Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Mountain Biking
Reload this Page >

Sundeal M7-SL...missing something?

Search
Notices
Mountain Biking Mountain biking is one of the fastest growing sports in the world. Check out this forum to discuss the latest tips, tricks, gear and equipment in the world of mountain biking.

Sundeal M7-SL...missing something?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-14-18, 02:15 PM
  #1  
fishboat
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: SE Wisconsin
Posts: 1,852

Bikes: Lemond '01 Maillot Jaune, Lemond '02 Victoire, Lemond '03 Poprad, Lemond '03 Wayzata DB conv(Poprad), '79 AcerMex Windsor Carrera Professional(pur new), '88 GT Tequesta(pur new), '01 Bianchi Grizzly, 1993 Trek 970 DB conv, Trek 8900 DB conv

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 759 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 810 Times in 471 Posts
Sundeal M7-SL...missing something?

I'm a long-term (40 yrs) roadie, but my GF and I will be visiting some areas that have fun MTB trails. We'll likely stick with intermediate level or less..we're both ... ahh..more mature in age. I don't anticipate any gnarly runs downhill, going airborne, or riding a fence on a sharp curve.

My knowledge is somewhat limited on MTB's..though I've been doing a fair bit of research. I'm looking for a bike for my GF(she rides a roadbike also and does quite well). I'm thinking a front suspension hardtail would be a good match for her & the trails we'll ride. She's ridden several MTBs, and likes a Trek Marlin 7 & X-Cal 7 in 15.5" the best in terms of fit.

I'm aware of the spring-coil vs air shock fork differences. While I'm willing to go with a pricier bike having an air-shock fork, I don't think it'll be necessary.

I've run across the Sundeal M7-SL. Looking at the 15" frame geometry, it's very similar to the Marlin 7 that fits well.

https://www.randombikeparts.com/coll...10s-yellow-new



SPECIFICATIONS:
  • Brand: Sundeal
  • Model: M7-SL
  • Frame size: 15"
  • Color: Blaze Yellow
  • Weight: 28.5lbs (Size 17")
  • Condition: New in box
COMPONENTS:
  • Frame: Tig Welded 6061 Aluminum, waterbotle mount internal shift cable routing, tapered headtube
  • Fork: Rock Shox XC28 TK - see note below on fork color
    • 1-1/8"Straight
    • Pre-load adjustment
    • Travel: 100mm
    • Remote lockout
    • Type: Coil (Medium)
  • Rims: Sundeal Alloy, 26", 26mm width (outer), Double Wall, , Schrader valve drilling, Clincher - tubed
  • Headset: Unbranded, semi-integrated, internal style. Note: It uses a 1-1/2"to 1-1/8" crown race adapter
  • Hubs: Shimano RM33, Centerlock rotor compatible
  • Tires: Kenda Small Block 8, Clincher - tubed, Wire Bead, 26 x 2.10", 30-80PSI
  • Shifters: Shimano Deore, SL-M610 3 x 10 speed Dynasys
  • Front derailleur: Shimano Deore, FD-M610
  • Rear derailleur: Shimano SLX, RD-M670 Dynasys
  • Handlebar: Sundeal 6061 alloy, 620mm
  • Cranks: Shimano Deore FC-M610, 170mm, 42/32/24T
  • Cassette: Shimano, CS-HG50-10, 11-36T
  • Pedals: None
  • Chain: KMC XXSP
  • Bottom bracket: Shimano Hollowech II
  • Spokes: black coated with brass nipples
  • Schrader Valves
  • Stem: Sundeal Alloy, 90mm
  • Saddle: Sundeal
  • Seatpost: Sundeal Alloy
  • Seatpost clamp: Alloy
  • Brakes: SRAM Avid hydraulic disc
  • Rotors: Shimano SM-RT20-M (180mm front), SM-RT20-S (160mm rear)
  • Grips: Pro-Palm Lock on
I see it's a house-brand bike from Ideal (frame mfger). Looking at the component package vs the Trek Marlin 7, and a couple of comparable Giant and Specialized models, it seems to be quite a deal as Trek/Giant/Spec don't get into Deore components until 2-3 levels above the Marlin 7 price-point. The Deore-level spec'd "big three" bikes will have a better fork, but they'll also be priced 2-3x that of the Sundeal.

So...what am I missing..anything? The Sundeal has an entry, though well used, Rock Shox XC28 TK fork. The bike has a tapered (1.5" to 1.125") head tube, so if a replacement fork is needed a few years down the road I should be able to fit an air-shock fork on it and still have a decent frame and Deore component bike in the end...for much less invested than in, say, an X-Cal 8. Of course, it's entirely possible that no replacement fork will ever be needed...given our use.

Anyone see any major issues as an entry-level MTB?

edit..Oh, and I'm aware it's a 26 in wheel vs 27.5 or 29..I understand the difference & I'm not worried about that. GF tried a couple 29ers..she didn't like them. There isn't much difference between a 26 and 27.5 inch wheel.

Last edited by fishboat; 05-14-18 at 02:20 PM.
fishboat is offline  
Old 05-16-18, 05:14 AM
  #2  
fishboat
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: SE Wisconsin
Posts: 1,852

Bikes: Lemond '01 Maillot Jaune, Lemond '02 Victoire, Lemond '03 Poprad, Lemond '03 Wayzata DB conv(Poprad), '79 AcerMex Windsor Carrera Professional(pur new), '88 GT Tequesta(pur new), '01 Bianchi Grizzly, 1993 Trek 970 DB conv, Trek 8900 DB conv

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 759 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 810 Times in 471 Posts
Speechless..must be really good or really bad.

I'd think someone here must have one or know someone who does. Seems like a good package that competes with the big three at half the price.
fishboat is offline  
Old 05-24-18, 12:31 PM
  #3  
dminor 
Moar cowbell
 
dminor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: The 509
Posts: 12,481

Bikes: Bike list is not a resume. Nobody cares.

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Yeah, it's just a bit of a boat-anchor, 26" hardtaill with outdated geometry. Nothing wrong with it for the intended purpose. Going cheap because nobody can really give away 26ers anymore; and this one has little to recommend it other than an acceptable collection of components. Giant Talon 3 is in the same price class and would be a better bike.
__________________
Originally Posted by Mark Twain
"Don't argue with stupid people; they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience."

Last edited by dminor; 05-24-18 at 12:52 PM.
dminor is offline  
Old 05-25-18, 06:56 AM
  #4  
fishboat
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: SE Wisconsin
Posts: 1,852

Bikes: Lemond '01 Maillot Jaune, Lemond '02 Victoire, Lemond '03 Poprad, Lemond '03 Wayzata DB conv(Poprad), '79 AcerMex Windsor Carrera Professional(pur new), '88 GT Tequesta(pur new), '01 Bianchi Grizzly, 1993 Trek 970 DB conv, Trek 8900 DB conv

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 759 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 810 Times in 471 Posts
Originally Posted by dminor
Yeah, it's just a bit of a boat-anchor, 26" hardtaill with outdated geometry. Nothing wrong with it for the intended purpose. Going cheap because nobody can really give away 26ers anymore; and this one has little to recommend it other than an acceptable collection of components. Giant Talon 3 is in the same price class and would be a better bike.
Thank you for your thoughts. Bear with me, as I'm not a mountain biker, but I'm trying to learn more about them. Below is the 2018 Talon 3 geometry along with two other 2018 Trek models she tried out. What aspects of the geometries in the new(design) bikes makes a difference vs outdated?

fishboat is offline  
Old 05-25-18, 07:09 AM
  #5  
cobba
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,895
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 184 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 67 Times in 53 Posts
Originally Posted by fishboat
I'm aware of the spring-coil vs air shock fork differences. While I'm willing to go with a pricier bike having an air-shock fork, I don't think it'll be necessary.

Rock Shox XC28 TK fork.
Depending on your gf's weight, you might need a different coil spring in the fork.

Rockshox makes different coil springs for different weight riders.

Page 7: https://sram-cdn-pull-zone-gsdesign....rts_2016_0.pdf
cobba is offline  
Old 05-29-18, 12:41 PM
  #6  
dminor 
Moar cowbell
 
dminor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: The 509
Posts: 12,481

Bikes: Bike list is not a resume. Nobody cares.

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Originally Posted by fishboat
Thank you for your thoughts. Bear with me, as I'm not a mountain biker, but I'm trying to learn more about them. Below is the 2018 Talon 3 geometry along with two other 2018 Trek models she tried out. What aspects of the geometries in the new(design) bikes makes a difference vs outdated?
{Nice Chart]
Most important difference IMO is head tube angle. Trail bikes are much more capable in part because they've finally adopted slacker head angles, making them much more stable at speed more confidence-inspiring in steep terrain. there are no drawbacks to this; only positives.
Also, check the difference in standover height - - another confidence-inspiring aspect, especially with shorter riders.
Stem length and handlebar width are things that can be changed on any bike BUT - - the newer bikes have been designed with the trend to shorter stems in mind; and everyone benefits from the leverage offered by wider bars.
Short chainstays on the X-Cal 7 make the bike more maneuverable for the larger wheel size (dunno if she rode the 27.5 or 29 version) and easier to weight the rear for clearing trail obstacles. if the X-Cal was a womens'-specific, all the better.

Hope that helps some.
__________________
Originally Posted by Mark Twain
"Don't argue with stupid people; they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience."
dminor is offline  
Old 06-03-18, 09:12 AM
  #7  
ctpres
Senior Member
 
ctpres's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Creede CO in summer & Okeechobee, FL or TX Gulf Coast in winter
Posts: 742

Bikes: Zenetto Stealth road bike & Sundeal M7 MTN bike

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 90 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Have had the M7 (not SL) for over a year now and am very happy. Shifting and brakes work much better than I expected. Actually shifting is very smooth and brakes - smooth and quiet stops at any speed. Outa the box very little tweaking was necessary. The small block tires are excellent. I ride mostly paved and ATV trails with no problems. and much quieter on pavement and more importantly on the trainer than my old big knob tires.
ctpres is offline  
Old 06-05-18, 02:37 PM
  #8  
fishboat
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: SE Wisconsin
Posts: 1,852

Bikes: Lemond '01 Maillot Jaune, Lemond '02 Victoire, Lemond '03 Poprad, Lemond '03 Wayzata DB conv(Poprad), '79 AcerMex Windsor Carrera Professional(pur new), '88 GT Tequesta(pur new), '01 Bianchi Grizzly, 1993 Trek 970 DB conv, Trek 8900 DB conv

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 759 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 810 Times in 471 Posts
Originally Posted by cobba
Depending on your gf's weight, you might need a different coil spring in the fork.

Rockshox makes different coil springs for different weight riders.

Page 7: https://sram-cdn-pull-zone-gsdesign....rts_2016_0.pdf
Thanks for the link cobba..She would need a softer spring than the medium that would come with the bike. The trick is finding one, or a suitable substitute.
fishboat is offline  
Old 06-05-18, 02:46 PM
  #9  
fishboat
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: SE Wisconsin
Posts: 1,852

Bikes: Lemond '01 Maillot Jaune, Lemond '02 Victoire, Lemond '03 Poprad, Lemond '03 Wayzata DB conv(Poprad), '79 AcerMex Windsor Carrera Professional(pur new), '88 GT Tequesta(pur new), '01 Bianchi Grizzly, 1993 Trek 970 DB conv, Trek 8900 DB conv

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 759 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 810 Times in 471 Posts
Originally Posted by dminor
Most important difference IMO is head tube angle. Trail bikes are much more capable in part because they've finally adopted slacker head angles, making them much more stable at speed more confidence-inspiring in steep terrain. there are no drawbacks to this; only positives.
Also, check the difference in standover height - - another confidence-inspiring aspect, especially with shorter riders.
Stem length and handlebar width are things that can be changed on any bike BUT - - the newer bikes have been designed with the trend to shorter stems in mind; and everyone benefits from the leverage offered by wider bars.
Short chainstays on the X-Cal 7 make the bike more maneuverable for the larger wheel size (dunno if she rode the 27.5 or 29 version) and easier to weight the rear for clearing trail obstacles. if the X-Cal was a womens'-specific, all the better.

Hope that helps some.
Actually it does help me understand things a bit better. Thanks for taking the time to compare/contrast the geometries.
fishboat is offline  
Old 06-05-18, 02:58 PM
  #10  
fishboat
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: SE Wisconsin
Posts: 1,852

Bikes: Lemond '01 Maillot Jaune, Lemond '02 Victoire, Lemond '03 Poprad, Lemond '03 Wayzata DB conv(Poprad), '79 AcerMex Windsor Carrera Professional(pur new), '88 GT Tequesta(pur new), '01 Bianchi Grizzly, 1993 Trek 970 DB conv, Trek 8900 DB conv

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 759 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 810 Times in 471 Posts
Originally Posted by ctpres
Have had the M7 (not SL) for over a year now and am very happy. Shifting and brakes work much better than I expected. Actually shifting is very smooth and brakes - smooth and quiet stops at any speed. Outa the box very little tweaking was necessary. The small block tires are excellent. I ride mostly paved and ATV trails with no problems. and much quieter on pavement and more importantly on the trainer than my old big knob tires.
I've run across a couple people that have the SL and they both give the bike two enthusiastic thumbs up. Seems to be your observation also. Cool. Thank you for offering some thoughts.
fishboat is offline  
Old 06-07-18, 12:31 PM
  #11  
Kapusta
Advanced Slacker
 
Kapusta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,210

Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt

Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2762 Post(s)
Liked 2,537 Times in 1,433 Posts
Originally Posted by fishboat
Thank you for your thoughts. Bear with me, as I'm not a mountain biker, but I'm trying to learn more about them. Below is the 2018 Talon 3 geometry along with two other 2018 Trek models she tried out. What aspects of the geometries in the new(design) bikes makes a difference vs outdated?

To echo what has been said, the main differences that I see are
1- the slacker head angle on the Talon
2- the wide bar/short stem combo on the talon.

Both of these things are reflecting current trends. And FWIW I personally prefer them.

Kapusta is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
crazyravr
Mountain Biking
14
04-05-21 06:53 PM
jdnewland
General Cycling Discussion
7
03-08-16 09:43 PM
es1bkacsur
Classic and Vintage Bicycles: Whats it Worth? Appraisals.
11
01-25-13 08:02 PM
ApexAZ
Mountain Biking
7
02-24-10 10:35 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.