Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Commuting
Reload this Page >

Surly cross check vs Trek 520

Search
Notices
Commuting Bicycle commuting is easier than you think, before you know it, you'll be hooked. Learn the tips, hints, equipment, safety requirements for safely riding your bike to work.

Surly cross check vs Trek 520

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-10-09, 12:47 PM
  #26  
bmike
Bye Bye
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Gone gone gone
Posts: 3,677
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by bigdurian
If you guys park your bicycles indoor during winter, do you clean off all the snow first?
bounce the bike 5-10 times before you try to get it inside.
an old snowbrush works well to clean off caked chainstays and the bb area.

but i have a bike garage and workshop. (car stays outside!)
the crap melts and runs on the floor and i sweep the water out the door or run a fan and dehumidifier.
in the spring everything gets a good washing.
__________________
So long. Been nice knowing you BF.... to all the friends I've made here and in real life... its been great. But this place needs an enema.
bmike is offline  
Old 04-10-09, 12:47 PM
  #27  
bmike
Bye Bye
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Gone gone gone
Posts: 3,677
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by vik
+1 - nice looking ride...
Thanks Vik.
It keeps morphing. Thats why I love the XC!
__________________
So long. Been nice knowing you BF.... to all the friends I've made here and in real life... its been great. But this place needs an enema.
bmike is offline  
Old 10-23-09, 09:59 AM
  #28  
Doconabike
Commuting & Touring Guy
 
Doconabike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 131

Bikes: Trek 520, Surly LHT, and an XtraCycle

Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by modernjess
The both could, but I do know that the Cross Check has plenty of tire clearance room which might serve you well in the winter if you want to mount studded or a wide tires with aggressive tread.

I use 35mm studded tires on my CC for the Minnesota winters. I'm not sure if the 520 has that much clearance, I could be wrong but the pictures and specs on the Trek sight are inconclusive.
I have ridden a Trek 520 for many years and love it. Like other folks have mentioned though, I've found the front fork to have limited tire clearance. In order to fit my commuting 45mm tires, I had to grind away a bit of metal from the fork. (This is NOT recommended.) If you are considering fat tires for fire-trails and dirt roads, go for the Cross Check. If you don't plan on fat tires, the 520 is a great sturdy bike. (For my super bumpy dirt-road commute, I plan on eventually switching out my fork so I don't suffer the consequences of my grinding.)

Doconabike is offline  
Old 10-23-09, 10:15 AM
  #29  
NormanF
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,737
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 8 Posts
A Trek 520 is a good tourer but slow as a commuter. I chose the Schwinn Super Sport DBX for half the price. It does every thing I want it to do in a road bike - and more.
NormanF is offline  
Old 10-23-09, 11:20 AM
  #30  
bmike
Bye Bye
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Gone gone gone
Posts: 3,677
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Doconabike


Is your fork cracked just below the weld on the left of the image? Or is that just paint?

Thems be some big tires on that bike!
__________________
So long. Been nice knowing you BF.... to all the friends I've made here and in real life... its been great. But this place needs an enema.
bmike is offline  
Old 10-24-09, 10:59 AM
  #31  
woodenidol
Senior Member
 
woodenidol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 193

Bikes: Schwinn Madison, Schwinn Tempo

Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Neither of those bikes sound that fun to me, The 520 and the LHT are nice but, for a less than two mile commute, I would spend alot less and get something a bit less purpose built. If you just ride it for your commute and the occasional weekend ride, you might be happier with something lighter, quicker. If you do fall in love with riding, you likely will change your mind on what you like, and wonder if the $1500 was worth it. Honestly componet wise, very few people actually wear things out, they just get bored and change out componets.

Then again, Im getting old and cheap. In my youth I wanted the newest and shinniest. After I got hit on my Trek 400 (very entry level road bike) I got my brand new, just came out Trek 2000. Nice bike, but I liked my 400 better and it was a third the cost when it was all done. The 2000 made people look, but other than that, for me, the value liekly wasnt there.

Not being a scrooge, but there are lots of bikes that may be cheaper and do the job as well, leaving you room for more equipment/clothes and the option of upgrading to something else once you really determine your riding wants and needs.
woodenidol is offline  
Old 10-24-09, 11:37 AM
  #32  
coffeecake
Blocking your fire exits
 
coffeecake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
If you live in Canada, I would recommend looking at Jamis, Opus, or Rocky Mountain bikes. You get a lot more bike for that price. Surlys are a good deal, in the States. In Canada, not so much. I got a Rocky Mountain with better components and a 853 cro-mo frame for $400 less than what a LHT or Cross Check would cost. RM and Opus are also Canadian brands, although their frames are made in Asia.
coffeecake is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Your Privacy Choices -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.