What is the difference between these bikes?
07-03-17, 04:57 PM
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 16
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
What is the difference between these bikes?
https://www.roadbikeoutlet.com/vilan...road-bike.html
https://www.roadbikeoutlet.com/vilan...ampaign=buynow
Why is the 2.0 model priced higher than the original?
https://www.roadbikeoutlet.com/vilan...ampaign=buynow
Why is the 2.0 model priced higher than the original?
07-03-17, 06:28 PM
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sin City, Nevada
Posts: 2,893
Bikes: Catrike 700, Greenspeed GTO trike, , Linear LWB recumbent, Haluzak Horizon SWB recumbent, Balance 450 MTB, Cannondale SM800 Beast of the East
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 523 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 231 Times
in
183 Posts
Not much difference if you go to the components and specs. They appear to be the same components on both bikes but the 2.0 has some parts anodized. If that's worth $20 to you, choose the more expensive model. They do have the cohones to list an approximate weight of 25 pounds which many of the larger companies do not , leaving you in the dark when it comes to the bike weight. Not bad weight for a sub $300 bike. And, they have three frame sizes to choose from. So many entry level bikes are "one size fits all" which is pure bull.
07-03-17, 06:58 PM
#3
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 16
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Not much difference if you go to the components and specs. They appear to be the same components on both bikes but the 2.0 has some parts anodized. If that's worth $20 to you, choose the more expensive model. They do have the cohones to list an approximate weight of 25 pounds which many of the larger companies do not , leaving you in the dark when it comes to the bike weight. Not bad weight for a sub $300 bike. And, they have three frame sizes to choose from. So many entry level bikes are "one size fits all" which is pure bull.
I meant why is the original more expensive than the 2.0 model?
I would expect newer models to be better. And it seems, from your answer, that the cheaper model (the 2.0 one) is in fact better which is counter intuitive. Do you have any idea as to why this is?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
kohey
Long Distance Competition/Ultracycling, Randonneuring and Endurance Cycling
9
12-06-09 10:17 AM
