Surly cross check vs Trek 520
#26
Bye Bye
an old snowbrush works well to clean off caked chainstays and the bb area.
but i have a bike garage and workshop. (car stays outside!)
the crap melts and runs on the floor and i sweep the water out the door or run a fan and dehumidifier.
in the spring everything gets a good washing.
__________________
So long. Been nice knowing you BF.... to all the friends I've made here and in real life... its been great. But this place needs an enema.
So long. Been nice knowing you BF.... to all the friends I've made here and in real life... its been great. But this place needs an enema.
#27
Bye Bye
#28
Commuting & Touring Guy
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 131
Bikes: Trek 520, Surly LHT, and an XtraCycle
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The both could, but I do know that the Cross Check has plenty of tire clearance room which might serve you well in the winter if you want to mount studded or a wide tires with aggressive tread.
I use 35mm studded tires on my CC for the Minnesota winters. I'm not sure if the 520 has that much clearance, I could be wrong but the pictures and specs on the Trek sight are inconclusive.
I use 35mm studded tires on my CC for the Minnesota winters. I'm not sure if the 520 has that much clearance, I could be wrong but the pictures and specs on the Trek sight are inconclusive.
#30
Bye Bye
Is your fork cracked just below the weld on the left of the image? Or is that just paint?
Thems be some big tires on that bike!
__________________
So long. Been nice knowing you BF.... to all the friends I've made here and in real life... its been great. But this place needs an enema.
So long. Been nice knowing you BF.... to all the friends I've made here and in real life... its been great. But this place needs an enema.
#31
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 193
Bikes: Schwinn Madison, Schwinn Tempo
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Neither of those bikes sound that fun to me, The 520 and the LHT are nice but, for a less than two mile commute, I would spend alot less and get something a bit less purpose built. If you just ride it for your commute and the occasional weekend ride, you might be happier with something lighter, quicker. If you do fall in love with riding, you likely will change your mind on what you like, and wonder if the $1500 was worth it. Honestly componet wise, very few people actually wear things out, they just get bored and change out componets.
Then again, Im getting old and cheap. In my youth I wanted the newest and shinniest. After I got hit on my Trek 400 (very entry level road bike) I got my brand new, just came out Trek 2000. Nice bike, but I liked my 400 better and it was a third the cost when it was all done. The 2000 made people look, but other than that, for me, the value liekly wasnt there.
Not being a scrooge, but there are lots of bikes that may be cheaper and do the job as well, leaving you room for more equipment/clothes and the option of upgrading to something else once you really determine your riding wants and needs.
Then again, Im getting old and cheap. In my youth I wanted the newest and shinniest. After I got hit on my Trek 400 (very entry level road bike) I got my brand new, just came out Trek 2000. Nice bike, but I liked my 400 better and it was a third the cost when it was all done. The 2000 made people look, but other than that, for me, the value liekly wasnt there.
Not being a scrooge, but there are lots of bikes that may be cheaper and do the job as well, leaving you room for more equipment/clothes and the option of upgrading to something else once you really determine your riding wants and needs.
#32
If you live in Canada, I would recommend looking at Jamis, Opus, or Rocky Mountain bikes. You get a lot more bike for that price. Surlys are a good deal, in the States. In Canada, not so much. I got a Rocky Mountain with better components and a 853 cro-mo frame for $400 less than what a LHT or Cross Check would cost. RM and Opus are also Canadian brands, although their frames are made in Asia.