Is compact 50t x 12t sufficient for serious road race at inter-club level?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 318
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Is compact 50t x 12t sufficient for serious road race at inter-club level?
I'd be grateful for your opinion on this matter. I've been told it's all I'll ever need, and to work up my cadence, instead of reaching for 11t sprocket. I know it's different strokes for different folks, but I'd like to hear your opinion and advices. Many road bikes do come with 53-39 and 11-23 cassette.
#2
Speechless
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Central NY
Posts: 8,842
Bikes: Felt Brougham, Lotus Prestige, Cinelli Xperience,
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 163 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 39 Times
in
16 Posts
I am not a racer, but do very fast club rides. Yes, 50x12 is sufficient, IMO. Learn to spin.
#3
Senior Member
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 28,682
Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build
Mentioned: 110 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 58 Times
in
36 Posts
Considering that the pros back in the day were not significantly slower on a 54/13 than their counterparts today, I would say of course a 50/12 is fast enough for club racing. The ratio is a little higher on the 50/12. And don't forget you can always have a 50/11 if you wish. The secret then and now is the same: being able to pedal over a broad range of cadences. That is a skill worth developing for anyone wishing to race at any level.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 386
Bikes: Vitus 979 x 2, Vitus 992, Colnago C40, Colnago C60
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Not sure what inter club level is?
Most of us who ride competitive use a 53/39 in front.
For racing I change cassettes, (10 speed) relatively flat 11-21, flat with a few rolling hills 11-23, hilly course 12-25, for those five mile 10% gradients 12-27
If you are below cat 4 level, a compact is a good idea.
Most of us who ride competitive use a 53/39 in front.
For racing I change cassettes, (10 speed) relatively flat 11-21, flat with a few rolling hills 11-23, hilly course 12-25, for those five mile 10% gradients 12-27
If you are below cat 4 level, a compact is a good idea.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 9,201
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1186 Post(s)
Liked 289 Times
in
177 Posts
Not sure what inter club level is?
Most of us who ride competitive use a 53/39 in front.
For racing I change cassettes, (10 speed) relatively flat 11-21, flat with a few rolling hills 11-23, hilly course 12-25, for those five mile 10% gradients 12-27
If you are below cat 4 level, a compact is a good idea.
Most of us who ride competitive use a 53/39 in front.
For racing I change cassettes, (10 speed) relatively flat 11-21, flat with a few rolling hills 11-23, hilly course 12-25, for those five mile 10% gradients 12-27
If you are below cat 4 level, a compact is a good idea.
A standard double works just fine for pros with 5.5-6+ W/kg threshold power. Club riders aren't close to those power levels and won't be held back by riding a compact.
The reality is gearing is far down the list of factors determining race outcome. Race what you have and adapt where necessary. If you find you're frequently mixing it up and placing top 5 with 40+mph sprints then you might need something bigger, otherwise there are plenty of races to be won with a 50-12
#9
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ffld Cnty Connecticut
Posts: 21,846
Bikes: Old Steelies I made, Old Cannondales
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1174 Post(s)
Liked 935 Times
in
618 Posts
Races are very rarely won or lost on long downhills where top end gear might make a difference.
Usually the opposite. Climbs separate the strong from less strong. Also, windy conditions can make the difference.
Plenty of examples of juniors with gear restrictions winning and placing in senior races against guys with unrestricted gears.
Usually the opposite. Climbs separate the strong from less strong. Also, windy conditions can make the difference.
Plenty of examples of juniors with gear restrictions winning and placing in senior races against guys with unrestricted gears.
__________________
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.
FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.
FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 386
Bikes: Vitus 979 x 2, Vitus 992, Colnago C40, Colnago C60
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The notion that you need a standard crank above cat 4 is laughable and part of the reason riders like the OP ask the question.
A standard double works just fine for pros with 5.5-6+ W/kg threshold power. Club riders aren't close to those power levels and won't be held back by riding a compact.
The reality is gearing is far down the list of factors determining race outcome. Race what you have and adapt where necessary. If you find you're frequently mixing it up and placing top 5 with 40+mph sprints then you might need something bigger, otherwise there are plenty of races to be won with a 50-12
A standard double works just fine for pros with 5.5-6+ W/kg threshold power. Club riders aren't close to those power levels and won't be held back by riding a compact.
The reality is gearing is far down the list of factors determining race outcome. Race what you have and adapt where necessary. If you find you're frequently mixing it up and placing top 5 with 40+mph sprints then you might need something bigger, otherwise there are plenty of races to be won with a 50-12
If a compact crank works for you, great! There is no right or wrong here, simply a matter of preference.
Just sharing the mean average.
Some of the pros climb a 15%+ gradient for several miles on a 39/23.
IMHO high cadence is always a bonus. A good plan is to learn spinning the easy gears first and work ones way up towards being able to spin a heavy gear at the same cadence eventually.
As a matter of curiosity, how many cat 1/2's here ride compact cranks?
#11
Rubber side down
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Teh Quickie Mart
Posts: 1,769
Bikes: are fun! :-)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Liked 225 Times
in
105 Posts
I occasionally ride (training) with a ladies Cat1 who sports a compact crank on her road race bike if that's of any help. She's a petite little climbing/road race specialist.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 9,201
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1186 Post(s)
Liked 289 Times
in
177 Posts
Apologies that you find my post laughable.
If a compact crank works for you, great! There is no right or wrong here, simply a matter of preference.
Just sharing the mean average.
Some of the pros climb a 15%+ gradient for several miles on a 39/23.
IMHO high cadence is always a bonus. A good plan is to learn spinning the easy gears first and work ones way up towards being able to spin a heavy gear at the same cadence eventually.
As a matter of curiosity, how many cat 1/2's here ride compact cranks?
If a compact crank works for you, great! There is no right or wrong here, simply a matter of preference.
Just sharing the mean average.
Some of the pros climb a 15%+ gradient for several miles on a 39/23.
IMHO high cadence is always a bonus. A good plan is to learn spinning the easy gears first and work ones way up towards being able to spin a heavy gear at the same cadence eventually.
As a matter of curiosity, how many cat 1/2's here ride compact cranks?
By the way I didn't find your post laughable, just the notion that crank type was somehow related to your racing category.
#13
Farmer tan
Example Strava Segment | Rose Bowl descent (east side)
#14
ka maté ka maté ka ora
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: wessex
Posts: 4,423
Bikes: breezer venturi - red novo bosberg - red, pedal force cg1 - red, neuvation f-100 - da, devinci phantom - xt, miele piste - miche/campy, bianchi reparto corse sbx, concorde squadra tsx - da, miele team issue sl - ultegra
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Even the pros sometimes reach for a compact. For them, it's course dependant
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 4,764
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1975 Post(s)
Liked 232 Times
in
173 Posts
When the gradient goes -1% for a mile and then turns slightly uphill, you have to turn 110-120 in 50x12 to not get dropped. Here's a segment from a fast local group ride where I'm often wishing for a 50x11:
Example Strava Segment | Rose Bowl descent (east side)
Example Strava Segment | Rose Bowl descent (east side)
#17
Speechless
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Central NY
Posts: 8,842
Bikes: Felt Brougham, Lotus Prestige, Cinelli Xperience,
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 163 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 39 Times
in
16 Posts
When the gradient goes -1% for a mile and then turns slightly uphill, you have to turn 110-120 in 50x12 to not get dropped. Here's a segment from a fast local group ride where I'm often wishing for a 50x11:
Example Strava Segment | Rose Bowl descent (east side)
Example Strava Segment | Rose Bowl descent (east side)
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Utah
Posts: 953
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
For time trials with downhill sections you'll probably be spinning out and wishing for more, but for anything short of those and downhill sprints 50x12 is just fine.
#20
Farmer tan
#21
Farmer tan
So is turning 110-120 for a short duration a problem? On our group ride, we have a 1 mile section of mostly -1% grade where I have to turn my 47x16 at 160+ rpm to not get dropped. I don't typically contest the final sprint with that gearing, but I don't get dropped either.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2953 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
I lost my FD cable 10 miles into a M123 road race a few weeks ago and the biggest gear I had was a 39x12. It was sufficient to finish with the main pack but not to contest the sprint.
Last edited by caloso; 04-28-14 at 10:13 PM.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 7,571
Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1853 Post(s)
Liked 680 Times
in
431 Posts
I once did almost an entire crit in my 39. I didn't realize until about 5 laps to go that I wasn't in the 53.
So, yeah, a 50 is sufficient for most races.
And I'll add, I know several very successful juniors (one a Cat 1) for whom a 50-12 is not allowed.
So, yeah, a 50 is sufficient for most races.
And I'll add, I know several very successful juniors (one a Cat 1) for whom a 50-12 is not allowed.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Mountain View, CA USA and Golden, CO USA
Posts: 6,341
Bikes: 97 Litespeed, 50-39-30x13-26 10 cogs, Campagnolo Ultrashift, retroreflective rims on SON28/PowerTap hubs
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 550 Post(s)
Liked 325 Times
in
226 Posts
I'd be grateful for your opinion on this matter. I've been told it's all I'll ever need, and to work up my cadence, instead of reaching for 11t sprocket. I know it's different strokes for different folks, but I'd like to hear your opinion and advices. Many road bikes do come with 53-39 and 11-23 cassette.
Even 50x13 is good for a 40 MPH sprint.