Stupid Stupid Stupid
#1
1coolrider
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 479
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Stupid Stupid Stupid
I got tired of the chain cleaning hassle with a mounted chain so I added a KMC link to one of my Campy 10 speed chains. Most of my bikes already have them. The installation went well and soon I had a clean chain and cassette. Reinstalled the chain and shifted through the gears on the stand with no problems. Later that day went out for a 50 mile ride with friends with no shifting problems, however, the chain sounded loud. After I got home, it dawned on me that I must have installed the chain upside down creating a situation where the worn cassette meshed with a new chain. Bad!!
A quick switch rectified the problem. I'll be more careful next time. Direction of travel and orientation are important.
A quick switch rectified the problem. I'll be more careful next time. Direction of travel and orientation are important.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 9,201
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1186 Post(s)
Liked 289 Times
in
177 Posts
I don't remove my campy chains except to replace but I've never heard of a directional chain. Still not clear what you are talking about.
#3
1coolrider
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 479
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
I turned the chain upside down using the "new" side of the chain rather than the "worn in" side. Also, if you reverse the direction of travel, the chain will be running backwards creating a new wear pattern.
#4
Senior Member
never heard of that one. i have 7 bikes and all of them have the missing link. i've never paid attention on if they are upside down or not. i've never had a problem.
#5
It do, but it don't.
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Bloomington, IL
Posts: 310
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
you should try riding with the chain right-side-up but the bike up-side-down. now THAT creates a new wear pattern.
#6
Senior Member
#8
Medicinal Cyclist
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Mohawk Valley/Adks, NYS
Posts: 2,807
Bikes: 2003 Klein Q Carbon Race; 2009 Giant OCR-1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
New one on me, too. One thing you don't want to do is install the slip link backwards. That will cause problems.
With a chain saw, on the other hand, it is a big deal. Cuts a lot better when the chain is pointed in the right direction.
With a chain saw, on the other hand, it is a big deal. Cuts a lot better when the chain is pointed in the right direction.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Owings Mills, Maryland
Posts: 494
Bikes: 2011 Trek 8.4 DS hybrid; 2012 Felt F-75 road bike; 1990 Specialized Stumpjumper MTB; 1992 Guerciotti road bike (inactive)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Yeah, may not be exactly what you are talking about, but a few days ago I just replaced my first modern chain (Shimano 105 Chain). I say modern b/c of getting back on the bike last yr after 13 yr hiatus, I was only used to changing the old Sedis, or Sachs chains that were bi-directional chains. As per the instructions of the new 105 chain, I had to be sure that I installed it in the correct direction (stamped lettering on links righ-side-up when viewing bike from dirve-train side).
#10
Speechless
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Central NY
Posts: 8,842
Bikes: Felt Brougham, Lotus Prestige, Cinelli Xperience,
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 163 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 39 Times
in
16 Posts
There is no upside down on a chain. They have rollers, so the wear moves about the roller. Some chains have direction, at least per their marketing.
If you used a KMC missing link on a Campy chain, you have to use the one specific to Campy 10 speed or 11 speed chain. A KMC link sold for a Shimano chain will make a noise through the cassette.
If you used a KMC missing link on a Campy chain, you have to use the one specific to Campy 10 speed or 11 speed chain. A KMC link sold for a Shimano chain will make a noise through the cassette.
#11
1coolrider
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 479
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
There is no upside down on a chain. They have rollers, so the wear moves about the roller. Some chains have direction, at least per their marketing.
If you used a KMC missing link on a Campy chain, you have to use the one specific to Campy 10 speed or 11 speed chain. A KMC link sold for a Shimano chain will make a noise through the cassette.
If you used a KMC missing link on a Campy chain, you have to use the one specific to Campy 10 speed or 11 speed chain. A KMC link sold for a Shimano chain will make a noise through the cassette.
The wear pattern that I noticed showed up on the side links not the rollers. Not sure what is causing this pattern, maybe it is caused from tension between the cassette and the chain ring rubbing the front derailleur??. When I reversed the chain the noise disappeared.. Who knows, I have at least 6 bikes both Shimano and Campy with missing links and have never bothered to check. This is the first time I've had problems. Oh well, an easy fix.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 832
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
I got tired of the chain cleaning hassle with a mounted chain so I added a KMC link to one of my Campy 10 speed chains. Most of my bikes already have them. The installation went well and soon I had a clean chain and cassette. Reinstalled the chain and shifted through the gears on the stand with no problems. Later that day went out for a 50 mile ride with friends with no shifting problems, however, the chain sounded loud. After I got home, it dawned on me that I must have installed the chain upside down creating a situation where the worn cassette meshed with a new chain. Bad!!
A quick switch rectified the problem. I'll be more careful next time. Direction of travel and orientation are important.
A quick switch rectified the problem. I'll be more careful next time. Direction of travel and orientation are important.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
Now I've got to go examine my old worn-out chains with a magnifying glass! My assumptions has always been it would make no difference upside-down because of reasoning similar to above, the wear being internal in the links between the plates. But what if the links are worn more closer to one side and less in the middle? Turning the chain over would reverse that. If it even happens that way. What if each plate was bent infinitesimally in one direction because of a skewed chainline? Again that would be reversed. Is the chain actually worn that way, I don't know but hopefully if so there's some way to detect it.
#14
Speechless
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Central NY
Posts: 8,842
Bikes: Felt Brougham, Lotus Prestige, Cinelli Xperience,
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 163 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 39 Times
in
16 Posts
This applies to roller chain, and should carry through to bike chain:
Link plate wear is uncommon as link plates are usually made out of 1040 or 1045, and through hardened. This means the hardness is full depth, and appreciable wear is very slow. Rollers are also full hard.
Pins and bushings are case hardened 1018 or 1020, with a fairly shallow case (.006-.008" on #40 chain, which is closest to bicycle). This shallow case, with a soft under layer (think nuggat), wears quickly and shows developed wear more quickly. With bike chain having a combined roller/bushing, I would expect it to be case hardened.
Link plate wear is uncommon as link plates are usually made out of 1040 or 1045, and through hardened. This means the hardness is full depth, and appreciable wear is very slow. Rollers are also full hard.
Pins and bushings are case hardened 1018 or 1020, with a fairly shallow case (.006-.008" on #40 chain, which is closest to bicycle). This shallow case, with a soft under layer (think nuggat), wears quickly and shows developed wear more quickly. With bike chain having a combined roller/bushing, I would expect it to be case hardened.
#15
Artificial Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Cyberspace
Posts: 7,159
Bikes: Retrospec Judd, Dahon Boardwalk, Specialized Langster
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6799 Post(s)
Liked 5,509 Times
in
3,245 Posts
I think the title of this thread is very descriptive.
__________________
#16
Still can't climb
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Limey in Taiwan
Posts: 23,024
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
6 Posts
really? upside down?
__________________
coasting, few quotes are worthy of him, and of those, even fewer printable in a family forum......quote 3alarmer
No @coasting, you should stay 100% as you are right now, don't change a thing....quote Heathpack
coasting, few quotes are worthy of him, and of those, even fewer printable in a family forum......quote 3alarmer
No @coasting, you should stay 100% as you are right now, don't change a thing....quote Heathpack
#17
Senior Member
This applies to roller chain, and should carry through to bike chain:
Link plate wear is uncommon as link plates are usually made out of 1040 or 1045, and through hardened. This means the hardness is full depth, and appreciable wear is very slow. Rollers are also full hard.
Pins and bushings are case hardened 1018 or 1020, with a fairly shallow case (.006-.008" on #40 chain, which is closest to bicycle). This shallow case, with a soft under layer (think nuggat), wears quickly and shows developed wear more quickly. With bike chain having a combined roller/bushing, I would expect it to be case hardened.
Link plate wear is uncommon as link plates are usually made out of 1040 or 1045, and through hardened. This means the hardness is full depth, and appreciable wear is very slow. Rollers are also full hard.
Pins and bushings are case hardened 1018 or 1020, with a fairly shallow case (.006-.008" on #40 chain, which is closest to bicycle). This shallow case, with a soft under layer (think nuggat), wears quickly and shows developed wear more quickly. With bike chain having a combined roller/bushing, I would expect it to be case hardened.
What I discovered is that there is more to chain wear than just elongation. Despite the chain's low elongation, it was totally shot. It also wore one of the cogs on the cassette enough that it skipped with a new chain.
I had another bike in use at the time that had Ti cogs. After only 4,000 miles and even less chain wear, the 19 and 21T cogs wear both worn enough to cause new-chain skip.
After that, I began using the roller spacing as my most important gage of wear and also started using 3-4 chains in a fairly frequent rotation, so I never get new-chain skip and the cassette will last for the entire life of all the chain in the rotation.
#18
Speechless
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Central NY
Posts: 8,842
Bikes: Felt Brougham, Lotus Prestige, Cinelli Xperience,
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 163 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 39 Times
in
16 Posts
Again, my knowledge is specific to roller chain:
To really measure component wear, you need to apply a static load of 1% of Ultimate, which is 18 lbs measuring load on a #40 or #41 chain (41 is the old ANSI designation for bike chain, but would have probably been an old 5 speed chain at this point). Under measuring load, the amount of wear seen grows dramatically, but again, this may be more pronounced on roller chain, with roller to bushing wear and bushing to pin wear.
Also, modern bike chain may not use a full hard link plate. Your information is very detailed, and a softer link would show more wear between plates.
Another interesting thing, most folks have no idea how much a chain will grow in length under load. We prestressed chain to 40% of ultimate at assembly, and you would have to allow 3/8" growth on 16" of chain (for 1/2" pitch chain, or essential 32 joints). Granted, that is a 700# load, and more than a bike sees in use, but anyone who thinks chain length is static under load is mistaken.
To really measure component wear, you need to apply a static load of 1% of Ultimate, which is 18 lbs measuring load on a #40 or #41 chain (41 is the old ANSI designation for bike chain, but would have probably been an old 5 speed chain at this point). Under measuring load, the amount of wear seen grows dramatically, but again, this may be more pronounced on roller chain, with roller to bushing wear and bushing to pin wear.
Also, modern bike chain may not use a full hard link plate. Your information is very detailed, and a softer link would show more wear between plates.
Another interesting thing, most folks have no idea how much a chain will grow in length under load. We prestressed chain to 40% of ultimate at assembly, and you would have to allow 3/8" growth on 16" of chain (for 1/2" pitch chain, or essential 32 joints). Granted, that is a 700# load, and more than a bike sees in use, but anyone who thinks chain length is static under load is mistaken.
#19
Senior Member
I've also measured brand new chains with my full-length measuring gage and found them only slightly short of an even-inch number. I always credited that to all the grease-like lube. I suspect that one ride would bring the chain to full length, without any significant load.
#20
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,583
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3914 Post(s)
Liked 1,964 Times
in
1,402 Posts
More than likely, the OP simply put his chain on the wrong side of the chain guide between his jockey wheels. He examine that little piece of metal for marks on the outside.
#21
Eric C.
Actually I think it's the opposite. It's ACTUALLY saying:
I'm feeling nice so let's go with number two. Relax OP, you're not that stupid. Trust me, I've done stupider things um...just about every day of my life...including saying stupider.
- In reality the OP is smart because unlike the rest of you dummies he knows there is an upside down side to a chain and YOU DIDN'T!
- Or, the OP is really hard on himself to call himself stupid three times for a trivial mistake that really amounts to no big deal, didn't even prevent him from riding.
I'm feeling nice so let's go with number two. Relax OP, you're not that stupid. Trust me, I've done stupider things um...just about every day of my life...including saying stupider.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: SW Fl.
Posts: 5,623
Bikes: Day6 Semi Recumbent "FIREBALL", 1981 Custom Touring Paramount, 1983 Road Paramount, 2013 Giant Propel Advanced SL3, 2018 Specialized Red Roubaix Expert mech., 2002 Magna 7sp hybrid, 1976 Bassett Racing 45sp Cruiser
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1069 Post(s)
Liked 800 Times
in
507 Posts
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Merry Land
Posts: 433
Bikes: Guru Evolo R, Colnago Pista, Look AL 464P SS, various frankenbikes
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts