Federal Panel Seeks Mandatory Helmet Laws
#101
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 1,289
Bikes: Bianchi Ti Megatube; Colnago Competition; Planet-X EC-130E; Klein Pulse; Amp Research B4; Litespeed Catalyst; Trek Y11
Liked 491 Times
in
267 Posts
Jesus, the amount of passive-aggressive whinging; and finally, a link to a chiropractor website for whiplash? C'mon.
Mandating helmet use won't make cycling more accessible, more attractive, or safer.
Improving cycling infrastructure does.
Mandating helmet use won't make cycling more accessible, more attractive, or safer.
Improving cycling infrastructure does.
Likes For ridelikeaturtle:
#102
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Groningen
Posts: 1,308
Bikes: Gazelle rod brakes, Batavus compact, Peugeot hybrid
Liked 1,000 Times
in
765 Posts
That may be the case, what I mean is that despite their everyday reality people should not give up on the idea of circumstances safe enough to ride without any passive safety measures.
#103
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
Uh, so the fed is going to mandate helmets eh? In cars, right... after all that is where 40,000+ Americans die each year... seems like the obvious place for helmets. I applaud this forward thinking safety measure... helmets, seatbelts and airbags for all motorvehicle occupants.
This is what we are talking about, right? Can'tbe for cyclist... heck, less tha 2% of America bikes... and only about 700 deaths a year occur from cycling...
But the automobile, man, that IS a dangerous beast.
This is what we are talking about, right? Can'tbe for cyclist... heck, less tha 2% of America bikes... and only about 700 deaths a year occur from cycling...
But the automobile, man, that IS a dangerous beast.
#104
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,612
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Liked 9,103 Times
in
5,054 Posts
Specifically, the recommendation that is being objected to is for elected state legislatures to enact mandatory helmet laws, so that generality is completely irrelevant here. This board is not acting as a dictator but as an advisor to elected officials. I was responding to a ridiculous comment and you're now defending that comment absurdly.
#105
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Groningen
Posts: 1,308
Bikes: Gazelle rod brakes, Batavus compact, Peugeot hybrid
Liked 1,000 Times
in
765 Posts
Specifically, the recommendation that is being objected to is for elected state legislatures to enact mandatory helmet laws, so that generality is completely irrelevant here. This board is not acting as a dictator but as an advisor to elected officials. I was responding to a ridiculous comment and you're now defending that comment absurdly.
They are unelected. They advise on what's a political decision, but they can't make a whole policy, they don't have a budget to improve safety in other ways and they are not in a position to consider other relevant issues than safety that are related to their advice. They are a single issue board with a very limited scope. Their expertise and possibiliteis dosn't stretch out over the whole issue, but their advice limits the issue to their expertise and possiblities. The board argues that they want zero deaths but they can't deliver zero deaths themselves and following their advice won't either, so it's not a valid argument.
It's just an advice, but it makes it very easy for elected politicians to claim to just follow the advice. They say it's safer and who can be against safety! It makes it harder for elected politicians to have to go against the advice with an integral cycling policy. It's an excuse for elected politicians to make what's really their own decision, and it's a difficulty for those who want to. To consider the full issue in relation to for example infrastructure budget, law enforcement and free choice is what offcials are elected for.
#106
For The Fun of It
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Louisissippi Coast
Posts: 5,910
Bikes: Lynskey GR300, Lynskey Backroad, Litespeed T6, Lynskey MT29, Burley Duet
Liked 1,746 Times
in
864 Posts
Yeah, that sounds like a bunch of poppycock to me. Will the commuters take to commuting by car because they would otherwise have to wear a helmet. Will the roadies suddenly retire to their Peloton because they would otherwise have to wear a helmet. Will the homeless or those who cannot legally hold a driver's license suddenly give up cycling and walk?
Likes For Paul Barnard:
#107
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Layton, UT
Posts: 1,606
Bikes: 2011 Bent TW Elegance 2014 Carbon Strada Velomobile
Liked 702 Times
in
418 Posts
join the car helmet revolution. You are right about head injuries, the ones suffered in cars far outstrip those suffered by cyclists. Spleen injuries is a different matter.
Note that helmet laws should also be considered for people that use showers. Also much more common to get a head injury in a shower than on a bicycle
Note that helmet laws should also be considered for people that use showers. Also much more common to get a head injury in a shower than on a bicycle
True story: My buddy and I, way back in the late 80s, were coming home from another friend's house. He was driving, I was in the passenger seat. I don't know what prompted it, but I had my motorcycle helmets with me, or he asked me to bring them, I forget.
Anyway, sitting at a light in pretty heavy traffic near the end of rush hour. We managed to be stopped at the front at a light, 4 lanes N-S, 6 lanes E-W. We both grab a motorcycle helmet and put it on while we're sitting through the red. We look around, and everyone stopped has noticed this (this was in the days before cell phones!).
Light changes, we take off.
.....every other car at the intersection sits there and waits until we are well clear before they move. We were probably 100+ yards through the other side before anyone started rolling through.
Good times.
#109
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,612
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Liked 9,103 Times
in
5,054 Posts
The comment was a bit hyperbolic, but that doesn't make it nonsensical.
They are unelected. They advise on what's a political decision, but they can't make a whole policy, they don't have a budget to improve safety in other ways and they are not in a position to consider other relevant issues than safety that are related to their advice. They are a single issue board with a very limited scope. Their expertise and possibiliteis dosn't stretch out over the whole issue, but their advice limits the issue to their expertise and possiblities. The board argues that they want zero deaths but they can't deliver zero deaths themselves and following their advice won't either, so it's not a valid argument.
It's just an advice, but it makes it very easy for elected politicians to claim to just follow the advice. They say it's safer and who can be against safety! It makes it harder for elected politicians to have to go against the advice with an integral cycling policy. It's an excuse for elected politicians to make what's really their own decision, and it's a difficulty for those who want to. To consider the full issue in relation to for example infrastructure budget, law enforcement and free choice is what offcials are elected for.
They are unelected. They advise on what's a political decision, but they can't make a whole policy, they don't have a budget to improve safety in other ways and they are not in a position to consider other relevant issues than safety that are related to their advice. They are a single issue board with a very limited scope. Their expertise and possibiliteis dosn't stretch out over the whole issue, but their advice limits the issue to their expertise and possiblities. The board argues that they want zero deaths but they can't deliver zero deaths themselves and following their advice won't either, so it's not a valid argument.
It's just an advice, but it makes it very easy for elected politicians to claim to just follow the advice. They say it's safer and who can be against safety! It makes it harder for elected politicians to have to go against the advice with an integral cycling policy. It's an excuse for elected politicians to make what's really their own decision, and it's a difficulty for those who want to. To consider the full issue in relation to for example infrastructure budget, law enforcement and free choice is what offcials are elected for.
Move the goalposts much?
Whatever the flaws in the recommendations and the scope of their expertise, the one thing you really can't plausibly accuse them of is acting as a dictator. Your post is so convoluted trying to make that dictator thing work that it made my head spin.
You want to play along with silly bumper sticker accusations, go ahead.
#110
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,612
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Liked 9,103 Times
in
5,054 Posts
I'm not for mandatory helmet laws, but some regulation of riders is necessary.
All laws tell people what to do (or not do). Do you hate all laws?
Likes For livedarklions:
#111
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Groningen
Posts: 1,308
Bikes: Gazelle rod brakes, Batavus compact, Peugeot hybrid
Liked 1,000 Times
in
765 Posts
Move the goalposts much?
Whatever the flaws in the recommendations and the scope of their expertise, the one thing you really can't plausibly accuse them of is acting as a dictator. Your post is so convoluted trying to make that dictator thing work that it made my head spin.
Whatever the flaws in the recommendations and the scope of their expertise, the one thing you really can't plausibly accuse them of is acting as a dictator. Your post is so convoluted trying to make that dictator thing work that it made my head spin.
#112
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,612
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Liked 9,103 Times
in
5,054 Posts
They want to force helmets on people's heads, you could argue that it's beyond the scope of policy in a free country, and characterize that as 'trying to be dictators' to get your point across. I focussed more on the 'unelected' bit because there is an issue with all kinds of boards and committees preluding on political decisions.
Hyperbolic language about dictators is a pretty silly rhetorical device. You can argue that any regulation of any kind is beyond the scope of policy in a free country but in this case, it's going to sound pretty hollow.
Honestly, the best argument against it is that we already have a fairly high acceptance rate compared to other countries, so the number of people who would start wearing helmets because it was made mandatory is probably very low, and some percentage of that increase will be people for whom wearing a helmet is likely of little benefit.
From a moral standpoint, unlike the lack of brakes, if I choose not to wear a helmet, I'm putting no one but myself at risk.
#113
Half way there
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 2,962
Bikes: Many, and the list changes frequently
Liked 890 Times
in
533 Posts
Honestly, the best argument against it is that we already have a fairly high acceptance rate compared to other countries, so the number of people who would start wearing helmets because it was made mandatory is probably very low, and some percentage of that increase will be people for whom wearing a helmet is likely of little benefit.
#114
Senior Member
The kooks shall inherit.... ....the everlasting gobstopper thread.
-mr. bill
Last edited by mr_bill; 01-29-20 at 09:07 PM.
#115
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,612
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Liked 9,103 Times
in
5,054 Posts
This thread died months ago, now we're reacting to a coughed up hairball.
#116
Senior Member
I’m sure there are three or four kooks in the Live Free or Die state who currently wear seatbelts, but will immediately stop wearing their seatbelts if HB1622 becomes law, just to spite Skip.
-mr. bill
-mr. bill
#117
Half way there
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 2,962
Bikes: Many, and the list changes frequently
Liked 890 Times
in
533 Posts
I'm not advocating that folks abandon their helmets. I wear mine all the time. What I was musing about was reactionary behaviour changes to the contrary in response to new laws not based on comprehensive science.
#118
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,612
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Liked 9,103 Times
in
5,054 Posts
#119
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,612
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Liked 9,103 Times
in
5,054 Posts
Apples and oranges, mate. The probable severity of a motor vehicle injury and the proven protection provided by seatbelts makes it a no-brainer to wear them. Although severe head injuries do happen to cyclists, they are uncommon. Lid-less cycling is not courting death as is riding belt-less.
I'm not advocating that folks abandon their helmets. I wear mine all the time. What I was musing about was reactionary behaviour changes to the contrary in response to new laws not based on comprehensive science.
I'm not advocating that folks abandon their helmets. I wear mine all the time. What I was musing about was reactionary behaviour changes to the contrary in response to new laws not based on comprehensive science.
I would put the importance of this argument somewhere between "how many angels can dance on the head of a pin" and "who's faster underwater, Flash or Aquaman".
Likes For livedarklions:
#121
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,612
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Liked 9,103 Times
in
5,054 Posts
Likes For livedarklions:
#122
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Layton, UT
Posts: 1,606
Bikes: 2011 Bent TW Elegance 2014 Carbon Strada Velomobile
Liked 702 Times
in
418 Posts
And in so few words.
Congratulations, I guess.
Likes For Notso_fastLane:
#123
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,612
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Liked 9,103 Times
in
5,054 Posts
Likes For livedarklions:
#124
Old and in the way.
I ride 2-3K per year and almost never wear a helmet. So we must have missed eachother, and I live in the "weak cycling culture of Eugene Oregon https://usa.streetsblog.org/2019/05/...the-northwest/, so I guess your argument is invalid.
#125
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 30,118
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Liked 1,648 Times
in
1,110 Posts
Actually you should try looks like you would fit right in.
I ride 2-3K per year and almost never wear a helmet. So we must have missed eachother, and I live in the "weak cycling culture of Eugene Oregon https://usa.streetsblog.org/2019/05/...the-northwest/, so I guess your argument is invalid.
I ride 2-3K per year and almost never wear a helmet. So we must have missed eachother, and I live in the "weak cycling culture of Eugene Oregon https://usa.streetsblog.org/2019/05/...the-northwest/, so I guess your argument is invalid.
For clarification, on another thread I asked about where was the location of a poster who claimed that a specific high priced model of Specialized - The S-Works was "everywhere" and the Dude has proceeded to go into a misquoting tizzy about a claim from me about never seeing Specialized brand bicycles and therefore don't know what I am posting about, with livedarklions piling on as is his wont. See Original post
Last edited by I-Like-To-Bike; 02-06-20 at 09:57 AM.