Maximum Human Torque II
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2023
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Maximum Human Torque II
So on a related note (going for 5 time zombie!! It is almost Halloween), I’m trying to explain to “a friend” (who might be my son) the physics of why he should downshift the chainring (move to a smaller front gear) and back gear (move to a bigger cog) going up long, steep hills. The empirical evidence (practically coming to a stop and falling off the bike) is apparently not proof enough. I’m thinking the simple explanation is that he doesn’t have enough strength/can’t exert enough force to drive the largest front gear when the back gear is on a smaller cog - which would give apx 4 rotations of the back wheel for a single pedal/crank rotation. What are the physics to explain this? I saw a video where a body builder rode up a hill in high gear but his time was slower that an amateur biker (who used lower gears and more rotations) and he was dead tired vs the biker. I saw in this forum that Torque x rpm = power…. I assume more power is needed to go uphill than flat …but that’s as far as I can get…I can’t translate it into the gear explanation. Please help all you physics masters!!
Last edited by Tribikenewbie; 10-16-23 at 10:08 PM. Reason: Want to tie this back to previous post
#2
Senior Member
Body builders often deliberately force themselves into catastrophic dehydration and other sorts of malnourishment, so it doesn't surprise me that one would be exhausted after trying to race a bicycle uphill, regardless of the gearing.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,710
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4544 Post(s)
Liked 5,050 Times
in
3,118 Posts
So on a related note (going for 5 time zombie!! It is almost Halloween), I’m trying to explain to “a friend” (who might be my son) the physics of why he should downshift the chainring (move to a smaller front gear) and back gear (move to a bigger cog) going up long, steep hills. The empirical evidence (practically coming to a stop and falling off the bike) is apparently not proof enough. I’m thinking the simple explanation is that he doesn’t have enough strength/can’t exert enough force to drive the largest front gear when the back gear is on a smaller cog - which would give apx 4 rotations of the back wheel for a single pedal/crank rotation. What are the physics to explain this? I saw a video where a body builder rode up a hill in high gear but his time was slower that an amateur biker (who used lower gears and more rotations) and he was dead tired vs the biker. I saw in this forum that Torque x rpm = power…. I assume more power is needed to go uphill than flat …but that’s as far as I can get…I can’t translate it into the gear explanation. Please help all you physics masters!!
The rider applies an Input Torque (Pedal Force x Crank Length) and an Input rpm (Pedal Cadence). This gives Input Power as defined in the above general equation.
The drivetrain gears convert this rider Input Power into an Output Power at the rear wheel = Wheel Torque x Wheel rpm.
Apart from minor drivetrain losses (which we can ignore for this purpose) Input Power = Output Power and the gear ratio simply determines how the Output Torque and rpm are split. A lower gear provides a higher Output Torque and lower Wheel speed for a given Input Power level. So the rider has to apply less Crank Tiorque (lower Pedal Force) to get the same Wheel Torque (same driving force at the contact patch), but at the expense of a lower Wheel Speed (since Power is a constant).
That’s the best I can simplify it with the actual physics equations included. It may be confusing. A more simple explanation is that a lower gear ratio multiplies your torque input and divides your pedal rpm. So you get more torque at the rear wheel, but at a lower speed.
Likes For PeteHski:
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,866
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 522 Post(s)
Liked 681 Times
in
398 Posts
So on a related note (going for 5 time zombie!! It is almost Halloween), I’m trying to explain to “a friend” (who might be my son) the physics of why he should downshift the chainring (move to a smaller front gear) and back gear (move to a bigger cog) going up long, steep hills. The empirical evidence (practically coming to a stop and falling off the bike) is apparently not proof enough. I’m thinking the simple explanation is that he doesn’t have enough strength/can’t exert enough force to drive the largest front gear when the back gear is on a smaller cog - which would give apx 4 rotations of the back wheel for a single pedal/crank rotation. What are the physics to explain this? I saw a video where a body builder rode up a hill in high gear but his time was slower that an amateur biker (who used lower gears and more rotations) and he was dead tired vs the biker. I saw in this forum that Torque x rpm = power…. I assume more power is needed to go uphill than flat …but that’s as far as I can get…I can’t translate it into the gear explanation. Please help all you physics masters!!
Likes For RChung:
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 6,038
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3998 Post(s)
Liked 7,489 Times
in
3,013 Posts
Likes For tomato coupe:
#7
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,460
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,760 Times
in
2,560 Posts
I considered having one of those tests done when my son asked me to build him a 'bent.
You can climb in too high of a gear. What I have found is it's really inefficient, and if it's on a long ride you'll probably need to eat afterwards.
Not to mention the danger of cramping.
You can climb in too high of a gear. What I have found is it's really inefficient, and if it's on a long ride you'll probably need to eat afterwards.
Not to mention the danger of cramping.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 6,038
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3998 Post(s)
Liked 7,489 Times
in
3,013 Posts
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,350
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4309 Post(s)
Liked 1,386 Times
in
966 Posts
So on a related note (going for 5 time zombie!! It is almost Halloween), I’m trying to explain to “a friend” (who might be my son) the physics of why he should downshift the chainring (move to a smaller front gear) and back gear (move to a bigger cog) going up long, steep hills.
If you know why you'd use a longer lever (arm), you know why you'd use a smaller gear ratio.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,350
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4309 Post(s)
Liked 1,386 Times
in
966 Posts
The basic idea is the same.
Both allow a lower power input over a longer distance.
https://www.explainthatstuff.com/toolsmachines.html
Simple machines-gears-gear ratio and mechanical advantage.
https://energyeducation.ca/encyclope...20gear%20train.
Anyway, it's two wheels.
Both allow a lower power input over a longer distance.
https://www.explainthatstuff.com/toolsmachines.html
Although it's not obvious just by looking at them, gears work in exactly the same way as levers (just as wheels do).
Simple machines-gears-gear ratio and mechanical advantage.
https://energyeducation.ca/encyclope...20gear%20train.
Anyway, it's two wheels.
Last edited by njkayaker; 10-18-23 at 04:49 PM.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,866
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 522 Post(s)
Liked 681 Times
in
398 Posts
the basic idea is the same.
both allow a lower power input over a longer distance.
simple machines-gears-gear ratio and mechanical advantage.
https://energyeducation.ca/encyclope...20gear%20train.
Anyway, it's two wheels.
both allow a lower power input over a longer distance.
simple machines-gears-gear ratio and mechanical advantage.
https://energyeducation.ca/encyclope...20gear%20train.
Anyway, it's two wheels.
#14
climber has-been
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,236
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3538 Post(s)
Liked 3,691 Times
in
1,850 Posts
In olden days, we often climbed in too high of a gear, as we didn't have a choice. We may not have been fast, but our legs were very fatigue resistant.
#15
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,460
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,760 Times
in
2,560 Posts
The advantage back then was there was nobody around with more appropriate gearing to show us up. When I started riding seriously again, it took a while for me to change my equipment over to anything more current. More importantly, it took some time to realize I should change my gearing. I don't think basic physiology has changed, it uses more energy to climb in too high of a gear, and there is a price to be paid for that.
Likes For unterhausen:
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 6,038
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3998 Post(s)
Liked 7,489 Times
in
3,013 Posts
Likes For tomato coupe:
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,710
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4544 Post(s)
Liked 5,050 Times
in
3,118 Posts
The advantage back then was there was nobody around with more appropriate gearing to show us up. When I started riding seriously again, it took a while for me to change my equipment over to anything more current. More importantly, it took some time to realize I should change my gearing. I don't think basic physiology has changed, it uses more energy to climb in too high of a gear, and there is a price to be paid for that.
Likes For PeteHski:
#18
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,460
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,760 Times
in
2,560 Posts
Apologies to the OP, but I de-zombified this thread. I came up with the best title I could for a new thread. If OP wants a different title just respond with it here in this thread.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 25 miles northwest of Boston
Posts: 29,592
Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint, GT Timberline 29r, Marin Muirwoods 29er, Trek FX Alpha 7.0
Mentioned: 112 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5234 Post(s)
Liked 3,609 Times
in
2,357 Posts
@Tribikenewbie
fwiw - with my kids, I kept it simple, real simple
I never look at the display on the shifter but my Daughter liked to. it helped her visually understand what numbers to use, when
meaning, fully understanding the mechanics & physics wasn't as important to her, as the basic settings
lots of ppl prefer not to shift gears & just muscle their way thru. everyone is different
how old is your son?
fwiw - with my kids, I kept it simple, real simple
I never look at the display on the shifter but my Daughter liked to. it helped her visually understand what numbers to use, when
meaning, fully understanding the mechanics & physics wasn't as important to her, as the basic settings
lots of ppl prefer not to shift gears & just muscle their way thru. everyone is different
how old is your son?
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,866
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 522 Post(s)
Liked 681 Times
in
398 Posts
LOL. My smallest gear is a 36/25 and I'm hardly ever on it, I've never been able to spin up hills, doesn't feel right, ironically, I spin like crazy on the flats, just what works for me. Now I gotta go watch Hinault blow out his knees...
#23
ignominious poltroon
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 4,138
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2280 Post(s)
Liked 3,503 Times
in
1,839 Posts
"My son doesn't know what he is torquing about."
Likes For Polaris OBark:
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,038
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7084 Post(s)
Liked 11,188 Times
in
4,782 Posts
If your son is smart enough to understand the physics, he's smart enough to choose his own gear.
Likes For Koyote:
#25
Cheerfully low end
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 1,980
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 646 Post(s)
Liked 1,051 Times
in
670 Posts
Also, if you can sustain the pedaling, you may be slower in the higher gear, which will reduce air drag though it likely isn’t a big factor unless you are a fast climber. Also, some coaches recommend starting long hard climbs in a slightly higher gear that discourages you from going too fast and blowing up too soon.
Otto
Last edited by ofajen; 10-18-23 at 01:08 PM.