Weightlifting Lifting And Endurance Cycling
#226
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,475
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3375 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times
in
253 Posts
Weight training is not very useful for 100mile+ races, esp with hills, and age is a factor too, but certainly they are for shorter distances.
Over time (3-5 years) it also builds the tenons and sinew/fibers that take time and are the parts that often get fatigued and injured.
My hopefully soon to be verified opinion is you can ride 1-2 hours a week, lift 3-4 hours and be 4-5 months off peak just by adding miles. The downside of course is the longer the race, multi-day - speed is the lessor factor than endurance, and mass. The GC world tour guys (men) need very little weight training, other than build the tendons, and they already have that. For a USA kinda rider, it seems only good if done carefully. Then some would rather spend those 3 hours in the gym on the road. Can't blame them, but I expect they are slower than those that spend it in the gym.
Over time (3-5 years) it also builds the tenons and sinew/fibers that take time and are the parts that often get fatigued and injured.
My hopefully soon to be verified opinion is you can ride 1-2 hours a week, lift 3-4 hours and be 4-5 months off peak just by adding miles. The downside of course is the longer the race, multi-day - speed is the lessor factor than endurance, and mass. The GC world tour guys (men) need very little weight training, other than build the tendons, and they already have that. For a USA kinda rider, it seems only good if done carefully. Then some would rather spend those 3 hours in the gym on the road. Can't blame them, but I expect they are slower than those that spend it in the gym.
#227
Senior Member
Weight training is not very useful for 100mile+ races, esp with hills, and age is a factor too, but certainly they are for shorter distances.
Over time (3-5 years) it also builds the tenons and sinew/fibers that take time and are the parts that often get fatigued and injured.
My hopefully soon to be verified opinion is you can ride 1-2 hours a week, lift 3-4 hours and be 4-5 months off peak just by adding miles. The downside of course is the longer the race, multi-day - speed is the lessor factor than endurance, and mass. The GC world tour guys (men) need very little weight training, other than build the tendons, and they already have that. For a USA kinda rider, it seems only good if done carefully. Then some would rather spend those 3 hours in the gym on the road. Can't blame them, but I expect they are slower than those that spend it in the gym.
Over time (3-5 years) it also builds the tenons and sinew/fibers that take time and are the parts that often get fatigued and injured.
My hopefully soon to be verified opinion is you can ride 1-2 hours a week, lift 3-4 hours and be 4-5 months off peak just by adding miles. The downside of course is the longer the race, multi-day - speed is the lessor factor than endurance, and mass. The GC world tour guys (men) need very little weight training, other than build the tendons, and they already have that. For a USA kinda rider, it seems only good if done carefully. Then some would rather spend those 3 hours in the gym on the road. Can't blame them, but I expect they are slower than those that spend it in the gym.
I would tend to agree with most of this. Seems to me that the shorter the effort the more strength training is going to help. I guess thats why Robert Forstemann is like a tank and froome is like a bean.
#228
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 2,433
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 741 Post(s)
Liked 412 Times
in
230 Posts
Definitely, something to consider. If one is doing Grande Fondos and double centuries, maybe keep weights to a minimum. If somebody is doing 40 mile group rides maybe a focused program of weights might be helpful.
#229
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 6,432
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 539 Post(s)
Liked 44 Times
in
38 Posts
Originally Posted by OBoile;Campag4life
Your so called facts only exist in your mind. People at the end of the day believe what they like. I have known riders that never touched a weight that could drop you easily on your best day. To say they would have been faster had they lifted is 'your fantasty'.
#232
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,535
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3889 Post(s)
Liked 1,938 Times
in
1,383 Posts
Weight training is not very useful for 100mile+ races, esp with hills, and age is a factor too, but certainly they are for shorter distances.
Over time (3-5 years) it also builds the tenons and sinew/fibers that take time and are the parts that often get fatigued and injured.
My hopefully soon to be verified opinion is you can ride 1-2 hours a week, lift 3-4 hours and be 4-5 months off peak just by adding miles. The downside of course is the longer the race, multi-day - speed is the lessor factor than endurance, and mass. The GC world tour guys (men) need very little weight training, other than build the tendons, and they already have that. For a USA kinda rider, it seems only good if done carefully. Then some would rather spend those 3 hours in the gym on the road. Can't blame them, but I expect they are slower than those that spend it in the gym.
Over time (3-5 years) it also builds the tenons and sinew/fibers that take time and are the parts that often get fatigued and injured.
My hopefully soon to be verified opinion is you can ride 1-2 hours a week, lift 3-4 hours and be 4-5 months off peak just by adding miles. The downside of course is the longer the race, multi-day - speed is the lessor factor than endurance, and mass. The GC world tour guys (men) need very little weight training, other than build the tendons, and they already have that. For a USA kinda rider, it seems only good if done carefully. Then some would rather spend those 3 hours in the gym on the road. Can't blame them, but I expect they are slower than those that spend it in the gym.
But like, never, never spend 3 hours in the gym lifting. Good grief. Ride your bike for and hour or two, then lift for an hour, go home. For Froome, it's probably more like ride for 5 hours, go to the gym for an hour. If my guess is correct, Froome's bike/gym ratio would be about the same as mine: 5/1. Seems about right.
__________________
Results matter
Results matter
#233
Voice of the Industry
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12,572
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1188 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
8 Posts
Actually, it's the other way 'round. Weight training, as done by endurance riders, adds endurance, but nothing to one's FTP, though it does help with the sprint. Track sprinters train and eat differently. As I linked to in a previous post, Froome lifts in the gym 5 days/week. I believe weight training is a big reason I could do 400k rides no problem while not doing training rides longer than 100k. For duffers like me, two 1-hour sessions/week in the gym is about right, ~30' once a week during the summer. Froome's trainer obviously thinks a lot more is appropriate for stage racers. Probably so. Worked for him.
But like, never, never spend 3 hours in the gym lifting. Good grief. Ride your bike for and hour or two, then lift for an hour, go home. For Froome, it's probably more like ride for 5 hours, go to the gym for an hour. If my guess is correct, Froome's bike/gym ratio would be about the same as mine: 5/1. Seems about right.
But like, never, never spend 3 hours in the gym lifting. Good grief. Ride your bike for and hour or two, then lift for an hour, go home. For Froome, it's probably more like ride for 5 hours, go to the gym for an hour. If my guess is correct, Froome's bike/gym ratio would be about the same as mine: 5/1. Seems about right.
#234
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,535
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3889 Post(s)
Liked 1,938 Times
in
1,383 Posts
Where is the idea that Froome can sprint come from? Froome cannot sprint. He is not a sprinter. He is not good at sprinting compared to other riders. He was NOT in contention for winning a sprint, and he had zero chance of beating Sagan in that sprint from the break. That wasn't even the point of him being in the break. The stage win never factored in to that because he never had a chance at it in the first place with Sagan in the group.
__________________
Results matter
Results matter
#235
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 4,764
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1975 Post(s)
Liked 232 Times
in
173 Posts
sigh, more ignorant drivel. Its been said at least 10x in this thread the goal in weightlifting for cyclists is not to put on mass, and to not weight train like weight lifters do.
#236
Senior Member
Seriously, pro cyclist should not be allowed to take their shirts off in public...LOL !
#237
Voice of the Industry
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12,572
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1188 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
8 Posts
Real question is, what kind of gym time takes a normal human being and turns them into a live popsicle stick?
Redlude's deduction is brilliant I tell you.
#240
Voice of the Industry
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12,572
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1188 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
8 Posts
No, he goes there. But he does what are called muscle shrinking exercises. In fact, looking at him, he may even have this muscles extracted in some kind of procedure so that he turns into a human skeleton. Rest of the time I think he kicks back and watches TV while stronger people lift weights while he is only allowed to sip water and eat nothing.
#241
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,535
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3889 Post(s)
Liked 1,938 Times
in
1,383 Posts
Note the considerable vascularity in those biceps. I could only wish. I got 'em, but they're teeny. These guys have amazing blood delivery equipment. But in the arms? Who knew?
I've been yakking about my weight training time, but with no facts. So I went to my PMC and adjusted the time scale to the last 730 days:
55% cycling
22% hiking and snowshoeing in the Cascades
12.5% weight training
10.5% Other - mostly snow sports and running
I use a Garmin to track cycling and a Polar V800 watch to track everything else. My wife and i do a good bit of hiking and backpacking. I pause the watch during our breaks. I think that's another reason that we have good endurance on the bike for our age and have been mostly injury-free.
Anyway, 7 hours of aerobic sports for every hour in the gym. That's been a good balance.
I've been yakking about my weight training time, but with no facts. So I went to my PMC and adjusted the time scale to the last 730 days:
55% cycling
22% hiking and snowshoeing in the Cascades
12.5% weight training
10.5% Other - mostly snow sports and running
I use a Garmin to track cycling and a Polar V800 watch to track everything else. My wife and i do a good bit of hiking and backpacking. I pause the watch during our breaks. I think that's another reason that we have good endurance on the bike for our age and have been mostly injury-free.
Anyway, 7 hours of aerobic sports for every hour in the gym. That's been a good balance.
__________________
Results matter
Results matter
#242
• —
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Land of Pleasant Living
Posts: 12,246
Bikes: Shmikes
Mentioned: 59 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10175 Post(s)
Liked 5,871 Times
in
3,160 Posts
Pic
#243
Voice of the Industry
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12,572
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1188 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
8 Posts
Note the considerable vascularity in those biceps. I could only wish. I got 'em, but they're teeny. These guys have amazing blood delivery equipment. But in the arms? Who knew?
I've been yakking about my weight training time, but with no facts. So I went to my PMC and adjusted the time scale to the last 730 days:
55% cycling
22% hiking and snowshoeing in the Cascades
12.5% weight training
10.5% Other - mostly snow sports and running
I use a Garmin to track cycling and a Polar V800 watch to track everything else. My wife and i do a good bit of hiking and backpacking. I pause the watch during our breaks. I think that's another reason that we have good endurance on the bike for our age and have been mostly injury-free.
Anyway, 7 hours of aerobic sports for every hour in the gym. That's been a good balance.
I've been yakking about my weight training time, but with no facts. So I went to my PMC and adjusted the time scale to the last 730 days:
55% cycling
22% hiking and snowshoeing in the Cascades
12.5% weight training
10.5% Other - mostly snow sports and running
I use a Garmin to track cycling and a Polar V800 watch to track everything else. My wife and i do a good bit of hiking and backpacking. I pause the watch during our breaks. I think that's another reason that we have good endurance on the bike for our age and have been mostly injury-free.
Anyway, 7 hours of aerobic sports for every hour in the gym. That's been a good balance.
No question, Froome has arms to envy. Well, for any 8 y.o. girl or supermodel anyway who want to look like clothes hangers.. But carry on. BF runs the entire spectrum of revisionist history and good to learn the alternative universe of oppositional thought is alive and well, if for nothing else, at least entertainment value...lol.
CFB, I hope you don't mind, I have adjusted your exercise routine just a bit to make you fitter as follows:
70% cycling
52% hiking and snowshoeing in the Cascades
2.5% weight training
81% fiction writing on BF
Please note, above subgroups don't tally to 100% but only for consistency because your posts don't add up either. Sorry just poking fun. I am waiting for the next episode. Maybe Froome will move away from 'cycling specific weight training' and become a powerlifter?
Last edited by Campag4life; 11-14-18 at 09:01 AM.
#244
Senior Member
https://www.sciencedaily.com/release...1113115430.htm
"Lifting weights for less than an hour a week may reduce your risk for a heart attack or stroke by 40 to 70 percent, according to a new study. Spending more than an hour in the weight room did not yield any additional benefit, the researchers found. The results show benefits of strength training are independent of running, walking or other aerobic activity."
"Lifting weights for less than an hour a week may reduce your risk for a heart attack or stroke by 40 to 70 percent, according to a new study. Spending more than an hour in the weight room did not yield any additional benefit, the researchers found. The results show benefits of strength training are independent of running, walking or other aerobic activity."
#245
Aluminium Crusader :-)
This might be slightly off topic, but one minor peeve of mine is the proliferation of the term "power" in cycling, particularly road cycling, because it often gives the incorrect impression that cyclists have to be power-FUL. I bet if power meters were called something else, such as "output meters" or "efficiency meters", there would be less confusion.
To generate 400 Watts, the required force on each pedal is something like 28 pounds (according to a very quick Google search; source Ric Stern on the Road Bike Review Forum), which obviously doesn't require much strength. To state something just as obvious: it's about sustaining that force.
Discuss
To generate 400 Watts, the required force on each pedal is something like 28 pounds (according to a very quick Google search; source Ric Stern on the Road Bike Review Forum), which obviously doesn't require much strength. To state something just as obvious: it's about sustaining that force.
Discuss
#246
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 9,201
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1186 Post(s)
Liked 289 Times
in
177 Posts
This might be slightly off topic, but one minor peeve of mine is the proliferation of the term "power" in cycling, particularly road cycling, because it often gives the incorrect impression that cyclists have to be power-FUL. I bet if power meters were called something else, such as "output meters" or "efficiency meters", there would be less confusion.
To generate 400 Watts, the required force on each pedal is something like 28 pounds (according to a very quick Google search; source Ric Stern on the Road Bike Review Forum), which obviously doesn't require much strength. To state something just as obvious: it's about sustaining that force.
Discuss
To generate 400 Watts, the required force on each pedal is something like 28 pounds (according to a very quick Google search; source Ric Stern on the Road Bike Review Forum), which obviously doesn't require much strength. To state something just as obvious: it's about sustaining that force.
Discuss
#247
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,853
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1067 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 259 Times
in
153 Posts
Obviously it is from a power viewpoint but the perceived force required seems considerably more also.
#248
Aluminium Crusader :-)
https://forums.roadbikereview.com/ra...-284570-2.html
#249
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 4,444
Bikes: bikes
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2622 Post(s)
Liked 1,429 Times
in
711 Posts
I've said 100 times on this forum that the ability to generate watts is not something that's holding anyone back. It's the ability to sustain those watts that lies at the core of nearly every question. And I still steadfastly maintain that if that's your goal, you need to get specific on-the-bike work to maximize those abilities.
#250
• —
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Land of Pleasant Living
Posts: 12,246
Bikes: Shmikes
Mentioned: 59 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10175 Post(s)
Liked 5,871 Times
in
3,160 Posts
Don’t confuse work and power. Power is work/time, so “going up stairs” (work) is meaningless in terms of this discussion unless you state how fast.