The Water Cooler, Scuttlebutt, Chit Chat Thread
#2501
How do you know USAC isn't just telling you what you want to hear, and that none of this was done for safety??
#2502
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,499
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
Liked 380 Times
in
259 Posts
That same group has specific rules changed just for them, just for the TT by the USA coaches. https://wmrc.org/wp-content/uploads/2...pmentRules.pdf
Add to that the junior gears for coaching, and the way they like to view/review power training (its complicated), I don't see that as coincidence, nor for safety.
But I don't KNOW.
#2503
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,499
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
Liked 380 Times
in
259 Posts
I've had the coaching reasons given to me for junior gears, not anything I can verify for safety. USAC has no issue with up hill races for kids, or what they do the majority of the time on the bike not racing. The small % of the race time would only be a data point and not conclusive if there were injuries - I just can't find any in youth males due to big gears.
I have seen over use fatigue in local kids. Bigger gears help reduce fatugue, and are a way to recover a bit in training. It is the racing high cadence chasing adults down hills, and over/spinning too many miles in training rides I blame for that.
15-18 year old males jump off high things, leg press more than most free weight machines can hold. "Knocked kneed
Females have easy 5:1 the injuries, mainly ACL, as men, and don't need as big of a gear as speeds are lower. That would be the first place to look at gear restrictions.
It is done for coaching.
High cadence causes overuse more than lower cadence.
...the repetitive motion of pedalling can lead to a variety of overuse knee injuries. The majority of cycling injuries are indeed caused by overuse, which leads to cumulative tissue microtrauma and consequent symptoms. In overuse injuries the problem is often not acute tissue inflammation, but chronic degeneration.
https://www.kneeclinic.info/knee_spor...es_cycling.php
I have seen over use fatigue in local kids. Bigger gears help reduce fatugue, and are a way to recover a bit in training. It is the racing high cadence chasing adults down hills, and over/spinning too many miles in training rides I blame for that.
15-18 year old males jump off high things, leg press more than most free weight machines can hold. "Knocked kneed
Females have easy 5:1 the injuries, mainly ACL, as men, and don't need as big of a gear as speeds are lower. That would be the first place to look at gear restrictions.
It is done for coaching.
High cadence causes overuse more than lower cadence.
...the repetitive motion of pedalling can lead to a variety of overuse knee injuries. The majority of cycling injuries are indeed caused by overuse, which leads to cumulative tissue microtrauma and consequent symptoms. In overuse injuries the problem is often not acute tissue inflammation, but chronic degeneration.
https://www.kneeclinic.info/knee_spor...es_cycling.php
Last edited by Doge; 02-20-18 at 03:32 PM.
#2505
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,499
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
Liked 380 Times
in
259 Posts
Gears?
USA Cycling coaches want USA (junior) riders to race a certain way and be ready to race in Europe by racing that way.
The reason the Belgium kids have it as a rule (and 52X16 max for 15-16) is when they throw the typical 100+ kids out there for a race, they want them to learn race craft by riding in close proximity. The strong can't just power away. The high spinners might. I watched junior go off on each hill to get caught on each downhill. So kids have to learn to win. Cool, except in the USA outside of nats, and VOS we see junior fields of much smaller. But the USA coaches like the Euro way. So they want USA kids to learn it. And smaller gears keeps the strong from riding away. They are likely right, but that is coaching.
The next thing is they are into souplesse. The coach you spoke with will tell you about it. It is that cool-look from spinning, being natural. It is what we have been taught to think is the best way to ride for 3 decades. They want the kids to learn that. So smaller gears. That is also coaching.
Thing is, I don't know it is a better way to ride. I have some hard data owned by others it is not. It depends. Even if it is, making rules to tell athletes how to do it - is coaching. I reluctantly accept USAC's choice to do that, but I also want them to admit that is what they are doing and this safety thing they have going is an excuse nobody has data to support and actually hurting kids (not much as they can take a lot). Some might argue - USAC is also not doing it right. But I'm pretty hopeful about the new batch running things in Colorado Springs.
USA Cycling coaches want USA (junior) riders to race a certain way and be ready to race in Europe by racing that way.
The reason the Belgium kids have it as a rule (and 52X16 max for 15-16) is when they throw the typical 100+ kids out there for a race, they want them to learn race craft by riding in close proximity. The strong can't just power away. The high spinners might. I watched junior go off on each hill to get caught on each downhill. So kids have to learn to win. Cool, except in the USA outside of nats, and VOS we see junior fields of much smaller. But the USA coaches like the Euro way. So they want USA kids to learn it. And smaller gears keeps the strong from riding away. They are likely right, but that is coaching.
The next thing is they are into souplesse. The coach you spoke with will tell you about it. It is that cool-look from spinning, being natural. It is what we have been taught to think is the best way to ride for 3 decades. They want the kids to learn that. So smaller gears. That is also coaching.
Thing is, I don't know it is a better way to ride. I have some hard data owned by others it is not. It depends. Even if it is, making rules to tell athletes how to do it - is coaching. I reluctantly accept USAC's choice to do that, but I also want them to admit that is what they are doing and this safety thing they have going is an excuse nobody has data to support and actually hurting kids (not much as they can take a lot). Some might argue - USAC is also not doing it right. But I'm pretty hopeful about the new batch running things in Colorado Springs.
Last edited by Doge; 02-21-18 at 08:42 AM.
#2507
Killing Rabbits
Pretty much. I lost the link to the paper but the most "stompy" pros were the fastest and most efficient.
The conclusion was something silly like "the greatest determinate of cycling performance is the amount of downward force produced at the crank 3 o'clock position."
The conclusion was something silly like "the greatest determinate of cycling performance is the amount of downward force produced at the crank 3 o'clock position."
#2509
Senior Member
I think it remains a challenging geographical issue. With the exception of the greatest of the great American kids, prospects are moving across the globe for meager pay. I suspect if there were more opportunities at the same pay, but living/training/racing in the US, you'd see more kids getting into and sticking with the sport. The lack of visibility limits the number of kids taking up bike racing which in turns leads to a more shallow talent pool moreso than USAC making kids spin high cadence. Even if there is a brief glimmer of hope with these 2015 kids I can't imagine too many took on contracts because of the items above.
#2511
I'm not an expert on human development or biology, but I think one could probably make the argument that stomp pedaling during development ages could lead to long-term damage of the knees.
We've seen it in a ton of other sports. Baseball, in particular, has pitch counts to limit how much throwing a young pitcher does. There is plenty of evidence to show that the wear and tear on an elbow and should can last a lifetime.
There's also a growing body of evidence on ACL tears in younger athletes, especially young women playing soccer, basketball, and cheerleading.
We've seen it in a ton of other sports. Baseball, in particular, has pitch counts to limit how much throwing a young pitcher does. There is plenty of evidence to show that the wear and tear on an elbow and should can last a lifetime.
There's also a growing body of evidence on ACL tears in younger athletes, especially young women playing soccer, basketball, and cheerleading.
#2512
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,499
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
Liked 380 Times
in
259 Posts
What happened to them? Who were they?
I think it remains a challenging geographical issue. With the exception of the greatest of the great American kids, prospects are moving across the globe for meager pay. I suspect if there were more opportunities at the same pay, but living/training/racing in the US, you'd see more kids getting into and sticking with the sport. The lack of visibility limits the number of kids taking up bike racing which in turns leads to a more shallow talent pool moreso than USAC making kids spin high cadence. Even if there is a brief glimmer of hope with these 2015 kids I can't imagine too many took on contracts because of the items above.
I think it remains a challenging geographical issue. With the exception of the greatest of the great American kids, prospects are moving across the globe for meager pay. I suspect if there were more opportunities at the same pay, but living/training/racing in the US, you'd see more kids getting into and sticking with the sport. The lack of visibility limits the number of kids taking up bike racing which in turns leads to a more shallow talent pool moreso than USAC making kids spin high cadence. Even if there is a brief glimmer of hope with these 2015 kids I can't imagine too many took on contracts because of the items above.
#2513
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,499
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
Liked 380 Times
in
259 Posts
It is mostly women, and I think it is hidden how high that multiple is. The men in that stat are generally from collision. There is a high correlation with hormonal cycles for the women as tendons soften/elongate. The ACL tear is generally from a twist you don't see in cycling, so I'm not claiming the same would happen, I don't think it is a problem at all.
#2514
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,499
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
Liked 380 Times
in
259 Posts
Pretty much. I lost the link to the paper but the most "stompy" pros were the fastest and most efficient.
The conclusion was something silly like "the greatest determinate of cycling performance is the amount of downward force produced at the crank 3 o'clock position."
The conclusion was something silly like "the greatest determinate of cycling performance is the amount of downward force produced at the crank 3 o'clock position."
So 60lbs pedal force from 4 O'clock to 5 O'clock vs 20lbs pedal force from 2 O'clock to 5 O'clock, which would calculate to both be the same. You could say one is more spinning, the other square pedaling.
But when the short arc power is applied as a pulse/stomp, the power-on is higher (PMs tell us this). I expect because it is invoking a different type of muscle (fast twitch) for that fraction of a second and then the other type for the remaining stroke. Total power is higher.
I took the picture down, but contact CyberCycleCoach Dave to learn it. He has plenty of power data to support his argument.
#2515
Senior Member
Power applied with more force, shorter arc, partially invoking both muscle fibre types.
So 60lbs pedal force from 4 O'clock to 5 O'clock vs 20lbs pedal force from 2 O'clock to 5 O'clock, which would calculate to both be the same. You could say one is more spinning, the other square pedaling.
But when the short arc power is applied as a pulse/stomp, the power-on is higher (PMs tell us this). I expect because it is invoking a different type of muscle (fast twitch) for that fraction of a second and then the other type for the remaining stroke. Total power is higher.
I took the picture down, but contact CyberCycleCoach Dave to learn it. He has plenty of power data to support his argument.
So 60lbs pedal force from 4 O'clock to 5 O'clock vs 20lbs pedal force from 2 O'clock to 5 O'clock, which would calculate to both be the same. You could say one is more spinning, the other square pedaling.
But when the short arc power is applied as a pulse/stomp, the power-on is higher (PMs tell us this). I expect because it is invoking a different type of muscle (fast twitch) for that fraction of a second and then the other type for the remaining stroke. Total power is higher.
I took the picture down, but contact CyberCycleCoach Dave to learn it. He has plenty of power data to support his argument.
#2516
Senior Member
What happened to them? Who were they?
I think it remains a challenging geographical issue. With the exception of the greatest of the great American kids, prospects are moving across the globe for meager pay. I suspect if there were more opportunities at the same pay, but living/training/racing in the US, you'd see more kids getting into and sticking with the sport. The lack of visibility limits the number of kids taking up bike racing which in turns leads to a more shallow talent pool moreso than USAC making kids spin high cadence. Even if there is a brief glimmer of hope with these 2015 kids I can't imagine too many took on contracts because of the items above.
I think it remains a challenging geographical issue. With the exception of the greatest of the great American kids, prospects are moving across the globe for meager pay. I suspect if there were more opportunities at the same pay, but living/training/racing in the US, you'd see more kids getting into and sticking with the sport. The lack of visibility limits the number of kids taking up bike racing which in turns leads to a more shallow talent pool moreso than USAC making kids spin high cadence. Even if there is a brief glimmer of hope with these 2015 kids I can't imagine too many took on contracts because of the items above.
European baseball players have the same problem. There's been at least a few pitchers that could throw good enough, but when you are in a remote location people don't sign 'good enough'. Going back to cycling, that means the cyclists like Greg Lemond and Lance Armstrong will get signed, but stars that develop into stars later like Froome will not.
So the kids have to move to the sports mecca to develop but most just don't have the resources. Its much easier for a kid in Belgium or France to stick with it as he doesn't have to leave home, learn a new language, and has a easier time finding secondary income (if he even needs it).
#2517
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 10,978
Bikes: aggressive agreement is what I ride.
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
Anyone ever actually get a TUE?
Weed is now legal in CA and I'm pretty sure I'd really benefit from 2-5mg each night to aid primarily in (stress/anxiety-reduced) sleep, but it's against the rules in-competition. Competition here goes from like January - September, and thc stays in your system long enough that it would either be don't-use, be at risk of a positive, or try to get a TUE.
Can it be any doctor who signs off, or what?
Weed is now legal in CA and I'm pretty sure I'd really benefit from 2-5mg each night to aid primarily in (stress/anxiety-reduced) sleep, but it's against the rules in-competition. Competition here goes from like January - September, and thc stays in your system long enough that it would either be don't-use, be at risk of a positive, or try to get a TUE.
Can it be any doctor who signs off, or what?
#2518
Nonsense
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Vagabond
Posts: 13,918
Bikes: Affirmative
Liked 541 Times
in
237 Posts
Theoretically there has to be documentation that every other realistic option has been tried prior to the thing that requires a TUE. In practice I honestly do not know how strict they are.
You could try Rhodiola? It's pretty well known for helping with stress and anxiety, and as a bonus it's a mild adaptogen.
You could try Rhodiola? It's pretty well known for helping with stress and anxiety, and as a bonus it's a mild adaptogen.
#2519
High cadence is not limiting use, it increases it. The joint moves more for the same power. Many recent articles (inc the one I quoted above) blame repetitions. So you could argue a kid riding 300 miles a week is more likely to get hurt than those doing 200. I agree that is true. And we saw some over use (cause he loved to ride) tendon fatigue in junior. The solution was not ride so much.
#2520
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,499
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
Liked 380 Times
in
259 Posts
My point about the pitch counts wasn't to point out the number of times they throw the ball, but rather they number of times they throw the ball really hard. Bigger gears are, in many, but not all, cases, harder to turn than smaller gears. I can see the argument that a developing body is more likely to sustain injury from repeatedly slamming a big gear.
Any kid able to hang with 15+ boys is training much more than racing. So, even if there were data supporting big gears are bad, rules do not address where most time is spent, not do they address hill where kids are definitely pushing hard.
#2521
Nonsense
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Vagabond
Posts: 13,918
Bikes: Affirmative
Liked 541 Times
in
237 Posts
Eh I mean if you're doing the same power but higher RPMs, you're producing less torque which in all likelihood puts less stress on developing joints. That said they still climb the same hills as the rest of us, so it really mostly applies to kermessey type stuff and crits.
#2522
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 10,978
Bikes: aggressive agreement is what I ride.
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
Theoretically there has to be documentation that every other realistic option has been tried prior to the thing that requires a TUE. In practice I honestly do not know how strict they are.
You could try Rhodiola? It's pretty well known for helping with stress and anxiety, and as a bonus it's a mild adaptogen.
You could try Rhodiola? It's pretty well known for helping with stress and anxiety, and as a bonus it's a mild adaptogen.
#2523
We do a lot of drug research at my job, and this morning I was talking with a coworker, when I commented, "Oh, I'm on opioids this morning."
I've also been overheard saying on the phone, "I'd prefer not to sit in a video and talk about my drug addictions."
In any other place, that would probably have been grounds for some serious inquiry or concern, but here, no one bats an eye.
I've also been overheard saying on the phone, "I'd prefer not to sit in a video and talk about my drug addictions."
In any other place, that would probably have been grounds for some serious inquiry or concern, but here, no one bats an eye.
#2524
Senior Member
We do a lot of drug research at my job, and this morning I was talking with a coworker, when I commented, "Oh, I'm on opioids this morning."
I've also been overheard saying on the phone, "I'd prefer not to sit in a video and talk about my drug addictions."
In any other place, that would probably have been grounds for some serious inquiry or concern, but here, no one bats an eye.
I've also been overheard saying on the phone, "I'd prefer not to sit in a video and talk about my drug addictions."
In any other place, that would probably have been grounds for some serious inquiry or concern, but here, no one bats an eye.
#2525
Newbie racer
On the one topic: Junior baseball stuff limits the pitch types allowed and the innings/throws allowed per player over the game counts to limit injuries.
On another topic.....I've been following the Novo guys and noticed now in two tours in a row they appear to be going after the IM sprint points. They got it in the first race. Not sure it will work this time. It tells me they don't have a credible leadout train or sprinter to challenge a stage win or overall in these flat races.
Same thing pretty much going on 10x in a row now, send Planet into the break to try for IM sprint points then have the break get caught and have someone finish around 15th each time.
It'll interesting to see what they try at Milan-San Remo.
On another topic.....I've been following the Novo guys and noticed now in two tours in a row they appear to be going after the IM sprint points. They got it in the first race. Not sure it will work this time. It tells me they don't have a credible leadout train or sprinter to challenge a stage win or overall in these flat races.
Same thing pretty much going on 10x in a row now, send Planet into the break to try for IM sprint points then have the break get caught and have someone finish around 15th each time.
It'll interesting to see what they try at Milan-San Remo.