Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > General Cycling Discussion
Reload this Page >

Repair vintage Trek or buy new?

Search
Notices
General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

Repair vintage Trek or buy new?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-21-20, 03:53 AM
  #51  
Lscico
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 18
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Oops. I did now that you mention it.
Scratch my comment. That bike is worth saving.

Doesn't even look like it needs a 300 overhaul. Probably a quick tuneup.

I had in mind a recent experience with a friend who wanted to fix up his old bike. It was a mess. He spent 100$ and an entire afternoon. Rode it for a week and then bought a new Trek for 1000$.
Lscico is offline  
Likes For Lscico:
Old 04-21-20, 09:29 AM
  #52  
JDandy
Newbie
 
JDandy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: The Western Reserve
Posts: 44

Bikes: 1996 Gary Fisher Avant Garde, 1989 Fuji Sundance, 1994 Bridgestone X0-4, 1971 WF Holdsworth Mitral

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Liked 7 Times in 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Korina
When you're standing over the top tube, there should be at least an inch between the bike and your pubic bone . . . If you're standing over the bike and have to lean, it's time for a new bike.
This.
JDandy is offline  
Old 04-21-20, 09:36 AM
  #53  
MRT2
Senior Member
 
MRT2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 6,319

Bikes: 2012 Salsa Casseroll, 2009 Kona Blast

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1031 Post(s)
Liked 208 Times in 146 Posts
Originally Posted by Bikerdave38
I would go online and shop around for a bargain, there are so many out there..you will need a small frame 50-52 cm
OP's bike is likely a 16.5 to 17" frame, which she says is maybe a tad big. That translates to 43 cm, give or take a cm. In what world would a 50 to 52 cm frame be smaller than a 43 cm frame?
MRT2 is offline  
Old 04-21-20, 09:43 AM
  #54  
MRT2
Senior Member
 
MRT2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 6,319

Bikes: 2012 Salsa Casseroll, 2009 Kona Blast

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1031 Post(s)
Liked 208 Times in 146 Posts
Originally Posted by JDandy
Chances are your bike is indeed 17" based on the info you were able to find so far. If that is the case then this would explain why the bike feels just a bit too big for you. Using the chart from this link: Bike Sizing ,you would be more comfortable with a 15-16" or 51-52 cm frame. Your current bike freshly tuned and restored could be a solid performer for years to come, however, you will never be completely comfortable if it is just a bit to big.

If you do find a bicycle co-op nearby, they may be able to suggest a reliable used bike that fits you and your needs at this time for a lot less than the cost of a new bike and no more than the estimate to fix your current non-functioning bike. I'm sure the co-op would love to have your current bike as a donation. With experience you can decide if a new bike is what you want or if you want to learn about doing your own maintenance as you ride worry-free without making a substantial initial investment.
15 or 16" is not 52 cm. I wouldn't necessarily accept that the frame is too big for OP. Maybe she needs a 15" frame, IDK, but I think a picture is worth 1,000 words. Some beginners ride with their saddle too low, others need the bars raise up bit, or the saddle moved forward or back.

Second, as I already pointed out, now that a pic of OP's bike is up, it clearly is a bike that is clean and probably needs less than $100 of work. Clearly, the dealer she went to is more interested in selling her a new bike than in repairing her old one. As for the co op, this is a good idea and I would bet the volunteers at a local coop would get OP on her way on her old bike for very little money.
MRT2 is offline  
Old 04-21-20, 09:48 AM
  #55  
Bikerdave38
Junior Member
 
Bikerdave38's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Size

Originally Posted by MRT2
OP's bike is likely a 16.5 to 17" frame, which she says is maybe a tad big. That translates to 43 cm, give or take a cm. In what world would a 50 to 52 cm frame be smaller than a 43 cm frame?
on previous attachment you said you were 5”4 which in real time would put into small frame which are usually around 50cm then medium are 53-54 large 56-58
Bikerdave38 is offline  
Old 04-21-20, 09:58 AM
  #56  
MRT2
Senior Member
 
MRT2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 6,319

Bikes: 2012 Salsa Casseroll, 2009 Kona Blast

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1031 Post(s)
Liked 208 Times in 146 Posts
Originally Posted by Bikerdave38
on previous attachment you said you were 5”4 which in real time would put into small frame which are usually around 50cm then medium are 53-54 large 56-58
This is a confusing area as some frames are compact geometry, others not. So I now ride a 55 cm frame, and my bike is not compact geometry. If I were riding a compact geometry frame, I wold probably need a much smaller frame. This is an area where a beginner needs to try a bike out and/or work with a fitter.

I used to ride an old frame similar to OP's bike and I am between 5'8" and 5'9". I rode a medium frame, or about 18". After years of riding, I finally concluded that bike was a bit too small for me. I gave it to my cousin who is about 5'6" and it fits him perfectly. For a 5'4" woman, a vintage 17" frame should be perfect, or might be a tad big, but I think with some fitting adjustments, it could work. A small size might be a little too small.

Last edited by MRT2; 04-21-20 at 10:05 AM.
MRT2 is offline  
Old 04-21-20, 11:27 AM
  #57  
JDandy
Newbie
 
JDandy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: The Western Reserve
Posts: 44

Bikes: 1996 Gary Fisher Avant Garde, 1989 Fuji Sundance, 1994 Bridgestone X0-4, 1971 WF Holdsworth Mitral

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Liked 7 Times in 5 Posts
Originally Posted by MRT2
OP's bike is likely a 16.5 to 17" frame, which she says is maybe a tad big. That translates to 43 cm, give or take a cm. In what world would a 50 to 52 cm frame be smaller than a 43 cm frame?
That would be the bike world. Mountain bikes and most hybrids are measured in inches. Road bikes are measured in centimeters. They are measured differently which is why a small hybrid bike might be identified as 15-16 inches or listed as 50-52 centimeters from the same manufacturer.

Since the OP's bike appears to have been sold as a 1994 model, it is most likely a 17 inch frame as that was the smallest size listed as a woman's model for that year. Trek also sold a 15 inch model that year but strangely not as a woman's model. I agree that the OP's bike may not necessarily be too big as we all have different torso, arm, and inseam dimensions regardless of our overall height but chances are that the OP's bike is just a bit too big for her as that is what she is describing as feeling. It's probably not off by much (and maybe can be corrected by other height and reach adjustments) but it is possible that what she is feeling correlates to the frame size being too big.

I also agree that the OP's bike does appear to to be in better shape than the initial repair estimate would lead one to believe. It definitely looks worthy of tuning up/ repairing but in the OP's case it might not be worth it if the frame is too big.
JDandy is offline  
Old 04-21-20, 05:23 PM
  #58  
Dk20
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
OP here again. It's been quite a while since I used my bike which is still at the shop awaiting my pick up (not repaired). I *think* my pelvic area touches the top bar/tube when I stand up with both feet on ground, though, I'll have to revisit that when I get the bike back. When stopping, I lean the bike to one side as I put my foot on the ground and my butt comes off the saddle. I remember having to place foot back on pedal, place button on saddle, and give myself a push or two with other foot to get myself moving again (from a stop position).

Thanks for all the replies and a shout out to Mad Honk. He and I talked at length the other night and he gave me some ideas on checking out the saddle height and moving the handle bar a bit to see if these make for a better fit. He shared much knowledge ear to ear. Nice guy.

Just for giggles, I may take the bike to another non-Trek bike shop or two to get their estimates. I wanna know "if" the Trek shop is ripping me off and/or adding non essential/needed repairs, etc., or perhaps they have freaking expensive service rates. We'll see.

I will look in to the Trek FX along with the Verve when they get them back in stick. Then, it's decision time on new or fix, or new and fix.
Dk20 is offline  
Likes For Dk20:
Old 04-22-20, 08:55 PM
  #59  
greatscott
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Indiana
Posts: 592

Bikes: 1984 Fuji Club, Suntour ARX; 2013 Lynskey Peloton, mostly 105 with Ultegra rear derailleur, Enve 2.0 fork; 2020 Masi Giramondo 700c, full Deore with TRP dual piston mech disk brakes

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 324 Post(s)
Liked 81 Times in 71 Posts
You can't buy much of a new bike for the $315, in fact you can't even buy much of a bike for twice that figure or so that it take to build you're back up again, if the frame is in great shape than just restore it. Be careful restoring it, all of that retro stuff from back the is superior to stuff made today, so keep as much of it as you can.

https://bikeretrogrouch.blogspot.com...-trek-720.html

Just look at how much a new version of the 720 would cost you today if you could buy the last year made as new, right around $2,000, that's how much you would need to spend to get anything close to what you had.

So I would have it restored and keep as much of the original parts as you can.

Last edited by greatscott; 04-22-20 at 09:05 PM.
greatscott is offline  
Old 04-23-20, 05:04 AM
  #60  
dedhed
SE Wis
 
dedhed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 10,516

Bikes: '68 Raleigh Sprite, '02 Raleigh C500, '84 Raleigh Gran Prix, '91 Trek 400, 2013 Novara Randonee, 1990 Trek 970

Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2747 Post(s)
Liked 3,401 Times in 2,058 Posts
Originally Posted by greatscott
Just look at how much a new version of the 720 would cost you today if you could buy the last year made as new, right around $2,000, that's how much you would need to spend to get anything close to what you had.
She has a 720 Multitrack Hybrid, NOT a 80's top of the line touring 720 as it has been shown in the previous posts. Here is what the new version roughly would be.

https://www.trekbikes.com/us/en_US/b...rCode=greydark
dedhed is offline  
Likes For dedhed:
Old 04-26-20, 10:38 PM
  #61  
hb88banzai
Newbie
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Small note: from the photo of the OP's bike, it is definitely not a women's model.

The 720w was a step through frame, with the top tube joining the seat tube about midway between the seat stay and the bottom bracket. So the photo shows a men's 720 with what looks to be a small 17" frame. It's definitely about a size smaller than my wife's 19" Multi-Track of the same year. Note that Treks of this vintage took their size from the full length of the seat tube, measured center of bottom bracket all the way to the top of the tube, to the seat post opening rather than to top of top tube.

Oddly, though my wife is also 5' 4" and her (mens) 750 is a size larger than the OPs 720, it still fits her like a glove, with a good 1" of clearance in standover using stock tires.

Last edited by hb88banzai; 04-26-20 at 11:06 PM.
hb88banzai is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.