How to Approach Restoration
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,995
Bikes: old ones
Liked 10,458 Times
in
7,255 Posts
I know that the Trek 560 has a 6 speed Helicomatic hub and have read that they are unreliable, the bearings don’t last, etc. Would this be something worth replacing right away? I suppose I could convert to an 8 speed free hub/ cassette and just rebuild the rear wheel? I would have to expand the frame to accommodate. Would I be able to use the original rear derailleur or would I need to buy something more modern to match? I am not interested in index shifting at this point.
As already stated, obtaining new cogs can be problematic. These showed up on many Trek bikes in the years when they first came out, because they were considered marvelous. You could remove and change out the cogs with one simple, lightweight, cheap, portable tool. The biggest issue I've experienced is that they are difficult to adjust, for proper bearing clearance/preload. I suspect this is why so many failed prematurely, but I have no research to back that up.
I, too, feel like I can get plenty wide enough gearing range with six cogs in back. But where I ride it's pretty flat.
#27
Senior Member
I know that the Trek 560 has a 6 speed Helicomatic hub and have read that they are unreliable, the bearings don’t last, etc. Would this be something worth replacing right away? I suppose I could convert to an 8 speed free hub/ cassette and just rebuild the rear wheel? I would have to expand the frame to accommodate. Would I be able to use the original rear derailleur or would I need to buy something more modern to match? I am not interested in index shifting at this point.
If you do find yourself needing to replace hubs/wheels/freewheel, here's just a sampling from only one vendor of the choices you have in 126mm wheels. There are plenty.
https://www.modernbike.com/700c-rear...iswheel-master
Last edited by Jeff Neese; 07-17-22 at 12:13 PM.
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 13,333
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Liked 4,336 Times
in
2,790 Posts
I don't have the "keep every thing as original as possible" gene. That said, a lot of the old stuff worked really well (sometimes with minor tweaks). Mafac Racer brakes. SunTour derailleurs. Hubs, BBs, cranksets. I insist on very good brakes. (I've exceeded my crash limit.) I hate exposed brake cables. Hated them when I raced back when aero brake levers were yet to be even a dream. I got spoiled by SunTour shifting in the early '70s and will never settle for less. Wheels need to be good. Rims I trust. (And trust to keep tires on.)
If I were handed my old Fuji Pro, my old racing bike, I'd pass on it simply because it was a pure, very, very sensitive steering race bike. I'll never do the hours to re-learn riding it smoothly and "quietly". But a lower BB'd, more trail version? I'd happily ride it "as is" if I was strong enough to ride the local hills (or as a very similar triple), same brakes, DT shifters, wheels (OK , after damage to those light rims, I'd go heavier now). But new brake levers would go on right away and those cables buried in the bar tape.
In fact, I am soon to get a Pro Miyata frame from a forumite with a bunch of visible rust. It just may be a less highstrung version of the Fuji. Probably get set up 7-speed triple. Already has my first choice of DT shifters brazed on. Sewups, maybe SunTour Superbe brake calipes, Textro levers, maybe Cyclone derailleurs. Seatpost to get my proper setback, very likely a Nitto lugged steel if the bike is a keeper. Stem to fit. (150?) So nothing exactly like it ever was, most of it generally period but exceptions to allow "the ride".
If I were handed my old Fuji Pro, my old racing bike, I'd pass on it simply because it was a pure, very, very sensitive steering race bike. I'll never do the hours to re-learn riding it smoothly and "quietly". But a lower BB'd, more trail version? I'd happily ride it "as is" if I was strong enough to ride the local hills (or as a very similar triple), same brakes, DT shifters, wheels (OK , after damage to those light rims, I'd go heavier now). But new brake levers would go on right away and those cables buried in the bar tape.
In fact, I am soon to get a Pro Miyata frame from a forumite with a bunch of visible rust. It just may be a less highstrung version of the Fuji. Probably get set up 7-speed triple. Already has my first choice of DT shifters brazed on. Sewups, maybe SunTour Superbe brake calipes, Textro levers, maybe Cyclone derailleurs. Seatpost to get my proper setback, very likely a Nitto lugged steel if the bike is a keeper. Stem to fit. (150?) So nothing exactly like it ever was, most of it generally period but exceptions to allow "the ride".
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: PDX
Posts: 13,503
Bikes: Merz x 5 + Specialized Merz Allez x 2, Strawberry/Newlands/DiNucci/Ti x3, Gordon, Fuso/Moulton x2, Bornstein, Paisley,1958-74 Paramounts x3, 3rensho, 74 Moto TC, 73-78 Raleigh Pro's x5, Marinoni x2, 1960 Cinelli SC, 1980 Bianchi SC, PX-10 X 2
Liked 6,818 Times
in
3,896 Posts
Stopped right there and called it good.
As I said, kind of hunt and peck, you have to feel your way through it, develop your own style and process. If you go slow you can refine it along the way.
You may not get the same results the same way everytime but you can learn how far to go and stop before it goes too far south.
You can beat yourself to death polishing some of these turds.
#30
Senior Member
I know that the Trek 560 has a 6 speed Helicomatic hub and have read that they are unreliable, the bearings don’t last, etc. Would this be something worth replacing right away? I suppose I could convert to an 8 speed free hub/ cassette and just rebuild the rear wheel? I would have to expand the frame to accommodate. Would I be able to use the original rear derailleur or would I need to buy something more modern to match? I am not interested in index shifting at this point.
#31
very true. I thought I was in for a battle with this crank, but a tiny bit of metal polish and about 30 minutes gave me this
__________________
59 Allegro Special -- 72 Bob Jackson -- 74 Motobecane Grand Jubile -- 74 Sekine SHS 271 -- 80 Nishiki International
85 Shogun 800 -- 86 Tommasini Super Prestige -- 92 Specialized Rockhopper -- 17 Colnago Arabesque
59 Allegro Special -- 72 Bob Jackson -- 74 Motobecane Grand Jubile -- 74 Sekine SHS 271 -- 80 Nishiki International
85 Shogun 800 -- 86 Tommasini Super Prestige -- 92 Specialized Rockhopper -- 17 Colnago Arabesque
Likes For droppedandlost:
#32
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: PDX
Posts: 13,503
Bikes: Merz x 5 + Specialized Merz Allez x 2, Strawberry/Newlands/DiNucci/Ti x3, Gordon, Fuso/Moulton x2, Bornstein, Paisley,1958-74 Paramounts x3, 3rensho, 74 Moto TC, 73-78 Raleigh Pro's x5, Marinoni x2, 1960 Cinelli SC, 1980 Bianchi SC, PX-10 X 2
Liked 6,818 Times
in
3,896 Posts
PugRider
"Old pedals were made for narrow feet"
While mostly true in general, there were plenty of wider pedals for touring, many not that nice but very functional.
These are my go to, still made the same for 50? years, inexpensive, great value, bulletproof, great classic look and very available.
MKS Sylvan touring
Sylvan quills can be ground down or bent to make room for wider feet as well if need be.
"Old pedals were made for narrow feet"
While mostly true in general, there were plenty of wider pedals for touring, many not that nice but very functional.
These are my go to, still made the same for 50? years, inexpensive, great value, bulletproof, great classic look and very available.
MKS Sylvan touring
Sylvan quills can be ground down or bent to make room for wider feet as well if need be.
Likes For merziac:
#33
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bastrop Texas
Posts: 4,771
Bikes: Univega, Peu P6, Peu PR-10, Ted Williams, Peu UO-8, Peu UO-18 Mixte, Peu Dolomites
Liked 1,846 Times
in
1,183 Posts
Unless you have a whole lot of money in most cases a "REAL RESTORATION" usually produces a "WALL HANGER".
But then again, everyone should have at least one wall hanger. OK... Maybe two? or Three?... Ha
But then again, everyone should have at least one wall hanger. OK... Maybe two? or Three?... Ha
__________________
No matter where you're at... There you are... Δf:=f(1/2)-f(-1/2)
No matter where you're at... There you are... Δf:=f(1/2)-f(-1/2)
#34
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: PDX
Posts: 13,503
Bikes: Merz x 5 + Specialized Merz Allez x 2, Strawberry/Newlands/DiNucci/Ti x3, Gordon, Fuso/Moulton x2, Bornstein, Paisley,1958-74 Paramounts x3, 3rensho, 74 Moto TC, 73-78 Raleigh Pro's x5, Marinoni x2, 1960 Cinelli SC, 1980 Bianchi SC, PX-10 X 2
Liked 6,818 Times
in
3,896 Posts
Assuming that's a fantastic looking Grand Jubilee, nice work.
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bastrop Texas
Posts: 4,771
Bikes: Univega, Peu P6, Peu PR-10, Ted Williams, Peu UO-8, Peu UO-18 Mixte, Peu Dolomites
Liked 1,846 Times
in
1,183 Posts
#36
Extraordinary Magnitude
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 13,766
Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT
Liked 1,791 Times
in
988 Posts
Of all the things you should NOT do, spreading the rear triangle is at the top of the list. You loved the 560 when you had it before, geared the way it was then. Love it again the same way. There are plenty of good 6-speed freewheels if that's what you're worried about. If my Trek 400T needed new hubs, the new one would be 6 speed just like the old one. I'm not going to take my lugged Reynolds 531 frame, hand assembled in Wisconsin on a jig and brazed by one of the skilled framebuilders at Trek, and start bending it up. Just let it be a six speed bike.
If you do find yourself needing to replace hubs/wheels/freewheel, here's just a sampling from only one vendor of the choices you have in 126mm wheels. There are plenty.
https://www.modernbike.com/700c-rear...iswheel-master
If you do find yourself needing to replace hubs/wheels/freewheel, here's just a sampling from only one vendor of the choices you have in 126mm wheels. There are plenty.
https://www.modernbike.com/700c-rear...iswheel-master
I'm a huge fan of the 86/87 Trek 400 Elance. That's a butted 531 frame with CrMo fork and stays (more than likely built in Japan and assembled in Waterloo). If you look at the catalog- that bike is down around the bottom of Trek's line- it's a great frame- it's got good/decent parts that were selected to function well yet keep the cost down. If you love the bike how it is- it's a great bike. But it's got a lot of room to grow up.
I love my 1986 400 Elance- I've upgraded most every part on it- it's 6 speed Accushift, but since changing over my 620 and 720 to 10 speed- it's in the queue.
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
#37
Extraordinary Magnitude
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 13,766
Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT
Liked 1,791 Times
in
988 Posts
I've never owned a "modern" bike- so "vintage" bikes are what I think I know. When all I knew was 5 and 6 speed and stock parts, those were swell. But once I got a taste for nicer components, and then rode a 10 speed rear end- it just seemed silly to handicap my ride by going back to 6 speed. Even 7 speed seems limiting (until you get used to it again).
It's entirely up to you and what you want and how much money you want to throw at it. I get the sense you're looking to just get the nostalgic bump from an old bicycle like your old one. To that end, I'd service everything on the bike- and ride it like an old 1980s 560- but pay attention to the Helicomatic. New bearings- look at the cups and cones and see if anything is pitted or chewed up- Roll with those, but make sure you're keeping them greased and cleaned often. Replace what needs to be replaced. Keep in mind, there are things that once you replace *this* you have to replace *that* and so you might as well replace *that other thing* while you're at it. It's a game. If you have to replace things with something new- you might want to think about future proofing it if you are enjoying riding it, and are enjoying it on a level beyond a nostalgic old bike.
My Trek 620 and 720 have had most everything replaced on them with parts that I consider among the best made- they're both running 10 speed rear ends.
IMG_2377 by Dave The Golden Boy, on Flickr
620 Rebuild Shakedown by Dave The Golden Boy, on Flickr
My Trek 400 Elance and Miyata 1000LT are both upgraded sorta like it was 1994 or something. The Trek is still running 6 speed but changed to Suntour Accushift and the Miyata is 7 speed XTR.
1986 Trek 400 Elance by Dave The Golden Boy, on Flickr
M1000LT by Dave The Golden Boy, on Flickr
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
Likes For The Golden Boy:
#38
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: SF Bay Area, East bay
Posts: 7,974
Bikes: Miyata 618 GT, Marinoni, Kestral 200, Soma double cross 2002 Trek 5200, KHS Flite, Koga Miyata, Schwinn Spitfire 5, Mondia Special, Univega Alpina, Miyata team Ti, Santa Cruz Highball, Waterford rs11
Liked 3,057 Times
in
1,390 Posts
#39
Senior Member
A 6 speed Trek (especially from 1987) is most likely spaced at 128- no need for "spreading" you can squeeze in a 10 speed 130 with no ill effects. Which is why they spaced at 128 (not that they particularly envisioned 10 speed, but 7 and 8 cassettes- yes)
I'm a huge fan of the 86/87 Trek 400 Elance. That's a butted 531 frame with CrMo fork and stays (more than likely built in Japan and assembled in Waterloo). If you look at the catalog- that bike is down around the bottom of Trek's line- it's a great frame- it's got good/decent parts that were selected to function well yet keep the cost down. If you love the bike how it is- it's a great bike. But it's got a lot of room to grow up...
I'm a huge fan of the 86/87 Trek 400 Elance. That's a butted 531 frame with CrMo fork and stays (more than likely built in Japan and assembled in Waterloo). If you look at the catalog- that bike is down around the bottom of Trek's line- it's a great frame- it's got good/decent parts that were selected to function well yet keep the cost down. If you love the bike how it is- it's a great bike. But it's got a lot of room to grow up...
Yeah, the Elance's are real sleepers. Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I think even the 330 was full chromoly. I love that mine's a triple.
Likes For Jeff Neese:
#40
Edumacator
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Goose Creek, SC
Posts: 7,563
Bikes: '87 Crestdale, '87 Basso Gap, '92 Rossin Performance EL-OS, 1990 VanTuyl, 1980s Losa, 1985 Trek 670, 1982 AD SLE, 1987 PX10, etc...
Liked 3,591 Times
in
2,255 Posts
Usually brakes, stem seatpost can be polished.
I use a nice rubbing polisher for the frame. Mild version. TCut or turtle wax. Chrome gets barkeeps friend but I doubt you will have any.
A good comment up there for your decisioning...the bike speaks to me. My AD SLE I bought from a member tempted me with repainting but then I went with the joy of polish and touch up. I dislike Weinmann 605 brakes, and the bike had already been upgraded to Cyclone and Campy Victory derailleurs so I decided to go Cyclone heavy with the original Nervar crank. Wheels kept, but had they been Helicomatic, no go for me.
__________________
1987 Crest Cannondale, 1987 Basso Gap, 1992 Rossin Performance EL, 1990ish Van Tuyl, 1985 Trek 670, 2003 Pinarello Surprise, 1990ish MBK Atlantique, 1987 Peugeot Competition, 1987 Nishiki Tri-A, 1981 Faggin, 1996 Cannondale M500, 1984 Mercian, 1982 AD SuperLeicht, 1985 Massi (model unknown), 1988 Daccordi Griffe , 1989 Fauxsin MTB, 1981 Ciocc Mockba, 1992 Bianchi Giro, 1977 Colnago Super, 1971 Raleigh International, 1998 Corratec Ap & Dun, 1991 Peugeot Slimestone
1987 Crest Cannondale, 1987 Basso Gap, 1992 Rossin Performance EL, 1990ish Van Tuyl, 1985 Trek 670, 2003 Pinarello Surprise, 1990ish MBK Atlantique, 1987 Peugeot Competition, 1987 Nishiki Tri-A, 1981 Faggin, 1996 Cannondale M500, 1984 Mercian, 1982 AD SuperLeicht, 1985 Massi (model unknown), 1988 Daccordi Griffe , 1989 Fauxsin MTB, 1981 Ciocc Mockba, 1992 Bianchi Giro, 1977 Colnago Super, 1971 Raleigh International, 1998 Corratec Ap & Dun, 1991 Peugeot Slimestone
Likes For jdawginsc:
#41
Extraordinary Magnitude
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 13,766
Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT
Liked 1,791 Times
in
988 Posts
When you say "a lot of room to grow up", I honestly don't know that there is much that I even want to change on my 400T. Everything works really, really well. Like I said, I decided to try a Charge Spoon and I like it very much, especially for the price. And I already changed brake levers. The only upgrade I might make is to replace the narrow stock handlebars, and put on Nitto Grand Randonneur 135 which I have on two other bikes. I'm not sure what else I would change. I do know that things like the BB, hubs, headset, and in fact all of the components are mid-level, but when I replace them with something better as they wear out, I wouldn't consider that an upgrade. So if that's what you mean, then yes - it would get "better" over time as things wore out and were replaced.
Yeah, the Elance's are real sleepers. Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I think even the 330 was full chromoly. I love that mine's a triple.
Yeah, the Elance's are real sleepers. Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I think even the 330 was full chromoly. I love that mine's a triple.
I think the 330 changed by year- in 1987, notice the catalog doesn't specify what the stays are made of- just that they're "special tapered." If something's is CrMo, they say it's CrMo.
I started discovering parts and the way parts work together by working on my 400 Elance and seeing other people's bikes here and reading about how stuff works. You don't know what you're missing until you find it. You've changed your saddle, stem and levers because you knew there was better than what was on there... you know there's bars that'll probably work better for you... There's plenty of parts that perform better, that are stronger and weigh less, not to mention just looking pretty and the ability to make you smile when you see it- you just have to run into them.
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
Likes For The Golden Boy:
#42
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: PDX
Posts: 13,503
Bikes: Merz x 5 + Specialized Merz Allez x 2, Strawberry/Newlands/DiNucci/Ti x3, Gordon, Fuso/Moulton x2, Bornstein, Paisley,1958-74 Paramounts x3, 3rensho, 74 Moto TC, 73-78 Raleigh Pro's x5, Marinoni x2, 1960 Cinelli SC, 1980 Bianchi SC, PX-10 X 2
Liked 6,818 Times
in
3,896 Posts
Mothers Mag polish does great for alloy parts that aren’t anodized. Anything anodized, you clean and live with the milkiness it might have.
Usually brakes, stem seatpost can be polished.
I use a nice rubbing polisher for the frame. Mild version. TCut or turtle wax. Chrome gets barkeeps friend but I doubt you will have any.
A good comment up there for your decisioning...the bike speaks to me. My AD SLE I bought from a member tempted me with repainting but then I went with the joy of polish and touch up. I dislike Weinmann 605 brakes, and the bike had already been upgraded to Cyclone and Campy Victory derailleurs so I decided to go Cyclone heavy with the original Nervar crank. Wheels kept, but had they been Helicomatic, no go for me.
Usually brakes, stem seatpost can be polished.
I use a nice rubbing polisher for the frame. Mild version. TCut or turtle wax. Chrome gets barkeeps friend but I doubt you will have any.
A good comment up there for your decisioning...the bike speaks to me. My AD SLE I bought from a member tempted me with repainting but then I went with the joy of polish and touch up. I dislike Weinmann 605 brakes, and the bike had already been upgraded to Cyclone and Campy Victory derailleurs so I decided to go Cyclone heavy with the original Nervar crank. Wheels kept, but had they been Helicomatic, no go for me.
#43
Banned.
1. What do you plan to do with it? That drives the equation.
Otherwise:
Disassemble
Clean
Polish
Preserve
Reassemble
Ride
Otherwise:
Disassemble
Clean
Polish
Preserve
Reassemble
Ride
#44
Full Member
Thread Starter
i will admire it, ride it to the coffee shop, ride it on a bike path, look at at some more trying to recapture my youth and tinker on it endlessly. I will not be going on long hard rides with it. I have other bikes for that.
Likes For Dominae:
#45
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: PDX
Posts: 13,503
Bikes: Merz x 5 + Specialized Merz Allez x 2, Strawberry/Newlands/DiNucci/Ti x3, Gordon, Fuso/Moulton x2, Bornstein, Paisley,1958-74 Paramounts x3, 3rensho, 74 Moto TC, 73-78 Raleigh Pro's x5, Marinoni x2, 1960 Cinelli SC, 1980 Bianchi SC, PX-10 X 2
Liked 6,818 Times
in
3,896 Posts
#46
Senior Member
By the way Jeff- I didn't mention it- but your bike is beautiful. I really like it and I don't want to seem like I'm knocking on your bike or you.
I think the 330 changed by year- in 1987, notice the catalog doesn't specify what the stays are made of- just that they're "special tapered." If something's is CrMo, they say it's CrMo.
I started discovering parts and the way parts work together by working on my 400 Elance and seeing other people's bikes here and reading about how stuff works. You don't know what you're missing until you find it. You've changed your saddle, stem and levers because you knew there was better than what was on there... you know there's bars that'll probably work better for you... There's plenty of parts that perform better, that are stronger and weigh less, not to mention just looking pretty and the ability to make you smile when you see it- you just have to run into them.
I think the 330 changed by year- in 1987, notice the catalog doesn't specify what the stays are made of- just that they're "special tapered." If something's is CrMo, they say it's CrMo.
I started discovering parts and the way parts work together by working on my 400 Elance and seeing other people's bikes here and reading about how stuff works. You don't know what you're missing until you find it. You've changed your saddle, stem and levers because you knew there was better than what was on there... you know there's bars that'll probably work better for you... There's plenty of parts that perform better, that are stronger and weigh less, not to mention just looking pretty and the ability to make you smile when you see it- you just have to run into them.
Everyone is different with regard to gearing, I guess. It's just not that big a deal to me. Whatever bike I've ridden since my first 10-speed Schwinn Continental, has always had enough gears. I toured many thousands of miles on my Trek 720 with a 6 speed freewheel. Admittedly the granny gear helped a lot. I just never have the urge to upgrade the number of gears on any bike I buy. To me, they had enough gears then and they still have enough gears now. I'm never going to spread any frame. If I want more gears I'll buy a frame that accomodates that. But again, that's just me. Same thing with indexing. I grew up with friction shifting so it's no big deal, and I prefer it for the simplicity and reliability. Downtube shifters are great - less cabling and also less clutter in the cockpit - they're out of the way but right there when you want them. Plus it's a cleaner and more elegant look, for a classic road bike.
Last edited by Jeff Neese; 07-18-22 at 05:38 AM.
Likes For Jeff Neese:
#47
Edumacator
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Goose Creek, SC
Posts: 7,563
Bikes: '87 Crestdale, '87 Basso Gap, '92 Rossin Performance EL-OS, 1990 VanTuyl, 1980s Losa, 1985 Trek 670, 1982 AD SLE, 1987 PX10, etc...
Liked 3,591 Times
in
2,255 Posts
I think the lesson learned from the responses...? Everyone has their own definition of “restoration” of vintage bikes...whether...
1. “holy crap this is in terrible shape. Let me spend $400 on a paint job for a frame on a bike that was $389 in 1986! I can get NOS parts for the bike and it shouldn’t cost me more than $800!”
Or 2. “Paint looks pretty good after a polish. These scratches show respect. Have to replace a few rusty parts but wayback machine ready!”
Or 3. “I can match that paint color with seventeen bottles of testors and nail polish. I hate Weinmann brakes, so I think I can get away with Cyclones to match the RD/FD/S. It’s period appropriate.”
Or 4. “Love the frame. Needs some retro-mod stuff. Brifters on a 1981 Faggin...? Sign me up!”
Or 5. “Gugie can undrew that monstrous SS conversion...I can find metallic paint to fill it in. I can put all sorts of combos of parts on that...maybe some Mavic Cosmics...”
Or 6. “It’s carbon fiber. I’m not messing with that as a restoration. That’s not vintage steel...Cannondale looks cool...I wonder if I can cold set the drops to 132...<<crack>>”
Or 7. “I love this Peugeot Super Competition...need to strip the paint (wonder which stripper to use), then I will buy an air gun painting kit. Maybe a triple crank set up with 3x10 half step gearing. Those mustache bars will be cool...”
1. “holy crap this is in terrible shape. Let me spend $400 on a paint job for a frame on a bike that was $389 in 1986! I can get NOS parts for the bike and it shouldn’t cost me more than $800!”
Or 2. “Paint looks pretty good after a polish. These scratches show respect. Have to replace a few rusty parts but wayback machine ready!”
Or 3. “I can match that paint color with seventeen bottles of testors and nail polish. I hate Weinmann brakes, so I think I can get away with Cyclones to match the RD/FD/S. It’s period appropriate.”
Or 4. “Love the frame. Needs some retro-mod stuff. Brifters on a 1981 Faggin...? Sign me up!”
Or 5. “Gugie can undrew that monstrous SS conversion...I can find metallic paint to fill it in. I can put all sorts of combos of parts on that...maybe some Mavic Cosmics...”
Or 6. “It’s carbon fiber. I’m not messing with that as a restoration. That’s not vintage steel...Cannondale looks cool...I wonder if I can cold set the drops to 132...<<crack>>”
Or 7. “I love this Peugeot Super Competition...need to strip the paint (wonder which stripper to use), then I will buy an air gun painting kit. Maybe a triple crank set up with 3x10 half step gearing. Those mustache bars will be cool...”
Last edited by jdawginsc; 07-18-22 at 05:58 AM.
#48
Full Member
Thread Starter
Thanks for all the thoughtful replies. They have helped me clarify that I want to keep as much of the original bike as possible. I will have to see what kind of shape the Helicomatic hub is in before I decide whether to replace it, but if it is serviceable I will keep it. I might make a few other changes to the original parts. For instance, on the original Bike that I owned in the 1980s I swapped the original derailleurs for Nuovo Record. I might make that change although it is not original but is how I remember the bike.
Does anyone know the tire width that these mid 1980s Trek frames will accommodate?
Does anyone know the tire width that these mid 1980s Trek frames will accommodate?
#49
Edumacator
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Goose Creek, SC
Posts: 7,563
Bikes: '87 Crestdale, '87 Basso Gap, '92 Rossin Performance EL-OS, 1990 VanTuyl, 1980s Losa, 1985 Trek 670, 1982 AD SLE, 1987 PX10, etc...
Liked 3,591 Times
in
2,255 Posts
The Elance 400t takes 28mm easily.
Thanks for all the thoughtful replies. They have helped me clarify that I want to keep as much of the original bike as possible. I will have to see what kind of shape the Helicomatic hub is in before I decide whether to replace it, but if it is serviceable I will keep it. I might make a few other changes to the original parts. For instance, on the original Bike that I owned in the 1980s I swapped the original derailleurs for Nuovo Record. I might make that change although it is not original but is how I remember the bike.
Does anyone know the tire width that these mid 1980s Trek frames will accommodate?
Does anyone know the tire width that these mid 1980s Trek frames will accommodate?
__________________
1987 Crest Cannondale, 1987 Basso Gap, 1992 Rossin Performance EL, 1990ish Van Tuyl, 1985 Trek 670, 2003 Pinarello Surprise, 1990ish MBK Atlantique, 1987 Peugeot Competition, 1987 Nishiki Tri-A, 1981 Faggin, 1996 Cannondale M500, 1984 Mercian, 1982 AD SuperLeicht, 1985 Massi (model unknown), 1988 Daccordi Griffe , 1989 Fauxsin MTB, 1981 Ciocc Mockba, 1992 Bianchi Giro, 1977 Colnago Super, 1971 Raleigh International, 1998 Corratec Ap & Dun, 1991 Peugeot Slimestone
1987 Crest Cannondale, 1987 Basso Gap, 1992 Rossin Performance EL, 1990ish Van Tuyl, 1985 Trek 670, 2003 Pinarello Surprise, 1990ish MBK Atlantique, 1987 Peugeot Competition, 1987 Nishiki Tri-A, 1981 Faggin, 1996 Cannondale M500, 1984 Mercian, 1982 AD SuperLeicht, 1985 Massi (model unknown), 1988 Daccordi Griffe , 1989 Fauxsin MTB, 1981 Ciocc Mockba, 1992 Bianchi Giro, 1977 Colnago Super, 1971 Raleigh International, 1998 Corratec Ap & Dun, 1991 Peugeot Slimestone
#50
Senior Member
Thanks for all the thoughtful replies. They have helped me clarify that I want to keep as much of the original bike as possible. I will have to see what kind of shape the Helicomatic hub is in before I decide whether to replace it, but if it is serviceable I will keep it. I might make a few other changes to the original parts. For instance, on the original Bike that I owned in the 1980s I swapped the original derailleurs for Nuovo Record. I might make that change although it is not original but is how I remember the bike.
Does anyone know the tire width that these mid 1980s Trek frames will accommodate?
Does anyone know the tire width that these mid 1980s Trek frames will accommodate?
I'm not sure about the later year models.
If you don't know what year it is, the "vintage trek" site will help you pinpoint the year. https://www.vintage-trek.com/
Last edited by Hobbiano; 07-18-22 at 07:04 AM.