Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

Unequal spacing of cogs in 7-speed Dura Ace cassette

Search
Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

Unequal spacing of cogs in 7-speed Dura Ace cassette

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-11-18, 05:31 AM
  #1  
johnlink
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 315

Bikes: 1988 Centurion Ironman

Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 114 Post(s)
Liked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Unequal spacing of cogs in 7-speed Dura Ace cassette

On my Dura Ace 7-speed cassette, I noticed that the width of the (1st position) threaded cog with spacer is slightly less than the width of the (2nd position) cog with spacer which is equal to the width of a spacer plus a regular cog. So the spacing between the first and second cogs is slightly less than the spacing between each of the other adjacent pairs of cogs. Why might that be so?
johnlink is offline  
Old 07-11-18, 07:48 AM
  #2  
Dean51 
Senior Member
 
Dean51's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Olympic Peninsula, WA
Posts: 648

Bikes: '8? Ciocc Mockba 80, '82 Ron Cooper, '84 Allez, '86 Tommasini Racing, '86? Klein Quantum, '87 Ciocc Designer 84, '95 Trek 5500, '98 Litespeed Classic, '98 S-Works Mtb

Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 228 Post(s)
Liked 312 Times in 124 Posts
'Need to know which Dura Ace free hub are you working with.

Dean
__________________
Roll Me Up and Smoke Me When I Die
Dean51 is offline  
Old 07-11-18, 07:50 AM
  #3  
dsbrantjr
Senior Member
 
dsbrantjr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Roswell, GA
Posts: 8,320

Bikes: '93 Trek 750, '92 Schwinn Crisscross, '93 Mongoose Alta

Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1439 Post(s)
Liked 1,094 Times in 724 Posts
Are you perhaps missing a thin spacer from behind the threaded cog? A slight difference is not too relevant, since the first cog's position is set by the low limit and you set the indexing (if used) to make the shifting line up anyway.
dsbrantjr is offline  
Old 07-11-18, 10:40 AM
  #4  
Iride01 
I'm good to go!
 
Iride01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 15,215

Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020

Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6321 Post(s)
Liked 4,910 Times in 3,384 Posts
Is it causing you problems shifting? If not, don't worry. I think that on some they do space them slightly different to optimize shifting.
Iride01 is online now  
Old 07-11-18, 12:19 PM
  #5  
AnkleWork
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Llano Estacado
Posts: 3,702

Bikes: old clunker

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 684 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 105 Times in 83 Posts
Originally Posted by johnlink
On my Dura Ace 7-speed cassette, I noticed that the width of the (1st position) threaded cog with spacer is slightly less than the width of the (2nd position) cog with spacer which is equal to the width of a spacer plus a regular cog. So the spacing between the first and second cogs is slightly less than the spacing between each of the other adjacent pairs of cogs. Why might that be so?
I recommend you look at your bike much more closely -- use high magnification and precision measurements. Then you'll have a valid context for the variability already observed, rather than some random internet guessing. Meanwhile, I'm going for a ride.
AnkleWork is offline  
Old 07-11-18, 03:36 PM
  #6  
johnlink
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 315

Bikes: 1988 Centurion Ironman

Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 114 Post(s)
Liked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by AnkleWork
I recommend you look at your bike much more closely -- use high magnification and precision measurements. Then you'll have a valid context for the variability already observed, rather than some random internet guessing. Meanwhile, I'm going for a ride.
I'll be ordering a digital calipers and will post precise measurements regarding the spacing once it arrives.
johnlink is offline  
Old 07-11-18, 03:38 PM
  #7  
johnlink
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 315

Bikes: 1988 Centurion Ironman

Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 114 Post(s)
Liked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by dean51
'need to know which dura ace free hub are you working with.

Dean
It's FH-7400.
johnlink is offline  
Old 07-11-18, 03:41 PM
  #8  
johnlink
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 315

Bikes: 1988 Centurion Ironman

Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 114 Post(s)
Liked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by dsbrantjr
Are you perhaps missing a thin spacer from behind the threaded cog? A slight difference is not too relevant, since the first cog's position is set by the low limit and you set the indexing (if used) to make the shifting line up anyway.
There's no thin spacer between the threaded cog and the second cog.
johnlink is offline  
Old 07-11-18, 05:11 PM
  #9  
Dean51 
Senior Member
 
Dean51's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Olympic Peninsula, WA
Posts: 648

Bikes: '8? Ciocc Mockba 80, '82 Ron Cooper, '84 Allez, '86 Tommasini Racing, '86? Klein Quantum, '87 Ciocc Designer 84, '95 Trek 5500, '98 Litespeed Classic, '98 S-Works Mtb

Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 228 Post(s)
Liked 312 Times in 124 Posts
I just measured a 7-speed cassette for a 7400 Dura Ace freehub.....that was conveniently removed from the hub for another issue. I have good quality digital calipers and here is what I found:

1st position cog with integral spacer (threads on to the 32 mm portion of the hub body) is 4.98 mm.

2nd position cog with integral spacer (splined on inside diameter) is 5.16 mm.

The cog plus separate spacer combination for the 3rd through 7th positions varied from 4.95 to 4.99 mm.

I run this cassette in friction mode, since my index shifter for the rear derailleur is a 6-speed model.

'Hope this is helpful.

Dean
__________________
Roll Me Up and Smoke Me When I Die
Dean51 is offline  
Old 07-12-18, 05:12 AM
  #10  
Asi
Engineer
 
Asi's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bucharest, Romania, Europe
Posts: 591

Bikes: 1989 Krapf (with Dura-ace) road bike, 1973 Sputnik (made by XB3) road bike , 1961 Peugeot fixed gear, 2010 Trek 4400

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 38 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have the 1989 8speed DA-7400. Be aware that dura-ace from that period is different cable pull ratio, different thread on the last cog (is smaller than standard uniglide. so they could fit 11T .. while normal non-duraace uniglide had 13T or 12T)
RD and shifter must be both dura-ace or both non-duraace to work on 8speed indexing (or a weird combo of standard 9speed shifter with dura-ace RD will work ok for 8speed but using only 8 out of the 9clicks the shifter has). Might be true for 7speed as well.

https://www.sheldonbrown.com/dura-ace.html
Asi is offline  
Old 07-12-18, 02:06 PM
  #11  
Kontact
Senior Member
 
Kontact's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,301
Mentioned: 43 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4553 Post(s)
Liked 1,695 Times in 1,113 Posts
Originally Posted by Asi
I have the 1989 8speed DA-7400. Be aware that dura-ace from that period is different cable pull ratio, different thread on the last cog (is smaller than standard uniglide. so they could fit 11T .. while normal non-duraace uniglide had 13T or 12T)
RD and shifter must be both dura-ace or both non-duraace to work on 8speed indexing (or a weird combo of standard 9speed shifter with dura-ace RD will work ok for 8speed but using only 8 out of the 9clicks the shifter has). Might be true for 7speed as well.

https://www.sheldonbrown.com/dura-ace.html
Sheldon is wrong about some of that - Uniglide wasn't replaced by Hyperglide until 1992, and UG cassettes for DA were made through 1994.

The reduced size locking cog is only partially true. Later DA hubs had the larger threading for standard threaded sprockets:
https://www.velobase.com/CompImages/H...65FF7FC9C.jpeg

vs the earlier:
https://www.velobase.com/CompImages/H...4A67CD046.jpeg
Kontact is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
agentmulder
Bicycle Mechanics
7
01-22-18 02:21 PM
Niloc
Classic & Vintage
4
10-14-16 06:26 AM
LeicaLad
Classic and Vintage Sales
1
03-24-15 09:10 PM
Beformusik
Road Cycling
9
12-13-14 12:10 PM
The Heckler
Bicycle Mechanics
2
04-18-10 10:47 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.