Is there a consensus "best bike GPS" going these days?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: PNW
Posts: 197
Bikes: Cutthroat, Scalpel, Roubaix, Sequoia, SuperX, Diverge
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Is there a consensus "best bike GPS" going these days?
I have done a lot of reading, and a lot of stuff that I've found is several months' old. What with software updates and such, I was wondering if there was a consensus being reached.
assuming a desire to do heart rate, cadence, and mapping, the research I've done seems to point to the Edge 800/810, the Edge 100, and the Magellan Cyclo 505.
A lot of what I've read seems to point to a ton of bugs and such with each of the above, but with firmware updates that fix a lot of the issues. Primarily interested in more 'long term' useage, i.e. those who have had a chance to do a few dozen hours' worth of riding with each to chime in with opinions concerning how well the features work and especially stability.
I read that the Edge 500 and 800 seem like better buys than their 510 and 810 brethren (As an example) and that the Edge 1000 is bug-ridden.
It's a really tough decision to make because it seems like so many places present opinions that are drastically different on the same device. Ugh...anwyay, any help greatly appreciated.
assuming a desire to do heart rate, cadence, and mapping, the research I've done seems to point to the Edge 800/810, the Edge 100, and the Magellan Cyclo 505.
A lot of what I've read seems to point to a ton of bugs and such with each of the above, but with firmware updates that fix a lot of the issues. Primarily interested in more 'long term' useage, i.e. those who have had a chance to do a few dozen hours' worth of riding with each to chime in with opinions concerning how well the features work and especially stability.
I read that the Edge 500 and 800 seem like better buys than their 510 and 810 brethren (As an example) and that the Edge 1000 is bug-ridden.
It's a really tough decision to make because it seems like so many places present opinions that are drastically different on the same device. Ugh...anwyay, any help greatly appreciated.
Last edited by sgtrobo; 01-28-15 at 05:58 PM.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Irvine
Posts: 1,416
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL3, Nishiki Pro Hybrid SL
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
For me it wasn't a tough decision. I went with the one that does the same as all the rest of them, but is cheap. I got a used 705 and love it. At $86 for a used one that's almost unused it makes a lot more "sense" than getting a 1000 for $600. For me I rather have a better set of wheels with a power hub than a gps that's not going to really improve my ride, but that's just me.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Seattle
Posts: 147
Bikes: Pinarello ROKH, Raleigh POS
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I don't meet your experience requirement but nevertheless I'm going through the same thing right now and also have done a lot of reading. I think (?) I've decided to go with the most Garmin that I can afford. Garmin is a very innovative, classy, and financially sound company and they dominate the GPS field in every market. For example, they make the most sophisticated aircraft GPS-driven avionics suite for aircraft that has ever been commercialized (approved by the FAA). I have no doubt that whatever bugs might be in their cycle computers will get ironed out - if they really exist and are not rider error.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 241
Bikes: Canyon Ultimate CF SL
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I don't meet your experience requirement but nevertheless I'm going through the same thing right now and also have done a lot of reading. I think (?) I've decided to go with the most Garmin that I can afford. Garmin is a very innovative, classy, and financially sound company and they dominate the GPS field in every market. For example, they make the most sophisticated aircraft GPS-driven avionics suite for aircraft that has ever been commercialized (approved by the FAA). I have no doubt that whatever bugs might be in their cycle computers will get ironed out - if they really exist and are not rider error.
That said, Garmin is the Goliath in the cycling GPS market and their devices mostly work as advertised, if not always intuitively or in a polished manner.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Oahu, HI
Posts: 1,413
Bikes: 89 Paramount OS 84 Fuji Touring Series III New! 2013 Focus Izalco Ergoride
Likes: 0
Liked 75 Times
in
55 Posts
Garmin pushed a lot of features from the 1000 into the 810 last month, so you might want to have a look at those. Prior to that I didn't see much advantage to the 810 over the 800, main thing being real time position if you link your smartphone while riding. I have an 800 and don't really use many of the features. I only use the maps on occasion but they work OK. If I used the map more I could probably be more of a power user. I have never had a functional problem with the hardware or software, other than I can only get a single Open Street Map file to work at a time. That might be operator error though.
scott s.
.
scott s.
.
#6
A quick dive into the Garmin Edge forums will set you straight. Garmin may be all those things but don't pretend for a second that their consumer devices get the same level of hardware and software quality control as their avionics or other ultra-spec packages deserve and require....
#8
Old. Slow. Happy.
Very happy with the Magellan Cyclo 505. Good interface, accurate, and works well with Strava. Using it with a Mio Alpha instead of a chest strap. Just wish the battery life were a little longer and that 3rd-party mounts were available.
#9
24-Speed Machine
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wash. Grove, MD
Posts: 6,058
Bikes: 2003 Specialized Allez 24-Speed Road Bike
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
My father bought me the Garmin Edge 500 for Christmas 2013. I know it doesn't have what the Edge 510, 800, 810, or 1000 has. But it has buttons', instead of a touch-screen, which I prefer. While the 500 doesn't have true GPS mapping-capability. That is not a must-have for me. Also, He didn't buy it direct from Garmin which brought the price down. He bought it from a Garmin reseller for around $250. Back in 2013, it was $299 if bought direct from Garmin. Now if you buy it direct from Garmin, it is $199. If you want the GPS mapping capability.
Here is a comparison link of the 500, 510, 800. and 810. the 1000 is still in development and has bugs.
https://buy.garmin.com/en-US/US/cata...eProduct=36728
Here is a comparison link of the 500, 510, 800. and 810. the 1000 is still in development and has bugs.
https://buy.garmin.com/en-US/US/cata...eProduct=36728
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 147
Bikes: No.22 Great Divide Disc Custom Ti
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
BTW, I had the Garmin 810 & 1000 before settling with the Cyclo.
#11
aka Tom Reingold
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 41,027
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Liked 3,010 Times
in
1,710 Posts
Plus, the use of the word "best" is misguided, since there are so many criteria to juggle. Just don't use it when asking for product recommendations. It's kind of asking what the best novel to read is.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
#13
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 106
Bikes: '20 Specialized Roubaix Expert, '20 Specialized Shiv Elite, '13 Specialized S-Works Epic
Liked 80 Times
in
36 Posts
And the whole emphasis on community like Garmin Connect... and make sure you like us on Facebook... I know, another subject.
Last edited by cybirr; 02-02-15 at 11:50 AM.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Mission, Texas
Posts: 133
Bikes: 2012 Specialized Sirrus Limited and 2013 Specialized Roubaix
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I use and love my Magellan Cyclo 505. Does all the metrics that I need and the wifi posting to Strava and TrainingPeaks is great! My only wish, a lap button, more battery life and a true K-Edge mount.
#15
Senior Member
Any thoughts on speed sensor vs gps speed? If it reads by satellite, why do I need a sensor other than for cadence? Almost ready to go for a garmin 500 but trying to get the right bundle seems impossible.
#16
Ride it like you stole it
GPS is not always available. Heavy overcast, tree cover, canyons, tunnels and more all degrade or inhibit GPS signal acquisition. Speed sensors smooth out the sections where GPS signal is lost rather than calculating an average from the time you lost your signal to the time you regained your signal. Do you need it? Maybe, maybe not. Its up to you to decide whether or not you live and ride in a GPS challenged area. Garmin also has the newer magnetless sensors which allow you to choose just a cadence sensor if you want one.
__________________
"Never use your face as a brake pad" - Jake Watson
The Reloutionaries @ Shapeways
"Never use your face as a brake pad" - Jake Watson
The Reloutionaries @ Shapeways
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Oahu, HI
Posts: 1,413
Bikes: 89 Paramount OS 84 Fuji Touring Series III New! 2013 Focus Izalco Ergoride
Likes: 0
Liked 75 Times
in
55 Posts
To my way of thinking, what you bundle now isn't so important (you can always add a sensor later) but are you going to stick to ANT+ or use Bluetooth instead.
scott s.
.
Last edited by scott967; 02-07-15 at 04:02 PM.
#19
Ride it like you stole it
Please note one thing about the way Garmin uses the speed sensor. It is not used to provide a continuous record or correction of any kind. It is only used when GPS is not available. I am not suggesting that Garmin's way is the best way to use a speed sensor, just telling you how they implemented it.
__________________
"Never use your face as a brake pad" - Jake Watson
The Reloutionaries @ Shapeways
"Never use your face as a brake pad" - Jake Watson
The Reloutionaries @ Shapeways