People Love Old Bikes But New….Meh
#101
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,995
Bikes: old ones
Liked 10,458 Times
in
7,255 Posts
.
...somebody gave one of these Novara "Barrow" bikes to the co-op last week.
Even though the bikes I ride around on are old ones, I found the design of it to be quite intriguing.
I had a passing conversation about it with the guy I know who was in charge that day.
...somebody gave one of these Novara "Barrow" bikes to the co-op last week.
Even though the bikes I ride around on are old ones, I found the design of it to be quite intriguing.
I had a passing conversation about it with the guy I know who was in charge that day.
#102
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,995
Bikes: old ones
Liked 10,458 Times
in
7,255 Posts
.
.
#103
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,995
Bikes: old ones
Liked 10,458 Times
in
7,255 Posts
Likes For Koyote:
#105
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Menomonee Falls, WI
Posts: 1,861
Bikes: 1984 Schwinn Supersport, 1988 Trek 400T, 1977 Trek TX900, 1982 Bianchi Champione del Mondo, 1978 Raleigh Supercourse, 1986 Trek 400 Elance, 1991 Waterford PDG OS Paramount, 1971 Schwinn Sports Tourer, 1985 Trek 670
Liked 1,078 Times
in
546 Posts
#106
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 6,006
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Liked 2,277 Times
in
1,393 Posts
#107
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Menomonee Falls, WI
Posts: 1,861
Bikes: 1984 Schwinn Supersport, 1988 Trek 400T, 1977 Trek TX900, 1982 Bianchi Champione del Mondo, 1978 Raleigh Supercourse, 1986 Trek 400 Elance, 1991 Waterford PDG OS Paramount, 1971 Schwinn Sports Tourer, 1985 Trek 670
Liked 1,078 Times
in
546 Posts
Likes For tkamd73:
#108
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Menomonee Falls, WI
Posts: 1,861
Bikes: 1984 Schwinn Supersport, 1988 Trek 400T, 1977 Trek TX900, 1982 Bianchi Champione del Mondo, 1978 Raleigh Supercourse, 1986 Trek 400 Elance, 1991 Waterford PDG OS Paramount, 1971 Schwinn Sports Tourer, 1985 Trek 670
Liked 1,078 Times
in
546 Posts
#109
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,995
Bikes: old ones
Liked 10,458 Times
in
7,255 Posts
Likes For 3alarmer:
#110
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Menomonee Falls, WI
Posts: 1,861
Bikes: 1984 Schwinn Supersport, 1988 Trek 400T, 1977 Trek TX900, 1982 Bianchi Champione del Mondo, 1978 Raleigh Supercourse, 1986 Trek 400 Elance, 1991 Waterford PDG OS Paramount, 1971 Schwinn Sports Tourer, 1985 Trek 670
Liked 1,078 Times
in
546 Posts
Tim
#111
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Menomonee Falls, WI
Posts: 1,861
Bikes: 1984 Schwinn Supersport, 1988 Trek 400T, 1977 Trek TX900, 1982 Bianchi Champione del Mondo, 1978 Raleigh Supercourse, 1986 Trek 400 Elance, 1991 Waterford PDG OS Paramount, 1971 Schwinn Sports Tourer, 1985 Trek 670
Liked 1,078 Times
in
546 Posts
#113
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Menomonee Falls, WI
Posts: 1,861
Bikes: 1984 Schwinn Supersport, 1988 Trek 400T, 1977 Trek TX900, 1982 Bianchi Champione del Mondo, 1978 Raleigh Supercourse, 1986 Trek 400 Elance, 1991 Waterford PDG OS Paramount, 1971 Schwinn Sports Tourer, 1985 Trek 670
Liked 1,078 Times
in
546 Posts
Likes For tkamd73:
#114
Dirty Heathen
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: MC-778, 6250 fsw
Posts: 2,273
Bikes: 1997 Cannondale, 1976 Bridgestone, 1998 SoftRide, 1989 Klein, 1989 Black Lightning #0033
Liked 984 Times
in
573 Posts
There’s nothing ‘crafted’ about an electroforged Schwinn, or a’65 Impala.
An old Ferrari, or Herse, you knew those were special things when they were new, and they’re usually treated as such; the Schwinn and the Chevy were more of a commodity. They’re ‘special’ in 2021, because “you don’t see those anymore” ie, they weren’t once common, but now they’re not, as opposed to the things that are rare because they always were special.
Likes For Ironfish653:
#115
SE Wis
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 10,811
Bikes: '68 Raleigh Sprite, '02 Raleigh C500, '84 Raleigh Gran Prix, '91 Trek 400, 2013 Novara Randonee, 1990 Trek 970
Liked 3,655 Times
in
2,201 Posts
I know where there's a Trail 70 sitting in a garage/shed. Talk about a fun bike. It hasn't been touched in 15-20 years. In good shape. The owner's had it since he was a kid. He's waiting for one of his kids to restore it. I have to resist the urge when I deliver something to that place.
#116
SE Wis
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 10,811
Bikes: '68 Raleigh Sprite, '02 Raleigh C500, '84 Raleigh Gran Prix, '91 Trek 400, 2013 Novara Randonee, 1990 Trek 970
Liked 3,655 Times
in
2,201 Posts
I don't own any CF and mostly older stuff.
Without fail, no matter when or where I ride it, this is the only bike I own that will never fail to have someone approach me and ask or talk about it.
Bike event, not bike event, bike people, not bike people, doesn't matter.
Without fail, no matter when or where I ride it, this is the only bike I own that will never fail to have someone approach me and ask or talk about it.
Bike event, not bike event, bike people, not bike people, doesn't matter.
Likes For dedhed:
#117
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: SW Fl.
Posts: 5,675
Bikes: Day6 Semi Recumbent "FIREBALL", 1981 Custom Touring Paramount, 1983 Road Paramount, 2013 Giant Propel Advanced SL3, 2018 Specialized Red Roubaix Expert mech., 2002 Magna 7sp hybrid, 1976 Bassett Racing 45sp Cruiser
Liked 888 Times
in
540 Posts
#118
Being an engineer and working in cutting edge design I've never been particularly impressed with vintage bikes. From an engineering perspective most of them are pretty crude. That's not to take away from the craftsmanship involved in producing them, but it's a bit like comparing a steam train with a modern high speed bullet train. The same goes with vintage cars. Plenty of craftsmanship, but often poor or crude design which wouldn't stand up in the modern world. I enjoy a bit of nostalgia as much as anyone, but I don't let it put me off the modern world like some people do. When I see a nice vintage bike, I'm always curious but don't have any interest in riding or owning one.
Likes For PeteHski:
#119
I’m a little Surly
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Near the district
Posts: 2,434
Bikes: Two Cross Checks, Karate Monkey, Disc Trucker, and a VO Randonneur
Liked 1,314 Times
in
655 Posts
Yea the old “they don’t build them like they used to” saw is crap.
Machining and engineering have gotten so good that you can go 6-10,000 on oil and your #6,000 symbol of America gets 30+ MPG. That doesn’t make any of it beautiful but they are better built for sure.
Machining and engineering have gotten so good that you can go 6-10,000 on oil and your #6,000 symbol of America gets 30+ MPG. That doesn’t make any of it beautiful but they are better built for sure.
Last edited by Germany_chris; 12-16-21 at 11:31 AM.
Likes For Germany_chris:
#120
Super Modest
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 23,831
Bikes: Trek Domane+, Trek Emonda, Giant Propel, Colnago V3, ICE VTX WC
Liked 5,129 Times
in
2,304 Posts
#121
"From an engineering perspective most of them are pretty crude."
Remember this 50 years from now as today's designs are considered crude. Every generation has its limits based on the advancements in technology. For example there is nothing crude about the Titanic, in fact it was considered an engineering accomplishment at the time, and still is considered as such. Aside from the armor issue it had, the thing was an outstanding piece of architecture and used the latest maritime engineering. Not crude, simply limited by technology.
Remember this 50 years from now as today's designs are considered crude. Every generation has its limits based on the advancements in technology. For example there is nothing crude about the Titanic, in fact it was considered an engineering accomplishment at the time, and still is considered as such. Aside from the armor issue it had, the thing was an outstanding piece of architecture and used the latest maritime engineering. Not crude, simply limited by technology.
#122
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,850
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX
Liked 1,611 Times
in
1,059 Posts
I always thought it was the style of sunglasses worn that indicated approachability.
approachable
not so approachable
approachable
not so approachable
Likes For Sy Reene:
#123
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,612
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Liked 9,103 Times
in
5,054 Posts
Being an engineer and working in cutting edge design I've never been particularly impressed with vintage bikes. From an engineering perspective most of them are pretty crude. That's not to take away from the craftsmanship involved in producing them, but it's a bit like comparing a steam train with a modern high speed bullet train. The same goes with vintage cars. Plenty of craftsmanship, but often poor or crude design which wouldn't stand up in the modern world. I enjoy a bit of nostalgia as much as anyone, but I don't let it put me off the modern world like some people do. When I see a nice vintage bike, I'm always curious but don't have any interest in riding or owning one.
There's no valid comparison between driving vintage cars and riding vintage bicycles.
As an engineer, I think you'd probably appreciate that car engine, electronic controls, materials and construction technology have changed the longevity of cars, their emissions and safety in ways that just haven't happened for bicycles, which have always been long-lived machines. Also, I think the average bike hasn't had that much change since the introduction of STI, it's the small percentage of bikes at the high end that really look very different from the supposedly "crude" older ones. The vast majority of new bikes being sold today aren't anywhere near "cutting edge" technology.
An older, well-constructed, well-maintained bike is an eminently practical vehicle for daily use. For the most part, an antique car, which was probably built with planned obsolescence baked into its design, is not.
What people comment on on the street is a relatively new topic on BF. Do we really need to hijack this thread into another silly debate about how other people's preferences are ill-informed?
#125
Senior Member
I've ridden and raced road and MTB since the late 80s.
In my opinion, three things that were better about older bikes:
- Standardization, serviceability and guaranteed swapability of almost all parts. Building a bike was more about personal choice than about what was going to work, because almost everything was going to work. Replacing anything broken was super easy and parts were all readily available.
- Lower cost. I used to race an SLX Tommasini with 7402 Dura Ace, Modolo everything else and a variety of top-end wheels. This was just about the nicest bike you'd see at any race back in the early 90s. Adjusting for inflation, that bike cost me the equivalent of about $4,800 in today's money. $4,800 is low-mid range these days. An off the shelf SWorks Tarmac is now a completely ridiculous $13.5K. Bike prices have gone insane.
- Diversity of paint. The frames were all mostly round (or round-ish) tubes but the bikes looked wildly different back then. Take a look at a Rossin from 1990, they had some crazy and really cool paint back then. Everything's is comparably super conservative now. Rapha has set the tone of chic, minimalist aesthetics and I think something's been lost. As another example, the pro kits also used to take way more chances back in the day, and the peloton looked better for it. Nothing today even remotely compares to the kits from Vetements Z and La Vie Clair.
In my opinion, three things that are better about newer carbon bikes:
- Diversity of offerings. You can get stuff off the rack these days that would have been custom only just 20 years ago. Race bikes back in the day all had 72 degree parallel frames, identical trail numbers, identical chainstay lengths, room for 21s at most etc, etc, etc. They were all fairly relaxed Grand Tour type geometry. If you didn't want that, too bad. I love that now you can get the precise bike you want easily and off the rack. People complain about the micro-niche marketing of modern bikes, I think it's a huge plus.
- Durability. People forget but old bikes used to make all kinds of creaks, clunks and noise. If you rode a lot like I did, you were constantly breaking stuff and wearing stuff out back then. My old shop had a "service course" fee, you could just pay them ~$200 a month and they would take care of whatever was going on with your bike, this was necessary because stuff went wrong all the time. Materials science, metallurgy, engineering etc all have made huge leaps over the past 30 years. Stuff is generally far more reliable these days, lasts longer and doesn't make noise. I'll be controversial: the BB86 on my current road bike is far more reliable than the square taper Dura Ace BB I had on my old Tommasini. Crash survivability is maybe questionable here, but I've never had an issue.
- Functionality. Modern carbon road bikes just ride better. They handle better. The are more comfortable. They feel like rocket ships out of the saddle. They shift better. They brake better. Tubeless 28s at 70 psi is just far better than tubed 21s at 120 psi. Di2 and eTap are both far better than 2x8 with downtube shifters. They are just better bikes.
In my opinion, three things that were better about older bikes:
- Standardization, serviceability and guaranteed swapability of almost all parts. Building a bike was more about personal choice than about what was going to work, because almost everything was going to work. Replacing anything broken was super easy and parts were all readily available.
- Lower cost. I used to race an SLX Tommasini with 7402 Dura Ace, Modolo everything else and a variety of top-end wheels. This was just about the nicest bike you'd see at any race back in the early 90s. Adjusting for inflation, that bike cost me the equivalent of about $4,800 in today's money. $4,800 is low-mid range these days. An off the shelf SWorks Tarmac is now a completely ridiculous $13.5K. Bike prices have gone insane.
- Diversity of paint. The frames were all mostly round (or round-ish) tubes but the bikes looked wildly different back then. Take a look at a Rossin from 1990, they had some crazy and really cool paint back then. Everything's is comparably super conservative now. Rapha has set the tone of chic, minimalist aesthetics and I think something's been lost. As another example, the pro kits also used to take way more chances back in the day, and the peloton looked better for it. Nothing today even remotely compares to the kits from Vetements Z and La Vie Clair.
In my opinion, three things that are better about newer carbon bikes:
- Diversity of offerings. You can get stuff off the rack these days that would have been custom only just 20 years ago. Race bikes back in the day all had 72 degree parallel frames, identical trail numbers, identical chainstay lengths, room for 21s at most etc, etc, etc. They were all fairly relaxed Grand Tour type geometry. If you didn't want that, too bad. I love that now you can get the precise bike you want easily and off the rack. People complain about the micro-niche marketing of modern bikes, I think it's a huge plus.
- Durability. People forget but old bikes used to make all kinds of creaks, clunks and noise. If you rode a lot like I did, you were constantly breaking stuff and wearing stuff out back then. My old shop had a "service course" fee, you could just pay them ~$200 a month and they would take care of whatever was going on with your bike, this was necessary because stuff went wrong all the time. Materials science, metallurgy, engineering etc all have made huge leaps over the past 30 years. Stuff is generally far more reliable these days, lasts longer and doesn't make noise. I'll be controversial: the BB86 on my current road bike is far more reliable than the square taper Dura Ace BB I had on my old Tommasini. Crash survivability is maybe questionable here, but I've never had an issue.
- Functionality. Modern carbon road bikes just ride better. They handle better. The are more comfortable. They feel like rocket ships out of the saddle. They shift better. They brake better. Tubeless 28s at 70 psi is just far better than tubed 21s at 120 psi. Di2 and eTap are both far better than 2x8 with downtube shifters. They are just better bikes.
Likes For Hiro11: