gear ratios...
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Malta, Europe
Posts: 59
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Hi to all,
sorry if this question might seem banal to you people, but I just realised (about time I did ??) that newer bikes have got much smaller chainrings than my 10 year old MTB... want to make sure before I buy some bits...
Is the gear ratio measured as the difference between the number of teeth between the chain ring and cog ? Would a, for example 44-11 gear ratio feel exactly the same as a 48-15 ??
thanks for any feedback
claude
sorry if this question might seem banal to you people, but I just realised (about time I did ??) that newer bikes have got much smaller chainrings than my 10 year old MTB... want to make sure before I buy some bits...
Is the gear ratio measured as the difference between the number of teeth between the chain ring and cog ? Would a, for example 44-11 gear ratio feel exactly the same as a 48-15 ??
thanks for any feedback
claude
#2
Member
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Christchurch. New Zealand
Posts: 33
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Chainrings
The formula is:
number of teeth on chainring/number of teeth on cog x wheel diameter = gear inches. The result is the distance travelled for one pedal revolution.
Hence 44:11 = 104 gear inches.
48:15 = 83 gear inches.
52:13 would give you 104.
A good cycle mechanics book should give give you a table of gear inch equivalents.
number of teeth on chainring/number of teeth on cog x wheel diameter = gear inches. The result is the distance travelled for one pedal revolution.
Hence 44:11 = 104 gear inches.
48:15 = 83 gear inches.
52:13 would give you 104.
A good cycle mechanics book should give give you a table of gear inch equivalents.
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Malta, Europe
Posts: 59
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
so, if I understood correctly, my older bike with a 48:13 ratio would actually be slower than a newer bike with 44:11 ratio, although the difference in teeth is actually more in the older bike....
claude
claude
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 929
Bikes: A few
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
10 Posts
You could always play around with the gear inches calculator on this page. https://sheldonbrown.com/gear-calc.html
#5
Really Old Senior Member
Unlikely for a "casual" cyclist. It would require an extreme degree of fitness to do so at those speeds due to wind resistance. For somebody my age, it would be torture feeling my knees grinding away slowly.
#6
TeeOhPea 2tha DeeOhGee
You could always play around with the gear inches calculator on this page. https://sheldonbrown.com/gear-calc.html
epic thread dredge.
Likes For MaxKatt:
Likes For urbanknight:
#8
Clark W. Griswold
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ,location, location
Posts: 13,793
Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26
Mentioned: 55 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4451 Post(s)
Liked 4,113 Times
in
2,746 Posts
You could always play around with the gear inches calculator on this page. https://sheldonbrown.com/gear-calc.html
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 1,361
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 546 Post(s)
Liked 479 Times
in
366 Posts
You could always play around with the gear inches calculator on this page. https://sheldonbrown.com/gear-calc.html
Likes For grumpus:
Likes For tomtomtom123:
#11
It's MY mountain
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mt.Diablo
Posts: 10,006
Bikes: Klein, Merckx, Trek
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4360 Post(s)
Liked 3,024 Times
in
1,639 Posts
Well as long as someone already woke the corpse -
That's the right formula but the wrong definition. The result is the equivalent diameter of a wheel that would travel the same distance in one revolution (like a penny farthing's wheel).
In other words, the distance travelled per pedal revolution is the (gear inches) * π.
In other words, the distance travelled per pedal revolution is the (gear inches) * π.
Last edited by DiabloScott; 05-07-24 at 06:02 AM.
Likes For DiabloScott:
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,844
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1138 Post(s)
Liked 1,237 Times
in
783 Posts
Hi to all,
sorry if this question might seem banal to you people, but I just realised (about time I did ??) that newer bikes have got much smaller chainrings than my 10 year old MTB... want to make sure before I buy some bits...
Is the gear ratio measured as the difference between the number of teeth between the chain ring and cog ? Would a, for example 44-11 gear ratio feel exactly the same as a 48-15 ??
thanks for any feedback
claude
sorry if this question might seem banal to you people, but I just realised (about time I did ??) that newer bikes have got much smaller chainrings than my 10 year old MTB... want to make sure before I buy some bits...
Is the gear ratio measured as the difference between the number of teeth between the chain ring and cog ? Would a, for example 44-11 gear ratio feel exactly the same as a 48-15 ??
thanks for any feedback
claude
Last edited by Camilo; 05-06-24 at 09:17 PM.