Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

SS Conversion - Noisy Chainring/Chain

Search
Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

SS Conversion - Noisy Chainring/Chain

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-05-20, 01:32 AM
  #26  
mostaza
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 18
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Well that was an unmitigated disaster!

A beautiful, quiet lockdown morning in Manchester, so I thought I'd try taking it out for a gentle ride to see how it felt.

Within the first few seconds the chain was slipping.
This was under any moderate forced - seated or stood up.
Slipping about one link at a time.
Couldn't tell if it was the sprocket or chainring.

Here are the drivetrain shots as requested...

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1PHw...w?usp=drivesdk

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1PP_...w?usp=drivesdk

I've pushed the tensioner to it's forward limit in the second shot (obviously can't do that for the other direction, but it travels about half as much as the forward direction).

So issues now are:
1. Noisy
2. Chain repeatedly slipping a link under medium force


------------- EDIT -----------
What are thoughts on shortening the chain and adapting the tensioner to push up?

Last edited by mostaza; 04-05-20 at 03:10 AM.
mostaza is offline  
Old 04-05-20, 03:18 AM
  #27  
tFUnK
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 3,739

Bikes: Too many bikes, too little time to ride

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 455 Post(s)
Liked 485 Times in 334 Posts
Originally Posted by mostaza

------------- EDIT -----------
What are thoughts on shortening the chain and adapting the tensioner to push up?
This is exactly what I was about to suggest, but I wanted to confirm your setup first. Can your tensioner be run in push up mode?
tFUnK is offline  
Old 04-05-20, 03:23 AM
  #28  
mostaza
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 18
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by tFUnK
This is exactly what I was about to suggest, but I wanted to confirm your setup first
Would you expect the chain to be slipping in its current setup?
46T front and 20T rear. Chainline good and tensioner as shown.

I'd say around at least ¼ of the sprocket teeth are engaging - so around 5/6/7.
I've seen plenty of conversions with much smaller chainring/sprocket combos - admittedly most without a tensioner.
mostaza is offline  
Old 04-05-20, 01:37 PM
  #29  
Litespud
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Chapel Hill NC
Posts: 1,683

Bikes: 2000 Litespeed Vortex Chorus 10, 1995 DeBernardi Cromor S/S

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 645 Post(s)
Liked 797 Times in 446 Posts
Originally Posted by mostaza
Would you expect the chain to be slipping in its current setup?
46T front and 20T rear. Chainline good and tensioner as shown.

I'd say around at least ¼ of the sprocket teeth are engaging - so around 5/6/7.
I've seen plenty of conversions with much smaller chainring/sprocket combos - admittedly most without a tensioner.
Although I'm trying to picture how your current setup would allow the chain to slip like you're describing, I might be inclined to get more chain wrap around the sprocket - most S/S and derailleur setups wrap the chain at least half way around the sprocket. Can you reconfigure the tensioner to push up a shorter chain, which would give you significantly more chain wrap?
Litespud is offline  
Likes For Litespud:
Old 04-05-20, 04:25 PM
  #30  
tFUnK
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 3,739

Bikes: Too many bikes, too little time to ride

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 455 Post(s)
Liked 485 Times in 334 Posts
I agree with litespud. You want more engagement between the chain and the chainring and cassette and you can achieve that by using the tensioner in push up mode. Back in the day I had skipping problems on a ss conversion with similar setup as yours, but I was using takeoff rings and cogs that weren't ss specific.
tFUnK is offline  
Old 04-05-20, 04:58 PM
  #31  
Miele Man
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,624

Bikes: iele Latina, Miele Suprema, Miele Uno LS, Miele Miele Beta, MMTB, Bianchi Model Unknown, Fiori Venezia, Fiori Napoli, VeloSport Adamas AX

Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1324 Post(s)
Liked 927 Times in 640 Posts
Can you not forgo the use of the chain tensioner?

Cheers
Miele Man is offline  
Old 04-05-20, 05:57 PM
  #32  
Unca_Sam
The dropped
 
Unca_Sam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 2,144

Bikes: Pake C'Mute Touring/Commuter Build, 1989 Kona Cinder Cone, 1995 Trek 5200, 1973 Raleigh Super Course FG, 1960/61 Montgomery Ward Hawthorne "thrift" 3 speed, by Hercules (sold) : 1966 Schwinn Deluxe Racer (sold)

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1739 Post(s)
Liked 1,014 Times in 696 Posts
Originally Posted by Miele Man
Can you not forgo the use of the chain tensioner?

Cheers
He could, if he has a magic ratio drivetrain. That's a vertical dropout.
Unca_Sam is offline  
Old 04-05-20, 07:43 PM
  #33  
Miele Man
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,624

Bikes: iele Latina, Miele Suprema, Miele Uno LS, Miele Miele Beta, MMTB, Bianchi Model Unknown, Fiori Venezia, Fiori Napoli, VeloSport Adamas AX

Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1324 Post(s)
Liked 927 Times in 640 Posts
Originally Posted by Unca_Sam
He could, if he has a magic ratio drivetrain. That's a vertical dropout.
That's where a half-link comes in handy.

Cheers
Miele Man is offline  
Old 04-05-20, 11:45 PM
  #34  
mostaza
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 18
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Miele Man
That's where a half-link comes in handy.

Cheers
​​​I've come to the same conclusion.
I measured without the tensioner and would definitely need a half link.
Will try it in its current format for a while, then look at getting rid of the tensioner.
mostaza is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.