I could not ride an event without this _______ saddle......
#26
Senior Member
Just a quick follow-up...
I successfully completed my 600 Km brevet this past weekend. I used my own special preventative anti chafing/saddlesore formula and applied it right on my sitbones before the start and once approximately every 200 Km after that. I also changed shorts after getting to the hotel at 385 Km. At that point, my sitbones were sore, but definitely not as much as when I finished the 400 Km brevet. Carbonfiberboy was right -- I hopped on the bike again (with Brooks B17 saddle) and within 10-15 mins I felt comfortable again. The sitbones surprisingly quieted down and I finished the rest of my brevet.
I successfully completed my 600 Km brevet this past weekend. I used my own special preventative anti chafing/saddlesore formula and applied it right on my sitbones before the start and once approximately every 200 Km after that. I also changed shorts after getting to the hotel at 385 Km. At that point, my sitbones were sore, but definitely not as much as when I finished the 400 Km brevet. Carbonfiberboy was right -- I hopped on the bike again (with Brooks B17 saddle) and within 10-15 mins I felt comfortable again. The sitbones surprisingly quieted down and I finished the rest of my brevet.
#27
multimodal commuter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ, NYC, LI
Posts: 19,811
Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...
Liked 577 Times
in
342 Posts
Obviously, getting the saddle in the right place is really important. Perhaps less obvious, that "right place" is determined in relation to the location of the pedal on the downstroke; and the relationship between the two is controlled by several factors that are beyond the control of the saddle manufacturer. For example, if all other factors are the same, the rider with 175 mm crank arms will want his saddle 1 cm farther forward than the rider with 165 mm crank arms. Likewise, if all other factors are the same, a frame with a 74° seat tube will place the saddle as much as 25 mm farther forward than a frame with a 72° seat tube (this depends on frame size; assuming a 60 cm frame with 12 cm seat post extension, for example, the difference works out to about 23 mm). One of my century bikes is an English frame from the 30's or 40's and its 68° seat tube angle seems insanely slack by today's standards; but when it was designed, racers used a "gallows" type seat post that allowed a great deal of fore-aft adjustment, all of it in front of the post itself. I use a standard old fashioned seat clamp, mounted in front of the post, which gives me a perfectly normal saddle placement vis-a-vis the pedal on the downstroke.
Bicycle frame design has changed a bit over the last half century: the steerer tube and seat tube have both gotten steeper.
And modern riders often use longer crank arms than was common a half century ago (I blame the mountain bike fad for this change).
Meanwhile, Brooks saddle frames have not changed at all. There is absolutely no difference between a 1965 Brooks Pro frame and a 2015 Brooks Pro frame.
So... I would not reject either a Brooks or a Selle Anatomica for the reasons given above. With the correct seat post (zero setback, lots of setback, whatever) you should be able to fit any saddle to any frame with whatever crank arm length you want. If you can't, you need a different seat post.
Bicycle frame design has changed a bit over the last half century: the steerer tube and seat tube have both gotten steeper.
And modern riders often use longer crank arms than was common a half century ago (I blame the mountain bike fad for this change).
Meanwhile, Brooks saddle frames have not changed at all. There is absolutely no difference between a 1965 Brooks Pro frame and a 2015 Brooks Pro frame.
So... I would not reject either a Brooks or a Selle Anatomica for the reasons given above. With the correct seat post (zero setback, lots of setback, whatever) you should be able to fit any saddle to any frame with whatever crank arm length you want. If you can't, you need a different seat post.
__________________
www.rhmsaddles.com.
www.rhmsaddles.com.
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,009
Bikes: SOMA Grand Randonneur, Gunnar Sport converted to 650B, Rivendell Rambouillet, '82 Trek 728, '84 Trek 610, '85 Trek 500, C'Dale F600, Burley Duet, Lotus Legend
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
...So... I would not reject either a Brooks or a Selle Anatomica for the reasons given above. With the correct seat post (zero setback, lots of setback, whatever) you should be able to fit any saddle to any frame with whatever crank arm length you want. If you can't, you need a different seat post.
#29
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,872
Liked 4,042 Times
in
2,753 Posts
I agree with Nick on the setback issue. I can just barely get my Brooks pro far enough back on a standard setback seatpost. I have seen SA saddles that are way too far back on a zero setback post, and I suspect they should change their rails to keep that from happening.
I used an Airone this weekend, it went really well. Going to reserve judgement on it. Sometimes I think the Aliante is too hammock-like for me, but it has served me well in the past
I used an Airone this weekend, it went really well. Going to reserve judgement on it. Sometimes I think the Aliante is too hammock-like for me, but it has served me well in the past
#31
Banned
saddle setback should be to balance your torso....not the silly KOP notion.
Peter White has a good explanation of this.....there is a another one from that Aussie fitter.....Steve Hogg
Lack of balance is a key reason for discomfort on long rides
SEAT SET BACK: for road bikes » Bike Fit » Steve Hogg's Bike Fitting Website
How to Fit a Bicycle
The Myth of K.O.P.S.
Peter White has a good explanation of this.....there is a another one from that Aussie fitter.....Steve Hogg
Lack of balance is a key reason for discomfort on long rides
SEAT SET BACK: for road bikes » Bike Fit » Steve Hogg's Bike Fitting Website
How to Fit a Bicycle
The Myth of K.O.P.S.
#32
multimodal commuter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ, NYC, LI
Posts: 19,811
Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...
Liked 577 Times
in
342 Posts
Currently-available seat posts that I can afford do not allow me to ride a Brooks saddle. The only possibility is the Nitto lugged seat post at $204 (Nitto Lugged seat post 27.2 x 250 - 11048), at triple the price of the VO seat posts that I buy.
But since I also find SA saddles more comfortable in other respects than Brooks saddles. I can't see why I would spend a ton of money to get a seatpost that lets me ride a saddle that I don't like as much as my current saddle. Of course, there's also Rivet saddles which allow you to set the saddle back far enough. So I would conclude that it is reasonable to reject Brooks saddles for the reasons given above :-).
I remain of the opinion that if you really wanted a Brooks saddle, you could make it fit your bike. If it was an absolute total fail, but you still wanted a Brooks saddle, then I'd say you you have the wrong frame. One way or another, there's a mismatch between your frame design and the Brooks saddle design. You can say the seat post angle is too steep, or the crank arms are too short, or the frame builder assumed you would be using longer crank arms, or the saddle is all wrong; they all amount to the same thing. Another option, if you really really wanted a Brooks saddle but couldn't make it fit your frame: I could rivet a Brooks top to a Selle Anatomica (or Rivet, or whatever) frame for you. That's pretty easy. But none of this matters if you prefer the SA saddle anyway.
__________________
www.rhmsaddles.com.
www.rhmsaddles.com.
#33
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Stow, MA
Posts: 91
Bikes: SOMA Double Cross w/ BlackSheep Ti Fork, SOMA Grand Randonneur
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I can't get the Selle Anatomica for enough forward with a Thompson Zero set back seatpoast on either a 74 or73 degree seat tube angle with 165 crank arms. I'm 6'1 and ride a Soma GR or a Merlin Cyrene. For me it does not work even using all of the tricks. Any further back and my knees hurt. A Brooks B-17 Imperial just works. But I get the best position on a Cobb JOF Randee.
Obviously, getting the saddle in the right place is really important. Perhaps less obvious, that "right place" is determined in relation to the location of the pedal on the downstroke; and the relationship between the two is controlled by several factors that are beyond the control of the saddle manufacturer. For example, if all other factors are the same, the rider with 175 mm crank arms will want his saddle 1 cm farther forward than the rider with 165 mm crank arms. Likewise, if all other factors are the same, a frame with a 74° seat tube will place the saddle as much as 25 mm farther forward than a frame with a 72° seat tube (this depends on frame size; assuming a 60 cm frame with 12 cm seat post extension, for example, the difference works out to about 23 mm). One of my century bikes is an English frame from the 30's or 40's and its 68° seat tube angle seems insanely slack by today's standards; but when it was designed, racers used a "gallows" type seat post that allowed a great deal of fore-aft adjustment, all of it in front of the post itself. I use a standard old fashioned seat clamp, mounted in front of the post, which gives me a perfectly normal saddle placement vis-a-vis the pedal on the downstroke.
Bicycle frame design has changed a bit over the last half century: the steerer tube and seat tube have both gotten steeper.
And modern riders often use longer crank arms than was common a half century ago (I blame the mountain bike fad for this change).
Meanwhile, Brooks saddle frames have not changed at all. There is absolutely no difference between a 1965 Brooks Pro frame and a 2015 Brooks Pro frame.
So... I would not reject either a Brooks or a Selle Anatomica for the reasons given above. With the correct seat post (zero setback, lots of setback, whatever) you should be able to fit any saddle to any frame with whatever crank arm length you want. If you can't, you need a different seat post.
Bicycle frame design has changed a bit over the last half century: the steerer tube and seat tube have both gotten steeper.
And modern riders often use longer crank arms than was common a half century ago (I blame the mountain bike fad for this change).
Meanwhile, Brooks saddle frames have not changed at all. There is absolutely no difference between a 1965 Brooks Pro frame and a 2015 Brooks Pro frame.
So... I would not reject either a Brooks or a Selle Anatomica for the reasons given above. With the correct seat post (zero setback, lots of setback, whatever) you should be able to fit any saddle to any frame with whatever crank arm length you want. If you can't, you need a different seat post.
#35
Member
I can't get Selle Anatomicas far enough forward for me. I tried the Rivet Independence but I experienced a bit of the dreaded numbness. I think it's shape is too arched. I'm trying a Brooks B17 Imperial. I have been using a Cobb jof Randee with fine results to 200k but want to make sure I can be comfortable for longer. Plus I wanted a honey brown saddle to go with the new bike...
#36
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,670
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Liked 2,600 Times
in
1,593 Posts
Two anecdotes:
- For the most part, I really like the width and leather on my vintage Brooks B5N. However, about halfway through last year's PBP, I really had to start slathering on the "Butt Butt'r" as my contact points were getting tender. It could well be that my shorts were to blame, but I think it goes to the point that you may not get all the information you need from the first 200k or 300k of a ride (this was my first 1200k).
- I use a regular Brooks B17 on my fixed-gear mountain bike with a 72° or 73° seat tube, and in the past, struggled with getting it back far enough. My thighs would chafe a little bit on longer rides, but I am out of the saddle often enough that circulation isn't a big issue. I belatedly realized that the saddle is just too wide for me -- I wonder how many other "I can't get the saddle back far enough" folks are in the same boat and haven't realized it yet?
- For the most part, I really like the width and leather on my vintage Brooks B5N. However, about halfway through last year's PBP, I really had to start slathering on the "Butt Butt'r" as my contact points were getting tender. It could well be that my shorts were to blame, but I think it goes to the point that you may not get all the information you need from the first 200k or 300k of a ride (this was my first 1200k).
- I use a regular Brooks B17 on my fixed-gear mountain bike with a 72° or 73° seat tube, and in the past, struggled with getting it back far enough. My thighs would chafe a little bit on longer rides, but I am out of the saddle often enough that circulation isn't a big issue. I belatedly realized that the saddle is just too wide for me -- I wonder how many other "I can't get the saddle back far enough" folks are in the same boat and haven't realized it yet?
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Stow, MA
Posts: 91
Bikes: SOMA Double Cross w/ BlackSheep Ti Fork, SOMA Grand Randonneur
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Bumping this thread because I'm going from a Fizik Aliante to either a Selle Anatomica or a Cobb JOF Randee (both are on order). Based on pictures of the Selle's rails, I think I'll be able to position it where I need. Wondering who on here has experience with the Randee and how it compares to either the Anatomica or the B17 Imperial.
#38
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: FL, Space Coast
Posts: 75
Bikes: Trek 7100 Multi-Track
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
ISM Adamo century. It's a good saddle. never had any pain or issues with it. I have a brooks swift as well, it's good on rides. I do miss the cutout when I'm riding with it though.
I think the best thing to take from this post is everyone's a little different.
I think the best thing to take from this post is everyone's a little different.
Last edited by ythe1300; 05-01-16 at 10:52 PM.
#40
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 13,321
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Liked 4,331 Times
in
2,788 Posts
Seatpost setback. I read in the earlier posts of a number of riders who had trouble with seats either not far enough back (esp the Brooks seats) or far enough forward.
My take on this? Really simple. The big money spent is on the bike. The most important contact point on that bike is the seat. Locating that perfect seat perfectly on the bike is simply a matter of getting the seatpost with the right setback. And if that seatpost cannot be found for sale, it can be made.
I had my two customs made with steep seat angles so I could mount 25c and 28c tires and use fenders while placing the wheel far enough forward for the correct weight balance for me. But I need the seat in the normal place. So I had the builder make me seatposts with 60mm of setback. Clamps are now centered on the rails and I have all the adjust I could ever need. Yes they cost me several hundred dollars; a lot for a seatpost but small change for the most important aspect of a high end bike.
I am not an ultra distance guy. But you guys need a perfect seat location more than I do. (I have done a 130 mile day on a fix gear, one of those two bikes. My butt was fine all day and that night.)
Ben
My take on this? Really simple. The big money spent is on the bike. The most important contact point on that bike is the seat. Locating that perfect seat perfectly on the bike is simply a matter of getting the seatpost with the right setback. And if that seatpost cannot be found for sale, it can be made.
I had my two customs made with steep seat angles so I could mount 25c and 28c tires and use fenders while placing the wheel far enough forward for the correct weight balance for me. But I need the seat in the normal place. So I had the builder make me seatposts with 60mm of setback. Clamps are now centered on the rails and I have all the adjust I could ever need. Yes they cost me several hundred dollars; a lot for a seatpost but small change for the most important aspect of a high end bike.
I am not an ultra distance guy. But you guys need a perfect seat location more than I do. (I have done a 130 mile day on a fix gear, one of those two bikes. My butt was fine all day and that night.)
Ben
#41
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 2,468
Bikes: Co-Motion Cappuccino Tandem,'88 Bob Jackson Touring, Co-Motion Cascadia Touring, Open U.P., Ritchie Titanium Breakaway, Frances Cycles SmallHaul cargo bike. Those are the permanent ones; others wander in and out of the stable occasionally as well.
Likes: 0
Liked 340 Times
in
230 Posts
Since I have been riding a Selle AnAtomica, I have completely forgotten that the dang seat is even there... I do not even think about it until someone brings it up in a thread. That is about the best testament a seat can have!