.
With a 32" inseam I would go with the 54.
#32
My grammar sucks.
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NYC
Posts: 488
Bikes: Merlin Extralight, Colnago Crystal, Serotta Club Special
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
i'm 5'9 and a half with a 31.5 inseam.
i ride a 55.5tt, 90mm stem and short reach bars (shimano 10s)
i ride a 54.5tt, 90mm stem and standard reach bars. (campy circa 2006 10s)
i ride a 55tt commuter with a 90mm stem and mustache bars.
all have relatively short headtube lengths and my saddle to bar drop is about 4-5 cm.
they all fit me well. the 54.5 actually fits the best.
i mention the groupsets because a lot of my position on the hoods is also dependent on the shape and length of the hoods themselves. the shimanos extend my reach just a touch, whereas the campy shortens it just a touch.
i ride a 55.5tt, 90mm stem and short reach bars (shimano 10s)
i ride a 54.5tt, 90mm stem and standard reach bars. (campy circa 2006 10s)
i ride a 55tt commuter with a 90mm stem and mustache bars.
all have relatively short headtube lengths and my saddle to bar drop is about 4-5 cm.
they all fit me well. the 54.5 actually fits the best.
i mention the groupsets because a lot of my position on the hoods is also dependent on the shape and length of the hoods themselves. the shimanos extend my reach just a touch, whereas the campy shortens it just a touch.
Last edited by a_phat_beat; 09-22-10 at 01:41 AM.
#33
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,224
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
6 Posts
I am very very glad to be rid of the bone rattler. Heck of a fast bike though.
#34
Pedal Warrior
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NorCal
Posts: 486
Bikes: 2010 Specialized Allez with SRAM Force gruppo
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
i feel at home in this thread. Better than reading that thread about that 6'8" guy looking for a bike.
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,901
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1869 Post(s)
Liked 666 Times
in
508 Posts
54 cm puts you in the right range but like umd says, there are no hard rules here and if you get a proper fitting should discover that there is a range of frames you can ride... for me it is 52-55 but what is most important is top tube and reach.
I'm 5'9 1/2 " and prefer a 55cm as I have a little longer leg (33) and need a little more reach but have a fg road bike that is a 52 with a 54 cm top tube which is also a very nice fit.
I'm 5'9 1/2 " and prefer a 55cm as I have a little longer leg (33) and need a little more reach but have a fg road bike that is a 52 with a 54 cm top tube which is also a very nice fit.
I tend to like bigger frames since I like the bars just a bit below teh saddle.
#36
fuggitivo solitario
5'8.5". i ride a frame with a TT of 54.5 with a 110mm -73 stem. my next bike will have a shorter TT (say 53) and a longer stem.
you know, most titanium bikes have very short head tubes. a merlin extralight with 54.5 TT has a HT of 11cm
you know, most titanium bikes have very short head tubes. a merlin extralight with 54.5 TT has a HT of 11cm
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 98
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#40
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 7,571
Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1853 Post(s)
Liked 680 Times
in
431 Posts
I'm 5'10" and I ride a 56 Cannondale or 56 Specialized. My wife is 5'9". She rides a 54 Roubaix. I don't know the exactly inseams, but I have very long legs/ short torso, while my wife is the opposite.
I can adjust the fit on her bike and ride it fine. She, however, cannot ride my bikes.
I can adjust the fit on her bike and ride it fine. She, however, cannot ride my bikes.
#41
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 392
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
It's all about headtube and top tube. I am the exact size and I've been on 53, 54, 55. The 53 HT length killed me. Some 55 top tube length killed me. Start with the right comfortable top tube length and headtube length (that is good for your flexibilty). From there you can play with stem length and stem angle, bar reach etc.
If the TT or HT is too short or long to begin with you are dead in the water from the start. The amount of tweaking (stem purchasing, handlebar purchasing swapping, etc.) will drive you crazy
If the TT or HT is too short or long to begin with you are dead in the water from the start. The amount of tweaking (stem purchasing, handlebar purchasing swapping, etc.) will drive you crazy
#42
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Raleigh NC
Posts: 358
Bikes: Takara 10 spd, Felt F90, Felt Q720
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
5'11", 32" inseam, 54cm FELT with a 100mm stem, been on it for 4 years
#43
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Memphis,TN
Posts: 18
Bikes: Cervelo R3 Lynskey R310
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Five nine and a half inch---Cervelo 54 or 56 with short stem, short legs inseam pants not bike 31
#44
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Westwood MA (just south of Boston)
Posts: 2,215
Bikes: 2009 Trek Soho
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
5'8.5" with a 28.5" inseam on a 54cm. it fits though a 52 might be a better fit for me.
#45
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,848
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Frames nowadays fit pretty big but as many people say the important number in there is the top tube length and if the bike has slope we are talking about virtual top tube length. Many of the 54s frames moving around are between 54.5 and 55.5 cms in length, so technically it is like a 55 in old steel school so the 54 is about right. Always go for the TT now, what the brand calls to a size is worthless now a days.
5,10 30ish inseam, medium bmc 55 , large kuota 55.5
5,10 30ish inseam, medium bmc 55 , large kuota 55.5
#46
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Boston
Posts: 4,556
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Frames nowadays fit pretty big but as many people say the important number in there is the top tube length and if the bike has slope we are talking about virtual top tube length. Many of the 54s frames moving around are between 54.5 and 55.5 cms in length, so technically it is like a 55 in old steel school so the 54 is about right. Always go for the TT now, what the brand calls to a size is worthless now a days.
5,10 30ish inseam, medium bmc 55 , large kuota 55.5
5,10 30ish inseam, medium bmc 55 , large kuota 55.5
I'm 5'9" and ride a 54 in a modern compact geometry road bike. I have short legs and a long torso, so I need the 54 to not feel cramped. I'm sure that personal preference matters too. Some guys like a really small bike. I don't.
#47
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Moraga, CA
Posts: 1,701
Bikes: 2008 Cervelo RS, 2011 Scott CR1 Elite, 2014 Volagi Liscio
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I'm 5'9.5" and I ride a Cervelo RS with a 80 mm stem. And, no, it's not twitchy.
#48
fuggitivo solitario
#50
Wheelsuck
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,158
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Didn't we already talk about the 110mm headtube on your bike or do you just not believe me? You have to add the headset stack dimension in as well, which is another 34mm. The total head tube length on your bike is about 145mm, which is on par with about everyone else. You don't have to believe me, grab a tape measure for yourself. Also, I'm willing to bet your -73 degree stem is actually a -17. Your front end is low, for sure, but let's keep things in perspective.