Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Two types of Shimano Chainrings?

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Two types of Shimano Chainrings?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-04-04, 04:29 PM
  #1  
hz536n
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 27
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Two types of Shimano Chainrings?

I have installed a Shimano Ultegra 53/42 on my AD that I would like to change to a 53/39 combination. When I look at listings for Shimano Ultegra Chainrings they are listed as either Type-A or Type-B.
What does this mean? I do not see any such markings on my early 1990's NOS Ultegra Crankset. Thanks.
hz536n is offline  
Old 12-04-04, 04:39 PM
  #2  
F1_Fan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 1,120
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I think it's to do with the Hyperglide teeth (or whatever they're called on the front). If you mis-match A&B then the special shift points don't line up right.
F1_Fan is offline  
Old 12-04-04, 04:58 PM
  #3  
catatonic
Chairman of the Bored
 
catatonic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: St. Petersburg, FL
Posts: 5,825

Bikes: 2004 Raleigh Talus, 2001 Motobecane Vent Noir (Custom build for heavy riders)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
maybe it's to differentiate between the two types of ultegra there are, the huge "newer" style, and the mosre classic looking style.

Maybe those styles are actually older and newer I dunno, but I see two ultegra crankset styles, and one has more metal in the chainrings than the other, or so it seems.
catatonic is offline  
Old 12-04-04, 05:40 PM
  #4  
DieselDan
Senior Member
 
DieselDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Beaufort, South Carolina, USA and surrounding islands.
Posts: 8,521

Bikes: Cannondale R500, Motobecane Messenger

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I believe it has to do with double or triple crankarm spiders.
DieselDan is offline  
Old 12-04-04, 07:18 PM
  #5  
F1_Fan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 1,120
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DieselDan
I believe it has to do with double or triple crankarm spiders.
Nope, those are distinguished by bolt circle... there is no need for another designator.

I believe my original posting was correct. Look at this description for Dura-Ace chainrings from bikenashbar.com

"Replacement chainrings for the 7700 series crankset. Chainrings Available: 39, 42, 52, 53A (mate to the 42), or 53B (mate to the 39)"
F1_Fan is offline  
Old 12-04-04, 08:54 PM
  #6  
Retro Grouch 
Senior Member
 
Retro Grouch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Posts: 30,225

Bikes: Catrike 559 I own some others but they don't get ridden very much.

Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1572 Post(s)
Liked 644 Times in 365 Posts
Originally Posted by F1_Fan
I think it's to do with the Hyperglide teeth (or whatever they're called on the front). If you mis-match A&B then the special shift points don't line up right.
Yup, I think so too. I also suspect that it's possible to overstate the amount of difference. I've known several riders who have mixed "A" and "B" chainrings and don't seem to have any difficulty with their front shifting. That's not a shift that you make all that often anyway.
Retro Grouch is offline  
Old 12-05-04, 09:03 AM
  #7  
hz536n
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 27
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
OK. so how do I tell if my Ultegra/600 FC-6400 Crankset is Type-A or Type-B?
The papers with the Crankset do not mention anything about it. The Crankset does not have any pins or ramps, just some special shift assist teeth. There is a tab on the inside diameter of each Chainring for alignment purposes.


hz536n is offline  
Old 12-05-04, 09:49 AM
  #8  
sydney
Senior Member
 
sydney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 9,428
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by hz536n
OK. so how do I tell if my Ultegra/600 FC-6400 Crankset is Type-A or Type-B?
The papers with the Crankset do not mention anything about it. The Crankset does not have any pins or ramps, just some special shift assist teeth. There is a tab on the inside diameter of each Chainring for alignment purposes.


If they aren't marked, they aren't either.It doesn't matter. You basically have generic rings. Replace them with similar or pay more for pinned and ramped ones.
sydney is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.