Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

RD choice for cross bike (R/T/M-range, GS vs SGS, Double Servo vs Shadow)

Search
Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

RD choice for cross bike (R/T/M-range, GS vs SGS, Double Servo vs Shadow)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-08-21, 05:30 AM
  #1  
am8117
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Posts: 265
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 125 Post(s)
Liked 29 Times in 24 Posts
RD choice for cross bike (R/T/M-range, GS vs SGS, Double Servo vs Shadow)

Shopping for a new Shimano RD for a bike with 44-32-22 crakset, 8-speed setup but intending to have it upgradeable to 9-speed. The current cassette is 11-30 and NOT expecting 32+ for the future, but rather a road-like one.

There's 3 RDs I can find currently on sale with rather different specs:
1) Sora RD-R3000 GS [https://bike.shimano.com/en-EU/product/component/sora-r3000/RD-R3000-GS.html]
2) Alivio RD-T4000 SGS [https://bike.shimano.com/en-EU/product/component/alivio-t4000/RD-T4000.html]
3) Alivio RD-M3100 SGS [https://bike.shimano.com/en-EU/product/component/alivio-m3100/RD-M3100-SGS.html]

The shifters to be used are rapidfires SL-M315. [https://bike.shimano.com/en-EU/product/component/shimano/SL-M315-8R.html]

All of them are 9-speed, but all of them should be "1:2" pull ratios and thus work with the 8sp and in the future possibly 9sp shifter, correct?

Sora GS is out of spec for the crankset as it has max front difference 20T, however should work with 11-14 to 28-34 cassettes.
Trekking Alivio (SGS only) is meant for 11 only to 28-34 cassettes, however in the future I might want to use a cassette starting at 12 or 13.
Mountain Alivio (SGS only) is out of spec for current cassette as it is meant for 11-12 to big 32-36 cassettes and future cassettes of my choice might be tighter, not large cogs ones.

Obviously, the M3100 comes across as most "modern", and considering all three can be had for about the same price. Which one would you go for and why? Which of the out of spec situations are more of concern than others? Anyone has experience Sora RD with a M/T triple crankset?

Last edited by am8117; 06-08-21 at 05:36 AM.
am8117 is offline  
Old 06-08-21, 06:51 AM
  #2  
aggiegrads
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Sherwood, OR
Posts: 1,279
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 337 Post(s)
Liked 317 Times in 180 Posts
Why not M-591? mountain and road are compatible at 9 speeds and you are still ready for future upgrades.
I would not worry about being under the max cog rating for a derailleur. Turning the b-screw out should make that a non-issue.

Last edited by aggiegrads; 06-08-21 at 06:54 AM.
aggiegrads is offline  
Likes For aggiegrads:
Old 06-08-21, 07:20 AM
  #3  
HillRider
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656

Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!

Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times in 742 Posts
The 11T small rear cog spec for those derailleurs is a minimum, not a limit. Any of those will work fine with a 12T or even a 13T smallest cog.

Also, the maximum front tooth difference isn't a hard limit. I have two bikes with 105 FC-5703 triple cranks and FD-5703 front derailleurs. The derailleurs are rated for 20T maximum (50/39/30) but I have replaced the 30T granny chainring with a 26T giving me a tooth difference of 24T and they shift just fine.
HillRider is offline  
Old 06-08-21, 08:10 AM
  #4  
hokiefyd 
Senior Member
 
hokiefyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Northern Shenandoah Valley
Posts: 4,143

Bikes: More bikes than riders

Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1446 Post(s)
Liked 766 Times in 572 Posts
The M3100's upper pulley wheel (the "guide pulley") has an axle that is coincident with the cage pivot, meaning its vertical position is constant and does not change with cage position. I think Shimano have done it this way to maintain that vertical guide pulley position when shifting between front chain rings, but the negative consequence of this is that pulley doesn't track with the cassette very well. In my experience, if you set the B-screw so that the guide pulley spacing is correct for the largest sprocket, it'll have a pretty large gap with the smaller sprockets (because it doesn't pivot upward as the cage relaxes). This results, in my experience, in sluggish and imprecise shifting in that region of the cassette. You'll notice that Shimano's Shadow derailleurs designed for 1x drivetrains have the guide pulley axle different from the cage pivot, as with a traditional derailleur.

I understand Shimano's intent with the guide pulley here, but I've never had problems tuning traditional derailleurs with 2x and 3x systems, and I far prefer the traditional derailleur's tracking of the guide pulley height with cage position. I'd get a Deore RD-M591 derailleur or similar and enjoy thousands of miles of smooth shifts. The RD-T4000 is also a very nice unit (I have both the M591 and the T4000 myself). The T4000's cage knuckle is resin whereas the M591's cage knuckle is all metal. Both seem very durable and I'd use either one with confidence.
hokiefyd is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.