Does anyone collect Cyclocross bikes?
#26
Senior Member
Thread Starter
In the C&V sense, almost every bike brand I've looked at had their CX bike with a higher BB than their road and touring models. There might not be a consensus on CX geometry in totality, but BB height relatively higher is a good general guideline. With 770cx33 BB drop of 70mm would put the height at 274, fairly low for a C&V CX bike in my view.
The triple review here seems to indicate common design style for each style - CX, Criterium, and Road Race: https://www.bikeforums.net/classic-v...e-special.html
Or, to phrase it another way - what are some brands and bikes to look for that have 270ish BB height designed for CX?
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,923
Bikes: 82 Medici, 85 Ironman, 2011 Richard Sachs
Liked 2,239 Times
in
1,218 Posts
High BB on that Merckx. When my kids raced with me, I got my son a Poprad and for my shorter daughter a “smaller” Ridley. The BB was so high on that Ridley and with the level TT, the stand over height was to be ignored.
__________________
I don't do: disks, tubeless, e-shifting, or bead head nymphs.
I don't do: disks, tubeless, e-shifting, or bead head nymphs.
#28
Senior Member
Thread Starter
I do not have a CX collection but I am happy to have one in the "collection".
Amature World Champion and then turned pro, John Talen, had this bike made for him at Merckx.
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/...0bff1168_h.jpg
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/...0dfa946a_h.jpg
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/...d5ce4008_h.jpg
Amature World Champion and then turned pro, John Talen, had this bike made for him at Merckx.
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/...0bff1168_h.jpg
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/...0dfa946a_h.jpg
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/...d5ce4008_h.jpg
Likes For Spoonrobot:
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,923
Bikes: 82 Medici, 85 Ironman, 2011 Richard Sachs
Liked 2,239 Times
in
1,218 Posts
2018 Colnago CX had 68mm BBdrop.
__________________
I don't do: disks, tubeless, e-shifting, or bead head nymphs.
I don't do: disks, tubeless, e-shifting, or bead head nymphs.
#30
vintage motor
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Tepic, Nayarit, Mexico
Posts: 1,648
Bikes: 48 Automoto, 49 Stallard, 50 Rotrax, 62 Jack Taylor, 67 Atala, 68 Lejeune, 72-74-75 Motobecanes, 73 RIH, 71 Zieleman, 74 Raleigh, 78 Windsor, 83 Messina (Villata), 84 Brazzo (Losa), 85 Davidson, 90 Diamondback, 92 Kestrel
Liked 177 Times
in
103 Posts
What do you do with a vintage CX bike?
#31
Senior Member
Thread Starter
No doubt BB height has gotten lower in the modern era but it isn't applicable here. I started in the C&V because those are the types of CX bikes where my interest lies. Obviously, road height BB was not much (if any) impediment to the enjoyment of cyclocross, it doesn't seem common once the niche became more developed in the late 70s/80s.
#32
Ride, Wrench, Swap, Race
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Northern California
Posts: 9,333
Bikes: Cheltenham-Pedersen racer, Boulder F/S Paris-Roubaix, Varsity racer, '52 Christophe, '62 Continental, '92 Merckx, '75 Limongi, '76 Presto, '72 Gitane SC, '71 Schwinn SS, etc.
Liked 1,392 Times
in
926 Posts
The high bottom bracket was not universal on CX bikes, was apparently there to provide for pedaling briefly with the clips pointing down, not for log-hopping.
Newer designs of course make no concessions for toe clips.
I've mostly used touring bikes for CX training mileage, done on-road and off.
Certain sport-touring bikes like the Super Course and Grand Sports bikes from Raleigh have (in my preferred 23-inch size at least) 71/73-degree geometry that is what most CX bikes and 1990's MTB's have.
I came across a pro's former bike for sale that was hard-ridden and being sold with two badly damaged rims. It turned out to be a great bike for all-around riding, at least where I don't have to leave it unattended as it's a top-end (Hi-Mod) model of Cannondale's Super-X.
Running super-light 33mm tubess semi-slick Mavic "AllRoad" tires makes it quite good for even on-road group rides. Geometry is perhaps a tad steeper than my quoted 71/73 degrees, and it's well under 18lbs due to it's super-light frame and rim brake configuration.
With the new wheels and tires I'm into this thing for only a grand:
This Fuji CX bike turned up on Craigslist having a defective, separating crankset, which I had used parts on hand to fix.
It had been on someone's trainer for most of it's life and was had for just $160 from the son of the original owner.
Geometry is slower (slacker HT), with it's generous steering flop helping me hold a line through hairpin turns on dirt trails.
The rear brake bosses were welded on in very poor alignment, such that I eventually had to replace the brake with a different brand in order to get the pads to hit the rim properly.
Newer designs of course make no concessions for toe clips.
I've mostly used touring bikes for CX training mileage, done on-road and off.
Certain sport-touring bikes like the Super Course and Grand Sports bikes from Raleigh have (in my preferred 23-inch size at least) 71/73-degree geometry that is what most CX bikes and 1990's MTB's have.
I came across a pro's former bike for sale that was hard-ridden and being sold with two badly damaged rims. It turned out to be a great bike for all-around riding, at least where I don't have to leave it unattended as it's a top-end (Hi-Mod) model of Cannondale's Super-X.
Running super-light 33mm tubess semi-slick Mavic "AllRoad" tires makes it quite good for even on-road group rides. Geometry is perhaps a tad steeper than my quoted 71/73 degrees, and it's well under 18lbs due to it's super-light frame and rim brake configuration.
With the new wheels and tires I'm into this thing for only a grand:
This Fuji CX bike turned up on Craigslist having a defective, separating crankset, which I had used parts on hand to fix.
It had been on someone's trainer for most of it's life and was had for just $160 from the son of the original owner.
Geometry is slower (slacker HT), with it's generous steering flop helping me hold a line through hairpin turns on dirt trails.
The rear brake bosses were welded on in very poor alignment, such that I eventually had to replace the brake with a different brand in order to get the pads to hit the rim properly.
Likes For dddd:
#33
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Ride it around, appreciate the vintage-ness. I do most of my gravel racing/riding on modern disc brake bikes but occasionally there's a course when my vintage CX bike is a good choice and it's such an interesting and different experience I get a lot out of it that the disc bikes don't give me. I suppose I could eventually race some CX too.
My path into vintage CX started with converting a 1990/91 flat-bar Schwinn Crosscut into a dropbar bike and I liked it so much that I bought a new rim brake Panasonic CX bike and that made me really want to go back and see what the actual CX bikes from the C&V era were like.
Sure, point taken. Happy accident for me, as I like it for the log hopping aspect as well. There's a thing about the handling that gives me comfort, feeling relatively higher above the ground or something, even if it's only 10-15-20mm.
Nice bikes, Fuji made some interesting cross bikes in the 2000s and early 2010s but they didn't sell well for whatever reason.
My path into vintage CX started with converting a 1990/91 flat-bar Schwinn Crosscut into a dropbar bike and I liked it so much that I bought a new rim brake Panasonic CX bike and that made me really want to go back and see what the actual CX bikes from the C&V era were like.
The high bottom bracket was not universal on CX bikes, was apparently there to provide for pedaling briefly with the clips pointing down, not for log-hopping.
Newer designs of course make no concessions for toe clips.
I've mostly used touring bikes for CX training mileage, done on-road and off.
Certain sport-touring bikes like the Super Course and Grand Sports bikes from Raleigh have (in my preferred 23-inch size at least) 71/73-degree geometry that is what most CX bikes and 1990's MTB's have.
I came across a pro's former bike for sale that was hard-ridden and being sold with two badly damaged rims. It turned out to be a great bike for all-around riding, at least where I don't have to leave it unattended as it's a top-end (Hi-Mod) model of Cannondale's Super-X.
Running super-light 33mm tubess semi-slick Mavic "AllRoad" tires makes it quite good for even on-road group rides. Geometry is perhaps a tad steeper than my quoted 71/73 degrees, and it's well under 18lbs due to it's super-light frame and rim brake configuration.
With the new wheels and tires I'm into this thing for only a grand:
https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...7cc8a86f44.jpg
This Fuji CX bike turned up on Craigslist having a defective, separating crankset, which I had used parts on hand to fix.
It had been on someone's trainer for most of it's life and was had for just $160 from the son of the original owner.
Geometry is slower (slacker HT), with it's generous steering flop helping me hold a line through hairpin turns on dirt trails.
The rear brake bosses were welded on in very poor alignment, such that I eventually had to replace the brake with a different brand in order to get the pads to hit the rim properly.
https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...5c7f071613.jpg
Newer designs of course make no concessions for toe clips.
I've mostly used touring bikes for CX training mileage, done on-road and off.
Certain sport-touring bikes like the Super Course and Grand Sports bikes from Raleigh have (in my preferred 23-inch size at least) 71/73-degree geometry that is what most CX bikes and 1990's MTB's have.
I came across a pro's former bike for sale that was hard-ridden and being sold with two badly damaged rims. It turned out to be a great bike for all-around riding, at least where I don't have to leave it unattended as it's a top-end (Hi-Mod) model of Cannondale's Super-X.
Running super-light 33mm tubess semi-slick Mavic "AllRoad" tires makes it quite good for even on-road group rides. Geometry is perhaps a tad steeper than my quoted 71/73 degrees, and it's well under 18lbs due to it's super-light frame and rim brake configuration.
With the new wheels and tires I'm into this thing for only a grand:
https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...7cc8a86f44.jpg
This Fuji CX bike turned up on Craigslist having a defective, separating crankset, which I had used parts on hand to fix.
It had been on someone's trainer for most of it's life and was had for just $160 from the son of the original owner.
Geometry is slower (slacker HT), with it's generous steering flop helping me hold a line through hairpin turns on dirt trails.
The rear brake bosses were welded on in very poor alignment, such that I eventually had to replace the brake with a different brand in order to get the pads to hit the rim properly.
https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...5c7f071613.jpg
Nice bikes, Fuji made some interesting cross bikes in the 2000s and early 2010s but they didn't sell well for whatever reason.
#34
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 14,964
Bikes: Yes
Liked 4,301 Times
in
1,584 Posts
The problem with vintage CX bikes, once they stop just being road bikes, is this:
https://teamawesomecycling.bigcartel...top-won-t-stop
Except for that, they are fantastic bikes. I really want an old Ibis, if nothing else, for the rear brake hanger, which I couldn't search for by its proper name because I'm at work.
I've got a couple of CX bikes in my garage, but the oldest of them is from 2013 for the reason shown on the T-shirt above.
__________________
My Bikes
My Bikes
Likes For Andy_K:
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,923
Bikes: 82 Medici, 85 Ironman, 2011 Richard Sachs
Liked 2,239 Times
in
1,218 Posts
Most 70s CX bikes are “mistaken” for road bikes. https://pezcyclingnews.com/interview...clocross-king/
__________________
I don't do: disks, tubeless, e-shifting, or bead head nymphs.
I don't do: disks, tubeless, e-shifting, or bead head nymphs.
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,954
Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones
Liked 4,323 Times
in
2,383 Posts
That's why I picked up a CX frame that is on the smaller end of the range of sizes I like. That won't fix the high BB but it will allow me to straddle the bike comfortably. The rest is just a learning experience (I hope). I do have the parts stashed for the bike other than wheels (unless I go tubular and maybe I should).
#37
Disciple of St. Tullio
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: State of Jefferson
Posts: 760
Bikes: Ciöcc, Bianchi, DeRosa, Eddy Merckx, Frejus, Hampsten, Kondor, Losa, Magni, Pegoretti, Pelizzoli, Pogliaghi, Scapin
Liked 384 Times
in
151 Posts
I have owned this '95 Bianchi Cross Project USA since new. It was sold as a frameset and for two years only. It's fully lugged Zero Uno tubing and Reparto Corse built. It does have the old school Euro high BB and it feels a bit strange when I first get on it, but it doesn't take long for that feeling to go away. The only real downside is that the chainstays max out at around a 35mm tire, though I don't really need anything larger.
#38
Senior Member
Thread Starter
I have owned this '95 Bianchi Cross Project USA since new. It was sold as a frameset and for two years only. It's fully lugged Zero Uno tubing and Reparto Corse built. It does have the old school Euro high BB and it feels a bit strange when I first get on it, but it doesn't take long for that feeling to go away. The only real downside is that the chainstays max out at around a 35mm tire, though I don't really need anything larger.
https://ciocctoo.com/forums/var/album...G?m=1633194020
https://ciocctoo.com/forums/var/album...G?m=1633194019
https://ciocctoo.com/forums/var/album...G?m=1633194020
https://ciocctoo.com/forums/var/album...G?m=1633194019
Likes For Spoonrobot:
#39
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,923
Bikes: 82 Medici, 85 Ironman, 2011 Richard Sachs
Liked 2,239 Times
in
1,218 Posts
There was one of those very rare Bianchis available nearby and I got excited — but a little research determined it was the largest they made and too big for me to throw around a CX course🙁.
edit: And here for a good price and local and TOOOO LARGE
https://www.ebay.com/itm/126274843464
edit: And here for a good price and local and TOOOO LARGE
https://www.ebay.com/itm/126274843464
__________________
I don't do: disks, tubeless, e-shifting, or bead head nymphs.
I don't do: disks, tubeless, e-shifting, or bead head nymphs.
Last edited by Classtime; 04-10-24 at 12:46 PM.
#40
Likes For icemilkcoffee:
#41
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Michigan USA
Posts: 1,057
Bikes: A bunch of old bikes.
Liked 1,093 Times
in
498 Posts
This is a bike I use for gravel and mixed stuff. The frameset came from another BF member via the classifieds. It would have been sold in the late 00's by BikesDirect as the CX853. A bit too young for C&V, the frame is 853, the fork is carbon.
I am running 35mm tires, but could go a bit larger although I never measured.
I am running 35mm tires, but could go a bit larger although I never measured.
Likes For daverup:
#42
Slowfoot
I need it when my son and I go riding together. He has a Gary Fisher hybrid and tends to cross medians and grassy knolls.
'93 Waterford X-12 753.
'93 Waterford X-12 753.
#43
Full Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Durango, CO
Posts: 499
Bikes: too many old steel bikes
Liked 970 Times
in
182 Posts
c1999 Voodoo Wazo CX
I looked for a vintage CX bike or frame for some time without success in finding something in my size for what I considered reasonable money. I wound up going with this Voodoo Wazo I bought as a frame set. I think it weighs in around 22 pounds and I use it as a gravel bike. I'm using 35mm tires. Not sure larger would fit.
#44
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Seattle
Posts: 148
Bikes: Masi Gran Criterium, Derosa, Ron Cooper, Davidson, Miyata 912, Le Jeune, Klein Rascals, AMP Research B3, B4, B5, PX10,Holdsworth, Schwinn Paramount, Frejus, Erickson, Simoncini SLX, Cecil Walker
Liked 119 Times
in
53 Posts
I've seen almost no pre-1990s cyclocross bicycles for sale over the years. What I've owned were not exactly classic, but fairly vintage:
the Pinarello--I sold this but it was lost in shipping somewhere in Arizona
Currently own this Bianchi:
the Pinarello--I sold this but it was lost in shipping somewhere in Arizona
Currently own this Bianchi:
Likes For cheffyjay:
#45
I’ve got that same frame a few years back; the one with the cable guides on the lugs…currently rebuilding it. But since mine was already repainted I didn’t care about period correct parts…just built it up as a 1x. Tried mini v brakes. Didn’t work because the distance of the cantilever bosses is only 65, 55mm respectively with these old frames. I kinda collect cyclocross bikes. I say kinda because, as mentioned here already, they’re incredibly rare. Have the pinarello and two gazelles. Looking for an Empella for a while now. So far no luck. I buy mostly in Europe, though. I have folks there which I have the stuff send to before I pick it at my yearly visit…outside of Europe it is even more difficult I’d say. Also: a lot of these frames are fairly banged up and have issues. One of the rear canti bosses of my pinarello came off - rust. One more question: that pinarello can you still decipher the Columbus sticker? What tubing was used? Mine has a 27.0 inner diameter seat tube, does yours too? Sorry for being slightly off topic…
Likes For tdh:
#46
Disciple of St. Tullio
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: State of Jefferson
Posts: 760
Bikes: Ciöcc, Bianchi, DeRosa, Eddy Merckx, Frejus, Hampsten, Kondor, Losa, Magni, Pegoretti, Pelizzoli, Pogliaghi, Scapin
Liked 384 Times
in
151 Posts
Yep, and the fork will take larger tire too, though not a 50mm. On the other hand, it was made for CX and since the UCI limits tires to 33mm it makes sense that they didn't go to the trouble to shape the chainstays.
#47
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,954
Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones
Liked 4,323 Times
in
2,383 Posts
I’ve got that same frame a few years back; the one with the cable guides on the lugs…currently rebuilding it. But since mine was already repainted I didn’t care about period correct parts…just built it up as a 1x. Tried mini v brakes. Didn’t work because the distance of the cantilever bosses is only 65, 55mm respectively with these old frames. I kinda collect cyclocross bikes. I say kinda because, as mentioned here already, they’re incredibly rare. Have the pinarello and two gazelles. Looking for an Empella for a while now. So far no luck. I buy mostly in Europe, though. I have folks there which I have the stuff send to before I pick it at my yearly visit…outside of Europe it is even more difficult I’d say. Also: a lot of these frames are fairly banged up and have issues. One of the rear canti bosses of my pinarello came off - rust. One more question: that pinarello can you still decipher the Columbus sticker? What tubing was used? Mine has a 27.0 inner diameter seat tube, does yours too? Sorry for being slightly off topic…
https://www.bikeforums.net/classic-v...-question.html