Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

gear ratios...

Search
Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

gear ratios...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-24-00, 02:29 AM
  #1  
claude
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
claude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Malta, Europe
Posts: 59
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hi to all,

sorry if this question might seem banal to you people, but I just realised (about time I did ??) that newer bikes have got much smaller chainrings than my 10 year old MTB... want to make sure before I buy some bits...

Is the gear ratio measured as the difference between the number of teeth between the chain ring and cog ? Would a, for example 44-11 gear ratio feel exactly the same as a 48-15 ??

thanks for any feedback

claude
claude is offline  
Old 11-25-00, 03:08 AM
  #2  
madsnake
Member
 
madsnake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Christchurch. New Zealand
Posts: 33
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Chainrings

The formula is:

number of teeth on chainring/number of teeth on cog x wheel diameter = gear inches. The result is the distance travelled for one pedal revolution.

Hence 44:11 = 104 gear inches.
48:15 = 83 gear inches.

52:13 would give you 104.

A good cycle mechanics book should give give you a table of gear inch equivalents.

madsnake is offline  
Old 11-27-00, 01:34 AM
  #3  
claude
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
claude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Malta, Europe
Posts: 59
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
so, if I understood correctly, my older bike with a 48:13 ratio would actually be slower than a newer bike with 44:11 ratio, although the difference in teeth is actually more in the older bike....

claude
claude is offline  
Old 05-01-24, 07:45 PM
  #4  
Ciufalon
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 929

Bikes: A few

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 10 Posts
You could always play around with the gear inches calculator on this page. https://sheldonbrown.com/gear-calc.html
Ciufalon is offline  
Old 05-01-24, 09:12 PM
  #5  
Bill Kapaun
Really Old Senior Member
 
Bill Kapaun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Mid Willamette Valley, Orygun
Posts: 13,924

Bikes: 87 RockHopper,2008 Specialized Globe. Both upgraded to 9 speeds. 2019 Giant Explore E+3

Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1814 Post(s)
Liked 1,298 Times in 894 Posts
Originally Posted by claude
so, if I understood correctly, my older bike with a 48:13 ratio would actually be slower than a newer bike with 44:11 ratio, although the difference in teeth is actually more in the older bike....

claude
IF the "engine" is spinning at the same RPM.
Unlikely for a "casual" cyclist. It would require an extreme degree of fitness to do so at those speeds due to wind resistance. For somebody my age, it would be torture feeling my knees grinding away slowly.
Bill Kapaun is offline  
Old 05-01-24, 09:28 PM
  #6  
MaxKatt
TeeOhPea 2tha DeeOhGee
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Everywhere, All the time.
Posts: 210

Bikes: Several

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 92 Post(s)
Liked 197 Times in 80 Posts
Originally Posted by Ciufalon
You could always play around with the gear inches calculator on this page. https://sheldonbrown.com/gear-calc.html

epic thread dredge.
MaxKatt is offline  
Likes For MaxKatt:
Old 05-01-24, 09:43 PM
  #7  
urbanknight
Over the hill
 
urbanknight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 24,406

Bikes: Giant Defy, Giant Revolt

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1011 Post(s)
Liked 1,235 Times in 707 Posts
Originally Posted by MaxKatt
epic thread dredge.
I think this is the oldest zombie I've ever seen!
__________________
It's like riding a bicycle
urbanknight is offline  
Likes For urbanknight:
Old 05-01-24, 11:59 PM
  #8  
veganbikes
Clark W. Griswold
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ,location, location
Posts: 13,793

Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26

Mentioned: 55 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4451 Post(s)
Liked 4,113 Times in 2,746 Posts
Originally Posted by Ciufalon
You could always play around with the gear inches calculator on this page. https://sheldonbrown.com/gear-calc.html
I think this was probably solved, it has been over 23 years. Though Sheldon Brown has always provided good info it is new posts with it are best left to current active threads rather than almost 24 year old threads.
veganbikes is offline  
Old 05-02-24, 12:27 PM
  #9  
grumpus
Senior Member
 
grumpus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 1,361
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 546 Post(s)
Liked 479 Times in 366 Posts
Originally Posted by Ciufalon
You could always play around with the gear inches calculator on this page. https://sheldonbrown.com/gear-calc.html
You're replying to someone who hasn't posted in 22 years.
grumpus is offline  
Likes For grumpus:
Old 05-04-24, 07:31 AM
  #10  
tomtomtom123
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 1,071
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 354 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 124 Times in 92 Posts
I wonder if Claude ever figured out how to calculate gear ratios.
tomtomtom123 is offline  
Likes For tomtomtom123:
Old 05-06-24, 08:53 PM
  #11  
DiabloScott
It's MY mountain
 
DiabloScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mt.Diablo
Posts: 10,006

Bikes: Klein, Merckx, Trek

Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4360 Post(s)
Liked 3,024 Times in 1,639 Posts
Well as long as someone already woke the corpse -
Originally Posted by madsnake
The formula is:
number of teeth on chainring/number of teeth on cog x wheel diameter = gear inches. The result is the distance travelled for one pedal revolution.
.
That's the right formula but the wrong definition. The result is the equivalent diameter of a wheel that would travel the same distance in one revolution (like a penny farthing's wheel).
In other words, the distance travelled per pedal revolution is the (gear inches) * π.

Last edited by DiabloScott; 05-07-24 at 06:02 AM.
DiabloScott is offline  
Likes For DiabloScott:
Old 05-06-24, 09:03 PM
  #12  
Camilo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,844
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1138 Post(s)
Liked 1,237 Times in 783 Posts
Originally Posted by claude
Hi to all,

sorry if this question might seem banal to you people, but I just realised (about time I did ??) that newer bikes have got much smaller chainrings than my 10 year old MTB... want to make sure before I buy some bits...

Is the gear ratio measured as the difference between the number of teeth between the chain ring and cog ? Would a, for example 44-11 gear ratio feel exactly the same as a 48-15 ??

thanks for any feedback

claude
Not the difference between front and rear teeth, but the ratio. And yes, that ration would be a good point of comparison if the wheel /tire circumference is held constant. It's an easy way of comparing two similar bikes, for examle, two 700c road bikes or two 29'er MTBs. Gear inches - which a lot of people are well versed in - is a better way to compare if the wheel size changes as well as the gearing. For example, comparing two mtb with different size wheels

Last edited by Camilo; 05-06-24 at 09:17 PM.
Camilo is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.