Sad Sack “Cyclist?”
#1
Cycle Year Round
Thread Starter
Sad Sack “Cyclist?”
The last few months, there has been a large jump in the number of threads that claim cyclist cause all their own problems (mostly in A&S but in other sub-forums as well). The first claim in these threads and by their supporters is along the lines “I am a cyclist as well”. The OP then goes along the lines of the bad image that ‘some’ cyclist cause creating problems for everyone else by doing thing like taking the lane. This is followed by claims of the cyclist being rude, arrogant, disrespectful and even unlawful for the supposed claim of ‘impeding traffic’.
In the past such claims against cyclist have been made by people that have clearly never cycled. Fireman Rob comes to mind. (Fireman Rob = a bubba Georgia guy who loaded his motorcycle in a truck with his buddies to drive down to Florida to recreational motorcycle ride and is only a volunteer medic to boost his ego).
These days, when I have dug into the Original Poster and their supporters, I find that most are complaining about cycle commuters or experience road riders in narrow lanes taking the lane while the complainer is driving a truck or SUV. Most times it is during rush hour. Further digging reveals these ‘cyclist’ are weekend MUP riders that think we cycling commuters should not ride on any of their highways or at least should be in the gutter with the glass and out of the way of their SUV/truck.
When we read a news article of a cyclist who get hit with no fault of their own, there is always one of these guys jumping in the comments saying ‘I am a cyclist too, but these guys give us all a bad name, I would never ride on that road, I would never impede traffic, all cyclist should gutter huge and stay out of the way’.
If these guys want to consider cycling as only a hobby, only recreational ride on MUPs, that is OK by me. I have never put them down for their choice of cycling (I have pointed out in threads that they know nothing of cycle commuting). I have never claimed they give ALL cyclist a bad image/name.
So why do these guys feel so compelled to put us cycle commuters and experienced road riders down and blame us for all their woes? Who is REALLY giving cyclist a bad image with their misinformation, demands and claims?
In the past such claims against cyclist have been made by people that have clearly never cycled. Fireman Rob comes to mind. (Fireman Rob = a bubba Georgia guy who loaded his motorcycle in a truck with his buddies to drive down to Florida to recreational motorcycle ride and is only a volunteer medic to boost his ego).
These days, when I have dug into the Original Poster and their supporters, I find that most are complaining about cycle commuters or experience road riders in narrow lanes taking the lane while the complainer is driving a truck or SUV. Most times it is during rush hour. Further digging reveals these ‘cyclist’ are weekend MUP riders that think we cycling commuters should not ride on any of their highways or at least should be in the gutter with the glass and out of the way of their SUV/truck.
When we read a news article of a cyclist who get hit with no fault of their own, there is always one of these guys jumping in the comments saying ‘I am a cyclist too, but these guys give us all a bad name, I would never ride on that road, I would never impede traffic, all cyclist should gutter huge and stay out of the way’.
If these guys want to consider cycling as only a hobby, only recreational ride on MUPs, that is OK by me. I have never put them down for their choice of cycling (I have pointed out in threads that they know nothing of cycle commuting). I have never claimed they give ALL cyclist a bad image/name.
So why do these guys feel so compelled to put us cycle commuters and experienced road riders down and blame us for all their woes? Who is REALLY giving cyclist a bad image with their misinformation, demands and claims?
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
#2
Noobie of the year :)
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Hour South of Boston
Posts: 287
Bikes: 1980's Miyata Seven Ten
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm not a cyclist. I'm a person on a bicycle riding to work. We need to stop grouping people into specific groups, it makes it too easy to target them.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 720
Bikes: 2012 Cinelli Mystic Rat, Nashbar CX
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I hear ya CB.
All boils down to pure selfishness. Same asinine cyclist hang up as the guy who thinks it cute to stomp the accelerator pedal and smoke out cyclists who are out minding their own business trying to make it safely to work, or get in their training mileage. Their truck/car is more expensive than my bike...therefore they are more "entitled" (if you will...) to the roads than cyclists are.
It's easy to hate on people when they delay others from reaching the red light or stop sign by .02 seconds.
*Some* people are falsely led my the misconception that cyclists do not pay road taxes. This is also fed by the other misconception that bicycles have no rights on the roads so they should be on the MUP or sidewalk.
I admit there are a *few* cyclists out there who either don't know how to ride properly, or they want to be scofflaws. Those folks can give us all a bad name. Those of us who actually do commute or ride on a routine basis know that this is not smart. If we were to ride foolishly every time we rode, then the law of averages will catch up to us.
I do in fact, pay taxes. I just decide to use a different vehicle than driving my car. If anything, they should be thanking us for allowing them to be able to purchase our share of gas so they can continue to drive their big trucks and SUV's to work to the tune of $100 to $200 a week.
All boils down to pure selfishness. Same asinine cyclist hang up as the guy who thinks it cute to stomp the accelerator pedal and smoke out cyclists who are out minding their own business trying to make it safely to work, or get in their training mileage. Their truck/car is more expensive than my bike...therefore they are more "entitled" (if you will...) to the roads than cyclists are.
It's easy to hate on people when they delay others from reaching the red light or stop sign by .02 seconds.
*Some* people are falsely led my the misconception that cyclists do not pay road taxes. This is also fed by the other misconception that bicycles have no rights on the roads so they should be on the MUP or sidewalk.
I admit there are a *few* cyclists out there who either don't know how to ride properly, or they want to be scofflaws. Those folks can give us all a bad name. Those of us who actually do commute or ride on a routine basis know that this is not smart. If we were to ride foolishly every time we rode, then the law of averages will catch up to us.
I do in fact, pay taxes. I just decide to use a different vehicle than driving my car. If anything, they should be thanking us for allowing them to be able to purchase our share of gas so they can continue to drive their big trucks and SUV's to work to the tune of $100 to $200 a week.
#5
Cycle Year Round
Thread Starter
For me, all forms of cycling are good.
Bad is putting other cyclist down and blaming them for the bad behavior of motorist rather than supporting cyclist by trying to educate both cyclist and motorist in safe cycling and driving.
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
#6
Banned
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Northern California
Posts: 5,804
Bikes: Raleigh Grand Prix, Giant Innova, Nishiki Sebring, Trek 7.5FX
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The last few months, there has been a large jump in the number of threads that claim cyclist cause all their own problems (mostly in A&S but in other sub-forums as well). The first claim in these threads and by their supporters is along the lines “I am a cyclist as well”. The OP then goes along the lines of the bad image that ‘some’ cyclist cause creating problems for everyone else by doing thing like taking the lane. This is followed by claims of the cyclist being rude, arrogant, disrespectful and even unlawful for the supposed claim of ‘impeding traffic’.
In the past such claims against cyclist have been made by people that have clearly never cycled. Fireman Rob comes to mind. (Fireman Rob = a bubba Georgia guy who loaded his motorcycle in a truck with his buddies to drive down to Florida to recreational motorcycle ride and is only a volunteer medic to boost his ego).
These days, when I have dug into the Original Poster and their supporters, I find that most are complaining about cycle commuters or experience road riders in narrow lanes taking the lane while the complainer is driving a truck or SUV. Most times it is during rush hour. Further digging reveals these ‘cyclist’ are weekend MUP riders that think we cycling commuters should not ride on any of their highways or at least should be in the gutter with the glass and out of the way of their SUV/truck.
When we read a news article of a cyclist who get hit with no fault of their own, there is always one of these guys jumping in the comments saying ‘I am a cyclist too, but these guys give us all a bad name, I would never ride on that road, I would never impede traffic, all cyclist should gutter huge and stay out of the way’.
If these guys want to consider cycling as only a hobby, only recreational ride on MUPs, that is OK by me. I have never put them down for their choice of cycling (I have pointed out in threads that they know nothing of cycle commuting). I have never claimed they give ALL cyclist a bad image/name.
So why do these guys feel so compelled to put us cycle commuters and experienced road riders down and blame us for all their woes? Who is REALLY giving cyclist a bad image with their misinformation, demands and claims?
In the past such claims against cyclist have been made by people that have clearly never cycled. Fireman Rob comes to mind. (Fireman Rob = a bubba Georgia guy who loaded his motorcycle in a truck with his buddies to drive down to Florida to recreational motorcycle ride and is only a volunteer medic to boost his ego).
These days, when I have dug into the Original Poster and their supporters, I find that most are complaining about cycle commuters or experience road riders in narrow lanes taking the lane while the complainer is driving a truck or SUV. Most times it is during rush hour. Further digging reveals these ‘cyclist’ are weekend MUP riders that think we cycling commuters should not ride on any of their highways or at least should be in the gutter with the glass and out of the way of their SUV/truck.
When we read a news article of a cyclist who get hit with no fault of their own, there is always one of these guys jumping in the comments saying ‘I am a cyclist too, but these guys give us all a bad name, I would never ride on that road, I would never impede traffic, all cyclist should gutter huge and stay out of the way’.
If these guys want to consider cycling as only a hobby, only recreational ride on MUPs, that is OK by me. I have never put them down for their choice of cycling (I have pointed out in threads that they know nothing of cycle commuting). I have never claimed they give ALL cyclist a bad image/name.
So why do these guys feel so compelled to put us cycle commuters and experienced road riders down and blame us for all their woes? Who is REALLY giving cyclist a bad image with their misinformation, demands and claims?
This actually, reminds me of other minority types, as well....
- Slim
PS.
Psychologically speaking, they appear to find greater security in aligning themselves with the majority, regardless as to how irrational the stance or position of the majority.
Last edited by SlimRider; 11-28-11 at 11:32 AM.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 1,834
Bikes: 05 Trek 5200, 07 Trek 520, 99 GT Karakoram, 08 Surly 1X1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
That said, there is very little to take seriously in A & S..
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Bay Area, Calif.
Posts: 7,239
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 659 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
Partly agree, but I think a large part of it is the perception that they are causing some delay unnecessarily. When I was bike commuting (I've since retired) I noticed that I encountered a higher level of hostility from drivers whenever my route changed (new job location, construction detour, etc.) and that after a number of days on the new route I no longer got the angry shouts or horn beeps. Presumably I was still delaying (or not delaying) other traffic by the same amount, but instead of being perceived as that 'idiot playing in traffic on his bike' I think the realization set in that if they saw me on the road each day at about the same time and place that I was likely doing the same thing they were - getting to and from work.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
#10
Half way there
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 1,109
Bikes: 69 Hercules, 73 Raleigh Sports, 74 Raliegh Competition, 78 Nishiki Professional, 79 Nishiki International, 83 Colnago Super, 83 Viner Junior
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Too much generalizing. I reckon I put an equal number of miles on my bike as my truck, but regardless of what vehicle I am using, I call it like I see it. Does this mean if I complain about a wacky cyclist that I see while driving, it is different than complaining about the same wacky cyclist if I am on my bike when I see him or her? Of course I do have a different frame of reference than most motorists and so I understand why cyclists do certain things (like taking the lane). On the other hand, there are some things that some cyclists do that I will never understand.
It's interesting that I complain about behaviors of motorists more often when I am driving than when I am cycling.
-G
-G
It's interesting that I complain about behaviors of motorists more often when I am driving than when I am cycling.
-G
-G
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
Why is cyclist in quotes in the thread title? A cyclist is a person on a bike. If English is a second language, you can verify this in a dictionary.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Brownsville, TX
Posts: 2,174
Bikes: Surly CC
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I believe he used cyclist in quotes to emphasis the word. Bold or some other variable might have had the same, desired effect.
CB, it's a difficult, and dangerous leap of assumption on all parts that leads to this type of identity fraud and misunderstanding. I spoke to a co-worker today who informed me that he saw me "walking the other day toward the building," co-worker Mo said. I affirmed that, yep, it probably was me. He called me a bum; jesting was the apparent intent. Ultimately, I asked him if he really thought I was giving the impression of being impoverished by simply walking to-and-from work and the university. They are geometrically "triangulated" perfectly from my condo - 2 miles give or take between all of them. His simple answer was that yes, in fact, I needed to "man up" and drive my car any distance greater than about 2-3 blocks. Bike or otherwise, if I wasn't in a car - I wasn't able to understand the adult world. Internally, I wanted to do some magic trick where I pulled his head out of his own ass with a satisfying "pop" sound from the obvious suction, but I did ask - and was answered.
On point of the post, this guy isn't abnormal or in any way out of the ordinary for the day-to-day individuals I meet in the RGV. If he thinks walking 2 miles is "too far," then he'd probably be insulted at the idea of almost any real commuting distance by bike, train, camel, bus or any other public transportation that didn't show his virility through his car. Generation after generation has taught boys that cars are the symbol of success, women like men who are successful - ergo - successful men who have women (and breed) do not ride bikes. With that logic, anybody on a bike is inferior and should GTFO of the way of "real men."
CB, it's a difficult, and dangerous leap of assumption on all parts that leads to this type of identity fraud and misunderstanding. I spoke to a co-worker today who informed me that he saw me "walking the other day toward the building," co-worker Mo said. I affirmed that, yep, it probably was me. He called me a bum; jesting was the apparent intent. Ultimately, I asked him if he really thought I was giving the impression of being impoverished by simply walking to-and-from work and the university. They are geometrically "triangulated" perfectly from my condo - 2 miles give or take between all of them. His simple answer was that yes, in fact, I needed to "man up" and drive my car any distance greater than about 2-3 blocks. Bike or otherwise, if I wasn't in a car - I wasn't able to understand the adult world. Internally, I wanted to do some magic trick where I pulled his head out of his own ass with a satisfying "pop" sound from the obvious suction, but I did ask - and was answered.
On point of the post, this guy isn't abnormal or in any way out of the ordinary for the day-to-day individuals I meet in the RGV. If he thinks walking 2 miles is "too far," then he'd probably be insulted at the idea of almost any real commuting distance by bike, train, camel, bus or any other public transportation that didn't show his virility through his car. Generation after generation has taught boys that cars are the symbol of success, women like men who are successful - ergo - successful men who have women (and breed) do not ride bikes. With that logic, anybody on a bike is inferior and should GTFO of the way of "real men."
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 1,834
Bikes: 05 Trek 5200, 07 Trek 520, 99 GT Karakoram, 08 Surly 1X1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#15
Cycle Year Round
Thread Starter
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 720
Bikes: 2012 Cinelli Mystic Rat, Nashbar CX
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I wonder if he's really pissed that his dad buys and wins races on a new carbon bike every other year, and here he is riding this piece of krap another year in the same, lame, event...
I'm with ya little brother.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: So of Seattle
Posts: 63
Bikes: Trek 800
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
USA needs cycle paths similar to Holland: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BGI-tSBItiw This is a comparison between Dutch and German paths. In Europe the red pavement is reserved for bicycles.
#18
Senior Member
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Henderson/Las Vegas NV
Posts: 1,498
Bikes: Giant Defy 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The last few months, there has been a large jump in the number of threads that claim cyclist cause all their own problems (mostly in A&S but in other sub-forums as well). The first claim in these threads and by their supporters is along the lines “I am a cyclist as well”. The OP then goes along the lines of the bad image that ‘some’ cyclist cause creating problems for everyone else by doing thing like taking the lane. This is followed by claims of the cyclist being rude, arrogant, disrespectful and even unlawful for the supposed claim of ‘impeding traffic’.
In the past such claims against cyclist have been made by people that have clearly never cycled. Fireman Rob comes to mind. (Fireman Rob = a bubba Georgia guy who loaded his motorcycle in a truck with his buddies to drive down to Florida to recreational motorcycle ride and is only a volunteer medic to boost his ego).
These days, when I have dug into the Original Poster and their supporters, I find that most are complaining about cycle commuters or experience road riders in narrow lanes taking the lane while the complainer is driving a truck or SUV. Most times it is during rush hour. Further digging reveals these ‘cyclist’ are weekend MUP riders that think we cycling commuters should not ride on any of their highways or at least should be in the gutter with the glass and out of the way of their SUV/truck.
When we read a news article of a cyclist who get hit with no fault of their own, there is always one of these guys jumping in the comments saying ‘I am a cyclist too, but these guys give us all a bad name, I would never ride on that road, I would never impede traffic, all cyclist should gutter huge and stay out of the way’.
If these guys want to consider cycling as only a hobby, only recreational ride on MUPs, that is OK by me. I have never put them down for their choice of cycling (I have pointed out in threads that they know nothing of cycle commuting). I have never claimed they give ALL cyclist a bad image/name.
So why do these guys feel so compelled to put us cycle commuters and experienced road riders down and blame us for all their woes? Who is REALLY giving cyclist a bad image with their misinformation, demands and claims?
In the past such claims against cyclist have been made by people that have clearly never cycled. Fireman Rob comes to mind. (Fireman Rob = a bubba Georgia guy who loaded his motorcycle in a truck with his buddies to drive down to Florida to recreational motorcycle ride and is only a volunteer medic to boost his ego).
These days, when I have dug into the Original Poster and their supporters, I find that most are complaining about cycle commuters or experience road riders in narrow lanes taking the lane while the complainer is driving a truck or SUV. Most times it is during rush hour. Further digging reveals these ‘cyclist’ are weekend MUP riders that think we cycling commuters should not ride on any of their highways or at least should be in the gutter with the glass and out of the way of their SUV/truck.
When we read a news article of a cyclist who get hit with no fault of their own, there is always one of these guys jumping in the comments saying ‘I am a cyclist too, but these guys give us all a bad name, I would never ride on that road, I would never impede traffic, all cyclist should gutter huge and stay out of the way’.
If these guys want to consider cycling as only a hobby, only recreational ride on MUPs, that is OK by me. I have never put them down for their choice of cycling (I have pointed out in threads that they know nothing of cycle commuting). I have never claimed they give ALL cyclist a bad image/name.
So why do these guys feel so compelled to put us cycle commuters and experienced road riders down and blame us for all their woes? Who is REALLY giving cyclist a bad image with their misinformation, demands and claims?
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 1,834
Bikes: 05 Trek 5200, 07 Trek 520, 99 GT Karakoram, 08 Surly 1X1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Henderson/Las Vegas NV
Posts: 1,498
Bikes: Giant Defy 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Tampa/St. Pete, Florida
Posts: 9,352
Bikes: Specialized Hardrock Mountain (Stolen); Giant Seek 2 (Stolen); Diamondback Ascent mid 1980 - 1997
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 62 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
The last few months, there has been a large jump in the number of threads that claim cyclist cause all their own problems (mostly in A&S but in other sub-forums as well). The first claim in these threads and by their supporters is along the lines “I am a cyclist as well”. The OP then goes along the lines of the bad image that ‘some’ cyclist cause creating problems for everyone else by doing thing like taking the lane. This is followed by claims of the cyclist being rude, arrogant, disrespectful and even unlawful for the supposed claim of ‘impeding traffic’.
In the past such claims against cyclist have been made by people that have clearly never cycled. Fireman Rob comes to mind. (Fireman Rob = a bubba Georgia guy who loaded his motorcycle in a truck with his buddies to drive down to Florida to recreational motorcycle ride and is only a volunteer medic to boost his ego).
These days, when I have dug into the Original Poster and their supporters, I find that most are complaining about cycle commuters or experience road riders in narrow lanes taking the lane while the complainer is driving a truck or SUV. Most times it is during rush hour. Further digging reveals these ‘cyclist’ are weekend MUP riders that think we cycling commuters should not ride on any of their highways or at least should be in the gutter with the glass and out of the way of their SUV/truck.
When we read a news article of a cyclist who get hit with no fault of their own, there is always one of these guys jumping in the comments saying ‘I am a cyclist too, but these guys give us all a bad name, I would never ride on that road, I would never impede traffic, all cyclist should gutter huge and stay out of the way.’
If these guys want to consider cycling as only a hobby, only recreational ride on MUPs, that is OK by me. I have never put them down for their choice of cycling (I have pointed out in threads that they know nothing of cycle commuting). I have never claimed they give ALL cyclist a bad image/name.
So why do these guys feel so compelled to put us cycle commuters and experienced road riders down and blame us for all their woes? Who is REALLY giving cyclist a bad image with their misinformation, demands and claims?
So why do these guys feel so compelled to put us cycle commuters and experienced road riders down and blame us for all their woes? Who is REALLY giving cyclist a bad image with their misinformation, demands and claims?
Last edited by Digital_Cowboy; 11-30-11 at 02:09 PM.
#24
Infamous Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 24,360
Bikes: Surly Big Dummy, Fuji World, 80ish Bianchi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
I blame the tea parties...and Obama.
__________________
"Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey
"Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 8,896
Bikes: Waterford RST-22, Bob Jackson World Tour, Ritchey Breakaway Cross, Soma Saga, De Bernardi SL, Specialized Sequoia
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 196 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
4 Posts
Around here, people mostly complain about recreational cyclists on large group rides. Two reasons for that: (1) hardly any one bike commutes; (2) group rides often consist of 20-40 cyclists who block the entire lane for about 1/4 mile, ignore traffic signals, etc. I get honked and yelled at all the time on group rides but rarely ever when I'm commuting.