Help building my first recumbent
#26
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Florianópolis, Brazil
Posts: 142
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 54 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Oh, I meant I race the UCI rules stuff, this bike:
https://weightweenies.starbike.com/f...3156&mode=view
I don't bother racing a recumbent, there's no one to race. But I bother about going the fastest possible under my legs' power just for the fun of it, without spending a ton on carbon fiber stuff.
https://weightweenies.starbike.com/f...3156&mode=view
I don't bother racing a recumbent, there's no one to race. But I bother about going the fastest possible under my legs' power just for the fun of it, without spending a ton on carbon fiber stuff.
#27
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Florianópolis, Brazil
Posts: 142
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 54 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
I would too. That is one sweet bike. 406 rear wheel would NOT improve aero! Only if YOU weren't there, but you are, and the rear wheel is in your wind shadow so the full size rear wheel is not an issue and your gearing and tire choices improve. Where do you find oval chainrings bigger than 50T? How much do they cost? Short cranks are for if you have a problem with heel strike against the front wheel which should not be the case with a 406 front wheel. IF you shorten the cranks then you should also lower the gearing, most people don't do that. They just use 155mm cranks with the same gears that the rest of us use 170mm cranks to turn and then wonder why their knees still hurt, or why they are still so slow. BTW a standard bike can be out of UCI compliance for various reasons. A recumbent isn't UCI compliant. Period. Once you are on a recumbent you are dead to the UCI. Most of us don't care. The Stringbike drivetrain still has rotary motion of the cranks. It has all the disadvantages of being way more complex and fragile than a bicycle drivetrain needs to be, heavier too, probably. But that is just first impressions. It looks interesting. I am going to study it some more. Linear pedal motion is useful if you need your foot motion to stay inside the confines of a fairing. Consider however: year after year, the fastest recumbent in the world is what amounts to a drop dead simple Easy Racer (LWB) recumbent inside a carbon fiber shell. You wouldn't kill yourself if you tried to ride it around town but if you fell over for whatever reason getting back up again would not be quick, or easy. But have you seen a Peregrin on Birk streamliner? More information available here. I don't think there are that many on the road and they don't look cheap but the idea of a two wheel recumbent in a shell being ridden on public roads is intriguing to some.
I also know that shorter cranks require a smaller chainring, in the same proportion as the cranks are shortened, so you keep the "pedal speed" the same. I actually got 120mm Sinz cranks at hand, and 38t chainring that would be equivalent to 54t on 170mm cranks. I was about to try that on a TT build, but might now save it for the recumbent. Or maybe just try before on the TT bike to decide if chainring size is right, because...
I also know that smaller wheel requires bigger chainrings, so if I go with 406 rear wheel, and if I expect my CdA to drop, and if I'm able to hold the same power... Then probably a chainring around 50t, being equivalent to 65t on 170mm cranks, would do the trick. But you can find up to 60t on aliexpress, look for "Stone 110 BCD oval chainring", the biggest one $70 shipped.
Then the UCI thing. I care about UCI for racing upright road bikes. I won't care about it while building a recumbent.
The StringBike has a bit more than only disadvantages, take a better look. I'd ride that on my upright race bike... if UCI didn't state bikes have to have a chain drive... (!!!!!!!!) I guess they made it with rotary motion just because that's what people are used too, but I intend to build something with linear motion some time. Being out of UCI anyways, that should be a recumbent too.
Then the linear pedal motion. Yes, the fastest HPV is circular motion so far. Could be for a few reasons: 1) nobody until today has trained long enough to have peak performance on a linear systems 2) Elite athletes are trained in circular motion 3) Linear drivetrains are underdeveloped. I believe all 3 play a role. Graeme Obree recently built a linear motion machine to go for HPV top speed record, but failed. His "Beastie" is backyard build with no wind tunnel data, made of cheap steel. It's fixed gear. He's now much older and less fit. He only trained a few months on it. But I still dream with linear motion. The human body is not made to pedal circles, it's that simple, we can theoretically generate more power linearly.
Finally, the Birk bikes. I like the Comet idea, tail fairing. I'd add a windshield at front to it. It's as close to full fairing you can get while still being able to put your feet on the ground, and getting up. Probably then you can add an stretched fabric/canvas on the sides when you wish, like the Aerowing stuff. I like their idea, looks like it helps.
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,004
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2502 Post(s)
Liked 745 Times
in
526 Posts
The main reason non-competitive riders use recumbents is comfort! You said you don't care that much for comfort, you are about speed. When I want to go fast on just two wheels I ride a motorcycle. In the United States recumbent trikes outsell recumbent bikes by a HUUGE margin. Recumbent bikes fall over way too easily and older riders cannot take the risk. Competitive riders on race worthy recumbents ARE faster than roadies. They are not dramatically faster! Just a few miles per hour faster until you get out the carbon fiber and wind tunnel tested shells and and. The ultimate in linear motion is the sliding seat rowing sequence. This is impractical for a two wheel recumbent, but there are fixed and sliding seat rowing trikes (maybe bikes too, who knows). 40 ish strokes per minute is a very high stroke rate to maintain and the same is true for linear foot action. You can't do the 120 rpm craziness that you can do with pedal cranks because the pedals absorb some of the effort of decelerating your lower leg and getting it moving in the opposite direction. In rowing and linear motion, the mechanism does not help as much in returning energy for the return stroke.
The simplest linear (or rowing) action will be very much more complex than a conventional chain drivetrain. Simple works. It works very well. You have to work very, very hard to beat simple and efficient. It isn't usually worth the effort. I would have little to say about it if you were able to prove me wrong by building a prototype and putting a Youtube video of it online. If you have to sub-contract fabrication to people with specialized knowledge of welding or metalworking or framebuilding you are dead in the water. It won't be worth it. I approached a talented metalworker in my area to collaborate on an idea I had and he didn't want to have anything to do with it. Framebuilders are much braver than metalworkers. They know their creations will be used by humans in possible risky ways. I don't know how they protect themselves legally but they seem to have figured it out. In Brazil there probably aren't as many lawyers making anyone who builds something for someone else nervous about liability but you still have to weight the cost of their labor vs what you get in return. TL;DR: Buy that sweet lowracer you linked to (700C rear) learn to ride it, and enjoy riding it. Do that for as long as you possibly can.
Oh, the short cranks ... so here's the thing about that. The way you put it "when you shorten cranks you lower the gear to keep pedal speed the same" is not quite right. You don't lower the gear to keep pedal speed the same, you lower the gear to keep the perceived effort the same. Pedal speed in innate. A person's preferred cadence is like the speed they talk (or walk) at: very much built in. If you pedal 170mm cranks at 90 rpm you will pedal 120mm cranks at 90 rpm!! Well, you will want to. When you see your riding buddies disappearing in the distance you will start flailing away trying to get some road speed to catch them. If you have lowered the gears to match the percent reduction in torque of the shorter cranks you will have to speed up well past what is 'natural' to actually be fast. I wouldn't know, but I have heard that using cranks shorter than 140mm (found on bikes for children in the US) makes you feel like "your feet are tied together". That's just what I have heard. Maybe you will feel differently. Maybe you already have tried short cranks and like them. This is just what I've heard.
#29
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Florianópolis, Brazil
Posts: 142
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 54 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
"how much faster do you think you will be on a recumbent at all?"
The simplest linear (or rowing) action will be very much more complex than a conventional chain drivetrain. Simple works. It works very well. You have to work very, very hard to beat simple and efficient. It isn't usually worth the effort. I would have little to say about it if you were able to prove me wrong by building a prototype and putting a Youtube video of it online. If you have to sub-contract fabrication to people with specialized knowledge of welding or metalworking or framebuilding you are dead in the water. It won't be worth it. I approached a talented metalworker in my area to collaborate on an idea I had and he didn't want to have anything to do with it. Framebuilders are much braver than metalworkers. They know their creations will be used by humans in possible risky ways. I don't know how they protect themselves legally but they seem to have figured it out. In Brazil there probably aren't as many lawyers making anyone who builds something for someone else nervous about liability but you still have to weight the cost of their labor vs what you get in return. TL;DR: Buy that sweet lowracer you linked to (700C rear) learn to ride it, and enjoy riding it. Do that for as long as you possibly can.
.
The simplest linear (or rowing) action will be very much more complex than a conventional chain drivetrain. Simple works. It works very well. You have to work very, very hard to beat simple and efficient. It isn't usually worth the effort. I would have little to say about it if you were able to prove me wrong by building a prototype and putting a Youtube video of it online. If you have to sub-contract fabrication to people with specialized knowledge of welding or metalworking or framebuilding you are dead in the water. It won't be worth it. I approached a talented metalworker in my area to collaborate on an idea I had and he didn't want to have anything to do with it. Framebuilders are much braver than metalworkers. They know their creations will be used by humans in possible risky ways. I don't know how they protect themselves legally but they seem to have figured it out. In Brazil there probably aren't as many lawyers making anyone who builds something for someone else nervous about liability but you still have to weight the cost of their labor vs what you get in return. TL;DR: Buy that sweet lowracer you linked to (700C rear) learn to ride it, and enjoy riding it. Do that for as long as you possibly can.
.
I've seen some rowing-bike systems already, they look cool but not really aero since you can't lay down!
We'll see what about those really short cranks, but I'm betting they will work well, I did my research before buying...
Liability for framebuilders around here isn't an issue, never heard about anything related. Actually for anything, liability isn't usually an issue! Plus the builder is also a friend, he'll do whatever crazy projects I ask for!
And for the custom machined parts, I'll see it, pricing etc. But as told by a biomedical and mechanical engineer friend, you just have to show up to a machining workshop with the SolidWorks file and pay for the machine time and the alloy block, that's it, they'll do it. He has done that several times for wheelchair and prosthetics parts, hand cycles and so on. Maybe sometime in 2020!?
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Buckhorn, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 217
Bikes: Rans Screamer, Catrike Expedition, Specialized Montain Bike, Cannondale Quick SL1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#31
Senior Member
Then the linear pedal motion. Yes, the fastest HPV is circular motion so far. Could be for a few reasons: 1) nobody until today has trained long enough to have peak performance on a linear systems 2) Elite athletes are trained in circular motion 3) Linear drivetrains are underdeveloped. I believe all 3 play a role. Graeme Obree recently built a linear motion machine to go for HPV top speed record, but failed. His "Beastie" is backyard build with no wind tunnel data, made of cheap steel. It's fixed gear. He's now much older and less fit. He only trained a few months on it. But I still dream with linear motion. The human body is not made to pedal circles, it's that simple, we can theoretically generate more power linearly.
#32
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Florianópolis, Brazil
Posts: 142
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 54 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Just because the record beating machines are circular that doesn't mean linear couldn't possibly beat if better developed.
Thats not stopping me from trying, certainly...
But now I'm excited about having found that low racer manufactured nearby
#33
Senior Member
I don't know if there is any study that I could find to post. It was a LOOOONG time ago.
Linear drives have the disadvantage of the rider's legs completely stopping and then reversing direction twice for every power stroke. Lots of wasted energy, big dead spots in the stroke. There have been some schemes to make the pedal cycle more ellipsoid, and they can increase the length of the main power stroke, but only at the expense of magnifying the dead spot at the top and bottom. (There's that stopping and reversing direction thing.)
Linear drives have the disadvantage of the rider's legs completely stopping and then reversing direction twice for every power stroke. Lots of wasted energy, big dead spots in the stroke. There have been some schemes to make the pedal cycle more ellipsoid, and they can increase the length of the main power stroke, but only at the expense of magnifying the dead spot at the top and bottom. (There's that stopping and reversing direction thing.)
#34
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Florianópolis, Brazil
Posts: 142
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 54 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
I don't know if there is any study that I could find to post. It was a LOOOONG time ago.
Linear drives have the disadvantage of the rider's legs completely stopping and then reversing direction twice for every power stroke. Lots of wasted energy, big dead spots in the stroke. There have been some schemes to make the pedal cycle more ellipsoid, and they can increase the length of the main power stroke, but only at the expense of magnifying the dead spot at the top and bottom. (There's that stopping and reversing direction thing.)
Linear drives have the disadvantage of the rider's legs completely stopping and then reversing direction twice for every power stroke. Lots of wasted energy, big dead spots in the stroke. There have been some schemes to make the pedal cycle more ellipsoid, and they can increase the length of the main power stroke, but only at the expense of magnifying the dead spot at the top and bottom. (There's that stopping and reversing direction thing.)
BTW indoor rowing is linear, and they also have power meters indoors. As far as I've checked (quite a long time ago) they managed to put equivalent power figures to cyclists when comparing HR and oxygen consumption. I also remember a guy mentioning he did both sports and his FTP, maxHR, and VO2 were about the same when tested indoors for both sports. Not a scientific comment at all, I wont bother researching that all over again, but if you are curious...
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Mountain Brook. AL
Posts: 4,003
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 303 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 137 Times
in
105 Posts
Looking at the https://ce.olx.com.br/fortaleza-e-re...leta-585063383 bicycle, a 406 wheel would probably not
work with the brakes, they are enough smaller diameter for this to be problematic.
It is also not clear how the bike is adjusted for rider size, possibly a telescoping boom? If you are too far in height from the
seller that may be a problem.
work with the brakes, they are enough smaller diameter for this to be problematic.
It is also not clear how the bike is adjusted for rider size, possibly a telescoping boom? If you are too far in height from the
seller that may be a problem.
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 659
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 195 Post(s)
Liked 207 Times
in
126 Posts
Easy Racer
I built a long wheelbase recumbent several years ago. High quality 20" bmx wheels and tires are easily available. They can be smooth high pressure tires that allow high speeds. My rear wheel was originally a 27" aluminum job but I changed to a 26" wheel when I turned it into a touring machine. I tried a fairing but found it too heavy to be useful. The low slung position gives you a nice aerodynamic advantage over any upright bike on flat roads. As a hill climber the design is pretty slow. I commuted to work on flat smooth roads and managed a 25mph average including a few traffic lights. My freewheel was 13-32 and I found a triple that accommodated a 54-44-26. Even with a long cage derailleur you had to be careful about not crossing gears too radically. A barend shifter did the shifting. I felt like I was on a motorcycle and pedestrians had a tendency to missjudge the speed when crossing streets resulting in some close calls. I built it from two fairly decent old English donor bikes. The two extra tubes needed to complete the build came from some cheaper cro-moly bikes. I'm not sure if the plans are still available but it was pretty straightforward and I needed only a hacksaw, a single file and the cheapest oxygen/propane or mapp fuel braizing set. The welder cost all of thirty dollars and if you take your time and file everything to fit tightly your frame will be unbreakable. I braized part of a derailleur cage to support the long chain about half way between the chainwheel and the freewheel. I cut and braised some tall handlebars rather than complicate things with more traditional under the seat steering. The seat was thin plywood, foam rubber and denim material stapeled over the whole thing. The thing was maybe 35 lbs and looked a little like a lowered chopper but it really flew. As a touring cycle it was great tearing along flat roads but grinding up hills was no picnic and not being able to stand while pedaling was often literally a real pain in the butt.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
lovemachine
Adaptive Cycling: Handcycles, Amputee Adaptation, Visual Impairment, and Other Needs
6
06-22-18 04:59 AM