Why are Modern Bikes So Expensive?
#626
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,991
Bikes: old ones
Mentioned: 304 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26460 Post(s)
Liked 10,418 Times
in
7,233 Posts
.
...OK thanks.
...OK thanks.
#627
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 15,111
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6263 Post(s)
Liked 4,862 Times
in
3,351 Posts
Comparing differences such as aero or not aero, people tend to look at only how much faster it can make them at any particular moment. And that's not usually much. The effects though are cumulative over the time of the ride. So in a way it's sort of like interest rates on a savings account, CD or other fund. If given a choice, would you choose a account with 1% less APR just because it doesn't get you much difference in money earned on any particular day?
#628
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,602
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4492 Post(s)
Liked 4,964 Times
in
3,069 Posts
I hear this a lot .... I think it is a case of "looks good on paper."
The "benefit" of aero is going faster for a given power output, or going farther at a given speed. Also, a lot of aero is Not the bike, but the rider. A slightly plump rider sitting sot of upright riding at 17 mph average is getting almost no aero benefit in reality, despite what the number s say (sort of like how sanding the paint of your bike will indeed make you faster mathematically, but in reality the 80 or 100 grams in meaningless ... lost in the noise.)
Also, the "benefit" of finishing a ride a few seconds quicker one one bike as opposed to another is not really even an issue for most non-pros (unless they have that specific drive. I actually like being out on the bike and being able to ride a little longer for a given amount of energy Sounds great ... but how does that benefit me? I can arbitrarilly add a few hundred meters to my ride ... by circling the block or something ... but since my ride is determined by my route, and time on the route is not an issue ... am I really getting any benefit by going more around the block at the end of my ride? Is being able to go a few hundred meters more on a given amount of energy a "benefit"? Also since my energy differs every day ...
So, am I actually saving a few seconds? Am I actually benefiting from saving .002 watts of energy over a ride? Also, if because of my rising posture i am actually not aero might the added weight of the aero frame actually a net cost?
The bike I ride most often has rim brakes and shallow rims ... and (bows head in shame) exposed cables coming out of the brifters. But .... it accelerates quickly with its lighter, less aero wheels---for the first three pedal strokes. it is comfortable for rides as long as my body can handle. I built it with zero care for "aero," but instead tried to make it light without breaking the bank. it is a really fun ride.
If "benefit" to me meant "I can cover a given course a few seconds faster on this bike, all else being equal" then sure, get the heavier aero frame, with the complicated cables-through-stem construction, the heavier deep-dish wheels .... but since i ride to enjoy the time I spend riding .... I mean, if we are really going to "benefit" from aero, shouldn't we all be riding TT bikes, and hurting ourselves making sure we always stay in a tight tuck?
To me, "aero" is the new "x hundred grams lighter" or ".00x percent laterally stiffer and .000x percent more vertically compliant." For almost every rider, pursuing marginal gains is a matter of personal preference, and the only real "benefit" is psychological.
The "benefit" of aero is going faster for a given power output, or going farther at a given speed. Also, a lot of aero is Not the bike, but the rider. A slightly plump rider sitting sot of upright riding at 17 mph average is getting almost no aero benefit in reality, despite what the number s say (sort of like how sanding the paint of your bike will indeed make you faster mathematically, but in reality the 80 or 100 grams in meaningless ... lost in the noise.)
Also, the "benefit" of finishing a ride a few seconds quicker one one bike as opposed to another is not really even an issue for most non-pros (unless they have that specific drive. I actually like being out on the bike and being able to ride a little longer for a given amount of energy Sounds great ... but how does that benefit me? I can arbitrarilly add a few hundred meters to my ride ... by circling the block or something ... but since my ride is determined by my route, and time on the route is not an issue ... am I really getting any benefit by going more around the block at the end of my ride? Is being able to go a few hundred meters more on a given amount of energy a "benefit"? Also since my energy differs every day ...
So, am I actually saving a few seconds? Am I actually benefiting from saving .002 watts of energy over a ride? Also, if because of my rising posture i am actually not aero might the added weight of the aero frame actually a net cost?
The bike I ride most often has rim brakes and shallow rims ... and (bows head in shame) exposed cables coming out of the brifters. But .... it accelerates quickly with its lighter, less aero wheels---for the first three pedal strokes. it is comfortable for rides as long as my body can handle. I built it with zero care for "aero," but instead tried to make it light without breaking the bank. it is a really fun ride.
If "benefit" to me meant "I can cover a given course a few seconds faster on this bike, all else being equal" then sure, get the heavier aero frame, with the complicated cables-through-stem construction, the heavier deep-dish wheels .... but since i ride to enjoy the time I spend riding .... I mean, if we are really going to "benefit" from aero, shouldn't we all be riding TT bikes, and hurting ourselves making sure we always stay in a tight tuck?
To me, "aero" is the new "x hundred grams lighter" or ".00x percent laterally stiffer and .000x percent more vertically compliant." For almost every rider, pursuing marginal gains is a matter of personal preference, and the only real "benefit" is psychological.
I simply choose the type of bike best suited to my overall riding goals. For me that’s a modern endurance road race bike.
Likes For PeteHski:
#629
Habitual User
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 8,113
Bikes: 2023 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2018 Trek Procaliber 9.9 RSL, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5035 Post(s)
Liked 8,245 Times
in
3,898 Posts
...instead of wasting more of your time on multiple response posts, where you repeat yourself, maybe you could link to a source for your numbers on this ? I'm fine with reading it, and the accompanying studies. believe I said I found the idea intriguing, which means I'm still thinking about and digesting it. The idea that slow people could derive some measurable benefit from current, high end, aero frames is new to me. If I really wanted aero benefit, personally, I'd buy a fairing for a few hundred bucks.
__________________
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
#630
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,991
Bikes: old ones
Mentioned: 304 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26460 Post(s)
Liked 10,418 Times
in
7,233 Posts
Comparing differences such as aero or not aero, people tend to look at only how much faster it can make them at any particular moment. And that's not usually much. The effects though are cumulative over the time of the ride. So in a way it's sort of like interest rates on a savings account, CD or other fund. If given a choice, would you choose a account with 1% less APR just because it doesn't get you much difference in money earned on any particular day?
#631
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 15,111
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6263 Post(s)
Liked 4,862 Times
in
3,351 Posts
But come on, there are bikes that are aero for the same price as round tubed bikes. So even the initial cost isn't a valid reason.
#632
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,991
Bikes: old ones
Mentioned: 304 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26460 Post(s)
Liked 10,418 Times
in
7,233 Posts
Not sure why anyone would be interested in my opinion on this, given what has gone before. Unless you want to further extend a thread that already draws numerous complaints about being too long and repetitive in nature.
#633
Habitual User
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 8,113
Bikes: 2023 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2018 Trek Procaliber 9.9 RSL, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5035 Post(s)
Liked 8,245 Times
in
3,898 Posts
Because not everyone who buys a high end bike does it only for realizing measurable performance gains. I buy bikes that excite me, and provide the kind of response I want when I'm pushing against the limits of my fitness and skills.
__________________
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
#634
Klaatu..Verata..Necktie?
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 18,086
Bikes: Litespeed Ultimate, Ultegra; Canyon Endurace, 105; Battaglin MAX, Chorus; Bianchi 928 Veloce; Ritchey Road Logic, Dura Ace; Cannondale R500 RX100; Schwinn Circuit, Sante; Lotus Supreme, Dura Ace
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10488 Post(s)
Liked 12,015 Times
in
6,151 Posts
"To us" is the key. Without that, it's a blanket assertion of what should be important to somebody else.
__________________
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
#635
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,991
Bikes: old ones
Mentioned: 304 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26460 Post(s)
Liked 10,418 Times
in
7,233 Posts
...it's a simple calculation to make on investment funds. It's why the high return funds with significant management fees often fail to produce better results than a low load Vanguard investment. I don't care any more about other people's investments than I do about which cycles they choose to ride. To suggest otherwise is simply untrue.
#636
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,991
Bikes: old ones
Mentioned: 304 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26460 Post(s)
Liked 10,418 Times
in
7,233 Posts
...great, I'm happy for you. You are one of the people I referenced when I said, "...you can buy some performance at the bike store".
#637
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,991
Bikes: old ones
Mentioned: 304 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26460 Post(s)
Liked 10,418 Times
in
7,233 Posts
Honestly, the current general forum would collapse flat on the floor without the copious amounts of straw that appear in these threads.
#638
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,991
Bikes: old ones
Mentioned: 304 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26460 Post(s)
Liked 10,418 Times
in
7,233 Posts
#639
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,992
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7062 Post(s)
Liked 11,128 Times
in
4,749 Posts
The reason this digression has gone on so long is mainly your constantly changing (and often self-contradictory) arguments. This is just the latest example.
Likes For Koyote:
#640
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,991
Bikes: old ones
Mentioned: 304 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26460 Post(s)
Liked 10,418 Times
in
7,233 Posts
...yet there it is, in black and white... "to us". Are we now reduced to arguing about what I might have said, rather than what I did say ? Well of course we are. We've been doing that ever since I made the fatal mistake of respinding to Koyote 's sincere request for an explanation.
Honestly, the current general forum would collapse flat on the floor without the copious amounts of straw that appear in these threads.
Honestly, the current general forum would collapse flat on the floor without the copious amounts of straw that appear in these threads.
And yet, within a few posts you declared that certain bikes are not worth the cost -- which is to judge other people's choices:
...sure. Why is it unfair to say (as some already have here, including me), that the ROI on these bicycles is not worth the fund's buy in fees to us ?
A straw man is a form of argument and an informal fallacy based on giving the impression of refuting an opponent's argument, while actually refuting an argument that was not presented by that opponent. One who engages in this fallacy is said to be "attacking a straw man"
The reason this digression has gone on so long is mainly your constantly changing (and often self-contradictory) arguments. This is just the latest example.
...OK.
#641
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,991
Bikes: old ones
Mentioned: 304 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26460 Post(s)
Liked 10,418 Times
in
7,233 Posts
#642
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,992
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7062 Post(s)
Liked 11,128 Times
in
4,749 Posts
I just spent thirty seconds scrolling up, and found posts from four different people (including me) who called you out on that statement -- who pointed out the exact same fallacy. But yes, I'm sure we're all misrepresenting you.
Or maybe something else is going on?
Or maybe something else is going on?
Likes For Koyote:
#643
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Hudson Valley, NY
Posts: 33,040
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene '04; Bridgestone RB-1 '92
Mentioned: 326 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11989 Post(s)
Liked 6,712 Times
in
3,508 Posts
I’m going to close this thread for the rest of the day in the hope some of you find something better to do. When I reopen I certainly don’t expect arguing to commence again. Thank you?
__________________
See, this is why we can't have nice things. - - smarkinson
Where else but the internet can a bunch of cyclists go and be the tough guy? - - jdon