Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > General Cycling Discussion
Reload this Page >

Importance of Cadence

Search
Notices
General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

Importance of Cadence

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-01-21, 01:37 PM
  #151  
tomato coupe
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,952

Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3953 Post(s)
Liked 7,302 Times in 2,948 Posts
Originally Posted by Harold74
When I look at the graphs, I see a rider deliberately holding cadence to roughly constant, preferred values which forces power to vary linearly in relation to crank torque.

It suggests that being in the right cadence zone has a larger impact on power generation than does crank torque.
Your second sentence totally contradicts the first.
tomato coupe is offline  
Old 10-01-21, 01:50 PM
  #152  
Harold74
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Calgary, AB Canada
Posts: 565

Bikes: Miyata 1000, Lemond Zurich, Lynskey Rouleur, Airborne Zeppelin, Vintage Zullo, Miele Lupa

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 329 Post(s)
Liked 98 Times in 75 Posts
Originally Posted by tomato coupe
Your second sentence totally contradicts the first.
I disagree. The second point speaks to the utility of correlation in the context being discussed. The third point speaks to things that may or may not be inferred by the trend of the graphs. The trend exhibited by a data set and that data set's coefficient of correlation or separate things with different potential uses.
Harold74 is offline  
Old 10-01-21, 01:57 PM
  #153  
tomato coupe
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,952

Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3953 Post(s)
Liked 7,302 Times in 2,948 Posts
Originally Posted by Harold74
I disagree. The second point speaks to the utility of correlation in the context being discussed. The third point speaks to things that may or may not be inferred by the trend of the graphs. The trend exhibited by a data set and and that data set's coefficient of correlation or separate things with different potential uses.
Your discussion of correlation is off target and meaningless. If power is equal to torque multiplied by angular velocity (i.e. RPM), and the angular velocity (RPM) is held constant, then all variation in the power are due to variation of the torque. This is as simple as it gets.
tomato coupe is offline  
Old 10-01-21, 02:11 PM
  #154  
Harold74
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Calgary, AB Canada
Posts: 565

Bikes: Miyata 1000, Lemond Zurich, Lynskey Rouleur, Airborne Zeppelin, Vintage Zullo, Miele Lupa

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 329 Post(s)
Liked 98 Times in 75 Posts
Originally Posted by tomato coupe
Your discussion of correlation is off target and meaningless.
Well, how fine of you to inform me of that in such a considerate manner.

Originally Posted by tomato coupe
If power is equal to torque multiplied by angular velocity (i.e. RPM), and the angular velocity (RPM) is held constant, then all variation in the power are due to variation of the torque. This is as simple as it gets.
Yes, so simple in fact that it's precisely what I said myself in my first point.

Originally Posted by Harold74
When I look at the graphs, I see a rider deliberately holding cadence to roughly constant, preferred values which forces power to vary linearly in relation to crank torque.
Somehow that point is worthwhile for you to make but off target and meaningless for me?
Harold74 is offline  
Old 10-01-21, 02:29 PM
  #155  
tomato coupe
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,952

Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3953 Post(s)
Liked 7,302 Times in 2,948 Posts
Originally Posted by Harold74
Yes, so simple in fact that it's precisely what I said myself in my first point.
Yes you did get it right in your first point. But, you totally contradicted it later, which was my point.

Last edited by tomato coupe; 10-01-21 at 02:42 PM.
tomato coupe is offline  
Old 10-01-21, 03:01 PM
  #156  
Harold74
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Calgary, AB Canada
Posts: 565

Bikes: Miyata 1000, Lemond Zurich, Lynskey Rouleur, Airborne Zeppelin, Vintage Zullo, Miele Lupa

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 329 Post(s)
Liked 98 Times in 75 Posts
Originally Posted by tomato coupe
Sorry. How about irrelevant to the point, instead of off target and meaningless?
Much better, thank you.

Originally Posted by tomato coupe
Yes you did get it right in your first point. But, you totally contradicted it later, which was my point.
Can you elaborate at all on how you see my second point contradicting my first? Where is this contradiction that you speak of? So far, all that you seem to have done is:

a) Indicate that you feel a contradiction exists and;

b) Reiterate my point #1.
Harold74 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.