Old 09-02-22, 01:44 PM
  #41  
terrymorse 
climber has-been
 
terrymorse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,111

Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3432 Post(s)
Liked 3,567 Times in 1,793 Posts
Originally Posted by RH Clark
I wouldn't agree that fish and fowl are healthier. Old thinking is that red meat raises cholesterol which leads to heart disease. There's plenty of new scientific studies proving that is not the case. There are more toxins in most fish than in red meat. It is still advisable however to source the healthiest meat available.
There is no such thing as healthy red meat. There is little disagreement that eating red meat is an unhealthy practice. It is associated with increased risk of heart attack, diabetes, and some forms of cancer. Multiple studies show this relationship.

Consumption of poultry and fish is not associated with the same risks.

Even Occasional Meat May Be Harmful
__________________
Ride, Rest, Repeat. ROUVY: terrymorse


terrymorse is offline