Carbon fiber bike life span
#1
Carbon fiber bike life span
I saw many opinions saying that a road carbon fiber bike should be changed after 6,7,10 years, to avoid risk of carbon failure. However, talking about the large pool of riders of carbon bikes from reputable brands, outside of professionals or hard racing world, I wonder:
How many road riders from above category experienced carbon fiber failure from normal riding (no hard crash or misuse), and how long (years or km) did it take for such failure to occur?
How many road riders from above category experienced carbon fiber failure from normal riding (no hard crash or misuse), and how long (years or km) did it take for such failure to occur?
Likes For Redbullet:
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Mich
Posts: 7,711
Bikes: RSO E-tire dropper fixie brifter
Liked 3,206 Times
in
2,037 Posts
imo; neglect is likely the cause for most carbon failures. I'd expect someone that had steel/aluminum/Ti bicycles & jumped to a CF bicycle, that they might be a little careless at times. (it: lean a CF on a tree & it rolls forward & slams onto a curb)
__________________
-YMMV
-YMMV
#3
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 15,416
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Liked 5,020 Times
in
3,454 Posts
Shouldn't you also include those that ride other types of bikes. Won't do much good to know about the stat's for CF if we don't know the stat's for steel, aluminum, titanium and bamboo.
I use to see a lot of videos where head tube and fork assemblies came off of steel and aluminum BMX bikes when the top and bottom tubes weren't properly lugged.
I use to see a lot of videos where head tube and fork assemblies came off of steel and aluminum BMX bikes when the top and bottom tubes weren't properly lugged.
#4
Habitual User
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 8,360
Bikes: 2023 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2018 Trek Procaliber 9.9 RSL, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP
Liked 8,542 Times
in
4,037 Posts
This one is over drinking age, and has fallen down a bunch of times. Still going...
![](https://i.imgur.com/JBvU9zA.jpg)
My 2003 Time road bike is doing fine, too.
![](https://i.imgur.com/JBvU9zA.jpg)
My 2003 Time road bike is doing fine, too.
__________________
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
Likes For Eric F:
#5
That is correct, but I did not want to start a comparison between materials. Carbon is pushed more and more as a standard. I also rode a carbon bike until a crash and the replacement will be most likely another carbon bike.
Likes For thin_concrete:
#7
Full Member
My 1992 TVT travelled 40,000 km on the road and then 34,000 km on Zwift before being retired. It shows no visible signs of fatigue or wear other than paint and clearcoat rubbing off. I'm not worried and I do check tubes and joints on all my bikes regularly.
#8
Senior Member
If anything, cf is less prone to damage from neglect. It doesn't corrode, it doesn't dent, it doesn't bend.
Rode my 2003 LeMond a couple days ago -- with the original cf fork. Almost 20 yrs old, probably about 45k miles.
Honestly, why do people worry about this?
Rode my 2003 LeMond a couple days ago -- with the original cf fork. Almost 20 yrs old, probably about 45k miles.
Honestly, why do people worry about this?
Likes For Koyote:
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Eastern VA
Posts: 1,745
Bikes: 2022 Fuel EX 8, 2021 Domane SL6, Black Beta (Nashbar frame), 2004 Trek 1000C for the trainer
Liked 472 Times
in
274 Posts
I had a Madone 5.0. Rear aluminum drop out broke. Can be fixed by Trek under warranty buuuuut when Trek inspected it they found a crack hidden under the paint of the top tube about 4 inches from the headset. Not visable. Bet the the drop out had not broken I’d still be riding it.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Olympic Peninsula, WA
Posts: 651
Bikes: '8? Ciocc Mockba 80, '82 Ron Cooper, '84 Allez, '86 Tommasini Racing, '86? Klein Quantum, '87 Ciocc Designer 84, '95 Trek 5500, '98 Litespeed Classic, '98 S-Works Mtb
Liked 316 Times
in
125 Posts
__________________
Roll Me Up and Smoke Me When I Die
Roll Me Up and Smoke Me When I Die
Likes For Dean51:
#11
Because they presume it's a bit like plastic maybe? To be fair I've seen plenty of carbon failures from inappropriate loading (usually from clamping to bike racks). The typical pencil thin seat stays you often see on modern road bikes are also easily prone to damage from everyday knocks. I'm always very careful when leaning my bikes up not to catch those on sharp edges of walls etc.
Likes For PeteHski:
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Mich
Posts: 7,711
Bikes: RSO E-tire dropper fixie brifter
Liked 3,206 Times
in
2,037 Posts
I was including careless behavior in my reference to neglect.
__________________
-YMMV
-YMMV
#13
My 2007 carbon monocoque Fuji frame is still solid. No cracks or suspicious looking areas. Still rides great. Also, the carbon Reynolds fork on it is even older, and has no issues.
#14
Senior Member
I don't know if there is any set age, although I've heard people discourage riding Carbon Fiber bikes from the 1970's. One of the issues with the oldest carbon fiber bikes with metal lugs is the bonding coming loose.
My Colnago C40 is about 25 years old, and still a sweet bike. Not overly babied.
![](https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikeforums.net-vbulletin/1334x712/80-buenavista_339843b3495cc0bf17e63a97302980a476d9635b.jpg)
One issue that some carbon fiber bikes have had is pealing clear coats.
My Colnago C40 is about 25 years old, and still a sweet bike. Not overly babied.
![](https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikeforums.net-vbulletin/1334x712/80-buenavista_339843b3495cc0bf17e63a97302980a476d9635b.jpg)
One issue that some carbon fiber bikes have had is pealing clear coats.
#16
Senior Member
My CF road bike is fairly young still, just 22300 km on it.
Has been ridden on not very pristine roads and crashed a number of times, but I can't tell it rides any differently and I can see it going for years of hard riding more, provided I don't crash hard enough.
In a couple of years I will be probably treating myself to a new bike, not because there's anything wrong with this one, but just because, well, why not?
Probably a good idea to keep this one for the kinds of races with a higher probability of crashing.
Has been ridden on not very pristine roads and crashed a number of times, but I can't tell it rides any differently and I can see it going for years of hard riding more, provided I don't crash hard enough.
In a couple of years I will be probably treating myself to a new bike, not because there's anything wrong with this one, but just because, well, why not?
Probably a good idea to keep this one for the kinds of races with a higher probability of crashing.
#17
Should Be More Popular
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 43,313
Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix
Liked 9,211 Times
in
4,270 Posts
#18
But... I wanted to "count" the failures during normal use, and the km or time period until the failure occurred. That might give a more practical perspective over the lifespan of a carbon bike for common users - as opposite to many articles that mix normal usage, poor construction, crashes, misuses and abuses - etc, to come up with a general and useless conclusion that, yes, carbon bikes fails, so you should replace your bike with a new one from time to time, for safety reasons...
#19
Should Be More Popular
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 43,313
Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix
Liked 9,211 Times
in
4,270 Posts
Good idea.
But... I wanted to "count" the failures during normal use, and the km or time period until the failure occurred. That might give a more practical perspective over the lifespan of a carbon bike for common users - as opposite to many articles that mix normal usage, poor construction, crashes, misuses and abuses - etc, to come up with a general and useless conclusion that, yes, carbon bikes fails, so you should replace your bike with a new one from time to time, for safety reasons...
But... I wanted to "count" the failures during normal use, and the km or time period until the failure occurred. That might give a more practical perspective over the lifespan of a carbon bike for common users - as opposite to many articles that mix normal usage, poor construction, crashes, misuses and abuses - etc, to come up with a general and useless conclusion that, yes, carbon bikes fails, so you should replace your bike with a new one from time to time, for safety reasons...
Consensus is that properly made and non-damaged CF should last a very long time.
#20
Good idea.
But... I wanted to "count" the failures during normal use, and the km or time period until the failure occurred. That might give a more practical perspective over the lifespan of a carbon bike for common users - as opposite to many articles that mix normal usage, poor construction, crashes, misuses and abuses - etc, to come up with a general and useless conclusion that, yes, carbon bikes fails, so you should replace your bike with a new one from time to time, for safety reasons...
But... I wanted to "count" the failures during normal use, and the km or time period until the failure occurred. That might give a more practical perspective over the lifespan of a carbon bike for common users - as opposite to many articles that mix normal usage, poor construction, crashes, misuses and abuses - etc, to come up with a general and useless conclusion that, yes, carbon bikes fails, so you should replace your bike with a new one from time to time, for safety reasons...
Another way to look at it is how long do you really need it to last? For me 10 years would be more than enough. Without crashing or misuse I know this is very easily attainable with a carbon frame.
Likes For PeteHski:
#21
I already saw here and there in this thread carbon bikes of 10-25 years old still in use. Not enough for an estimation, yet I could not see a story of failure during normal use. Carbon bikes are available for large public for 25 years (roughly). However, if many users change their bikes at every 10 or even 3-4 years just to be in line with technological progress, we might never have enough stories available to assess carbon bike life span above 10 years.
Last edited by Redbullet; 11-05-22 at 03:54 PM.
Likes For Redbullet:
#22
Senior Member
Likes For Koyote:
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Northern NY...Brownville
Posts: 2,602
Bikes: Specialized Aethos, Specialized Diverge Comp E5
Liked 477 Times
in
282 Posts
Steel, aluminum, carbon feeebray frames can and do last decades...even without much care.
I'm always working on 30-40-+ year old steel bikes, most of dubious ancestry, and with few exceptions they are all perfectly rideable...generally needing some care but the frames are all still generally fine, even where there are visible rusty areas. I'd not trust them on a 40+ mph descent or a 30mph hard corner but to plug along they are still fine.
Bike frames are more robust than most think. Can they fail? Sure can but generally it is a manufacturing problem isolated to a batch or a bike or few...I remember back in the late 80's a team I was close to scored a batch of Bianchi steel frames, through the supporting bike shop. They were beautiful frames and rode very well...until...apparently a manufacturing/welding defect occurred where the seat stay weld broke away from the seat tube. Bianchi took them all back, broken or not, and replaced them with new frames which never had a problem.
I don't think a carbon feebray frame has a built in failure point nor are they any more susceptible to failure than any other frame for generally all the same reasons.
I'm always working on 30-40-+ year old steel bikes, most of dubious ancestry, and with few exceptions they are all perfectly rideable...generally needing some care but the frames are all still generally fine, even where there are visible rusty areas. I'd not trust them on a 40+ mph descent or a 30mph hard corner but to plug along they are still fine.
Bike frames are more robust than most think. Can they fail? Sure can but generally it is a manufacturing problem isolated to a batch or a bike or few...I remember back in the late 80's a team I was close to scored a batch of Bianchi steel frames, through the supporting bike shop. They were beautiful frames and rode very well...until...apparently a manufacturing/welding defect occurred where the seat stay weld broke away from the seat tube. Bianchi took them all back, broken or not, and replaced them with new frames which never had a problem.
I don't think a carbon feebray frame has a built in failure point nor are they any more susceptible to failure than any other frame for generally all the same reasons.
#24
feebray?