Odd bird Eddy Merckx frameset, seeking expert opinions
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Odd bird Eddy Merckx frameset, seeking expert opinions
Hi. I picked this up today as a frameset. It has a strange mix of features that I've never seen together on a Merckx. Any insight from our resident Merckx experts appreciated! Serial is left: Y, right: A 2107
features:
single downtube shifter boss for aero-style mounted shifters
Columbus SLX tubing (helical ridges in seat tube and downtube near bottom bracket)
eddy merckx brake bridge
top tube internal cable guides
top mounted cable guides on the bottom bracket
a sticker with a person's name (probably the racer this was made custom for?)
possibly others to a discerning eye (see photos)
features:
single downtube shifter boss for aero-style mounted shifters
Columbus SLX tubing (helical ridges in seat tube and downtube near bottom bracket)
eddy merckx brake bridge
top tube internal cable guides
top mounted cable guides on the bottom bracket
a sticker with a person's name (probably the racer this was made custom for?)
possibly others to a discerning eye (see photos)
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: PDX
Posts: 13,502
Bikes: Merz x 5 + Specialized Merz Allez x 2, Strawberry/Newlands/DiNucci/Ti x3, Gordon, Fuso/Moulton x2, Bornstein, Paisley,1958-74 Paramounts x3, 3rensho, 74 Moto TC, 73-78 Raleigh Pro's x5, Marinoni x2, 1960 Cinelli SC, 1980 Bianchi SC, PX-10 X 2
Liked 6,807 Times
in
3,891 Posts
[MENTION=532200]sthurman[/MENTION],
Good pic of the bottom of the BB with all #'s and build tag on the steerer if present plz.
Paging [MENTION=448872]CyclesMakaron[/MENTION]
Good pic of the bottom of the BB with all #'s and build tag on the steerer if present plz.
Paging [MENTION=448872]CyclesMakaron[/MENTION]
#3
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Likes For sthurman:
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: PDX
Posts: 13,502
Bikes: Merz x 5 + Specialized Merz Allez x 2, Strawberry/Newlands/DiNucci/Ti x3, Gordon, Fuso/Moulton x2, Bornstein, Paisley,1958-74 Paramounts x3, 3rensho, 74 Moto TC, 73-78 Raleigh Pro's x5, Marinoni x2, 1960 Cinelli SC, 1980 Bianchi SC, PX-10 X 2
Liked 6,807 Times
in
3,891 Posts
#5
Senior Member
-----
certainly looks like mcmlxxxiv
-----
certainly looks like mcmlxxxiv
-----
#7
Junior Member
Thread Starter
#8
Junior Member
Thread Starter
#9
Insane Bicycle Mechanic
Shift lever mount is for top-mount shifters similar to Shimano AX stuff. I’m trying to remember if there was a top-mount gadget for Nuovo/Super Record.
__________________
Jeff Wills
Comcast nuked my web page. It will return soon..
Jeff Wills
Comcast nuked my web page. It will return soon..
Likes For CyclesMakaron:
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: PDX
Posts: 13,502
Bikes: Merz x 5 + Specialized Merz Allez x 2, Strawberry/Newlands/DiNucci/Ti x3, Gordon, Fuso/Moulton x2, Bornstein, Paisley,1958-74 Paramounts x3, 3rensho, 74 Moto TC, 73-78 Raleigh Pro's x5, Marinoni x2, 1960 Cinelli SC, 1980 Bianchi SC, PX-10 X 2
Liked 6,807 Times
in
3,891 Posts
#12
The helical ridges on the tubing, I don't see, are those on the inside of the tubing near the bottom bracket?
The large cutouts on the bottom of the BB shell, don't make sense to me. Highly stressed area and the shapes don't make sense.
Otherwise it seems like a desirable frame.
The large cutouts on the bottom of the BB shell, don't make sense to me. Highly stressed area and the shapes don't make sense.
Otherwise it seems like a desirable frame.
#13
Senior Member
#14
Junior Member
Thread Starter
#15
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Inside
Yes, inside tubing. You can feel them in the seat and down tubes through BB, and see them clearly if you shine a light in there and peer through the top of the seat tube.
#17
Junior Member
Thread Starter
#18
Tailored blanks are semi-finished parts, which are typically made from sheets with different alloys, thicknesses, coatings or material properties. After joining, these will be subjected to deep drawing or stamping.
#19
__________________
Nothing quite says wall hanger like drillium toe straps
Nothing quite says wall hanger like drillium toe straps
#20
Photo credit VeloBase user wiel
__________________
Nothing quite says wall hanger like drillium toe straps
Nothing quite says wall hanger like drillium toe straps
#21
(above and link) Interesting. The FEA part of my brain needs to digest in terms of BB loading. Nomad: "Must a-nal-lyze."
OK. So in terms of torsional loading on the BB shell, the partial-depth slots don't make sense. However the BB shell is loaded mostly in bending, due to pedal forces transmitted through the shell to the seat tube and down tube. The stability of the shell in bending depends on the wall stability of the cylinder; For example, a filled and pressurized soda can is very stable, the pressure from a mostly incompressible liquid under pressure, pushing out on the can walls, prevents them from easily buckling. But empty that can, and the sides are very vulnerable to localized buckling and the can collapses. But if you were able to stiffen the can walls, like with vertical ribs, it would be stronger. The BB shell curvature gives some form stiffness. But at a smaller scale, the partial depth slots may help. Plate stiffness, IIRC, is proportional to the thickness cubed (t^3). This is how aluminum frames can be lighter, aluminum is 1/3 the density and 1/3 the elastic stiffness; Making the frame tubes much larger diameter greatly improves bending and torsional strength, but with steel, you run into limitations on how thin the walls can be on a bigger tube before you can distort the walls just by squeezing with your hand. Aluminum, for the same weight, can make the tube wall 3X the thickness, thus 3^3 = 27X the geometric stiffness but times 1/3 the material stiffness = 9X local stiffness, or go 1.5X thickness so half the weight and still 1.5^3 = 3.375X better geometric local stiffness but times 1/3 the material stiffness = 1.125X local stiffness, about the same as steel but at half the weight.
So getting back to the BB shell, they were still in the steel frame era, but need to make the shell stiffer; By reducing thickness in some places, while adding thickness in others, the shell walls may be stiffer in localized bending for the same weight, and thus more stable in global bending strength, or less weight for the same stiffness. At least on paper. How well this worked in practice is another question, both in performance, and manufacturing; That BB shell looks to be investment cast, a lot more expensive than just cutting off lengths of drawn tubing. Anyway, that's my theory on the partial depth slots. Then again, they might just have thought it looks cool.
OK. So in terms of torsional loading on the BB shell, the partial-depth slots don't make sense. However the BB shell is loaded mostly in bending, due to pedal forces transmitted through the shell to the seat tube and down tube. The stability of the shell in bending depends on the wall stability of the cylinder; For example, a filled and pressurized soda can is very stable, the pressure from a mostly incompressible liquid under pressure, pushing out on the can walls, prevents them from easily buckling. But empty that can, and the sides are very vulnerable to localized buckling and the can collapses. But if you were able to stiffen the can walls, like with vertical ribs, it would be stronger. The BB shell curvature gives some form stiffness. But at a smaller scale, the partial depth slots may help. Plate stiffness, IIRC, is proportional to the thickness cubed (t^3). This is how aluminum frames can be lighter, aluminum is 1/3 the density and 1/3 the elastic stiffness; Making the frame tubes much larger diameter greatly improves bending and torsional strength, but with steel, you run into limitations on how thin the walls can be on a bigger tube before you can distort the walls just by squeezing with your hand. Aluminum, for the same weight, can make the tube wall 3X the thickness, thus 3^3 = 27X the geometric stiffness but times 1/3 the material stiffness = 9X local stiffness, or go 1.5X thickness so half the weight and still 1.5^3 = 3.375X better geometric local stiffness but times 1/3 the material stiffness = 1.125X local stiffness, about the same as steel but at half the weight.
So getting back to the BB shell, they were still in the steel frame era, but need to make the shell stiffer; By reducing thickness in some places, while adding thickness in others, the shell walls may be stiffer in localized bending for the same weight, and thus more stable in global bending strength, or less weight for the same stiffness. At least on paper. How well this worked in practice is another question, both in performance, and manufacturing; That BB shell looks to be investment cast, a lot more expensive than just cutting off lengths of drawn tubing. Anyway, that's my theory on the partial depth slots. Then again, they might just have thought it looks cool.
Last edited by Duragrouch; 05-03-24 at 05:16 AM.
Likes For Choke:
#23
Edumacator
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Goose Creek, SC
Posts: 7,561
Bikes: '87 Crestdale, '87 Basso Gap, '92 Rossin Performance EL-OS, 1990 VanTuyl, 1980s Losa, 1985 Trek 670, 1982 AD SLE, 1987 PX10, etc...
Liked 3,590 Times
in
2,254 Posts
What’s that one? That’s cool!
__________________
1987 Crest Cannondale, 1987 Basso Gap, 1992 Rossin Performance EL, 1990ish Van Tuyl, 1985 Trek 670, 2003 Pinarello Surprise, 1990ish MBK Atlantique, 1987 Peugeot Competition, 1987 Nishiki Tri-A, 1981 Faggin, 1996 Cannondale M500, 1984 Mercian, 1982 AD SuperLeicht, 1985 Massi (model unknown), 1988 Daccordi Griffe , 1989 Fauxsin MTB, 1981 Ciocc Mockba, 1992 Bianchi Giro, 1977 Colnago Super, 1971 Raleigh International, 1998 Corratec Ap & Dun, 1991 Peugeot Slimestone
1987 Crest Cannondale, 1987 Basso Gap, 1992 Rossin Performance EL, 1990ish Van Tuyl, 1985 Trek 670, 2003 Pinarello Surprise, 1990ish MBK Atlantique, 1987 Peugeot Competition, 1987 Nishiki Tri-A, 1981 Faggin, 1996 Cannondale M500, 1984 Mercian, 1982 AD SuperLeicht, 1985 Massi (model unknown), 1988 Daccordi Griffe , 1989 Fauxsin MTB, 1981 Ciocc Mockba, 1992 Bianchi Giro, 1977 Colnago Super, 1971 Raleigh International, 1998 Corratec Ap & Dun, 1991 Peugeot Slimestone
#24
Disciple of St. Tullio
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: State of Jefferson
Posts: 760
Bikes: Ciöcc, Bianchi, DeRosa, Eddy Merckx, Frejus, Hampsten, Kondor, Losa, Magni, Pegoretti, Pelizzoli, Pogliaghi, Scapin
Liked 382 Times
in
151 Posts
#25
Stop reading my posts!
the IC (investment-cast) BB shell on the OP's Merckx frame MIGHT be a Roto product, but details differ from the example on Velobase, most glaring besides the pattern of the (NOT) "cutouts" on the shell body and the style of all 3 sockets is lack of a Roto logo. Might be made by one of the other casting/forging operations in Italy.
Kind of doubt Merckx would have sourced a Japanese shell, but there were popular Hitachi-branded IC units that also shared the "bas-relief" treatment of the shell body, but yet another pattern from these two.
some pix of the typical "Hitachi" branded shell from other C&V threads, and per Mark Bulgier this may have beencast by sold as a Takahashi or Eisho shell but cast by and branded with Hitachi's mark:
"The Hitachi mark does mean it was cast there, but that's not the "brand". I think it's an Eisho shell, and they used Hitachi as their casting partner. Takahashi also made shells and crowns with the Hitachi mark."
Kind of doubt Merckx would have sourced a Japanese shell, but there were popular Hitachi-branded IC units that also shared the "bas-relief" treatment of the shell body, but yet another pattern from these two.
some pix of the typical "Hitachi" branded shell from other C&V threads, and per Mark Bulgier this may have been
"The Hitachi mark does mean it was cast there, but that's not the "brand". I think it's an Eisho shell, and they used Hitachi as their casting partner. Takahashi also made shells and crowns with the Hitachi mark."
Last edited by unworthy1; 05-04-24 at 11:11 AM.