Clueless about Tubeless!
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 35
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Clueless about Tubeless!
I'm thinking about purchasing the Shimano DuraAce C24-TL or the DT Swiss version and have read everything about the weight savings, rolling resistance and durability related to punctures however my question for anyone who has them is about maintenance.
Since the "slime" or sealant is in the tires, do you need to change it out from a maintenance perspective? Does it remain in a liquid state for the duration of your next tire change (say, 1k to 1.5k miles) or would I need to add some amounts overtime during routine inflation? Speaking of inflation, does it consistently hold air pressure or would I have to check/add air prior to each ride like I normally do on tubed tires? Thanks for your help.
Since the "slime" or sealant is in the tires, do you need to change it out from a maintenance perspective? Does it remain in a liquid state for the duration of your next tire change (say, 1k to 1.5k miles) or would I need to add some amounts overtime during routine inflation? Speaking of inflation, does it consistently hold air pressure or would I have to check/add air prior to each ride like I normally do on tubed tires? Thanks for your help.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 6,956
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
5 Posts
The sealant should be checked occasionally, since it'll slowly dry out. The tires should (famous last words) hold air consistently. You may have heard about the difference between theory and reality...? 'Nuf said on that.
Personally, I'm not sold on road tubeless. If I lived where there were a serious goathead thorn issue, then maybe. Other than that, from a weight perspective it appears to be a wash, at best. But if you're getting TLR wheels, you can always try it out and see what you think.
Personally, I'm not sold on road tubeless. If I lived where there were a serious goathead thorn issue, then maybe. Other than that, from a weight perspective it appears to be a wash, at best. But if you're getting TLR wheels, you can always try it out and see what you think.
#4
Should Be More Popular
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 43,056
Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix
Mentioned: 560 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22600 Post(s)
Liked 8,927 Times
in
4,160 Posts
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 8,951
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
12 Posts
Here's an interesting thread on the topic: https://forums.roadbikereview.com/whe...ed-272307.html
#6
Two-Wheeled Aficionado
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Wichita
Posts: 4,903
Bikes: Santa Cruz Blur TR, Cannondale Quick CX dropbar conversion & others
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
weight savings? no way... I thought so too, and then researched it.
there are really only 3 tires to pick from, all made by hutchinson: intensive (sport touring), fusion 3 (sport), atom (race). the fusion3 is the tire everyone ought to be on, which is 312g.
you will easily add 30g of sealant at a minimum. 60, perhaps, but let's say 30. grand total is 342g if your wheels are UST / roadtubeless ready. if not then you have to install two layers of the stans rim tape and add that.
a conti GP 4000S, very comparable tire to the fusion 3, is 205g. ultralight tube is 75g. grand total is 280g, in fact if you install mr tuffy ultralight liners, that's still only 310g to the road tubeless 342g+.
there are really only 3 tires to pick from, all made by hutchinson: intensive (sport touring), fusion 3 (sport), atom (race). the fusion3 is the tire everyone ought to be on, which is 312g.
you will easily add 30g of sealant at a minimum. 60, perhaps, but let's say 30. grand total is 342g if your wheels are UST / roadtubeless ready. if not then you have to install two layers of the stans rim tape and add that.
a conti GP 4000S, very comparable tire to the fusion 3, is 205g. ultralight tube is 75g. grand total is 280g, in fact if you install mr tuffy ultralight liners, that's still only 310g to the road tubeless 342g+.
#7
Senior Member
I bought some Hutchinson Atom tubeless to mount on a brand new WH 6700 wheelset. My tubeless newbie experience:
First of all: mounting these things is a huge pain in the ass. They are ridiculously tight and levering them on (something I hate doing) was absolutely necessary. I've changed many, many tires in my day and I spent a few hours getting the damned thing on. I can never, ever imagine having to tube-up on the side of the road with these things.
Secondly the sealant is a bit messy and instantly voids your Shimano wheels warranty.
Thirdly inflating the things initially is a bit tricky. You either have to use a compressor or you get lucky with a floor pump and get them to inflate. Once the bead seats, you're good but it can be tricky to get them to do so.
Lastly (probably unique to me) after all of this hassle, the GD sidewall on one of the tires leaked air. Not the bead which seated well, the actual sidewall. Soaping up the side showed about a foot of bubbles hissing out of the sidewall. the sealant did nothing to stop the leakage. So then I had to reverse the entire process and splash sealant everywhere getting the tires off.
I promptly returned the tires and went back to GP4000s which took about two minutes to mount up sans tools. Long story short, I agree: road tubeless = (pain in the ass) solution looking for a problem.
One note: I bought them from Stan's and returned them with no problem whatsoever. They were mailed instantly, packaged carefully and the price was good. Awesome, amazing customer service for their part.
First of all: mounting these things is a huge pain in the ass. They are ridiculously tight and levering them on (something I hate doing) was absolutely necessary. I've changed many, many tires in my day and I spent a few hours getting the damned thing on. I can never, ever imagine having to tube-up on the side of the road with these things.
Secondly the sealant is a bit messy and instantly voids your Shimano wheels warranty.
Thirdly inflating the things initially is a bit tricky. You either have to use a compressor or you get lucky with a floor pump and get them to inflate. Once the bead seats, you're good but it can be tricky to get them to do so.
Lastly (probably unique to me) after all of this hassle, the GD sidewall on one of the tires leaked air. Not the bead which seated well, the actual sidewall. Soaping up the side showed about a foot of bubbles hissing out of the sidewall. the sealant did nothing to stop the leakage. So then I had to reverse the entire process and splash sealant everywhere getting the tires off.
I promptly returned the tires and went back to GP4000s which took about two minutes to mount up sans tools. Long story short, I agree: road tubeless = (pain in the ass) solution looking for a problem.
One note: I bought them from Stan's and returned them with no problem whatsoever. They were mailed instantly, packaged carefully and the price was good. Awesome, amazing customer service for their part.
Last edited by Hiro11; 02-14-12 at 04:10 PM.
#8
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 35
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Allen, TX
Posts: 1,916
Bikes: Look 585
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
weight savings? no way... I thought so too, and then researched it.
there are really only 3 tires to pick from, all made by hutchinson: intensive (sport touring), fusion 3 (sport), atom (race). the fusion3 is the tire everyone ought to be on, which is 312g.
you will easily add 30g of sealant at a minimum. 60, perhaps, but let's say 30. grand total is 342g if your wheels are UST / roadtubeless ready. if not then you have to install two layers of the stans rim tape and add that.
a conti GP 4000S, very comparable tire to the fusion 3, is 205g. ultralight tube is 75g. grand total is 280g, in fact if you install mr tuffy ultralight liners, that's still only 310g to the road tubeless 342g+.
there are really only 3 tires to pick from, all made by hutchinson: intensive (sport touring), fusion 3 (sport), atom (race). the fusion3 is the tire everyone ought to be on, which is 312g.
you will easily add 30g of sealant at a minimum. 60, perhaps, but let's say 30. grand total is 342g if your wheels are UST / roadtubeless ready. if not then you have to install two layers of the stans rim tape and add that.
a conti GP 4000S, very comparable tire to the fusion 3, is 205g. ultralight tube is 75g. grand total is 280g, in fact if you install mr tuffy ultralight liners, that's still only 310g to the road tubeless 342g+.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Big Red One, Kansas
Posts: 269
Bikes: Cervelo Soloist Carbon/ Cervelo S1/ Cervelo P2C
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I set up my Neuvation training wheels with Hutchinson Intensive Tubeless 25c tires about 3 months ago. I set it up using Stan's road tubeless system. Set up was pretty easy. Following the instruction on Stan's website, I had the tires installed, inflated and sealed on the first go. It was bit more work than normal tires, but not a whole lot more.
The ride on these are quite amazing....like a magic carpet ride! I am not sure if this is due to the lack of a tube or the fact that I can run these tires at much lower PSI without the fear of pinch flats. I suspect it is a bit of both. For comparison, for training I had been riding on Continental GP4000, 25c @ 110-120PSI. With the Intensives, 25c I have been running the tires @ 90-95PSI. My body used to feel quite rattled and tired after 3-4 hour rides on the former setup. Running tubeless has me feeling much fresher at the end of rides due to the tire's ability to soak up bumps on the road. The Intensives do not wear any faster than GP4000s, and the grip and flat resistance feels pretty much the same. As a matter of fact, with the sealant in the tires, I have pulled out a small piece of wire and a shard of glass out of the rear tire on a post-ride inspection (about 4 weeks ago) and the tire sealed and remained inflated until now. I truly believe that I will wear through these tires before I get any significant flats that would require me to have to set them up with a tube. The tires have 1,600 miles on them and I am ready to move the front to the rear and put a fresh one in the front.
I am so exhilarated about my training road tubeless set up, I have set my race wheels (Kinlin XR-270s) the same, but with the lighter Hutchinson Fusion3 tires.
I am in no way, shape or form, a weight weenie. I was looking for improved ride quality and I have found it with this setup. Setup is more complicated than just a tube, but once you get the hang of it, it is pretty simple.
EDIT: I agree that, if you are not riding on rough, flat prone roads the GP4000s are a good way to go. For comparison, riding the same amount last winter I got 3 flats (2 rear, one front=pinch flat....I log everything). I have had not flats with a tubeless setup this winter.
The ride on these are quite amazing....like a magic carpet ride! I am not sure if this is due to the lack of a tube or the fact that I can run these tires at much lower PSI without the fear of pinch flats. I suspect it is a bit of both. For comparison, for training I had been riding on Continental GP4000, 25c @ 110-120PSI. With the Intensives, 25c I have been running the tires @ 90-95PSI. My body used to feel quite rattled and tired after 3-4 hour rides on the former setup. Running tubeless has me feeling much fresher at the end of rides due to the tire's ability to soak up bumps on the road. The Intensives do not wear any faster than GP4000s, and the grip and flat resistance feels pretty much the same. As a matter of fact, with the sealant in the tires, I have pulled out a small piece of wire and a shard of glass out of the rear tire on a post-ride inspection (about 4 weeks ago) and the tire sealed and remained inflated until now. I truly believe that I will wear through these tires before I get any significant flats that would require me to have to set them up with a tube. The tires have 1,600 miles on them and I am ready to move the front to the rear and put a fresh one in the front.
I am so exhilarated about my training road tubeless set up, I have set my race wheels (Kinlin XR-270s) the same, but with the lighter Hutchinson Fusion3 tires.
I am in no way, shape or form, a weight weenie. I was looking for improved ride quality and I have found it with this setup. Setup is more complicated than just a tube, but once you get the hang of it, it is pretty simple.
EDIT: I agree that, if you are not riding on rough, flat prone roads the GP4000s are a good way to go. For comparison, riding the same amount last winter I got 3 flats (2 rear, one front=pinch flat....I log everything). I have had not flats with a tubeless setup this winter.
Last edited by RedLeg; 02-14-12 at 04:23 PM.
#11
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 35
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Here's an interesting thread on the topic: https://forums.roadbikereview.com/whe...ed-272307.html
#12
Two-Wheeled Aficionado
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Wichita
Posts: 4,903
Bikes: Santa Cruz Blur TR, Cannondale Quick CX dropbar conversion & others
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
No flats this winter on Conti GP 4 Season + Mr Tuffy Ultralight liner + Conti Race Light tube. Rides well at 95F/105R, I'm 180 pounds. Yes, I know that even without the liner the GP4S is a super durable tire, but I don't think changing at tire in the dark at 30 degrees is very fun so my goal was zero flats.
BTW this stuff I've been writing about roadtubeless is in no way comparable to a tubeless for MTB. It's hugely popular on MTBs for several key reasons:
1) lower pressure puts more meat on the trail. those knobs on the side of your tire do something cool when they're flat on the ground.
2) soaks up small bumps due to higher air volume-- a tube actually doesn't use up all the space inside a tire carcass, plus the tube itself consumes some of it.
3) seals small punctures. (agree with above comment, insane not to run sealant in a tubeless tire.)
4) even if you do puncture, a MTB tubeless tire is easy to change rather than the nightmare that is roadtubeless due to the large, pliable sidewall.
I did a lot of research a few months back and was very gungho to try roadtubeless this year. But I'm skipping it.
BTW this stuff I've been writing about roadtubeless is in no way comparable to a tubeless for MTB. It's hugely popular on MTBs for several key reasons:
1) lower pressure puts more meat on the trail. those knobs on the side of your tire do something cool when they're flat on the ground.
2) soaks up small bumps due to higher air volume-- a tube actually doesn't use up all the space inside a tire carcass, plus the tube itself consumes some of it.
3) seals small punctures. (agree with above comment, insane not to run sealant in a tubeless tire.)
4) even if you do puncture, a MTB tubeless tire is easy to change rather than the nightmare that is roadtubeless due to the large, pliable sidewall.
I did a lot of research a few months back and was very gungho to try roadtubeless this year. But I'm skipping it.
#13
Should Be More Popular
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 43,056
Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix
Mentioned: 560 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22600 Post(s)
Liked 8,927 Times
in
4,160 Posts
Pretty cool video but this doesn't convince me of much. Real world flats are not nails that go in/out in a fraction of a second...real world flats are caused by shards etc. that work their way into the tire and STAY there. Maybe the sealant will still work well for this scenario, maybe not.
#14
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 35
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I set up my Neuvation training wheels with Hutchinson Intensive Tubeless 25c tires about 3 months ago. I set it up using Stan's road tubeless system. Set up was pretty easy. Following the instruction on Stan's website, I had the tires installed, inflated and sealed on the first go. It was bit more work than normal tires, but not a whole lot more.
The ride on these are quite amazing....like a magic carpet ride! I am not sure if this is due to the lack of a tube or the fact that I can run these tires at much lower PSI without the fear of pinch flats. I suspect it is a bit of both. For comparison, for training I had been riding on Continental GP4000, 25c @ 110-120PSI. With the Intensives, 25c I have been running the tires @ 90-95PSI. My body used to feel quite rattled and tired after 3-4 hour rides on the former setup. Running tubeless has me feeling much fresher at the end of rides due to the tire's ability to soak up bumps on the road. The Intensives do not wear any faster than GP4000s, and the grip and flat resistance feels pretty much the same. As a matter of fact, with the sealant in the tires, I have pulled out a small piece of wire and a shard of glass out of the rear tire on a post-ride inspection (about 4 weeks ago) and the tire sealed and remained inflated until now. I truly believe that I will wear through these tires before I get any significant flats that would require me to have to set them up with a tube. The tires have 1,600 miles on them and I am ready to move the front to the rear and put a fresh one in the front.
I am so exhilarated about my training road tubeless set up, I have set my race wheels (Kinlin XR-270s) the same, but with the lighter Hutchinson Fusion3 tires.
I am in no way, shape or form, a weight weenie. I was looking for improved ride quality and I have found it with this setup. Setup is more complicated than just a tube, but once you get the hang of it, it is pretty simple.
EDIT: I agree that, if you are not riding on rough, flat prone roads the GP4000s are a good way to go. For comparison, riding the same amount last winter I got 3 flats (2 rear, one front=pinch flat....I log everything). I have had not flats with a tubeless setup this winter.
The ride on these are quite amazing....like a magic carpet ride! I am not sure if this is due to the lack of a tube or the fact that I can run these tires at much lower PSI without the fear of pinch flats. I suspect it is a bit of both. For comparison, for training I had been riding on Continental GP4000, 25c @ 110-120PSI. With the Intensives, 25c I have been running the tires @ 90-95PSI. My body used to feel quite rattled and tired after 3-4 hour rides on the former setup. Running tubeless has me feeling much fresher at the end of rides due to the tire's ability to soak up bumps on the road. The Intensives do not wear any faster than GP4000s, and the grip and flat resistance feels pretty much the same. As a matter of fact, with the sealant in the tires, I have pulled out a small piece of wire and a shard of glass out of the rear tire on a post-ride inspection (about 4 weeks ago) and the tire sealed and remained inflated until now. I truly believe that I will wear through these tires before I get any significant flats that would require me to have to set them up with a tube. The tires have 1,600 miles on them and I am ready to move the front to the rear and put a fresh one in the front.
I am so exhilarated about my training road tubeless set up, I have set my race wheels (Kinlin XR-270s) the same, but with the lighter Hutchinson Fusion3 tires.
I am in no way, shape or form, a weight weenie. I was looking for improved ride quality and I have found it with this setup. Setup is more complicated than just a tube, but once you get the hang of it, it is pretty simple.
EDIT: I agree that, if you are not riding on rough, flat prone roads the GP4000s are a good way to go. For comparison, riding the same amount last winter I got 3 flats (2 rear, one front=pinch flat....I log everything). I have had not flats with a tubeless setup this winter.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Big Red One, Kansas
Posts: 269
Bikes: Cervelo Soloist Carbon/ Cervelo S1/ Cervelo P2C
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I can't really tell yet. From everything I have read, the sealant should last 2-3months. I first installed the tires and sealant on December 3rd. Based on tire wear, I will rotate the front tire to the back and put a new tire on the front in two-three weeks (which should put me at about 2k miles, and 3 months of riding). I will report what I see than. I can still hear sealant sloshing inside the tires when they sit still for a while, I believe that is a good sign.
#16
Underwhelming
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Northeast Mississippi
Posts: 1,263
Bikes: Lynskey R330 Ti, Dean El Vado Ti, Trek 4300
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
weight savings? no way... I thought so too, and then researched it. ... the fusion3 is the tire everyone ought to be on, which is 312g.
you will easily add 30g of sealant ... grand total is 342g if your wheels are UST / roadtubeless ready. if not then you have to install two layers of the stans rim tape and add that.
a conti GP 4000S, very comparable tire to the fusion 3, is 205g. ultralight tube is 75g. grand total is 280g ... mr tuffy ultralight liners ... still only 310g to the road tubeless 342g+.
you will easily add 30g of sealant ... grand total is 342g if your wheels are UST / roadtubeless ready. if not then you have to install two layers of the stans rim tape and add that.
a conti GP 4000S, very comparable tire to the fusion 3, is 205g. ultralight tube is 75g. grand total is 280g ... mr tuffy ultralight liners ... still only 310g to the road tubeless 342g+.
First of all: mounting these things is a huge pain in the ass. They are ridiculously tight and levering them on (something I hate doing) was absolutely necessary. I've changed many, many tires in my day and I spent a few hours getting the damned thing on. I can never, ever imagine having to tube-up on the side of the road with these things.
This is somewhat true. Also gets easier to avoid mess with successive tire changes.
Lastly (probably unique to me) after all of this hassle, the GD sidewall on one of the tires leaked air. Not the bead which seated well, the actual sidewall. Soaping up the side showed about a foot of bubbles hissing out of the sidewall. the sealant did nothing to stop the leakage. So then I had to reverse the entire process and splash sealant everywhere getting the tires off.
#17
Underwhelming
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Northeast Mississippi
Posts: 1,263
Bikes: Lynskey R330 Ti, Dean El Vado Ti, Trek 4300
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I think Stan says his sealant will last up to 6-7 months. Hutchinson's says theirs lasts up to 2 years. The guy I asked at Stan's said no way. I've used both. Currently on Hutchinson's.
Regarding tire life, I'm trying something that one of the guys at Stan's recommended. That is running the pressure lower than the Hutchinson recommendation. He said the tires will last much longer with the same handling quality. So I'm doing that on my tires now, and will know next tire change what kind of difference it made in tire life. I'm 175 lbs, and run the tires at 85-90 PSI.
#18
Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 825
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Pretty cool video but this doesn't convince me of much. Real world flats are not nails that go in/out in a fraction of a second...real world flats are caused by shards etc. that work their way into the tire and STAY there. Maybe the sealant will still work well for this scenario, maybe not.
Road and MTB definitely have different needs and I do agree that it makes a lot of sense for MTB but there are still significant drawbacks for road application.
Bob
#19
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Henrico, Virginia
Posts: 166
Bikes: 1978 Jack Taylor "Tour of Britain", 2010 Cannondale CAAD9-4, 2013, Cannondale Supersix Evo Red Racing, 1969 Jack Taylor Ladies "Tourist" (wife's), 2010 Specialized Dolce Sport (wife's)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
I have been running Dura-Ace 7850 tubeless wheels for about 2 years. I started having leakage problems after 9-10 months. I found that the sealant had severely corroded my rims. There were tiny holes in the rims semi-plugged with corrosion and sealant. Eventually I had to replace the rims on my nickel because Shimano would not warrant them because sealant had been used. Since I had a shop mount and maintain the wheels I could not say for sure what sealant was used, but they told me they use only Stan's or Caffelatex and the only thing I see on the shelf in the service area is Caffelatex. I now run them without sealant and carry a spare tube. I'll pry the tire off and install the tube on the road if I have to.
BTW, the sealant dries up after 6 months for sure.
The upside to all this? While my wheels were down awaiting parts I ran Shimano RS-20s with Vittoria Open Corsa Evo CX tires. The difference in ride when I went back to the tubeless (Hutchinson Fusion 3s) was quite remarkable. I rode tubulars exclusively for over 30 years and can say that the tubeless system comes really close in feel. FYI, I run 90 psi front and 100 rear.
For me the tubeless has a distinct advantage in ride and handling but it also has some downsides. I'll see how it goes without the sealant.
BTW, the sealant dries up after 6 months for sure.
The upside to all this? While my wheels were down awaiting parts I ran Shimano RS-20s with Vittoria Open Corsa Evo CX tires. The difference in ride when I went back to the tubeless (Hutchinson Fusion 3s) was quite remarkable. I rode tubulars exclusively for over 30 years and can say that the tubeless system comes really close in feel. FYI, I run 90 psi front and 100 rear.
For me the tubeless has a distinct advantage in ride and handling but it also has some downsides. I'll see how it goes without the sealant.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,159
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 119 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
I have been running Dura-Ace 7850 tubeless wheels for about 2 years. I started having leakage problems after 9-10 months. I found that the sealant had severely corroded my rims. There were tiny holes in the rims semi-plugged with corrosion and sealant. Eventually I had to replace the rims on my nickel because Shimano would not warrant them because sealant had been used. Since I had a shop mount and maintain the wheels I could not say for sure what sealant was used, but they told me they use only Stan's or Caffelatex and the only thing I see on the shelf in the service area is Caffelatex. I now run them without sealant and carry a spare tube. I'll pry the tire off and install the tube on the road if I have to.
BTW, the sealant dries up after 6 months for sure.
The upside to all this? While my wheels were down awaiting parts I ran Shimano RS-20s with Vittoria Open Corsa Evo CX tires. The difference in ride when I went back to the tubeless (Hutchinson Fusion 3s) was quite remarkable. I rode tubulars exclusively for over 30 years and can say that the tubeless system comes really close in feel. FYI, I run 90 psi front and 100 rear.
For me the tubeless has a distinct advantage in ride and handling but it also has some downsides. I'll see how it goes without the sealant.
BTW, the sealant dries up after 6 months for sure.
The upside to all this? While my wheels were down awaiting parts I ran Shimano RS-20s with Vittoria Open Corsa Evo CX tires. The difference in ride when I went back to the tubeless (Hutchinson Fusion 3s) was quite remarkable. I rode tubulars exclusively for over 30 years and can say that the tubeless system comes really close in feel. FYI, I run 90 psi front and 100 rear.
For me the tubeless has a distinct advantage in ride and handling but it also has some downsides. I'll see how it goes without the sealant.
As for the corrosion, Stans says their sealant absolutely does not cause it. I don't know, perhaps something in it is interacting with something inherent in the metal of the Dura Ace wheel. Something is obviously causing it as I have read others talk about the same thing.
Last edited by whitemax; 02-15-12 at 08:25 AM. Reason: add text
#21
Two-Wheeled Aficionado
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Wichita
Posts: 4,903
Bikes: Santa Cruz Blur TR, Cannondale Quick CX dropbar conversion & others
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
I used Competitive Cyclist's 'actual weight' numbers.
I don't disagree with the rest of what you said. It's just that in my experience I'm happy with the ride of 25mm tires, I can choose from a huge variety of them (rather than 3 tires, which is really 1), I don't have to mess with sealant, and changing a flat is very infrequent with a liner and very easy with a normal tire.
I don't fear the rust issue because I don't have Shimano wheels. I have Mavic Ksyrium, which are really good for roadtubeless because of the rim design. Pop in a stan's valve and viola!
I don't disagree with the rest of what you said. It's just that in my experience I'm happy with the ride of 25mm tires, I can choose from a huge variety of them (rather than 3 tires, which is really 1), I don't have to mess with sealant, and changing a flat is very infrequent with a liner and very easy with a normal tire.
I don't fear the rust issue because I don't have Shimano wheels. I have Mavic Ksyrium, which are really good for roadtubeless because of the rim design. Pop in a stan's valve and viola!
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 1,586
Bikes: A couple
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 38 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I have been running tubeless for about two years now (Campy Zonda 2-way fit wheels with Hutchinson Fusion tires). I love the ride at 90-100 psi, they roll and grip well, and I still haven't had a flat that the sealant hasn't ben able to seal (using Hutchinson sealant). I actually prefer the way they ride to my tubular tires (290 tpi with latex tubes).
My Fusion 2 tires weighed 307g each, for what it is worth.
With that said, there is a lot of information that can be found on this topic if you do a simple search in this forum, or on the web.
My Fusion 2 tires weighed 307g each, for what it is worth.
With that said, there is a lot of information that can be found on this topic if you do a simple search in this forum, or on the web.
#23
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 35
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The video is impressive in several ways. First, he absolutely murders that tire and it's still not flat. Tell me you didn't cringe when he was stabbing that spoke through the sidewall. Second, the guy is amazingly accurate with that shiv. Don't like tubeless? Don't tell it to his face.
Road and MTB definitely have different needs and I do agree that it makes a lot of sense for MTB but there are still significant drawbacks for road application.
Bob
Road and MTB definitely have different needs and I do agree that it makes a lot of sense for MTB but there are still significant drawbacks for road application.
Bob
#24
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 35
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks all for the comments. Didn't mean to start a big debate but all of your comments are all helpful in my decision to go tubeless.
#25
Experienced
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,039
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Be sure to Search the Forums; this has been hashed out already many times. Some of us have tens of thousands of kilometers on Road Tubeless and really like it, but we've taken the time to understand it. Most of the naysayers don't have much (or any) experience with it. Many of them were also the same people who pooh-poohed things like aero bars, STIs, and clipless pedals.