View Poll Results: What is your training zone? Can select multiple zones
130-139
9
27.27%
140-149
13
39.39%
150-159
11
33.33%
160-169
11
33.33%
170-180
2
6.06%
Am off the charts
4
12.12%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 33. You may not vote on this poll
What is your heart rate training zone?
#1
Grupetto Bob
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Seattle-ish
Posts: 6,222
Bikes: Bikey McBike Face
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2584 Post(s)
Liked 5,642 Times
in
2,922 Posts
What is your heart rate training zone?
What zones range do you find optimal for your training?
At 66 I find my sweet spot in the 150s on the flats. Find I am efficient there without over taxing.
At 66 I find my sweet spot in the 150s on the flats. Find I am efficient there without over taxing.
__________________
Road 🚴🏾♂️ & Mountain 🚵🏾♂️
Road 🚴🏾♂️ & Mountain 🚵🏾♂️
Last edited by rsbob; 01-02-21 at 10:29 PM.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 2,433
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 741 Post(s)
Liked 412 Times
in
230 Posts
To be honest, I rarely wear my heart rate monitor anymore, especially on endurance or sweet spot type rides. I find that I ride much more steady using power than heart rate. When I first started riding with power, I noticed my heart rate was more stable with less peaks and valleys when I used my power meter to determine pace/effort. I do use my heart rate monitor when doing to determine proper recovery before the next interval.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
There’s no single best training zone. Some days are threshold, some days are VO2max, some days are recovery. There might be 90bpm difference between what’s optimal for what I’m trying to do that particular day.
Likes For caloso:
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 4,444
Bikes: bikes
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2622 Post(s)
Liked 1,429 Times
in
711 Posts
I usually wear a hrm but I never train by heart rate. Too fickle, way too many factors affect it, and it doesn't tell me much. One day 230 watts might give me a heart rate of 150, another day it may give me a heart rate of 130.
Power all the way.
Power all the way.
Likes For rubiksoval:
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,520
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20810 Post(s)
Liked 9,456 Times
in
4,672 Posts
What?
You're asking the wrong question.
You're asking the wrong question.
Likes For WhyFi:
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,515
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3241 Post(s)
Liked 2,512 Times
in
1,510 Posts
Training? I'm just out riding one of my bikes. I have a watch the captures the data. I might glance at it some during the rides, but I don't crunch the data afterwards.
#9
• —
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Land of Pleasant Living
Posts: 12,241
Bikes: Shmikes
Mentioned: 59 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10171 Post(s)
Liked 5,867 Times
in
3,157 Posts
The premise of the question is faulty. I suggest reading a book on training with HR.
Likes For MoAlpha:
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
I do, but not to train on. I monitor it mostly to see how closely it tracks with power, how quickly it recovers after a hard effort. I don’t train by it because it lags behind power and because on a long interval it doesn’t change much once it reaches LTHR.
#11
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,534
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3889 Post(s)
Liked 1,938 Times
in
1,383 Posts
One wants to train in all the zones. Though it is said that too many riders train neither easy enough nor hard enough. Try riding so that on the flat, you're breathing through your nose and on the climbs, you're panting. See what that does to your HR. That's what you really want to look at, how you want to ride. Try riding away from home until you are really tired, then ride back. See what your HR is at the end. That's probably what it should have been at the start if you've stayed well hydrated and fed on the ride..
__________________
Results matter
Results matter
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,971
Bikes: Habanero Titanium Team Nuevo
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 399 Post(s)
Liked 185 Times
in
121 Posts
Your poll does not work for me. I rarely average over 120. I am almost 60 years old and resting HR is 40. I go between 110-125 tops. I also don't think it means a huge amount either but interesting.
#13
• —
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Land of Pleasant Living
Posts: 12,241
Bikes: Shmikes
Mentioned: 59 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10171 Post(s)
Liked 5,867 Times
in
3,157 Posts
HR was a lot more useful to me back when I was running competitively and the dynamic range was 150 BPM instead of the lousy 120 I’m
now.
#14
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,637
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4736 Post(s)
Liked 1,532 Times
in
1,003 Posts
Sounds like the intent of the question may be more along the lines of "What is your tempo HR range", otherwise yeah, the question doesn't make a lot of sense.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Napa Valley, CA
Posts: 908
Bikes: Wife says I have too many :-)
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 327 Post(s)
Liked 250 Times
in
158 Posts
OK, I get it. BTW, I love to ride the American River Trail up in your area. Hope to ride it this year again. Its about an hour drive from here in Napa but worth it. Just beautiful...........
Likes For frogman:
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,884
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6969 Post(s)
Liked 10,966 Times
in
4,691 Posts
As has been noted, the question makes no sense. Training by HR is pretty crude -- but if you are going to do it, each individual's "zones" will differ (because threshold is an individual thing), and the optimal zone for a workout depends on the goal for that particular ride.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
Like most cyclists, my HRM stopped having a great deal of value once I got a power meter. The HR I target when riding is "whatever it comes out to." Some days I use power to measure my efforts, some days I'm a Fred "just riding around" as they say.
I wear a chest strap on every ride, it doesn't cost much (a new $0.50 battery a year) and the data can be useful. I enjoy a lot of non bike activity, unlike most cyclists, so HR is the lowest common denominator, and gives me an idea about my recovery needs.
I wear a chest strap on every ride, it doesn't cost much (a new $0.50 battery a year) and the data can be useful. I enjoy a lot of non bike activity, unlike most cyclists, so HR is the lowest common denominator, and gives me an idea about my recovery needs.
#19
• —
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Land of Pleasant Living
Posts: 12,241
Bikes: Shmikes
Mentioned: 59 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10171 Post(s)
Liked 5,867 Times
in
3,157 Posts
HR has been supplanted by power as the basic measure of output for obvious reasons, but HR is the only direct measure of the physiological stress which meeting each power level is imposing on the system, that day or over time. Without that it’s all modeling pegged to an estimate of FTP, which is a somewhat theoretical notion in itself. That’s my take, anyway.
Likes For MoAlpha:
#20
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,637
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4736 Post(s)
Liked 1,532 Times
in
1,003 Posts
HR has been supplanted by power as the basic measure of output for obvious reasons, but HR is the only direct measure of the physiological stress which meeting each power level is imposing on the system, that day or over time. Without that it’s all modeling pegged to an estimate of FTP, which is a somewhat theoretical notion in itself. That’s my take, anyway.
#21
Enthusiastic Sufferer
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 229
Bikes: 2015 Specialized Roubaix, 2014 Salsa Fargo, 2013 Trek Remedy, 2014 Cannondale Synapse
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 124 Post(s)
Liked 311 Times
in
107 Posts
I used maffetone method to get mine and it's served me really well.
155 max for aerobic all efforts. It's my "go forever speed"
Edit: 26 years old
155 max for aerobic all efforts. It's my "go forever speed"
Edit: 26 years old
Likes For SapInMyBlood:
#22
• —
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Land of Pleasant Living
Posts: 12,241
Bikes: Shmikes
Mentioned: 59 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10171 Post(s)
Liked 5,867 Times
in
3,157 Posts
Sounds about right, but don’t worry: Any of us could drop at any moment, but high HR, per se, during exercise poses no risk to a trained individual. This season, at age 63-64, my max was 177. I don’t look at HR much on the bike, but if I saw 170s in the numbers for a ride, especially a TT, I was happy I could still push myself that hard and had left it all on the road.
Last edited by MoAlpha; 01-03-21 at 07:49 PM.
Likes For MoAlpha:
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,884
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6969 Post(s)
Liked 10,966 Times
in
4,691 Posts
Do you have a heart condition? Aside from that, is it dangerous to raise your HR to a high level?
#24
Grupetto Bob
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Seattle-ish
Posts: 6,222
Bikes: Bikey McBike Face
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2584 Post(s)
Liked 5,642 Times
in
2,922 Posts
Ok it was a totally crackpot question made by someone who can’t justify the price of a power meter and the computer to read it. As a former runner, I used a HRM consistently to improve my time, evaluate my splits, etc but now see it is an outmoded method for evaluating the zones each of us train in. My bad. But appreciate the responses and seeing how training can be more meaningfully measured.
__________________
Road 🚴🏾♂️ & Mountain 🚵🏾♂️
Road 🚴🏾♂️ & Mountain 🚵🏾♂️
#25
Me duelen las nalgas
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 13,513
Bikes: Centurion Ironman, Trek 5900, Univega Via Carisma, Globe Carmel
Mentioned: 199 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4560 Post(s)
Liked 2,802 Times
in
1,800 Posts
After two years with a Tickr chest strap, I can't say it's indispensable for training. Way too much variability depending on my meds, caffeine intake, etc.
Taking a Sudafed for sinus congestion or ephedrine for asthma will spike my heart rate for two or three days -- my resting HR is around 90 and the slightest effort will peg around 160 bpm. Same but opposite effect if I take a beta blocker for occasional migraines/cluster headache -- I won't be able to get my HR above 120 for two or three days, regardless of effort. Coffee and other caffeinated beverages and snacks have a similar effect to Sudafed, but slightly less exaggerated. I've cut way back on coffee and caffeine in general but it hasn't had any effect on reducing my heart rate.
And my heart rate tends to run 20-30 bpm higher outdoors for the same effort, compared with indoors on the trainer. So even if I tried to follow a training program that recommended, say, 80 percent zone 1 and 20 percent zone 4, I couldn't do it outdoors. According to the usual charts, graphs, tables and practical tests for my heart rate zones, my zone 1 should be 100 bpm or below. In actual practice my HR is seldom below 100 bpm even during a casual walk, and *never* on a bike ride, even if I'm just coasting. There's a quarter-mile 2%-4% downhill grade from my parking lot to the main street where I turn off to my usual riding/jogging routes, and my HR is 130 bpm just coasting. Because so many drivers in my neighborhood are murderous imbeciles who should never be permitted to drive, the most stressful part of every ride is the first mile from my door. After that drivers are a bit better and my heart rate settles.
I check my HR trends after rides and jogs but other than responding more or less appropriately to the effort, terrain, etc., the information isn't particularly useful.
I've also noticed on long rides or indoor trainer sessions that I experience the same heart rate drift/creep many people do, but after 2-3 hours, it drifts back downward for the same effort. I do 3-5 hour indoor trainer sessions once in awhile because it's the only way I can consistently stay in zone 1/2, per the usual suggestions for training according to heart rate. And consistently after about 3 hours my heart rate drifts downward a bit and it takes a bit more effort to reach zones 4 or 5. Outdoors on rides of 2 hours or less I routinely reach zones 4 and 5 on sprints and climbs. Very rare indoors. So I'm not even sure "my" heart rate zones are anywhere near accurate.
Mostly I just train by how I feel. While the HRV app I use seems to correlate with how I feel, heart rate alone hasn't been useful.
Taking a Sudafed for sinus congestion or ephedrine for asthma will spike my heart rate for two or three days -- my resting HR is around 90 and the slightest effort will peg around 160 bpm. Same but opposite effect if I take a beta blocker for occasional migraines/cluster headache -- I won't be able to get my HR above 120 for two or three days, regardless of effort. Coffee and other caffeinated beverages and snacks have a similar effect to Sudafed, but slightly less exaggerated. I've cut way back on coffee and caffeine in general but it hasn't had any effect on reducing my heart rate.
And my heart rate tends to run 20-30 bpm higher outdoors for the same effort, compared with indoors on the trainer. So even if I tried to follow a training program that recommended, say, 80 percent zone 1 and 20 percent zone 4, I couldn't do it outdoors. According to the usual charts, graphs, tables and practical tests for my heart rate zones, my zone 1 should be 100 bpm or below. In actual practice my HR is seldom below 100 bpm even during a casual walk, and *never* on a bike ride, even if I'm just coasting. There's a quarter-mile 2%-4% downhill grade from my parking lot to the main street where I turn off to my usual riding/jogging routes, and my HR is 130 bpm just coasting. Because so many drivers in my neighborhood are murderous imbeciles who should never be permitted to drive, the most stressful part of every ride is the first mile from my door. After that drivers are a bit better and my heart rate settles.
I check my HR trends after rides and jogs but other than responding more or less appropriately to the effort, terrain, etc., the information isn't particularly useful.
I've also noticed on long rides or indoor trainer sessions that I experience the same heart rate drift/creep many people do, but after 2-3 hours, it drifts back downward for the same effort. I do 3-5 hour indoor trainer sessions once in awhile because it's the only way I can consistently stay in zone 1/2, per the usual suggestions for training according to heart rate. And consistently after about 3 hours my heart rate drifts downward a bit and it takes a bit more effort to reach zones 4 or 5. Outdoors on rides of 2 hours or less I routinely reach zones 4 and 5 on sprints and climbs. Very rare indoors. So I'm not even sure "my" heart rate zones are anywhere near accurate.
Mostly I just train by how I feel. While the HRV app I use seems to correlate with how I feel, heart rate alone hasn't been useful.