Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Which vintage for a loaded tour?

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Which vintage for a loaded tour?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-27-19, 01:01 PM
  #26  
BrewsterII
Newbie
 
BrewsterII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Arizona
Posts: 35
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Liked 9 Times in 5 Posts
I love my Trek .......... but the Miyata wins, hands down!

Last edited by BrewsterII; 07-28-19 at 07:20 AM.
BrewsterII is offline  
Old 07-27-19, 02:03 PM
  #27  
cannonride15
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Hampton Roads
Posts: 143

Bikes: Cannondales: '85 ST400, '86 SR800, '87 SM600

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 55 Post(s)
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Matching Cannondales would be nice!
cannonride15 is offline  
Old 07-27-19, 06:59 PM
  #28  
Cycle Tourist
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 659
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 195 Post(s)
Liked 207 Times in 126 Posts
If by bike paths you mean gravel, go with the widest tires.
No to the 720. Too flexible. Love Cannondales generally but the 1000 will give you more comfort and some nimbleness IF you're confident in the reliability! Tough choice. Love them all.
Cycle Tourist is offline  
Old 07-28-19, 01:15 AM
  #29  
Lascauxcaveman 
Senior Member
 
Lascauxcaveman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Port Angeles, WA
Posts: 7,922

Bikes: A green one, "Ragleigh," or something.

Mentioned: 194 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1627 Post(s)
Liked 630 Times in 356 Posts
Originally Posted by Chr0m0ly
I...

1) 1991 Miyata 1000LT, A size small at 57cm but works well with the riser stem I've got on it. I'm hesitant to take it on a 4 day trip without fine tuning the rise and reach a little more, but we have a couple weeks.

2) 1990 Cannondale ST600, like the Miyata it has a good stiff frame and also like the Miyata a strong rear rack. The featherweight of the group.

3) The Trek Triplets. '84 520 and 620, and an '83 720. All sporting original racks, but the wheels on the 620 and 720 have been replaced so no Helicomatic to worry about.
....
What say you?
Embarrassment of riches. You could do this kind of ride on a Schwinn Varsity with mismatched rims with under inflated Kendas and not even break a sweat.

So, obviously, the Cannondale, duh
__________________
● 1971 Grandis SL ● 1972 Lambert Grand Prix frankenbike ● 1972 Raleigh Super Course fixie ● 1973 Nishiki Semi-Pro ● 1979 Motobecane Grand Jubile ●1980 Apollo "Legnano" ● 1984 Peugeot Vagabond ● 1985 Shogun Prairie Breaker ● 1986 Merckx Super Corsa ● 1987 Schwinn Tempo ● 1988 Schwinn Voyageur ● 1989 Bottechia Team ADR replica ● 1990 Cannondale ST600 ● 1993 Technium RT600 ● 1996 Kona Lava Dome ●

Lascauxcaveman is offline  
Old 07-28-19, 07:54 AM
  #30  
mstateglfr 
Sunshine
 
mstateglfr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,614

Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo

Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10964 Post(s)
Liked 7,491 Times in 4,189 Posts
I rode a 720 in 25"(or 25.5"?) and even unloaded it flexed more than Hans and Franz. Goofy amount of flex, even when sitting. Hadn't experienced that before- odd sensation.

The Cdale or Miyata would be my choice- whichever of those fits best. Toss the widest possible tires on the bike that fits best and have fun.


**and if you haven't tried before, get a multi mount front rack(jandd extreme, for example) and load rear panniers on the front low position. Then use a compression dry bag(they exist) lashed atop the rear rack.
This setup holds a lot, especially for summer touring, is lighter(dry bag instead of more panniers), and is really stable due to the large front bags.
mstateglfr is offline  
Old 07-28-19, 11:54 AM
  #31  
Hobbiano 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Baton Rouge La
Posts: 1,214
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 394 Post(s)
Liked 346 Times in 230 Posts
Originally Posted by Cycle Tourist
If by bike paths you mean gravel, go with the widest tires.
No to the 720. Too flexible. Love Cannondales generally but the 1000 will give you more comfort and some nimbleness IF you're confident in the reliability! Tough choice. Love them all.
Wow. A 720 is too flexible for a 200 mile tour on flatish terrain with a 35 pound load? Really? I feel sorry for those who rode these things on a trans-continental trip not knowing any better.
Hobbiano is offline  
Old 07-28-19, 12:04 PM
  #32  
trailmix
Senior Member
 
trailmix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 684

Bikes: 50+/-

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 63 Post(s)
Liked 81 Times in 48 Posts
I have an 85 Trek 620 and a handful of ST Cannondales and from my experience either would do the task. Although I have never owned or ridden a Miyata tourer, I am sure it would as well but the "size too small" thing would concern me. Nothing worse than a bike that doesn't quite fit.
trailmix is offline  
Old 07-28-19, 01:20 PM
  #33  
Cycle Tourist
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 659
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 195 Post(s)
Liked 207 Times in 126 Posts
Originally Posted by Hobbiano
Wow. A 720 is too flexible for a 200 mile tour on flatish terrain with a 35 pound load? Really? I feel sorry for those who rode these things on a trans-continental trip not knowing any better.
Sorry. Didn't mean to insult your 720. I rode one with about 50 lbs. of gear from Portland to San Diego. It was in the 63cm size. It was very very wobbly. On an overpass with a strong wind, I got off and walked. Lightly loaded the big frame was fine but with the same tubing as the small frames it just didn't work for me. Maybe the rider being 200lbs. didn't help. Again, sorry to besmirch the 720. I meant no insult.
Cycle Tourist is offline  
Old 07-28-19, 02:18 PM
  #34  
Hobbiano 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Baton Rouge La
Posts: 1,214
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 394 Post(s)
Liked 346 Times in 230 Posts
No. No insult taken. I just think all of these bikes would handle this trip easily and be an enjoyable ride a that. Well, maybe not a Schwinn Varsity.
Hobbiano is offline  
Old 08-06-19, 09:38 AM
  #35  
Chr0m0ly 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Chr0m0ly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Back in Lincoln Sq, Chicago...🙄
Posts: 1,609

Bikes: '84 Miyata 610 ‘91 Cannondale ST600,'83 Trek 720 ‘84 Trek 520, 620, ‘91 Miyata 1000LT, '79 Trek 514, '78 Trek 706, '73 Raleigh Int. frame.

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 685 Post(s)
Liked 370 Times in 219 Posts
I took the 720
It is noodly. 😄😄

The 720 had 1 1/4 tires and fenders, and it had been gone over most recently, plus I wanted to try out the famed grande dame of touring bikes.

I started with weight evenly distributed among my bar bag and two panniers, but once I moved the heavy stuff to the bar bar it did MUCH better. Mine is a 24" model (61cm) and I think I'm and the limit with about 30lbs of gear. It would benefit a LOT from some front panniers.

...and OS tubing 😄👍

It does soak up road chatter, and I think with better weight distribution (we're about to pack up and head to Chain O' Lakes) I think I can dial it in. Next time I think the Cannondale or the Miyata.

This would be epic if I were more ruthless with my gear though! And it's got a lot to teach me about spinning!




Chr0m0ly is offline  
Likes For Chr0m0ly:
Old 08-06-19, 12:54 PM
  #36  
BikeWonder
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Calgary
Posts: 323
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 160 Post(s)
Liked 75 Times in 52 Posts
Originally Posted by Chr0m0ly
I took the 720
It is noodly. 😄😄

The 720 had 1 1/4 tires and fenders, and it had been gone over most recently, plus I wanted to try out the famed grande dame of touring bikes.

I started with weight evenly distributed among my bar bag and two panniers, but once I moved the heavy stuff to the bar bar it did MUCH better. Mine is a 24" model (61cm) and I think I'm and the limit with about 30lbs of gear. It would benefit a LOT from some front panniers.

...and OS tubing 😄👍

It does soak up road chatter, and I think with better weight distribution (we're about to pack up and head to Chain O' Lakes) I think I can dial it in. Next time I think the Cannondale or the Miyata.

This would be epic if I were more ruthless with my gear though! And it's got a lot to teach me about spinning!




So happy to see those Cannondale panniers being used. I used them for my trip and they were amazing. I had a front pair but I lost the right side one which resulted in me jamming my rear panniers and front rack.

If you take the M1000, I guarantee you that you'll have an incredible experience. It's lively loaded and I honestly didn't notice at times when I had the rear load. It was fun to manuever and go quickly.
BikeWonder is offline  
Old 08-06-19, 04:36 PM
  #37  
Chr0m0ly 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Chr0m0ly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Back in Lincoln Sq, Chicago...🙄
Posts: 1,609

Bikes: '84 Miyata 610 ‘91 Cannondale ST600,'83 Trek 720 ‘84 Trek 520, 620, ‘91 Miyata 1000LT, '79 Trek 514, '78 Trek 706, '73 Raleigh Int. frame.

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 685 Post(s)
Liked 370 Times in 219 Posts
It's funny, the vague-ness feels like it's in the steering. When I turn the bars it takes a second for the input to get down to the front tire. Is that a symptom of anything like a headset adjustment? Makes me wonder how the 5 or 620 would behave. I've just dropped the steering stem a little, might help with the feel...
BUT, that's just a tiny bit of the trip, we're having a blast!
Chr0m0ly is offline  
Old 08-06-19, 06:18 PM
  #38  
Hobbiano 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Baton Rouge La
Posts: 1,214
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 394 Post(s)
Liked 346 Times in 230 Posts
Originally Posted by Chr0m0ly
It's funny, the vague-ness feels like it's in the steering. When I turn the bars it takes a second for the input to get down to the front tire. Is that a symptom of anything like a headset adjustment? Makes me wonder how the 5 or 620 would behave. I've just dropped the steering stem a little, might help with the feel...
BUT, that's just a tiny bit of the trip, we're having a blast!
Could the headset be slightly tight? Sometimes those needle bearing Stronglights can be a little touchy to adjust just right. Did you overhall the headset? It really should turn before you even thinking about turning the bars.
Hobbiano is offline  
Old 08-07-19, 12:03 PM
  #39  
Chr0m0ly 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Chr0m0ly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Back in Lincoln Sq, Chicago...🙄
Posts: 1,609

Bikes: '84 Miyata 610 ‘91 Cannondale ST600,'83 Trek 720 ‘84 Trek 520, 620, ‘91 Miyata 1000LT, '79 Trek 514, '78 Trek 706, '73 Raleigh Int. frame.

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 685 Post(s)
Liked 370 Times in 219 Posts
Originally Posted by Hobbiano
Could the headset be slightly tight? Sometimes those needle bearing Stronglights can be a little touchy to adjust just right. Did you overhall the headset? It really should turn before you even thinking about turning the bars.
Naw I figured it out. When I started a turn with the bars the whole bike wants to keep going forward. So the top tube and the down tubes flex sideways a little. Then they kinda snap back to true and the bike turns.

Solution: motorcycle style turns. Push right to go right.
Chr0m0ly is offline  
Old 08-07-19, 05:21 PM
  #40  
Chr0m0ly 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Chr0m0ly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Back in Lincoln Sq, Chicago...🙄
Posts: 1,609

Bikes: '84 Miyata 610 ‘91 Cannondale ST600,'83 Trek 720 ‘84 Trek 520, 620, ‘91 Miyata 1000LT, '79 Trek 514, '78 Trek 706, '73 Raleigh Int. frame.

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 685 Post(s)
Liked 370 Times in 219 Posts
Hmmmm....

I took the bathroom scale down to the garage just now, and put it under each tire....

The rear tire (bike loaded) reads 45lbs, and the front tire (with loaded handle bar bag) reads at 20....

I'm not sure how weight at the tires translates, but I seem to have overloaded myself a bit! 😳
Chr0m0ly is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Chr0m0ly
Classic & Vintage
26
03-22-20 04:21 PM
BikeWonder
Classic & Vintage
152
03-31-19 07:46 PM
Rbonn
Classic & Vintage
16
10-09-18 08:18 AM
Jay.Money
Classic & Vintage
24
10-12-16 05:22 AM
eastbay71
Classic & Vintage
12
11-11-15 12:39 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.