Would you consider a Specialized Roubaix Sport to lean towards the endurance end?
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 76
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 57 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
7 Posts
Would you consider a Specialized Roubaix Sport to lean towards the endurance end?
Through no fault of my own, my late model Canoondale Synapse 105 was totaled in an accident. Luckily I came out relatively unscathed. This is considered an endurance bike and I rode it with 700x32 tires. I'm still in good shape but at 58 years old and most rides capping out at about 30 miles, averaging 15 mph, The bike was a pretty good fit for me for someone that still wants a road bike experience but giving up ultimate speed and handing for some comfort. A new one cost $1900 and I got enough insurance money to cover it but of course none available and local bike shop said I could order one and wait a year.
Looking at other online offerings at local shops and as you know, pickings are slim but I see one carried a Specialized Roubaix Sport in my size. At $3200 this is a big step up in price which I would have to consider if I really wanted to spend that much but of course it's a better bike with a carbon frame and hydraulic disk brakes. It also comes with some sort of shock absorbing stem. Good news too is it comes with 700x28 tires and it looks like hopefully the 700x32's might fit. Anybody have experience with this bike? Does it lean towards being more a strictly tight handling road bike or would one consider the specs relaxed enough to put it towards the endurance type end?
Another option is to ride out the year with my 20 year old tried and true Trek 7500 hybrid and see if new and used bike inventory looks more promising in the spring. Think bike inventory will have picked up by then?
Looking at other online offerings at local shops and as you know, pickings are slim but I see one carried a Specialized Roubaix Sport in my size. At $3200 this is a big step up in price which I would have to consider if I really wanted to spend that much but of course it's a better bike with a carbon frame and hydraulic disk brakes. It also comes with some sort of shock absorbing stem. Good news too is it comes with 700x28 tires and it looks like hopefully the 700x32's might fit. Anybody have experience with this bike? Does it lean towards being more a strictly tight handling road bike or would one consider the specs relaxed enough to put it towards the endurance type end?
Another option is to ride out the year with my 20 year old tried and true Trek 7500 hybrid and see if new and used bike inventory looks more promising in the spring. Think bike inventory will have picked up by then?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South shore, L.I., NY
Posts: 7,064
Bikes: Flyxii FR322, Cannondale Topstone, Miyata City Liner, Specialized Chisel, Specialized Epic Evo
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3361 Post(s)
Liked 2,193 Times
in
1,244 Posts
If it fits and you can actually find one to test ride, it's a nice bike. I know 2 people that ride with this suspension, like it and have had no issues with it.
Likes For Steve B.:
#3
Pizzaiolo Americano
Through no fault of my own, my late model Canoondale Synapse 105 was totaled in an accident. Luckily I came out relatively unscathed. This is considered an endurance bike and I rode it with 700x32 tires. I'm still in good shape but at 58 years old and most rides capping out at about 30 miles, averaging 15 mph, The bike was a pretty good fit for me for someone that still wants a road bike experience but giving up ultimate speed and handing for some comfort. A new one cost $1900 and I got enough insurance money to cover it but of course none available and local bike shop said I could order one and wait a year.
Looking at other online offerings at local shops and as you know, pickings are slim but I see one carried a Specialized Roubaix Sport in my size. At $3200 this is a big step up in price which I would have to consider if I really wanted to spend that much but of course it's a better bike with a carbon frame and hydraulic disk brakes. It also comes with some sort of shock absorbing stem. Good news too is it comes with 700x28 tires and it looks like hopefully the 700x32's might fit. Anybody have experience with this bike? Does it lean towards being more a strictly tight handling road bike or would one consider the specs relaxed enough to put it towards the endurance type end?
Another option is to ride out the year with my 20 year old tried and true Trek 7500 hybrid and see if new and used bike inventory looks more promising in the spring. Think bike inventory will have picked up by then?
Looking at other online offerings at local shops and as you know, pickings are slim but I see one carried a Specialized Roubaix Sport in my size. At $3200 this is a big step up in price which I would have to consider if I really wanted to spend that much but of course it's a better bike with a carbon frame and hydraulic disk brakes. It also comes with some sort of shock absorbing stem. Good news too is it comes with 700x28 tires and it looks like hopefully the 700x32's might fit. Anybody have experience with this bike? Does it lean towards being more a strictly tight handling road bike or would one consider the specs relaxed enough to put it towards the endurance type end?
Another option is to ride out the year with my 20 year old tried and true Trek 7500 hybrid and see if new and used bike inventory looks more promising in the spring. Think bike inventory will have picked up by then?
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,859
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4630 Post(s)
Liked 5,167 Times
in
3,195 Posts
If you get on with the front spring and the fit is good then it could be ideal. It's definitely an endurance bike in a similar vein to your Synapse.
Likes For PeteHski:
#5
I like speed
It's definitely an endurance bike and should fit 32's. I built one up recently for riding fondos since the other bike is a SuperSix; I end up feeling a bit beaten up after long rides.
Overall the Roubaix is more stable in handling and comfortable, particularly while descending. You don't really notice the Future Shock working unless you're out of the saddle and putting in the watts. The Roubaix isn't a race bike so it lacks the snap in acceleration however it holds speed well and is noticeably less taxing after a long day.
Overall the Roubaix is more stable in handling and comfortable, particularly while descending. You don't really notice the Future Shock working unless you're out of the saddle and putting in the watts. The Roubaix isn't a race bike so it lacks the snap in acceleration however it holds speed well and is noticeably less taxing after a long day.
#6
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 15,314
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 53 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6370 Post(s)
Liked 4,971 Times
in
3,421 Posts
Would you consider a Specialized Roubaix Sport to lean towards the endurance end?
Most everything we call road bikes are endurance bikes. It's only the desired fit that changes. Just because you don't want what is considered a race fit doesn't make them any more or less endurance bikes.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,859
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4630 Post(s)
Liked 5,167 Times
in
3,195 Posts
Toward the Endurance end? It's an endurance bike just like my Tarmac is. However the Roubaix is less aggressive geometry that will give you more of the relaxed, more upright position that your Cannondale did.
Most everything we call road bikes are endurance bikes. It's only the desired fit that changes. Just because you don't want what is considered a race fit doesn't make them any more or less endurance bikes.
Most everything we call road bikes are endurance bikes. It's only the desired fit that changes. Just because you don't want what is considered a race fit doesn't make them any more or less endurance bikes.
#8
LBKA (formerly punkncat)
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Jawja
Posts: 4,299
Bikes: Spec Roubaix SL4, GT Traffic 1.0
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2208 Post(s)
Liked 960 Times
in
686 Posts
I have what I recall is a Roubaix Elite? It's a 2013-ish model with the Zertz fittings. It has been tremendously comfortable and I compare it to a Cadillac in regard to the other road bikes I have owned and ridden. Great bikes IMO.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,976
Bikes: Specialized Roubaix, Canyon Inflite AL SLX, Ibis Ripley AF, Priority Continuum Onyx, Santana Vision, Kent Dual-Drive Tandem
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 891 Post(s)
Liked 736 Times
in
441 Posts
Definitely worth considering and test riding. Just rode back-to-back 200 kms last weekend on my 2019 Roubaix with Ultegra Di2 on 25mm tubeless tires with only tired legs at the end.
#10
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 15,314
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 53 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6370 Post(s)
Liked 4,971 Times
in
3,421 Posts
Well the whole point of an endurance bike is the slightly less aggressive geometry. The Roubaix has a much higher stack than your Tarnac, but the rest of the geometry is fairly race oriented. Obviously it has more vertical compliance too for improved comfort. The pros do actually race this bike, but they have a special version with a lower stack height.
BITD I was told that a road bike was an endurance bike and just like color, you picked whether you wanted one with a relaxed fit or a race fit. When mfrs on their websites show less aggressive fit bikes as endurance bikes, it's not because they are the one and only bikes that are endurance. It's more that there is nothing else special about them. And I'm not saying that as a bad thing. It's just that they are the most basic of the endurance geometry bikes
#11
Senior Member
Geometry-wise, it's definitely on the Endurance end. That said, definitely test ride it. I rented a Roubaix Comp Di2 back in 2019, and it wasn't really the bike for me - ambivalent about the disc brakes, not used to the Di2, but really, really, disliked bobbing up and down on the suspension stem. I'm sure if I had more than a day with it, I would've been able to adjust my pedal stroke to be more compatible, but not so much with one 40 miler.
But if the bike shop says its available, go test ride it and let us know what you think!
But if the bike shop says its available, go test ride it and let us know what you think!
Likes For aliasfox:
#12
Pizzaiolo Americano
#13
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 15,314
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 53 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6370 Post(s)
Liked 4,971 Times
in
3,421 Posts
#14
Pizzaiolo Americano
Accept what you want. You have been riding for quite a while it looks. If you think that there is no difference between a bike with race or endurance geometry, I don't know what to tell you...Endurance geometry bikes don't have low stack. It is their main defining trait...That and a steep head tube angle. I suspect you already know this and just want to argue though...
Last edited by Pizzaiolo Americano; 08-25-21 at 02:43 PM.
#15
Full Member
If you ride your Tarmac in a triathon, is it a tri bike?
If you ride your Tarmac on single track, is it a mountain bike?
etc...
Likes For teejaywhy:
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: South Central PA
Posts: 549
Bikes: Focus Arriba, Specialized Roubaix Expert, Bianchi Impulso Allroad
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 109 Post(s)
Liked 82 Times
in
53 Posts
Iride01 has been peddling the same 'all bikes are endurance bikes' BS since he purchased his Tarmac. I just laugh and don't bother responding to his ridiculous generalization any more. By the way, it doesn't help to reason with him, provide geometry charts, etc. to point out the differences-- he just continues with his ridiculous assertions regarding road frame geometry.
Hopefully the OP, and others who have asked about endurance geometry, see right through his ridiculous logic straight away also. Unfortunately for BF, he seems to have a lot of time on his hands to post about things he knows little about.
Hopefully the OP, and others who have asked about endurance geometry, see right through his ridiculous logic straight away also. Unfortunately for BF, he seems to have a lot of time on his hands to post about things he knows little about.
#17
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 76
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 57 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
7 Posts
Thanks for the sage advice thus far. Another issue is the frame size. The available bike is 54cm and at 5'10", I think 56cm is more suitable. My friend said you can compensate for frame differences somewhat by changing the stem, etc.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,859
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4630 Post(s)
Liked 5,167 Times
in
3,195 Posts
When mfrs on their websites show less aggressive fit bikes as endurance bikes, it's not because they are the one and only bikes that are endurance. It's more that there is nothing else special about them. And I'm not saying that as a bad thing. It's just that they are the most basic of the endurance geometry bikes
Likes For PeteHski:
#19
Junior Member
I am about the same height as you (5' 11"). I think we roughly straddle the 2 sizes. I purchased a 54 Roubaix in 2013 and have ridden it many miles. Yesterday, I took delivery of a 56 Aethos. I'm still dialing in the fit, but it feels good so far. I only have about 10 miles on it so far. Plan to stretch it legs this weekend.
#20
Pizzaiolo Americano
Geometry Geeks
Last edited by Pizzaiolo Americano; 08-25-21 at 06:35 PM.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: South Jersey near PHL
Posts: 599
Bikes: Frequently
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 158 Post(s)
Liked 254 Times
in
132 Posts
I have a 56cm Roubaix (2013, pre- future shock) and a 32" pants inseam (height is 5'10"+). Don't think I'd fit on a 54cm bike.
It came with 25s, and I run it with 28s. Would like to go with 30s or 32s, but can't.
Still, I like my bike a lot, and never feel bike envy.
It came with 25s, and I run it with 28s. Would like to go with 30s or 32s, but can't.
Still, I like my bike a lot, and never feel bike envy.
#22
Newbie
I'd been riding a 2005 Specialized Roubaix Elite Triple for many years before I finally took delivery this year of a 2021 Roubaix Sport. It's a terrific bike. The FutureShock stem is wonderful and the entire ride is just what I wanted. Like you, I ride a hilly 20-mile course at average 15 mph. I'm more interested in overall comfort than razor handling so I was looking for the endurance rider design.
My thoughts on the Roubaix Sport: https://www.bikeforums.net/road-cycl...ths-delay.html
My only concern for you is the frame size. I'm your cohort (age and height, I'm a little taller and a little older). The Roubaix Elite I used to ride was a 56 and since I got the Sport in a 58 frame size, I realize that at 6-foot-1 I was really a 58 all along.
So the 54 might possibly be small for you at 5-foot-11. I would guess you're a 56. Don't let the simple availability of the bike in 54 sway you - it's an expensive bike and you need to get it in your size. It's worth waiting for.
It only took me 9 months to receive mine in the correct size ... see thread at https://www.bikeforums.net/road-cycl...ew-normal.html ... but the Roubaix Sport was worth every day of the wait.
=K
My thoughts on the Roubaix Sport: https://www.bikeforums.net/road-cycl...ths-delay.html
My only concern for you is the frame size. I'm your cohort (age and height, I'm a little taller and a little older). The Roubaix Elite I used to ride was a 56 and since I got the Sport in a 58 frame size, I realize that at 6-foot-1 I was really a 58 all along.
So the 54 might possibly be small for you at 5-foot-11. I would guess you're a 56. Don't let the simple availability of the bike in 54 sway you - it's an expensive bike and you need to get it in your size. It's worth waiting for.
It only took me 9 months to receive mine in the correct size ... see thread at https://www.bikeforums.net/road-cycl...ew-normal.html ... but the Roubaix Sport was worth every day of the wait.
=K
#23
Full Member
I am about the same height as you (5' 11"). I think we roughly straddle the 2 sizes. I purchased a 54 Roubaix in 2013 and have ridden it many miles. Yesterday, I took delivery of a 56 Aethos. I'm still dialing in the fit, but it feels good so far. I only have about 10 miles on it so far. Plan to stretch it legs this weekend.
Your 56 Aethos has about the same amount of stack as your 54 Roubaix (565mm vs 563mm) but a lot more reach (395mm vs 380mm). At 392mm, even my 58 Roubaix (2020 model) (for reference I'm 6' and have a 36" cycling inseam) has a shorter reach than your 56 Aethos.
Last edited by Kabuto; 08-25-21 at 07:19 PM.
#24
Method to My Madness
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 3,881
Bikes: Trek FX 2, Cannondale Synapse x2, Cannondale CAAD4, Santa Cruz Stigmata 3
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2080 Post(s)
Liked 1,567 Times
in
1,085 Posts
I felt the same way when I shopped for my first road bike in 2017. I test rode the carbon versions of the Synapse, Roubaix, and Domane, and was weirded out by the Future Shock of the Roubaix and the Isospeed of the Domane.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,859
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4630 Post(s)
Liked 5,167 Times
in
3,195 Posts
Definitely don't buy it if it is too small. Unless you have particularly short arms then a 56 cm is likely to fit you much better. The only thing in favour of the Roubaix in smaller sizes is the relatively high stack. If you prefer a bit more saddle to bar drop then you might just get on with the 54 cm frame. But only if the reach is still long enough for you and it might well not be.