Cost of bike commuting
#1
Cost of bike commuting
Many years ago, when I was just starting my professional career, I lived close enough to work to walk there in half an hour. After walking to work and home for several months a pair of shoes needed new heels and soles. It cost $36.00. That weekend I went to a flea market, bought a black, large frame, woman's Raleigh equipped with Sturmey Archer 3 speed hub for $25. $10 got me two new tires and $6 a smaller rear cog. I rode the bike to work most days for the next two years. At that point I changed jobs and cycle commuting became impractical. I continued to ride the bike on occasional week ends. A couple of years later I felt flush enough to buy a real ten speed with front and rear derailleurs, drop bars and skinny tires. I sold the Raleigh for $50 --- a profit of $9.
I concluded from that experience that it was cheaper to commute by bike than walk, The same numbers certainly would not work today, but I wonder if my conclusion is still true,
I concluded from that experience that it was cheaper to commute by bike than walk, The same numbers certainly would not work today, but I wonder if my conclusion is still true,
#2
Disco Infiltrator
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom CA
Posts: 13,464
Bikes: Stormchaser, Paramount, Tilt, Samba tandem
Liked 2,116 Times
in
1,379 Posts
I think most of us are in it for the exercise and alone-time, but yeah it can be very cheap if you aim to.
__________________
Genesis 49:16-17
Genesis 49:16-17
Likes For Darth Lefty:
#3
If solely judging by the dollars spent on walking vs bike equipment, regardless of distance, bike would be more costly. A pair of cheapo $20 Walmart shoes could cover my 16 mile (one way) commute, compared to a $200 Walmart bike.
Again this only works if you take dollars spent on equipment as the only variable. Once you factor in time cost, then bike wins in my scenario. But if you are 2 blocks from your work, then obviously shoes would win out on cost!
Again this only works if you take dollars spent on equipment as the only variable. Once you factor in time cost, then bike wins in my scenario. But if you are 2 blocks from your work, then obviously shoes would win out on cost!
#4
If solely judging by the dollars spent on walking vs bike equipment, regardless of distance, bike would be more costly. A pair of cheapo $20 Walmart shoes could cover my 16 mile (one way) commute, compared to a $200 Walmart bike.
Again this only works if you take dollars spent on equipment as the only variable. Once you factor in time cost, then bike wins in my scenario. But if you are 2 blocks from your work, then obviously shoes would win out on cost!
Again this only works if you take dollars spent on equipment as the only variable. Once you factor in time cost, then bike wins in my scenario. But if you are 2 blocks from your work, then obviously shoes would win out on cost!
I agree, the time factor is a major consideration on calculating transportation cost differences between bicycling versus walking.
#6
Senior Member
![Big Grin](images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
Also, over the course of a year, 32 miles a day mon-fri comes to 8320 miles. Even with a $500 bike plus, say, $500 for repair and maintenance (tires, tubes, chain, new cassette and chainring, etc.), that's $1000 sunk vs maybe a couple hundred in good quality walking shoes, plus an extra ~400,000 calories burned walking that distance vs biking it. Quality food is expensive. Figure an extra $5 per work day for the extra calories from healthy foods, that adds up to $100 a month or $1200 a year.
I'd argue that anything over a ~6 mile round trip commute will probably end up with the bike winning out on cost, even with the assumption that commute time has no value.
#7
Senior Member
If solely judging by the dollars spent on walking vs bike equipment, regardless of distance, bike would be more costly. A pair of cheapo $20 Walmart shoes could cover my 16 mile (one way) commute, compared to a $200 Walmart bike.
Again this only works if you take dollars spent on equipment as the only variable. Once you factor in time cost, then bike wins in my scenario. But if you are 2 blocks from your work, then obviously shoes would win out on cost!
Again this only works if you take dollars spent on equipment as the only variable. Once you factor in time cost, then bike wins in my scenario. But if you are 2 blocks from your work, then obviously shoes would win out on cost!
Likes For StarBiker:
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: northern Deep South
Posts: 9,006
Bikes: Fuji Touring, Novara Randonee
Liked 2,007 Times
in
1,257 Posts
When the alternative was driving a car, and gas was $5/gal, cycling to work was really, really cheap.
When the cardiologist said, "You're alive today because of all the cycling you've been doing," cycling to work became priceless.
When the cardiologist said, "You're alive today because of all the cycling you've been doing," cycling to work became priceless.
Likes For pdlamb:
#9
Senior Member
For me bike commuting started out as something to do for fun and make me feel better about not ever going to the gym. I also still have my car because I commute about 50%, and as a result I've probably spent more bike commuting than I would have if I just kept driving 100% of the time. If I factor in not paying for a gym membership that helps, but my current employer for the last 10 years has a free on-site gym so that isn't even a factor any more. Not complaining, there are lots of things I could be doing that are worse for my health and my wallet.
Likes For RoadKill:
#11
Senior Member
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Liked 3,110 Times
in
1,418 Posts
The lesson here isn't how cheap bike commuting is; it's how expensive car commuting is.
Likes For caloso:
#13
Senior Member
Everything is relative. Car ownership in general, for most people, is quite expensive. DIYers who don't mind driving 20+ year old beaters can do it pretty cheaply, but then the same could be said of cycling as a hobby. It can be as cheap or as expensive as you want it to be, depending on the time and effort you want to put in.
Likes For General Geoff:
#15
Disco Infiltrator
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom CA
Posts: 13,464
Bikes: Stormchaser, Paramount, Tilt, Samba tandem
Liked 2,116 Times
in
1,379 Posts
Yeah, gas on a calories per dollar basis is really cheap. Too bad you can't eat it
__________________
Genesis 49:16-17
Genesis 49:16-17
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: northern Deep South
Posts: 9,006
Bikes: Fuji Touring, Novara Randonee
Liked 2,007 Times
in
1,257 Posts
I used "what I'm saving on gas" as an excuse to buy parts, clothing, etc. I figure I'm still saving on maintenance (oil change twice a year instead of four times a year), tires (Yikes! have you bought a set of new car tires lately?), and other wear and tear. I'd probably be looking for my third new car since I bought the last one if I weren't bike commuting. (New car price tag makes car tires look cheap by comparison!)
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,863
Bikes: too many of all kinds
Liked 415 Times
in
335 Posts
I used "what I'm saving on gas" as an excuse to buy parts, clothing, etc. I figure I'm still saving on maintenance (oil change twice a year instead of four times a year), tires (Yikes! have you bought a set of new car tires lately?), and other wear and tear. I'd probably be looking for my third new car since I bought the last one if I weren't bike commuting. (New car price tag makes car tires look cheap by comparison!)
#18
Disco Infiltrator
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom CA
Posts: 13,464
Bikes: Stormchaser, Paramount, Tilt, Samba tandem
Liked 2,116 Times
in
1,379 Posts
I am not saving money on bike commuting. Maybe gas. The third kid and suburb living are really counter to the idea of saving money.
__________________
Genesis 49:16-17
Genesis 49:16-17
Likes For Darth Lefty:
#19
Senior Member
![EEK!](images/smilies/eek.gif)
Besides kidding Darth I can't see how eating a bit more is a comparison to savings on gas, insurance, maintenance, potential car payment, somebody running into you (I had that happened to me, one DRIVER ran into another DRIVER and flung his car into mine while I was on a side street) overall traffic, even in clusterf*ck suburbia where they can't stop unnecessary building........
and some states are just plain bizarre. Some states the police can pull you over for a minor infraction and issue a bond for your license, taking your license.. Isn't Illinois one of those states?
I may have to drive again but I hate it!
Last edited by StarBiker; 06-27-20 at 06:50 AM.
#20
Grillparzer
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 643
Bikes: Surly Cross Check
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
My total bicycle numbers for 2014 and 2015:
Surly Cross Check: $1340
Lighting: $400 (A really good Dinotte set.)
Clothing: $600 ($400 for a close out Rivendell rain jacket. Until I had to buy suits for work, it was the single most expensive piece of clothing I had ever purchased.)
Brooks Saddle: $85
Ticket: $50 (Trail riding after dark)
Total: $2475
My total vehicle numbers for 2016 and 2017:
Jeep Wrangler: $11,640
Insurance: $5088
Fuel: $2704
Maintenance: $700
Tickets: $300
Total: $20,432
My commute changed and I had to buy a motor vehicle. When I was commuting by bicycle, I spent lavishly and justified my purchases by comparing the costs to what I would have been paying had I owned a car. My commute was fifteen miles round trip and for me that was a long ride. I splurged because I enjoy comfort and stuff that works. Thinking about it now, I could have easily have cut my expenditures by seventy-five percent. A less expensive bicycle, a cheaper light set, and avoiding online sales would have made a big difference.
Surly Cross Check: $1340
Lighting: $400 (A really good Dinotte set.)
Clothing: $600 ($400 for a close out Rivendell rain jacket. Until I had to buy suits for work, it was the single most expensive piece of clothing I had ever purchased.)
Brooks Saddle: $85
Ticket: $50 (Trail riding after dark)
Total: $2475
My total vehicle numbers for 2016 and 2017:
Jeep Wrangler: $11,640
Insurance: $5088
Fuel: $2704
Maintenance: $700
Tickets: $300
Total: $20,432
My commute changed and I had to buy a motor vehicle. When I was commuting by bicycle, I spent lavishly and justified my purchases by comparing the costs to what I would have been paying had I owned a car. My commute was fifteen miles round trip and for me that was a long ride. I splurged because I enjoy comfort and stuff that works. Thinking about it now, I could have easily have cut my expenditures by seventy-five percent. A less expensive bicycle, a cheaper light set, and avoiding online sales would have made a big difference.
#23
Newbie
The Michigan auto insurance catastrophic injury law literally saved my entire extended family from financial ruin.
Likes For hammster:
#24
bOsscO
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 746
Bikes: 2024 Spec Crux, 2015 Norco Search S1, 93 Mongoose IBOC COMP
Liked 358 Times
in
212 Posts
Lot's of interesting comments/points here.
I don't want to derail the thread but, since lot's of you have mentioned motor vehicle vs bike for commuting, I'd be interested to hear how many folx own both a motor vehicle and a bike and how many folx own just a bike?
I own both. I use my bike to commute as often as possible. But we also own a car to use for family driving, longer commutes, carrying larger loads, etc.
I suspect many/most own both. Sure it means you pay for car insurance anyways, but you still save on gas, wear/tear, maintenance of the motor vehicle when commuting by bike.
I don't want to derail the thread but, since lot's of you have mentioned motor vehicle vs bike for commuting, I'd be interested to hear how many folx own both a motor vehicle and a bike and how many folx own just a bike?
I own both. I use my bike to commute as often as possible. But we also own a car to use for family driving, longer commutes, carrying larger loads, etc.
I suspect many/most own both. Sure it means you pay for car insurance anyways, but you still save on gas, wear/tear, maintenance of the motor vehicle when commuting by bike.
Likes For bOsscO:
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: northern Deep South
Posts: 9,006
Bikes: Fuji Touring, Novara Randonee
Liked 2,007 Times
in
1,257 Posts
Monte Python style:
What is your name? pdlamb
How many cars do you own? One.
How many bikes do you own? Two. No, three. No, four. Aaaauugh!
Back BC (Before Covid), I'd leave my car at work most days and commute on a bike. We could take my wife's car when we needed to go somewhere from home, and I needed one at work for meetings 10 miles from the office a couple times a week.
What is your name? pdlamb
How many cars do you own? One.
How many bikes do you own? Two. No, three. No, four. Aaaauugh!
Back BC (Before Covid), I'd leave my car at work most days and commute on a bike. We could take my wife's car when we needed to go somewhere from home, and I needed one at work for meetings 10 miles from the office a couple times a week.