Le Tour tire wins
#51
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,520
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20810 Post(s)
Liked 9,456 Times
in
4,672 Posts
Sure thing. Let's ask the guy that started this thread, and others like it, about how much practical experience he's got.
#52
Senior Member
Road tubeless had a bumpy start ~10 years ago. Memories of the utter pain of trying to get some first gen Hutchinson Atoms mounted on some first gen tubeless Shimano rims are vivid in my mind. About five years ago, I gave it another try, bought a compressor and a Prestaflator and at this point I have swapped all of my bikes to tubeless. Tubeless definitely requires that you learn new skills, acquire new tools and get comfortable with new maintenance procedures.
At this point, I've done about 10 full tubeless setups and I've done all kinds of tubeless maintenance/swapping tires/retaping/putting fresh sealant in etc. I'm now 100% confident in the technology. I've also figured out a setup process that is foolproof and easy for me. The last tubeless setup I did (a couple of weeks ago on my cross bike) took maybe 25 minutes total. In my opinion (note: opinion), tubeless is better in every way when compared to tube-type clinchers: lower pressures, better ride, better grip, lower (perceived) rolling resistance, dramatically lower chance of puncturing. These are benefits I've seen in the real world over lots of riding.
Pro gear selection is more driven by sponsor commitments and what mechanics are comfortable with than any other factor, but I believe it's inevitable that every pro team will move to tubeless in the next few years.
At this point, I've done about 10 full tubeless setups and I've done all kinds of tubeless maintenance/swapping tires/retaping/putting fresh sealant in etc. I'm now 100% confident in the technology. I've also figured out a setup process that is foolproof and easy for me. The last tubeless setup I did (a couple of weeks ago on my cross bike) took maybe 25 minutes total. In my opinion (note: opinion), tubeless is better in every way when compared to tube-type clinchers: lower pressures, better ride, better grip, lower (perceived) rolling resistance, dramatically lower chance of puncturing. These are benefits I've seen in the real world over lots of riding.
Pro gear selection is more driven by sponsor commitments and what mechanics are comfortable with than any other factor, but I believe it's inevitable that every pro team will move to tubeless in the next few years.
I believe you are conflating attributes. Those are not inherent to TL, they are related to lower pressure. I mean, Just stop being so scared of "low" pressure. I ride 50 PSI every single day on 28mm with tubes and haven't had any real issues. Certainly none that would warrant converting that bike to TL. If pinch flats at the desired pressure gets to be an issue, TL is not the answer. Bigger tyres is. TL doesnt protect the rim/wheel from too skinny tyres at too low pressure anyway.
Imo most of the arguments for switching to TL is based on FUD. - Thinking you will get pinch flats all the time if the pressure is not 80+ PSI, - thinking flat protected tyres ride like garbage, etc. Its not true. Id even challenge the idea that TL tyres "ride better" even if it cant be quantified in any meaningful way. Why would that be? Usually TL tyres are much more robust and heavy than the same non-TL tyre. Just like the protected tyres everybody like to bag on. At about 50 PSI they all ride just fine
#53
Senior Member
For me tubeless works very well. Somehow I seem to avoid all these issues trotted out on the forums. I do research my TL tyres carefully though as I do think some brands do tubeless much better than others. I’m a big fan of Pirelli at the moment, having run a couple of pairs now (Cinturato and P-Zero Race).
#54
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 13,451
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4243 Post(s)
Liked 2,954 Times
in
1,812 Posts
Not really sure why this thread devolved into a discussion on the relative merits of tubeless tires when the first post clear shows that, when you have your own personal mechanics and you are being paid to do so, winners still ride sew ups more than any other kind of tire.
#55
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,520
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20810 Post(s)
Liked 9,456 Times
in
4,672 Posts
Not really sure why this thread devolved into a discussion on the relative merits of tubeless tires when the first post clear shows that, when you have your own personal mechanics and you are being paid to do so, winners still ride sew ups more than any other kind of tire.
#56
Thread Killer
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 12,471
Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII, 23 3T Strada
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3168 Post(s)
Liked 1,724 Times
in
1,042 Posts
I believe you are conflating attributes. Those are not inherent to TL, they are related to lower pressure. I mean, Just stop being so scared of "low" pressure. I ride 50 PSI every single day on 28mm with tubes and haven't had any real issues. Certainly none that would warrant converting that bike to TL. If pinch flats at the desired pressure gets to be an issue, TL is not the answer. Bigger tyres is. TL doesnt protect the rim/wheel from too skinny tyres at too low pressure anyway.
Imo most of the arguments for switching to TL is based on FUD. - Thinking you will get pinch flats all the time if the pressure is not 80+ PSI, - thinking flat protected tyres ride like garbage, etc. Its not true. Id even challenge the idea that TL tyres "ride better" even if it cant be quantified in any meaningful way. Why would that be? Usually TL tyres are much more robust and heavy than the same non-TL tyre. Just like the protected tyres everybody like to bag on. At about 50 PSI they all ride just fine
Imo most of the arguments for switching to TL is based on FUD. - Thinking you will get pinch flats all the time if the pressure is not 80+ PSI, - thinking flat protected tyres ride like garbage, etc. Its not true. Id even challenge the idea that TL tyres "ride better" even if it cant be quantified in any meaningful way. Why would that be? Usually TL tyres are much more robust and heavy than the same non-TL tyre. Just like the protected tyres everybody like to bag on. At about 50 PSI they all ride just fine
With regard to “robustness” and weight being a basis to impugn the better ride quality of tubeless, where and how the robustness and weight are added makes all the difference; weight alone tells virtually nothing about ride quality. While tubeless generally have weightier, reinforced sidewalls, it’s there to control deleterious flex and to maintain the tire shape under load, things which ensure crisp handling, better wear, and allow lower air pressures. Adding weight under the tread, as with a stiff kevlar anti-puncture belt, decreases tread compliance over the road surface, increases rolling resistance, and diminishes the perception of suppleness and reducing ride quality.
Of course there are tons of construction variations for both tubed and tubeless tires which can push either closer to, or further away from, dreamy ride quality, so generalizations such as “protected tires” are as hollow as using weight variation of 30g-40g as a proxy for ride quality.
#57
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,530
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3244 Post(s)
Liked 2,524 Times
in
1,516 Posts
Is there a tally being done on which brand is being ridden the most? Golf has the Darrell Survey does cycling have something similar?
#58
Thread Killer
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 12,471
Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII, 23 3T Strada
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3168 Post(s)
Liked 1,724 Times
in
1,042 Posts
Likes For chaadster:
#59
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,542
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4461 Post(s)
Liked 4,928 Times
in
3,048 Posts
At the weekend I did a very long 9 hour road event with around 100 riders. The roads were generally quite good, but included some fairly rough farm tracks. I passed at least 5 guys fixing flats by the roadside (so at least 5% of the field had a flat and I didn't see those who started behind me). Now I must admit I didn't notice if any of the guys who had flats were running tubeless, but I kind of doubt it given that tubeless road is still a bit of a novelty. Anyway no flats for me yet again!
#60
Fat n slow
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Saratoga, NY
Posts: 4,302
Bikes: Cervelo R3, Giant Revolt
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3259 Post(s)
Liked 2,086 Times
in
980 Posts
I'm a firm believer that you learn pretty quickly once you get your hands on things and gain practical experience (as long as you don't quit at the first hint of adversity). I'm also a firm believer that the vast majority of tubeless naysayers online have little-to-no practical experience and/or they tried tubeless when they really weren't in a position to benefit from it. Oh, or they used Stan's.
Buy some plugs, keep a spare tube and you'll be good to go. In many years of riding TL I have yet to have a puncture require a tube and only once needed a top off with CO2. I may have had to wash my bike when I got home (which I was going to do anyway) but that was the worst of it.
Likes For phrantic09: