Suntour Symmetric shifter, does it "trim" or shift?
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Suntour Symmetric shifter, does it "trim" or shift?
Just picked up this old Motobecane Jubilee Sport with an old Suntour Symmetric shifter. Cleaned it up , reassembled . I'm not clear if the symmetric system is intended to "trim" the front derailleur position or actually perform a full on "shift" between chainring's which is how it's currently working.Im taking the word trim to mean in small increments.? If so, what would these small movements look like at the FD while shifting between rear cogs? Anyhow, I tried the basic adjustments with chain on largest rear cog, tensioned the FD cable with left shift lever forward, right lever pulled back.
I Placed a piece of tape to draw reference marks to illustrate the shifter maximum travel approximately under a 1/4" with that said trim would seem to make sense.?
I Placed a piece of tape to draw reference marks to illustrate the shifter maximum travel approximately under a 1/4" with that said trim would seem to make sense.?
Last edited by jzr756; 01-05-24 at 03:19 AM.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2020
Posts: 2,859
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1118 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,348 Times
in
797 Posts
Trim.
i.e. shifting the rear full-range should not make the front shift in either direction, just move to follow the small change in chainline.
The only extra trick to shifting with these is that when shifting the front, you learn to get the cage centred on whichever ring you're shifting to, because that will change depending on where the rear mech is.
Half-step is thus very fiddly, it is much more suited to 52-36 or so, especially if you are running a wide (two ways) set of sprockets.
i.e. shifting the rear full-range should not make the front shift in either direction, just move to follow the small change in chainline.
The only extra trick to shifting with these is that when shifting the front, you learn to get the cage centred on whichever ring you're shifting to, because that will change depending on where the rear mech is.
Half-step is thus very fiddly, it is much more suited to 52-36 or so, especially if you are running a wide (two ways) set of sprockets.
Likes For oneclick:
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,750
Bikes: 82 Medici, 2011 Richard Sachs, 2011 Milwaukee Road
Mentioned: 55 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1975 Post(s)
Liked 2,092 Times
in
1,145 Posts
Mine only trims.
That vise grip on the Jubilee Sport’s top tube is frightening. Maybe something like this will go on that cool stand?
That vise grip on the Jubilee Sport’s top tube is frightening. Maybe something like this will go on that cool stand?
__________________
I don't do: disks, tubeless, e-shifting, or bead head nymphs.
I don't do: disks, tubeless, e-shifting, or bead head nymphs.
Likes For Classtime:
#4
Death fork? Naaaah!!
On a double it trims nicely, on a triple not so much.
You might find this interesting:
https://www.bikeforums.net/classic-v...enge-pics.html
Top
You might find this interesting:
https://www.bikeforums.net/classic-v...enge-pics.html
Top
__________________
You know it's going to be a good day when the stem and seatpost come right out.
(looking for a picture and not seeing it? Thank the Photobucket fiasco.PM me and I'll link it up.)
You know it's going to be a good day when the stem and seatpost come right out.
(looking for a picture and not seeing it? Thank the Photobucket fiasco.PM me and I'll link it up.)
Likes For top506:
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 2,513
Bikes: Drysdale/Gitane/Zeus/Masi/Falcon/Palo Alto/Raleigh/Legnano
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1026 Post(s)
Liked 706 Times
in
433 Posts
That said, interesting repurposing of what looks to me like an engine stand.
__________________
Larry:1958 Drysdale, 1961 Gitane Gran Sport, 1974 Zeus track, 1988 Masi Gran Corsa, 1974 Falcon, 1980 Palo Alto, 1973 Raleigh Gran Sport, 1974 Legnano. Susan: 1976 Windsor Profesional.
Larry:1958 Drysdale, 1961 Gitane Gran Sport, 1974 Zeus track, 1988 Masi Gran Corsa, 1974 Falcon, 1980 Palo Alto, 1973 Raleigh Gran Sport, 1974 Legnano. Susan: 1976 Windsor Profesional.
#6
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Thanks Classtime. LOL most definitely would make for a welcome addition to my would be bike shop! Previously looked at those before improvising/repurposing the engine stand. I get it.
Thank you top506. Sounds like you're familiar with the system. I'm really looking for guidance on how to go about adjusting the system correctly. Before reaching out with a new post I read completely through the Test-your- wits- post, including many others. I'm thankful for all these great post thus far, gathering together all these bits and pieces of info. Just trying to wrap may head around how much the FD moves in or outwards with each shift at the freewheel and any additional pointers. including how to go about making the system work as intended.
Thank you top506. Sounds like you're familiar with the system. I'm really looking for guidance on how to go about adjusting the system correctly. Before reaching out with a new post I read completely through the Test-your- wits- post, including many others. I'm thankful for all these great post thus far, gathering together all these bits and pieces of info. Just trying to wrap may head around how much the FD moves in or outwards with each shift at the freewheel and any additional pointers. including how to go about making the system work as intended.
Last edited by jzr756; 01-05-24 at 11:46 AM.
#7
SE Wis
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 10,557
Bikes: '68 Raleigh Sprite, '02 Raleigh C500, '84 Raleigh Gran Prix, '91 Trek 400, 2013 Novara Randonee, 1990 Trek 970
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2755 Post(s)
Liked 3,427 Times
in
2,075 Posts
#8
Ride, Wrench, Swap, Race
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Northern California
Posts: 9,206
Bikes: Cheltenham-Pedersen racer, Boulder F/S Paris-Roubaix, Varsity racer, '52 Christophe, '62 Continental, '92 Merckx, '75 Limongi, '76 Presto, '72 Gitane SC, '71 Schwinn SS, etc.
Mentioned: 132 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1568 Post(s)
Liked 1,308 Times
in
870 Posts
My Trek 710 has those shifters with a regular AT triple.
I used the bike for a lot of spirited foothills riding about 15 years ago and the Symmetric function never did anything but what it was supposed to do, trim the front derailer.
I removed the shifter from the DT and oiled it from the back, all that it ever required.
The cable adjustment or lever position would have to be off for the symmetric function to initiate a chainring shift, since it doesn't move the front derailer's cable very far.
Sheldon Brown reported an issue with the Symmetric shifter function re-setting itself into uselessness, but after using Symmetric for a good while on doubles and triples I am convinced that only happens when the cable adjustment needs tensioning/adjustment.
I used the bike for a lot of spirited foothills riding about 15 years ago and the Symmetric function never did anything but what it was supposed to do, trim the front derailer.
I removed the shifter from the DT and oiled it from the back, all that it ever required.
The cable adjustment or lever position would have to be off for the symmetric function to initiate a chainring shift, since it doesn't move the front derailer's cable very far.
Sheldon Brown reported an issue with the Symmetric shifter function re-setting itself into uselessness, but after using Symmetric for a good while on doubles and triples I am convinced that only happens when the cable adjustment needs tensioning/adjustment.
#9
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Trim.
i.e. shifting the rear full-range should not make the front shift in either direction, just move to follow the small change in chainline.
The only extra trick to shifting with these is that when shifting the front, you learn to get the cage centred on whichever ring you're shifting to, because that will change depending on where the rear mech is.
Half-step is thus very fiddly, it is much more suited to 52-36 or so, especially if you are running a wide (two ways) set of sprockets.
i.e. shifting the rear full-range should not make the front shift in either direction, just move to follow the small change in chainline.
The only extra trick to shifting with these is that when shifting the front, you learn to get the cage centred on whichever ring you're shifting to, because that will change depending on where the rear mech is.
Half-step is thus very fiddly, it is much more suited to 52-36 or so, especially if you are running a wide (two ways) set of sprockets.
Last edited by jzr756; 01-05-24 at 01:09 PM.
#10
Junior Member
Thread Starter
My Trek 710 has those shifters with a regular AT triple.
I used the bike for a lot of spirited foothills riding about 15 years ago and the Symmetric function never did anything but what it was supposed to do, trim the front derailer.
I removed the shifter from the DT and oiled it from the back, all that it ever required.
The cable adjustment or lever position would have to be off for the symmetric function to initiate a chainring shift, since it doesn't move the front derailer's cable very far.
Sheldon Brown reported an issue with the Symmetric shifter function re-setting itself into uselessness, but after using Symmetric for a good while on doubles and triples I am convinced that only happens when the cable adjustment needs tensioning/adjustment.
I used the bike for a lot of spirited foothills riding about 15 years ago and the Symmetric function never did anything but what it was supposed to do, trim the front derailer.
I removed the shifter from the DT and oiled it from the back, all that it ever required.
The cable adjustment or lever position would have to be off for the symmetric function to initiate a chainring shift, since it doesn't move the front derailer's cable very far.
Sheldon Brown reported an issue with the Symmetric shifter function re-setting itself into uselessness, but after using Symmetric for a good while on doubles and triples I am convinced that only happens when the cable adjustment needs tensioning/adjustment.
Last edited by jzr756; 01-05-24 at 01:48 PM.
#11
Ride, Wrench, Swap, Race
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Northern California
Posts: 9,206
Bikes: Cheltenham-Pedersen racer, Boulder F/S Paris-Roubaix, Varsity racer, '52 Christophe, '62 Continental, '92 Merckx, '75 Limongi, '76 Presto, '72 Gitane SC, '71 Schwinn SS, etc.
Mentioned: 132 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1568 Post(s)
Liked 1,308 Times
in
870 Posts
So unless the chosen front derailer is of the product family from that period of time, some degree of lessened or exaggerated cage movement might result.
And the choice of rear derailer could also affect things in this way, as some will require more or less lever movement to effect the same amount of lateral movement of the chain.
And finally there's the chainstay length as another variable affecting how far that the front derailer cage should move, as well as the chainring-size difference, which is also critical in that it affects the distance and thus length of chain between the chainring teeth engaging the chain and the front derailer cage.
As far as the symmetric shifters causing unwanted up- or down-shifting, if it's a double, then the cable tension adjustment would seem to be the first thing to visit, with the cable tightened or perhaps even loosened depending on which kind of unwanted shift is occurring (up- or down-shift).
With a triple, one might experience an unwanted shift if the cage happened to be positioned to either extreme of where the cage is positioned over the middle chainring. So the left lever may need manual trimming from time to time following any shift of the front derailer.
Could you describe the exact unwanted-shift scenario/type?
One thing about analog front shifting is that it's always a bit quirky when a triple crankset is being used. It's kind of entertaining once the user becomes familiar with the range of behaviors and the lever movements needed to keep the chain flowing!
Last edited by dddd; 01-05-24 at 01:55 PM.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 13,009
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 131 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4877 Post(s)
Liked 4,042 Times
in
2,621 Posts
I've always run those on triples and find they help but don't quite do all the trimming. On a 126 OLD 7-speed and a Cyclone Mk II I will probably "have to" do one or two trims by hand if I run across the entire cassette. (The quotes because I have done thousands of rear shifts without Symmetrics and not done the trimming and I am still alive, well and well fed. I probably have shortened the lives of a few purists who have accompanied me and my FD chain rubs but they never told me and I remain happily oblivious. And yes, in my racing days I had to buy new Cyclones every year and a half or so. Paper thin cages.)
I'm guessing there is a particular FD(s) that work perfectly with the Symmetrics and that it is not one of the SunTours I have used with it. Maybe the Superbe? The Symmetric came on my circa '83 Pro Miyata as did the Superbe derailleurs but the bike had seen a lot of time outdoors in the rain. Symmetric cleaned up just fine but the Superbes are basket cases.
Edit: When you take the Symmetric apart, be sure you have the right-hand "shaft" in the correct position, not 180 degrees out. Get it wrong and the FD will anti-trim and thwart all your intentions of clean, effortless shifts and instead requite manual trimming every shift! If you see this, take off the right lever, loosen the cables and turn the shaft 180 degrees.
Second edit: I wonder if that wrong assembly of my first edit will cause unintended shifts. I didn't see it when I ran my Symmetric wrong when I first set it up but those rides were pretty awful.
I'm guessing there is a particular FD(s) that work perfectly with the Symmetrics and that it is not one of the SunTours I have used with it. Maybe the Superbe? The Symmetric came on my circa '83 Pro Miyata as did the Superbe derailleurs but the bike had seen a lot of time outdoors in the rain. Symmetric cleaned up just fine but the Superbes are basket cases.
Edit: When you take the Symmetric apart, be sure you have the right-hand "shaft" in the correct position, not 180 degrees out. Get it wrong and the FD will anti-trim and thwart all your intentions of clean, effortless shifts and instead requite manual trimming every shift! If you see this, take off the right lever, loosen the cables and turn the shaft 180 degrees.
Second edit: I wonder if that wrong assembly of my first edit will cause unintended shifts. I didn't see it when I ran my Symmetric wrong when I first set it up but those rides were pretty awful.
Last edited by 79pmooney; 01-05-24 at 02:08 PM.
#13
Junior Member
Thread Starter
One thing to keep in mind is that different derailers have different "actuation" or "pull ratios".
So unless the chosen front derailer is of the product family from that period of time, some degree of lessened or exaggerated cage movement might result.
And the choice of rear derailer could also affect things in this way, as some will require more or less lever movement to effect the same amount of lateral movement of the chain.
And finally there's the chainstay length as another variable affecting how far that the front derailer cage should move, as well as the chainring-size difference, which is also critical in that it affects the distance and thus length of chain between the chainring teeth engaging the chain and the front derailer cage.
As far as the symmetric shifters causing unwanted up- or down-shifting, if it's a double, then the cable tension adjustment would seem to be the first thing to visit, with the cable tightened or perhaps even loosened depending on which kind of unwanted shift is occurring (up- or down-shift).
With a triple, one might experience an unwanted shift if the cage happened to be positioned to either extreme of where the cage is positioned over the middle chainring. So the left lever may need manual trimming from time to time following any shift of the front derailer.
Could you describe the exact unwanted-shift scenario/type?
One thing about analog front shifting is that it's always a bit quirky when a triple crankset is being used. It's kind of entertaining once the user becomes familiar with the range of behaviors and the lever movements needed to keep the chain flowing!
So unless the chosen front derailer is of the product family from that period of time, some degree of lessened or exaggerated cage movement might result.
And the choice of rear derailer could also affect things in this way, as some will require more or less lever movement to effect the same amount of lateral movement of the chain.
And finally there's the chainstay length as another variable affecting how far that the front derailer cage should move, as well as the chainring-size difference, which is also critical in that it affects the distance and thus length of chain between the chainring teeth engaging the chain and the front derailer cage.
As far as the symmetric shifters causing unwanted up- or down-shifting, if it's a double, then the cable tension adjustment would seem to be the first thing to visit, with the cable tightened or perhaps even loosened depending on which kind of unwanted shift is occurring (up- or down-shift).
With a triple, one might experience an unwanted shift if the cage happened to be positioned to either extreme of where the cage is positioned over the middle chainring. So the left lever may need manual trimming from time to time following any shift of the front derailer.
Could you describe the exact unwanted-shift scenario/type?
One thing about analog front shifting is that it's always a bit quirky when a triple crankset is being used. It's kind of entertaining once the user becomes familiar with the range of behaviors and the lever movements needed to keep the chain flowing!
Last edited by jzr756; 01-05-24 at 03:18 PM.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,472
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 802 Post(s)
Liked 760 Times
in
413 Posts
I used them for years. Really nice friction shifting feeling, I greatly prefer it to suntour friction power shifting that so many others here love. I like for the cable to move where I want it to be, not to a destination pre-defined by clicks.
On a 6 speed freewheel double crankset bike, it worked fine for years without needing any adjustments. Highly recommend you re-read some of the posts and threads already made on this site and re-do your setup. It works!
On a 6 speed freewheel double crankset bike, it worked fine for years without needing any adjustments. Highly recommend you re-read some of the posts and threads already made on this site and re-do your setup. It works!
#15
Junior Member
Thread Starter
I used them for years. Really nice friction shifting feeling, I greatly prefer it to suntour friction power shifting that so many others here love. I like for the cable to move where I want it to be, not to a destination pre-defined by clicks.
On a 6 speed freewheel double crankset bike, it worked fine for years without needing any adjustments. Highly recommend you re-read some of the posts and threads already made on this site and re-do your setup. It works!
On a 6 speed freewheel double crankset bike, it worked fine for years without needing any adjustments. Highly recommend you re-read some of the posts and threads already made on this site and re-do your setup. It works!