When ignorant cops think they know the law
#76
You can't trust 'em. They're like the religious people who go door to door, in that no matter how friendly and casual chatting with them might seem, you know the subject of that conversation is always gonna return to "what can I charge this guy with?"
#77
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 3,947
Bikes: Trek 1100 road bike, Roadmaster gravel/commuter/beater mountain bike
Liked 1,711 Times
in
937 Posts
Again, the cop sent him on his way after stopping him for maybe 10 minutes, didn't want to write him a ticket or anything, just warned him that he was hard to see and checked him for warrants, saw he was clean and then kicked him loose. Again, much ado about nothing.
Likes For Milton Keynes:
#78
Senior Member
The cop erroneously stopped him due to his misunderstanding of the law. If the guy had a warrant he'd have gone to jail regardless. They wouldn't kick him loose just because the cop misunderstood the law. Had the guy been arrested for some other offense at the scene, then a good lawyer could get that charge dismissed due to the incorrect reason for the stop.
In fact, had he had a warrant, he would have been arrested, but then may have been released due to the error.
However, had the search subsequent to arrest turned up something as minor as a “recreational” quantity of drugs, then he could be arrested and not released, tried, and then even convicted. See Utah v. Strieff, and Sotomayor’s brilliant dissent on how that makes absolutely no sense.
“Do not be soothed by the opinion’s technical language: This case allows the police to stop you on the street, demand your identification, and check it for outstanding traffic warrants—even if you are doing nothing wrong.”
-mr. bill
Last edited by mr_bill; 10-01-19 at 07:54 PM.
#79
☢
The cop erroneously stopped him due to his misunderstanding of the law. If the guy had a warrant he'd have gone to jail regardless. They wouldn't kick him loose just because the cop misunderstood the law. Had the guy been arrested for some other offense at the scene, then a good lawyer could get that charge dismissed due to the incorrect reason for the stop. However, if the cop had a hard time seeing the cyclist as he said, then it could be considered a safety stop. That would be something for the courts to decide. However, if someone has a warrant they're going to jail no matter the reason for the stop. Warrants don't get dismissed because the person with the warrant was pulled over on a traffic stop for false reasons.
Again, the cop sent him on his way after stopping him for maybe 10 minutes, didn't want to write him a ticket or anything, just warned him that he was hard to see and checked him for warrants, saw he was clean and then kicked him loose. Again, much ado about nothing.
Again, the cop sent him on his way after stopping him for maybe 10 minutes, didn't want to write him a ticket or anything, just warned him that he was hard to see and checked him for warrants, saw he was clean and then kicked him loose. Again, much ado about nothing.
#80
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 30,119
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Liked 1,650 Times
in
1,111 Posts
And if you should decide to stop in order to read the riot act to the LEO about his "ignorance", and the LEO asks your name are you going to go mute and take whatever comes next, all for the sake of a stupid YouTube video appreciated only by dimwits who like that sort of BS?
Likes For I-Like-To-Bike:
#81
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,612
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Liked 9,103 Times
in
5,054 Posts
He's told he's free to go about 4 minutes into the stop, then proceeds to insist that the cop write him a ticket and plead his case to a second cop who came on the scene for about 2 minutes.
Last edited by livedarklions; 10-02-19 at 07:46 AM.
Likes For livedarklions:
#82
So it is
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Westminster, CO
Posts: 21,872
Bikes: Luzerne, 684, Boreas, Wheelhouse, Alize©®, Bayamo, Cayo
Liked 5,281 Times
in
3,011 Posts
Likes For LAJ:
#83
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 3,947
Bikes: Trek 1100 road bike, Roadmaster gravel/commuter/beater mountain bike
Liked 1,711 Times
in
937 Posts
Seriously, if I were riding at night and my taillight quit working, and a cop stopped me to let me know I was hard to see, I'd be grateful.
Last edited by Milton Keynes; 10-02-19 at 12:36 PM.
#84
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 3,947
Bikes: Trek 1100 road bike, Roadmaster gravel/commuter/beater mountain bike
Liked 1,711 Times
in
937 Posts
However, had the search subsequent to arrest turned up something as minor as a “recreational” quantity of drugs, then he could be arrested and not released, tried, and then even convicted. See Utah v. Strieff, and Sotomayor’s brilliant dissent on how that makes absolutely no sense.
But at any rate, we're getting way the heck off the topic with all these "what if's" since that's obviously not what happened here. The guy was not searched, he had no warrants, the cop didn't cite him, so it was little more than a "citizen contact" type stop that the guy's making a mountain out of a molehill. Again, had it happened to me, if I on my bicycle were hard to see by motorists, I'd be grateful for the info because I really don't want to get run over by a motorist who can't see me. And I don't care if a cop wants to run me for warrants because I know that I've never had a warrant in my life, nor plan to.
#85
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: NE Tennessee
Posts: 917
Bikes: Giant TCR/Surly Karate Monkey/Foundry FireTower/Curtlo Tandem
Liked 84 Times
in
62 Posts
What guilt was assumed? A police officer is not required to write everyone they pull over a ticket, and it doesn't sound like he had any intention of writing him one. Just a warning that he was hard to see without a light on the rear of his bike. Basically just a safety stop with a routine warrant check.
Seriously, if I were riding at night and my taillight quit working, and a cop stopped me to let me know I was hard to see, I'd be grateful.
Seriously, if I were riding at night and my taillight quit working, and a cop stopped me to let me know I was hard to see, I'd be grateful.
#86
Senior Member
I do not care if riding at night in that area is legal without a proper light setup. If I am riding at night I will be lit up brighter than a Christmas tree.
#87
☢
Police don't spend time following cyclist for light infractions. There's something fishy going on in all of these instances that's more than meets the eye.
#88
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,612
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Liked 9,103 Times
in
5,054 Posts
#89
he said member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: is everything
Posts: 13,802
Bikes: yes please
Liked 1,951 Times
in
1,207 Posts
The cyclist is indeed correct in that no rear light is required, and the cop is wrong. However, for safety's sake, it's an incredibly smart idea to run rear red lights at night, along with reflectors. And with this guy's rear rack, I can see how the reflector is being obscured. He really should put a light on the rear of that bike.
I don't think his rights were being violated, it was a valid stop if the cop was having a hard time seeing the cyclist. But yes, it could have been a pretense for a warrant check, since most cops check everyone they deal with for warrants just as a matter of procedure. Source: My 15 years as a police dispatcher.
So all in all, this is much ado about nothing. Maybe the cop didn't know the law (and should look it up if he's not sure) but he apparently just wanted to warn the guy that he's not very visible to motorists and send him on his way.
I don't think his rights were being violated, it was a valid stop if the cop was having a hard time seeing the cyclist. But yes, it could have been a pretense for a warrant check, since most cops check everyone they deal with for warrants just as a matter of procedure. Source: My 15 years as a police dispatcher.
So all in all, this is much ado about nothing. Maybe the cop didn't know the law (and should look it up if he's not sure) but he apparently just wanted to warn the guy that he's not very visible to motorists and send him on his way.
#91
☢
I would rather they not use profiling for random stops to question people for criminality. If he's being stopped for the light, why is he asking question about where he comes from? What does any of that have to do with not being able to see him at night?