Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Saddle height

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Saddle height

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-22-14, 10:55 AM
  #1  
veganpower
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 53
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Saddle height

Can you guys tell if my saddle is too high or too low from the look of this picture:
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
leg rätt.jpg (97.8 KB, 198 views)
veganpower is offline  
Old 03-22-14, 11:56 AM
  #2  
Cookiemonsta
Senior Member
 
Cookiemonsta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 533
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
To be honest you can never really tell from a picture. But at first glance it seems kind of an ok length in the sense that how far you leg extends at the lowest point looks pretty natural. But no one here can tell from a picture better than you can yourself.
Cookiemonsta is offline  
Old 03-22-14, 12:14 PM
  #3  
surgeonstone
Senior Member
 
surgeonstone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: South Bend IN
Posts: 11,218

Bikes: 1976 FRESCHI, 2004 Crumpton.

Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 925 Post(s)
Liked 21 Times in 10 Posts
Originally Posted by veganpower
Can you guys tell if my saddle is too high or too low from the look of this picture:
Looks about right to me.
surgeonstone is offline  
Old 03-22-14, 01:11 PM
  #4  
rpenmanparker 
Senior Member
 
rpenmanparker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 28,682

Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build

Mentioned: 110 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 58 Times in 36 Posts
Does your ass rock when you peddle. That is a primary sign of too high. You are definitely not too low.
__________________
Robert

Originally Posted by LAJ
No matter where I go, here I am...
rpenmanparker is offline  
Old 03-22-14, 01:59 PM
  #5  
Reynolds 
Passista
 
Reynolds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,660

Bikes: 1998 Pinarello Asolo, 1992 KHS Montaña pro, 1980 Raleigh DL-1, IGH Hybrid, IGH Utility

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 890 Post(s)
Liked 754 Times in 412 Posts
As said above, you need to watch the actual pedaling and not a picture. However, it looks a little bit low to me - but that depends on your pedaling style.
Reynolds is offline  
Old 03-22-14, 03:11 PM
  #6  
Fiery
Senior Member
 
Fiery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,361
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 242 Post(s)
Liked 18 Times in 13 Posts
You're in the right ballpark, not excessively high or low. Get some longer rides in and adjust if you feel any problems. In general, front knee pain - go higher, back knee and Achilles tendon pain - go lower. Do not adjust by more than 2-3mm at a time.
Fiery is offline  
Old 03-22-14, 03:47 PM
  #7  
veganpower
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 53
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Fiery
You're in the right ballpark, not excessively high or low. Get some longer rides in and adjust if you feel any problems. In general, front knee pain - go higher, back knee and Achilles tendon pain - go lower. Do not adjust by more than 2-3mm at a time.
I did a 130km ride today with the saddle 2 mm higher than this but didn't feel right so I lowered it, now I've lowered it even more. Now it should be fine. When the picture was taken the saddle height was at 75.5 now it's at 75.2. According to the lemond method it should be above 76 cm since I have a inseam of around 86 cm.
veganpower is offline  
Old 03-22-14, 04:05 PM
  #8  
veganpower
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 53
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
This is how it looks now after I lowered it from 75.4 to 75.1. Is that better?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
75.2 ....jpg (99.0 KB, 106 views)
veganpower is offline  
Old 03-22-14, 04:17 PM
  #9  
datlas 
Should Be More Popular
 
datlas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 43,266

Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix

Mentioned: 561 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22769 Post(s)
Liked 9,169 Times in 4,253 Posts
Both look like they are in the ballpark. Can you post a video of you pedaling (on a trainer)? Hard to say more than ballpark from a static pic.
__________________
Originally Posted by rjones28
Addiction is all about class.
datlas is offline  
Old 03-22-14, 04:19 PM
  #10  
datlas 
Should Be More Popular
 
datlas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 43,266

Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix

Mentioned: 561 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22769 Post(s)
Liked 9,169 Times in 4,253 Posts
BTW maybe it's an optical illusion, but the drivetrain looks strange. Looks like the chainrings are facing us but the RD/cassette is facing away from us.

Or is it just me??
__________________
Originally Posted by rjones28
Addiction is all about class.
datlas is offline  
Old 03-22-14, 04:25 PM
  #11  
veganpower
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 53
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by datlas
BTW maybe it's an optical illusion, but the drivetrain looks strange. Looks like the chainrings are facing us but the RD/cassette is facing away from us.

Or is it just me??
On the picture both the drive train and cassette and RD is on the left side due to the way I took the photo.
veganpower is offline  
Old 03-22-14, 04:28 PM
  #12  
veganpower
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 53
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by datlas
Both look like they are in the ballpark. Can you post a video of you pedaling (on a trainer)? Hard to say more than ballpark from a static pic.
Maybe I'll do that tomorrow, it's getting late. Have to be up early tomorrow for a pre-Milan-San remo ride
veganpower is offline  
Old 03-22-14, 06:23 PM
  #13  
3rdcoast
Full Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: South Texas
Posts: 207

Bikes: 2019 Giant Propel, 2017 Giant Revolt, 2015 Cervelo P3, 2011 Scott Addict R1, 2008 Giant OCR c3,

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
The pic is taken thru a mirror
3rdcoast is offline  
Old 03-22-14, 08:22 PM
  #14  
Jiggle
Senior Member
 
Jiggle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Somewhere in TX
Posts: 2,266

Bikes: BH, Cervelo, Cube, Canyon

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 212 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
You guy's are totally missing the point.

Nice legs, bro. Very muscular.

That's all he wanted us to say.
Jiggle is offline  
Old 03-23-14, 12:56 AM
  #15  
veganpower
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 53
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jiggle
You guy's are totally missing the point.

Nice legs, bro. Very muscular.

That's all he wanted us to say.
Haha, not really. I have been messing around with my saddle for the past week, it's getting real frustrating.
veganpower is offline  
Old 03-23-14, 02:19 AM
  #16  
link0
Senior Member
 
link0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 794

Bikes: '11 Merlin Extralight, '98 Dean Castanza, '89 Schwinn Prologue

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Saddle looks about 1cm too high to me. Your foot is pointed a bit too angled down.
link0 is offline  
Old 03-23-14, 05:12 AM
  #17  
veganpower
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 53
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by datlas
Both look like they are in the ballpark. Can you post a video of you pedaling (on a trainer)? Hard to say more than ballpark from a static pic.
Here is the video of me pedaling on the trainer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QLXd...ature=youtu.be
veganpower is offline  
Old 03-23-14, 07:50 AM
  #18  
SirHustlerEsq
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Rep. of Dallas
Posts: 1,062
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 52 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Did you give a "fitter" several hundred dollars to tell you "you are comfortable"? You may want to consider that after making a thread like this.
SirHustlerEsq is offline  
Old 03-23-14, 09:39 AM
  #19  
Looigi
Senior Member
 
Looigi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 8,951
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times in 12 Posts
The angle at which you hold your ankle while pedaling is a largely matter of preference. All else equal, if you tend to pedal toe down the saddle will be lower than if you pedal toe level or toe up. The difference can be as much as several cm. Ride for a while, on the road or a trainer so that your ankle assumes it's normal angle and then assess the degree of knee bend at the bottom of the stroke. ~20 degrees is the usual.
Looigi is offline  
Old 03-23-14, 10:39 AM
  #20  
coasting 
Still can't climb
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Limey in Taiwan
Posts: 23,024
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
looks too low.
__________________
coasting, few quotes are worthy of him, and of those, even fewer printable in a family forum......quote 3alarmer

No @coasting, you should stay 100% as you are right now, don't change a thing....quote Heathpack
coasting is offline  
Old 03-23-14, 10:43 AM
  #21  
Fiery
Senior Member
 
Fiery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,361
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 242 Post(s)
Liked 18 Times in 13 Posts
Originally Posted by veganpower
Here is the video of me pedaling on the trainer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QLXd...ature=youtu.be
Judging on this, I would not go lower. You have made a change recently, now ride for a while like that before changing anything again. Otherwise you risk going into "adjustment hell", always adjusting, never feeling quite right and completely losing any idea of what you were trying to achieve in the first place.
Fiery is offline  
Old 03-23-14, 11:09 AM
  #22  
veganpower
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 53
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Fiery
Judging on this, I would not go lower. You have made a change recently, now ride for a while like that before changing anything again. Otherwise you risk going into "adjustment hell", always adjusting, never feeling quite right and completely losing any idea of what you were trying to achieve in the first place.
I think I'm going to stick to this position, definitely not lower. According to my calculations my knee angle when the foot is at 6 o'clock is at around 33 degrees, give or take. From my understanding the ideal angle is between 25-35 so if I would to draw any conclusions from that I would say that my saddle is towards the low end of my range. My inseam is 87 cm and according to the lemond method (.883 * inseam=saddle height B-B) my saddle should be at 76.8 cm, which is 1.5-1.6 cm higher than my actual set up. Doesn't make any sense.

Last edited by veganpower; 03-23-14 at 11:10 AM. Reason: typo
veganpower is offline  
Old 03-23-14, 11:21 AM
  #23  
Bandera
~>~
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: TX Hill Country
Posts: 5,931
Mentioned: 87 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1112 Post(s)
Liked 182 Times in 121 Posts
Originally Posted by veganpower
My inseam is 87 cm and according to the lemond method (.883 * inseam=saddle height B-B) my saddle should be at 76.8 cm, which is 1.5-1.6 cm higher than my actual set up. Doesn't make any sense.
Started too low, went the wrong way.
The Guimard/Le Mond system (if calculated correctly) will take time/miles to adjust to but it is well proven for a classic competitive fit.

"Guimard raised my position an inch and a half...he told me to raise it slowly...once I got used to it I realized how much difference the right position makes." -Greg Lemond's Complete Book of Bicycling

There is a "Fitting Your Bike" sub-forum, but that is not a substitute for a good coach and/or experience local fitter.

-Bandera
Bandera is offline  
Old 03-23-14, 11:35 AM
  #24  
nkfrench 
Senior Member
 
nkfrench's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 1,847

Bikes: 2006 Specialized Ruby Pro aka "Rhubarb" / and a backup road bike

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 14 Times in 5 Posts
I heard that sitting on the saddle placing HEEL on pedal the leg should be almost straight without rocking on saddle.
OP's feet look long so I'm not sure that applies.

Is changing saddle height supposed to fix some problem or just provide more power?
nkfrench is offline  
Old 03-23-14, 11:50 AM
  #25  
emveezee
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 142
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Style points for shoe covers indoors.
emveezee is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.