Is my gearing/speed off?
#26
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,638
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3873 Post(s)
Liked 2,574 Times
in
1,581 Posts
When it comes down to it, spending $15-20 each for cogs is still a pretty good deal. They last a long time, and most of us here have ended up with extra cogs lying around from trial and error.
I happen to think my rear wheel looks cool permanently sporting a 16T on one side and 18T on the other.
I happen to think my rear wheel looks cool permanently sporting a 16T on one side and 18T on the other.
__________________
RUSA #7498
Originally Posted by noglider
People in this forum are not typical.
Last edited by ThermionicScott; 01-27-18 at 01:30 PM.
#27
Super-duper Genius
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Muskrat Springs, Utah
Posts: 1,713
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 768 Post(s)
Liked 984 Times
in
508 Posts
An oversimplified but sound approach is this:
If your legs are getting tired first, you need a lower gear. If your heart and lungs tire first, you need a higher one.
I've always been a pretty good cyclist, but I'm not very powerful. So it seems like I'd be one to choose a ratio too low. Alas, like many folks, I tend to err on the too-high side when choosing gears. I've learned how to sprint to get up short hills, and this helps a lot. It doesn't help for long rides on flat terrain when I've set up a single speed or fixed gear with a ratio a bit too high. I should be working to get good at spinning high cadences for an extended timeframe, and choosing ratios just a bit lower.
If your legs are getting tired first, you need a lower gear. If your heart and lungs tire first, you need a higher one.
I've always been a pretty good cyclist, but I'm not very powerful. So it seems like I'd be one to choose a ratio too low. Alas, like many folks, I tend to err on the too-high side when choosing gears. I've learned how to sprint to get up short hills, and this helps a lot. It doesn't help for long rides on flat terrain when I've set up a single speed or fixed gear with a ratio a bit too high. I should be working to get good at spinning high cadences for an extended timeframe, and choosing ratios just a bit lower.
#29
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Arizona
Posts: 106
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 63 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Can anybody recommend the proper tool (I'm assuming chain whip) for getting my 16t off and putting on my new 17t? I have a Park Tool HCW-5, but I've never even touched it and can't remember what I even bough it for. I know this tool alone won't be enough, but I don't know what else to buy. I'll need to get the lock ring off, the 16t off, and then put on the 17t and put the lock ring back on.
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,985
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 131 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4862 Post(s)
Liked 4,011 Times
in
2,607 Posts
I haven't read all the the threads here. I can tell you what was the norm in the 1970s for winter training in January. It was gears like 42-18,maybe 42-17. Much, much lower gears than you are riding. I am about to go out for a 50 mile and I put on a 43-17. (Some small hills, but mostly flat. I also have 300 miles under my belt so far this month.)
I have the advantage over you in that I have been riding and riding fix gear for a long time and am much more comfortable with a quick cadence than you. But I only got there by doing this spinning. In the gear you are riding now, you will never get there. Put on a 19 and ride it until you can regularly go 19-20 mph before going to an 18. (It will be frustrating, trust me. And it will be SO worth it!) Next January, you will have far better spin and you can do your early miles on a 20 and reap the benefits of a still better spin all year.
Ben
I have the advantage over you in that I have been riding and riding fix gear for a long time and am much more comfortable with a quick cadence than you. But I only got there by doing this spinning. In the gear you are riding now, you will never get there. Put on a 19 and ride it until you can regularly go 19-20 mph before going to an 18. (It will be frustrating, trust me. And it will be SO worth it!) Next January, you will have far better spin and you can do your early miles on a 20 and reap the benefits of a still better spin all year.
Ben
#31
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,985
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 131 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4862 Post(s)
Liked 4,011 Times
in
2,607 Posts
Can anybody recommend the proper tool (I'm assuming chain whip) for getting my 16t off and putting on my new 17t? I have a Park Tool HCW-5, but I've never even touched it and can't remember what I even bough it for. I know this tool alone won't be enough, but I don't know what else to buy. I'll need to get the lock ring off, the 16t off, and then put on the 17t and put the lock ring back on.
48-17 is still 76". That's huge. (See my post above.)
Ben
#32
Calamari Marionette Ph.D
#33
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,985
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 131 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4862 Post(s)
Liked 4,011 Times
in
2,607 Posts
I swapped bikes before going out yesterday (from fendered to not - a rare day of dry roads). Good bike was set up 42-18. Did 44 miles on it in a medium crosswind and was quite glad I went that low on the gear. Felt the ride when I got home, felt my lungs cleaned out. Was passed by two riders decades younger and passed several. Decent showing and a bigger gear would not have helped.
Ben
Ben
#34
Jedi Master
The cheapest way to try different cog sizes is the miche pista cog carrier.
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: PHL
Posts: 9,948
Bikes: Litespeed Catalyst, IRO Rob Roy, All City Big Block
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1332 Post(s)
Liked 398 Times
in
194 Posts
I use the Miche system on one side of my hub at the moment. It's pretty cool, cheap cogs and swapping them is much easier. I feel like splined cogs would be a lot more popular if only there was just any kind of standardization for them.
#36
Jedi Master
I use miche cogs too and change gearing as my fitness improves throughout the season starting with a 44/18 in the spring and ending with a 46/16 in the fall. Three chainrings 44,45,46 and three cogs 16,17,18 gives you a range of around 11 gear inches from ~65-76 with 1-2 inch increments.
#37
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,638
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3873 Post(s)
Liked 2,574 Times
in
1,581 Posts
#38
52psi
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 4,016
Bikes: Schwinn Volare ('78); Raleigh Competition GS ('79)
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 790 Post(s)
Liked 802 Times
in
391 Posts
When I built up the Volare I started at 45x16. Seemed like a good number till I got my ass handed to me by a headwind and rolling hills combo my first time out. So I downshifted, swapping on a 42t chainring. This took me from ~76 to ~71 gear inches.
Based on @79pmooney and @SquidPuppet's numbers above (and the rather angry messages my body is sending me) I'm still running too tall and the fact I'm spinning out on the flats isn't a gearing issue so much as an "I clearly suck at spinning" issue. So with all this in mind I have two questions for whoever might be interested:
1. As a total novice to SS who's about to install his first FG cog after this post, what should my target gear-inches number be? Mid- to high-60s? Even lower?
2. What cadence should I be aiming to be able to carry on more or less indefinitely? 90? 100? More? Or if you prefer, what do you guys pull off under normal conditions?
I'm slowly reconciling myself to the idea that I'm gonna have to sacrifice top-end speed for a while. Not real thrilled, but everything has its price.
@rEVOLVED Sorry to pile my questions into your thread, but they're topical and might help us both out.
Based on @79pmooney and @SquidPuppet's numbers above (and the rather angry messages my body is sending me) I'm still running too tall and the fact I'm spinning out on the flats isn't a gearing issue so much as an "I clearly suck at spinning" issue. So with all this in mind I have two questions for whoever might be interested:
1. As a total novice to SS who's about to install his first FG cog after this post, what should my target gear-inches number be? Mid- to high-60s? Even lower?
2. What cadence should I be aiming to be able to carry on more or less indefinitely? 90? 100? More? Or if you prefer, what do you guys pull off under normal conditions?
I'm slowly reconciling myself to the idea that I'm gonna have to sacrifice top-end speed for a while. Not real thrilled, but everything has its price.
@rEVOLVED Sorry to pile my questions into your thread, but they're topical and might help us both out.
__________________
A race bike in any era is a highly personal choice that at its "best" balances the requirements of fit, weight, handling, durability and cost tempered by the willingness to toss it and oneself down the pavement at considerable speed. ~Bandera
A race bike in any era is a highly personal choice that at its "best" balances the requirements of fit, weight, handling, durability and cost tempered by the willingness to toss it and oneself down the pavement at considerable speed. ~Bandera
Last edited by Fahrenheit531; 01-29-18 at 10:20 PM.
#39
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,638
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3873 Post(s)
Liked 2,574 Times
in
1,581 Posts
@J.Oxley, this is a good read if you haven't yet: https://www.bikeforums.net/singlespe...mer-newbs.html
#40
52psi
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 4,016
Bikes: Schwinn Volare ('78); Raleigh Competition GS ('79)
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 790 Post(s)
Liked 802 Times
in
391 Posts
@J.Oxley, this is a good read if you haven't yet: https://www.bikeforums.net/singlespe...mer-newbs.html
__________________
A race bike in any era is a highly personal choice that at its "best" balances the requirements of fit, weight, handling, durability and cost tempered by the willingness to toss it and oneself down the pavement at considerable speed. ~Bandera
A race bike in any era is a highly personal choice that at its "best" balances the requirements of fit, weight, handling, durability and cost tempered by the willingness to toss it and oneself down the pavement at considerable speed. ~Bandera
#41
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,985
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 131 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4862 Post(s)
Liked 4,011 Times
in
2,607 Posts
When I built up the Volare I started at 45x16. Seemed like a good number till I got my ass handed to me by a headwind and rolling hills combo my first time out. So I downshifted, swapping on a 42t chainring. This took me from ~76 to ~71 gear inches.
Based on @79pmooney and @SquidPuppet's numbers above (and the rather angry messages my body is sending me) I'm still running too tall and the fact I'm spinning out on the flats isn't a gearing issue so much as an "I clearly suck at spinning" issue. So with all this in mind I have two questions for whoever might be interested:
1. As a total novice to SS who's about to install his first FG cog after this post, what should my target gear-inches number be? Mid- to high-60s? Even lower?
2. What cadence should I be aiming to be able to carry on more or less indefinitely? 90? 100? More? Or if you prefer, what do you guys pull off under normal conditions?
I'm slowly reconciling myself to the idea that I'm gonna have to sacrifice top-end speed for a while. Not real thrilled, but everything has its price.
@rEVOLVED Sorry to pile my questions into your thread, but they're topical and might help us both out.
Based on @79pmooney and @SquidPuppet's numbers above (and the rather angry messages my body is sending me) I'm still running too tall and the fact I'm spinning out on the flats isn't a gearing issue so much as an "I clearly suck at spinning" issue. So with all this in mind I have two questions for whoever might be interested:
1. As a total novice to SS who's about to install his first FG cog after this post, what should my target gear-inches number be? Mid- to high-60s? Even lower?
2. What cadence should I be aiming to be able to carry on more or less indefinitely? 90? 100? More? Or if you prefer, what do you guys pull off under normal conditions?
I'm slowly reconciling myself to the idea that I'm gonna have to sacrifice top-end speed for a while. Not real thrilled, but everything has its price.
@rEVOLVED Sorry to pile my questions into your thread, but they're topical and might help us both out.
2. Cadence is a meaningless concept on a fix gear. You pick your gear based on conditioning, skill and the roads and conditions. Once you start rolling, you ride the "effort" that is appropriate for that ride, your intentions, the conditions and your body. Your RPM is whatever it is. Same with heartrate. (Effort in quotes because it is not a number you can measure with cadence, a speedometer or power meter. It can be considered the percentage of what your body and mindset can do at that moment. Uphill it may well be perceived as breathing level or leg burn. On the flat, it may be mental grind. Downhill it may well be a level of comfort, both for your saddle area and bike control. I think loosely of rides as being perhaps 75% ride. On that ride I am riding roughly 75% of whatever that effort or limiting factor is.
That said, there are tricks. Rolling hills for example. Downhill go easy UNTIL the hill is about to bottom out, then go up. At that instant, go as hard as you can! Keep it poured on! Make those feet fly! Come out of the saddle but fight to keep the spin as far up the hill as you can. Only then do you go back to your percentage. (And your heartbeat and breathing will be wild. But you just have a few more feet of hill to go, then you will back off and repeat.
Start as low as you can. Move up the gears one cog at a time over the summer as the hills get easier. Start lower next year. (You will have new pedaling skills and this won't be nearly as hard or bad as it seems now. And you will benefit all next year. Promise.)
Ben
#42
Senior Member
2. Cadence is a meaningless concept on a fix gear. You pick your gear based on conditioning, skill and the roads and conditions. Once you start rolling, you ride the "effort" that is appropriate for that ride, your intentions, the conditions and your body. Your RPM is whatever it is. Same with heartrate. (Effort in quotes because it is not a number you can measure with cadence, a speedometer or power meter. It can be considered the percentage of what your body and mindset can do at that moment. Uphill it may well be perceived as breathing level or leg burn. On the flat, it may be mental grind. Downhill it may well be a level of comfort, both for your saddle area and bike control. I think loosely of rides as being perhaps 75% ride. On that ride I am riding roughly 75% of whatever that effort or limiting factor is.
I, as well as a lot of folks its seems, typically run higher gear inches fixed and just suffer. Even more so than SS do you forget about what the bike is up to and focus on your fitness.
#43
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Arizona
Posts: 106
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 63 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Well for now, I want to get the 17t on to replace my 16t. Might still be too high for a beginner, given my 48t chain ring, but that's okay. Problem is, 16t that I'm taking off is a 3/32 and 17t that's going on is 1/8. So what kind of chain whip do I need?
#47
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Arizona
Posts: 106
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 63 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Going to try and not start a new thread since that seems silly... Sorry to sort of resurrect this one.
I've decided that simply swapping my 16t cog for a 17t will make little difference, and I think I'm going to try to lose a bigger chunk of gear inches at once. Currently running 48/16, and thinking of going down to somewhere in the range of 42 or 44 in the front. Hoping to end up around 70 gear inches.
Question - I need a super affordable 130 BCD chainring that I can install primarily for trying out my new gearing. I want to get my gearing right with cheap components before buying anything nicer. More than anything... I want to get my gearing right.
I've decided that simply swapping my 16t cog for a 17t will make little difference, and I think I'm going to try to lose a bigger chunk of gear inches at once. Currently running 48/16, and thinking of going down to somewhere in the range of 42 or 44 in the front. Hoping to end up around 70 gear inches.
Question - I need a super affordable 130 BCD chainring that I can install primarily for trying out my new gearing. I want to get my gearing right with cheap components before buying anything nicer. More than anything... I want to get my gearing right.
#48
Calamari Marionette Ph.D
Going to try and not start a new thread since that seems silly... Sorry to sort of resurrect this one.
I've decided that simply swapping my 16t cog for a 17t will make little difference, and I think I'm going to try to lose a bigger chunk of gear inches at once. Currently running 48/16, and thinking of going down to somewhere in the range of 42 or 44 in the front. Hoping to end up around 70 gear inches.
Question - I need a super affordable 130 BCD chainring that I can install primarily for trying out my new gearing. I want to get my gearing right with cheap components before buying anything nicer. More than anything... I want to get my gearing right.
I've decided that simply swapping my 16t cog for a 17t will make little difference, and I think I'm going to try to lose a bigger chunk of gear inches at once. Currently running 48/16, and thinking of going down to somewhere in the range of 42 or 44 in the front. Hoping to end up around 70 gear inches.
Question - I need a super affordable 130 BCD chainring that I can install primarily for trying out my new gearing. I want to get my gearing right with cheap components before buying anything nicer. More than anything... I want to get my gearing right.
Remember, even if you get the gearing perfect on the first stab, it will only be perfect temporarily. As your fitness and technique improve, it will become too easy. That's why folks have recommended cheap cogs for the experimentation phase.
#50
Senior Member
If your goal is to get faster and stronger, you needs to deal with it.
Endurance and Speed (power) take time to build up.
48/16 is not so tall at all for your range. OP kinda 210 and big legs, that (in theory) should have pretty big watts by natural. And OP says he rides flat paved path with winds, actually that excellent way to train your speed! dealing with the winds is so normal.
Mash********** Spin********** huh, why bother********** I personally not really care, mash sounds less efficient than spin blah blah blah BUT most serious fast riders MASH TO WIN. not spin.
BUT spinning will make you efficient pedaling on the bike and techniques.
You just needs to concentrate and push yourself. And you will reaps the reward.
Endurance and Speed (power) take time to build up.
48/16 is not so tall at all for your range. OP kinda 210 and big legs, that (in theory) should have pretty big watts by natural. And OP says he rides flat paved path with winds, actually that excellent way to train your speed! dealing with the winds is so normal.
Mash********** Spin********** huh, why bother********** I personally not really care, mash sounds less efficient than spin blah blah blah BUT most serious fast riders MASH TO WIN. not spin.
BUT spinning will make you efficient pedaling on the bike and techniques.
You just needs to concentrate and push yourself. And you will reaps the reward.