Adjusting rim brake spacing for wear? (cantilever)
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Adjusting rim brake spacing for wear? (cantilever)
Hi. Tektro Oryx brakes (cantilever, yes? Not V? I think?) brakes on my touring bike.
I've always left the brake pad spacing on the "3 mm" option, which is what they came with and what the LBS has set the bike to after a tuneup involving pad replacement.
Usually when one wheel's brakes don't have good stopping force anymore (as I noticed this weekend when my front wheel got out of true and so I popped open the front brake and realized the rear brake was not adequate to stop the bike) and the barrel adjuster is maxed out, I just replace the brake pads, and look at them and wonder why there's so much pad left before running down to the wear line. Then I give up and move on.
Anyhow tonight I thought, "well, why don't I just advance the spacing on the pad and get more life out of it?" i.e. moving around the spacers and conical washers.
First I moved to the "4 mm" setting by moving the thin washer from outside the fork to adjacent to the pad. This was better but still left room for improvement.
Then I went to the "5 mm" setting by putting the washer back where it was before and swapping the 2mm and 4mm spacers. This seemed excellent at first, but after a test ride there was some rubbing of the rear wheel.
I dug up some spare washers from old worn out brake pads and went back to the "4 mm" setting plus doubling up the thin washer (I think it measured 0.8mm on my calipers? Did not write it down, my bad) and that seemed to be a good compromise. Maybe I should futz with the lateral true of the rear wheel.
Anyhow, I don't see anything in the literature (print or web) that suggests increasing the fork-to-pad spacing (decreasing the pad-to-rim spacing) is a normal maintenance task. Nobody seems to be explicit, but it seems like this spacing is intended as a set-it-and-forget it.
Am I wrong to be changing this spacing to get more life of my pads? And if so why?
Maybe I need barrel adjusters with more travel?
Thanks!
I've always left the brake pad spacing on the "3 mm" option, which is what they came with and what the LBS has set the bike to after a tuneup involving pad replacement.
Usually when one wheel's brakes don't have good stopping force anymore (as I noticed this weekend when my front wheel got out of true and so I popped open the front brake and realized the rear brake was not adequate to stop the bike) and the barrel adjuster is maxed out, I just replace the brake pads, and look at them and wonder why there's so much pad left before running down to the wear line. Then I give up and move on.
Anyhow tonight I thought, "well, why don't I just advance the spacing on the pad and get more life out of it?" i.e. moving around the spacers and conical washers.
First I moved to the "4 mm" setting by moving the thin washer from outside the fork to adjacent to the pad. This was better but still left room for improvement.
Then I went to the "5 mm" setting by putting the washer back where it was before and swapping the 2mm and 4mm spacers. This seemed excellent at first, but after a test ride there was some rubbing of the rear wheel.
I dug up some spare washers from old worn out brake pads and went back to the "4 mm" setting plus doubling up the thin washer (I think it measured 0.8mm on my calipers? Did not write it down, my bad) and that seemed to be a good compromise. Maybe I should futz with the lateral true of the rear wheel.
Anyhow, I don't see anything in the literature (print or web) that suggests increasing the fork-to-pad spacing (decreasing the pad-to-rim spacing) is a normal maintenance task. Nobody seems to be explicit, but it seems like this spacing is intended as a set-it-and-forget it.
Am I wrong to be changing this spacing to get more life of my pads? And if so why?
Maybe I need barrel adjusters with more travel?
Thanks!
Likes For bboy314:
#3
Junior Member
Thread Starter
But my experience is I get many years and sets of pads out of a set of brake cables, and that loosening and tightening the pinch bolt more than a few times leads to a freyed cable,
On the other hand, it's probably easier than messing around with swapping washers and spacers, and infinitely variably adjustable.
But it still leaves the real question: Is it normal to have to make this kind of adjustment over the life of a pad?
#4
Senior Member
Past the initial new pad setup, I never really have to mess with the pad spacing. If your cable is fraying when you adjust it, you might just be overtightening a little. I do like to use a simple straddle yoke without pinch bolts which makes it easier to just tighten the cable at the brake arm.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Northern Shenandoah Valley
Posts: 4,145
Bikes: More bikes than riders
Liked 768 Times
in
573 Posts
I don't think the conical washer-and-spacer system is designed to be used to maintain pad-to-rim clearance as the pad wears. I think it's designed to help you adjust and tune your brake system from the onset...because different types of brakes (cantilever vs. linear pull) and different brake boss spacing exist in the market and exactly how the brake is configured can have a pretty large effect on performance.
For example, low profile cantilevers, like the Oryx brakes, usually respond well to a wider brake arm splay at rest. In other words, install the pads with the thickest spacers to the inside of the brake arm (which moves the pad closer to the rim, right?). This forces you to set the arms wider apart, which minimizes the loss of mechanical advantage that low profile cantilevers experience as they're actuated (pulled together). Your straddle cable will also generally sit lower with a straighter path between each arm (assuming you have the tire or fender clearance), which increases mechanical advantage.
The relatively small amount of pad wear over the life of the pads (in terms of dimensions you can measure) can well be taken up by the barrel adjuster up at the brake lever.
For example, low profile cantilevers, like the Oryx brakes, usually respond well to a wider brake arm splay at rest. In other words, install the pads with the thickest spacers to the inside of the brake arm (which moves the pad closer to the rim, right?). This forces you to set the arms wider apart, which minimizes the loss of mechanical advantage that low profile cantilevers experience as they're actuated (pulled together). Your straddle cable will also generally sit lower with a straighter path between each arm (assuming you have the tire or fender clearance), which increases mechanical advantage.
The relatively small amount of pad wear over the life of the pads (in terms of dimensions you can measure) can well be taken up by the barrel adjuster up at the brake lever.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Golden, CO and Tucson, AZ
Posts: 2,864
Bikes: 2012 Specialized Elite Disc, 1983 Trek 520
Liked 789 Times
in
444 Posts
Study this. Pop quiz tomorrow.
A real key to canti brake performance is maintaining the yoke angle of the straddle cable system. Most of the old canti brakes I see coming into the non-profit shop have an extremely acute angle at the straddle clamp, which I think comes from persistently tightening the brake cable to allow for pad wear, probably over many years and many pairs of shoes. I usually have to start from scratch, forget about the shoes, get the geometry of the calipers and straddle cable correct, then adjust shoes accordingly. Measurements depend on rim and brake boss widths.
A real key to canti brake performance is maintaining the yoke angle of the straddle cable system. Most of the old canti brakes I see coming into the non-profit shop have an extremely acute angle at the straddle clamp, which I think comes from persistently tightening the brake cable to allow for pad wear, probably over many years and many pairs of shoes. I usually have to start from scratch, forget about the shoes, get the geometry of the calipers and straddle cable correct, then adjust shoes accordingly. Measurements depend on rim and brake boss widths.
Likes For andrewclaus:
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 744
Bikes: Cannondale tandems: '92 Road, '97 Mtn. Mongoose 10.9 Ti, Kelly Deluxe, Tommaso Chorus, Cdale MT2000, Schwinn Deluxe Cruiser, Torker Unicycle, among others.
Liked 207 Times
in
129 Posts
Canti pads need to be set properly to hit the rim at the correct angle, achieve good leverage, avoid brake pad dive, prevent squeal, and make sure you aren't gonna slash that sidewall. Straddle cable length should be optimized for optimal leverage and braking power. Too long, not enough power, too short, too squishy.
Now if the OP actually means v-brakes, then (in an Emily Litella voice), "Never mind!" Set up still requires much of the above, but without the dire consequences. Many v-brakes require you just push the pad against the rim loose, make sure it's tangent and at the proper height, and tighten down the nut. Squeal was supposedly eliminated and toe wasn't necessary. (But we all know that isn't true, don't we!)
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 744
Bikes: Cannondale tandems: '92 Road, '97 Mtn. Mongoose 10.9 Ti, Kelly Deluxe, Tommaso Chorus, Cdale MT2000, Schwinn Deluxe Cruiser, Torker Unicycle, among others.
Liked 207 Times
in
129 Posts
I feel it should be a right of passage for EVERY bicycle mechanic to be able to master cantilever brake set up. Not for any particular reason, of course. Just to build proper character !
#9
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by me
But my experience is I get many years and sets of pads out of a set of brake cables, and that loosening and tightening the pinch bolt more than a few times leads to a freyed cable,
Past the initial new pad setup, I never really have to mess with the pad spacing. If your cable is fraying when you adjust it, you might just be overtightening a little. I do like to use a simple straddle yoke without pinch bolts which makes it easier to just tighten the cable at the brake arm.
#10
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Now if the OP actually means v-brakes, then (in an Emily Litella voice), "Never mind!" Set up still requires much of the above, but without the dire consequences. Many v-brakes require you just push the pad against the rim loose, make sure it's tangent and at the proper height, and tighten down the nut. Squeal was supposedly eliminated and toe wasn't necessary. (But we all know that isn't true, don't we!)
It seems unfathomable to me that Tektro's product page: www.tektro.com/products.php?p=48
doesn't say either "cantilever brake" or "V-brake" but alas:
992AG
DESCRIPTION
Brake - Cyclocross Collection
◆ Linear spring designed
◆ Dual micro tension adjusters
992AG
DESCRIPTION
Brake - Cyclocross Collection
◆ Linear spring designed
◆ Dual micro tension adjusters
DESCRIPTION
Brake - Cyclocross Collection
◆ Linear spring designed
◆ Dual micro tension adjusters
#11
Junior Member
Thread Starter
As long as we're going there for character building, could I suggest a left of passage instead? Take one road less traveled by, and all that. (It's "rite" of passage.)
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 13,054
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Liked 4,083 Times
in
2,641 Posts
I never thought of cantilevers as being all that fuss. Now I"ve only owned the old Mafacs and an early Shimano that is a near exact copy of the Mafac for the geometry. (Levers stick straight out and snag cyclocross riders' legs on mounts and dismounts.) I think little of either pushing the canti arms inboard to compensate for pad wear or simply tightening the cable and angling the blocks up, back to the rim center. (And yes, you do not want to let those pads get too low.)
Oh. John, it seems you have cantis with the pad detail modeled after regular road brakes. A threaded rod that you run through the caliper arm and secure with a nut. Most cantis and all the old ones are a different system. There is a bolt through the caliper arm that runs fore and aft parallel to the rim. The head of the bolt has a hole the brake post (with no threads) goes through. The nut on the other side of the caliper pulls the bolt head and post snug up against the caliper arm. Very flexible for rotating the pad up and down and sliding in and out Toe-in took creativity on the old ones. I went to KoolStop pads decades ago and have had few squeal issues so I haven't sweated it.
John, you might consider tightening the cable at the clamp as a good preventive measure. Yes, it tires out cables. So you have to replace them far sooner. But ... those broken strands rarely cause a cable failure when riding unless you waited far too long AND they are very easy to see. If you do all you can to preserve that end it may just happen that the cable has worn through part of the ferrule at the brake hood and is now in metal to metal contact not as intended at the brake lever or somewhere else internal and you will never know until it breaks. When that happens, you'll have just enough time to utter "Oh s***" very loud. By regularly killing your cables at the brake clamp, you get to pull them out to see if any other issues are starting. Cables are consumables and if you don't treat them as such, they will bite you.
Cambridge, MA! Brings back memories. In my racing days, I lived in Inman Sq (Fayette St) and worked at the now defunct Bicycle Exchange.
Oh. John, it seems you have cantis with the pad detail modeled after regular road brakes. A threaded rod that you run through the caliper arm and secure with a nut. Most cantis and all the old ones are a different system. There is a bolt through the caliper arm that runs fore and aft parallel to the rim. The head of the bolt has a hole the brake post (with no threads) goes through. The nut on the other side of the caliper pulls the bolt head and post snug up against the caliper arm. Very flexible for rotating the pad up and down and sliding in and out Toe-in took creativity on the old ones. I went to KoolStop pads decades ago and have had few squeal issues so I haven't sweated it.
John, you might consider tightening the cable at the clamp as a good preventive measure. Yes, it tires out cables. So you have to replace them far sooner. But ... those broken strands rarely cause a cable failure when riding unless you waited far too long AND they are very easy to see. If you do all you can to preserve that end it may just happen that the cable has worn through part of the ferrule at the brake hood and is now in metal to metal contact not as intended at the brake lever or somewhere else internal and you will never know until it breaks. When that happens, you'll have just enough time to utter "Oh s***" very loud. By regularly killing your cables at the brake clamp, you get to pull them out to see if any other issues are starting. Cables are consumables and if you don't treat them as such, they will bite you.
Cambridge, MA! Brings back memories. In my racing days, I lived in Inman Sq (Fayette St) and worked at the now defunct Bicycle Exchange.
#13
Senior Member
Because as cantilever brake pads wear, they hit lower and lower on the rim until "OH CRAP!" they dive under the rim and NO MORE BRAKE!!! (Ask me how I know!)
Canti pads need to be set properly to hit the rim at the correct angle, achieve good leverage, avoid brake pad dive, prevent squeal, and make sure you aren't gonna slash that sidewall. Straddle cable length should be optimized for optimal leverage and braking power. Too long, not enough power, too short, too squishy.
Now if the OP actually means v-brakes, then (in an Emily Litella voice), "Never mind!" Set up still requires much of the above, but without the dire consequences. Many v-brakes require you just push the pad against the rim loose, make sure it's tangent and at the proper height, and tighten down the nut. Squeal was supposedly eliminated and toe wasn't necessary. (But we all know that isn't true, don't we!)
Canti pads need to be set properly to hit the rim at the correct angle, achieve good leverage, avoid brake pad dive, prevent squeal, and make sure you aren't gonna slash that sidewall. Straddle cable length should be optimized for optimal leverage and braking power. Too long, not enough power, too short, too squishy.
Now if the OP actually means v-brakes, then (in an Emily Litella voice), "Never mind!" Set up still requires much of the above, but without the dire consequences. Many v-brakes require you just push the pad against the rim loose, make sure it's tangent and at the proper height, and tighten down the nut. Squeal was supposedly eliminated and toe wasn't necessary. (But we all know that isn't true, don't we!)
#14
Senior Member
Start here, read the PDF Brakes- installation instructions. If there's enough pad left looks like you readjust the main cable, realign the pads.
https://www.tektro.com/products.php?p=48
https://www.tektro.com/products.php?p=48
Last edited by grizzly59; 04-15-22 at 06:15 PM.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 744
Bikes: Cannondale tandems: '92 Road, '97 Mtn. Mongoose 10.9 Ti, Kelly Deluxe, Tommaso Chorus, Cdale MT2000, Schwinn Deluxe Cruiser, Torker Unicycle, among others.
Liked 207 Times
in
129 Posts
Indeed. Mea culpa. That is much more appropriate, as I'm left-handed and left dominant. Except for throwing a frizbee and using scissors, for unknown reasons. Have I LEFT anything out?!!!
#16
Junior Member
Thread Starter
(Sorry for the delay and the perhaps overly pithy replies above, I was trying to get up to ten posts to lose the restrictions, but then I ran into the 5 post/day limit. Doh! No more posts another 7 hours…)
Err, yes, I'd reviewed that before the initial post.
(I even linked to it in a post above that appears to be stuck in moderation—responding to LV2TNDM's q about V or cantilever — oops. Maybe it'll show up soon.)
It doesn't really say anything about how pads should be spaced away from the brake arm -- the 1mm dimension given is a vertical one, the top of the pad should contact the rim 1mm down from the top of the rim — no manufacturer’s guidance on the rim/pad spacing during motion. (I suppose this depends on the lateral truing runout, but still).
Even so, like basically all the literature, it doesn't give any guidance on what to do if, months after the initial setup, a partially worn brake pad no longer provides sufficient friction when the barrel adjuster is maximized.
As noted in this thread, the two choices seem to be moving around the spacers and adjusting the brake cable.
Actually, I thought it was interesting that the Tektro instructions don't seem to say anything about setting the brake cable tension. Just the torque for the anchor bolt (6-8 Nm).
Hrmm, I am confused by this — what is the adjustment that controls the width of the arms apart ("arm spacing")? As far as I'm aware, the Oryx adjustments are:
• Spring-pin pivot boss hole. Instructions say to use the middle, but nothing stops you from the others.
• Brake pad positioning via the threaded stud from the pad that has…well quite a few degrees of freedom: up/down; a little bit of side-to-side (slot is wider than the stud); rotation around the stud; and then—gosh, what's the nomenclature?—the ability to wobble off-axis from plane of the brake arm by a few degrees because of the conical spacers, which lets you set toe-in and match the angled plane of the rim.
• Brake cable tension
• Spring tension adjustment (2mm Allen key)
None of these seem to be about arm spacing?
Also, I vaguely recall reading some people suggest about not using the supplied "link wire" and instead fashioning some kind of alternative? Is that what is meant here? I don't know anything about that…
Well would that it were so, but it seems not to be.
But maybe I'm not understanding. What does "in terms of dimensions you can measure" mean here?
Also: If cable tension really is the recommended solution here, why is the answer not to install additional barrel adjusters?
(I even linked to it in a post above that appears to be stuck in moderation—responding to LV2TNDM's q about V or cantilever — oops. Maybe it'll show up soon.)
It doesn't really say anything about how pads should be spaced away from the brake arm -- the 1mm dimension given is a vertical one, the top of the pad should contact the rim 1mm down from the top of the rim — no manufacturer’s guidance on the rim/pad spacing during motion. (I suppose this depends on the lateral truing runout, but still).
Even so, like basically all the literature, it doesn't give any guidance on what to do if, months after the initial setup, a partially worn brake pad no longer provides sufficient friction when the barrel adjuster is maximized.
As noted in this thread, the two choices seem to be moving around the spacers and adjusting the brake cable.
Actually, I thought it was interesting that the Tektro instructions don't seem to say anything about setting the brake cable tension. Just the torque for the anchor bolt (6-8 Nm).
For example, low profile cantilevers, like the Oryx brakes, usually respond well to a wider brake arm splay at rest. In other words, install the pads with the thickest spacers to the inside of the brake arm (which moves the pad closer to the rim, right?). This forces you to set the arms wider apart, which minimizes the loss of mechanical advantage that low profile cantilevers experience as they're actuated (pulled together). Your straddle cable will also generally sit lower with a straighter path between each arm (assuming you have the tire or fender clearance), which increases mechanical advantage.
• Spring-pin pivot boss hole. Instructions say to use the middle, but nothing stops you from the others.
• Brake pad positioning via the threaded stud from the pad that has…well quite a few degrees of freedom: up/down; a little bit of side-to-side (slot is wider than the stud); rotation around the stud; and then—gosh, what's the nomenclature?—the ability to wobble off-axis from plane of the brake arm by a few degrees because of the conical spacers, which lets you set toe-in and match the angled plane of the rim.
• Brake cable tension
• Spring tension adjustment (2mm Allen key)
None of these seem to be about arm spacing?
Also, I vaguely recall reading some people suggest about not using the supplied "link wire" and instead fashioning some kind of alternative? Is that what is meant here? I don't know anything about that…
The relatively small amount of pad wear over the life of the pads (in terms of dimensions you can measure) can well be taken up by the barrel adjuster up at the brake lever.
But maybe I'm not understanding. What does "in terms of dimensions you can measure" mean here?
Also: If cable tension really is the recommended solution here, why is the answer not to install additional barrel adjusters?
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Northern Shenandoah Valley
Posts: 4,145
Bikes: More bikes than riders
Liked 768 Times
in
573 Posts
The geometry of low-profile cantilever brakes like the Oryx means that the mechanical advantage of the brakes decreases pretty rapidly as they rotate in towards the rim. This is why spacing the pads further from the arm (by using the thick spacers) is usually advantageous -- it keeps the arms splayed wider which reduces the loss in mechanical advantage as they rotate towards the rim.
I'm sure it's been posted somewhere above, but Sheldon Brown has an excellent article on this: https://www.sheldonbrown.com/cantilever-geometry.html
Browse down to the section for special considerations for low-profile cantilevers.
Originally Posted by Sheldon Brown
Traditional good practice had been to slide the brake shoe holders all the way into the eyebolts, so that the back of the shoe butts up against the cantilever arm. This is not the case with the newer low-profile models.With low-profile cantilevers,, the shoe needs to be extended inward from the arm, increasing the effective cantilever angle . The unsupported length of shaft connecting the brake shoe to the arm may cause an increased tendency to squeal, but that is one of the inherent trade-offs of low-profile brakes.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Roswell, GA
Posts: 8,321
Bikes: '93 Trek 750, '92 Schwinn Crisscross, '93 Mongoose Alta
Liked 1,095 Times
in
725 Posts
Great question. Of course the real answer is I didn't think about that.
But my experience is I get many years and sets of pads out of a set of brake cables, and that loosening and tightening the pinch bolt more than a few times leads to a freyed cable,
On the other hand, it's probably easier than messing around with swapping washers and spacers, and infinitely variably adjustable.
But it still leaves the real question: Is it normal to have to make this kind of adjustment over the life of a pad?
But my experience is I get many years and sets of pads out of a set of brake cables, and that loosening and tightening the pinch bolt more than a few times leads to a freyed cable,
On the other hand, it's probably easier than messing around with swapping washers and spacers, and infinitely variably adjustable.
But it still leaves the real question: Is it normal to have to make this kind of adjustment over the life of a pad?
Also, make certain that your barrel adjusters are nearly all the way retracted and the shoes firmly against the rim when you set up the cable clamp so that you do not waste adjuster travel setting up the initial pad adjustment.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 744
Bikes: Cannondale tandems: '92 Road, '97 Mtn. Mongoose 10.9 Ti, Kelly Deluxe, Tommaso Chorus, Cdale MT2000, Schwinn Deluxe Cruiser, Torker Unicycle, among others.
Liked 207 Times
in
129 Posts
Cables do not last forever, are inexpensive to change, and make an often remarkable improvement when replaced. I replace the outers at the same time.
Also, make certain that your barrel adjusters are nearly all the way retracted and the shoes firmly against the rim when you set up the cable clamp so that you do not waste adjuster travel setting up the initial pad adjustment.
Also, make certain that your barrel adjusters are nearly all the way retracted and the shoes firmly against the rim when you set up the cable clamp so that you do not waste adjuster travel setting up the initial pad adjustment.
So if it came down to it and I could only replace ONE of the two, it would be cable housing every time. But when you're going to the trouble of this work, you always replace them in tandem.
And while you're doing this work, it's important to trim housing ends flat and perpendicular. Do not rely only on the ferrule to provide a "flat" surface for the housing to fit in the cable stop. I use a grinder to get the metal ends nice and flat. (A Dremel works too, as does a file, but not as quick and easy as a bench grinder.) Brake housing wire (wound circularly) always seems to "wrap around" on itself when cutting it to length. And even if you do manage to get a clean cut, you still have a non-flat end. Grinding gets it nice and flat and perpendicular. You just have to be careful not to overheat too much and melt the plastic liner and cover. Same with shift housing, despite the wires being aligned differently. Shifting is very sensitive to issues with the housing having friction or fouled ends. (And the wires to foul over time and they tend to start to protrude from the end.)
I have a good shift housing story. A customer who bought his bike from our LBS came in for some service; I think it was a flat tire. Either way, it was not shifting related. I completed the repair and gave the bike a quick check-over and lubricated the chain. I quickly noticed that the shifting was TERRIBLE. He saw my reaction and said, "Oh don't even TRY! I've had you guys work on the shifting ever since I bought it and it has never worked well." I was aghast and embarrassed that his bike never performed as expected or intended. So I checked it over, pulled the housing and cables out of the slotted guides. Sure enough, not only were the cables dry as a bone inside the housing, there was white powder on the cables. So I quickly lubricated the housing and reinstalled everything. Functioned like a charm. After I gave it a test ride, I let the customer take it out to see what he thought. "WOW! It has NEVER worked this well!" he exclaimed. I was so happy to have solved his problem and make his bike perform as it should have all along.
So, smooth, low-friction housing is important, and crucial for indexed shifting.
#20
Senior Member
For the more common (these days) v-brake ie. linear pull brakes, am I correct in understanding that 1) compressionless housing is nice to have, and 2) pad wear should be compensated simply by dialing out the barrel adjuster (which pushes the housing against the brake mechanism at the other end, hence the recommendation for compressionless housing), NOT by unhooking and rehooking the brake cable?
https://bicycles.stackexchange.com/q...-the-pads-wear
Thank you.
https://bicycles.stackexchange.com/q...-the-pads-wear
Thank you.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Golden, CO and Tucson, AZ
Posts: 2,864
Bikes: 2012 Specialized Elite Disc, 1983 Trek 520
Liked 789 Times
in
444 Posts
No. V-brakes can be very responsive, and some dynamic response in the housing is desired for modulation.
The barrel adjusters are there for a reason. Use them for small adjustments, even while riding. When the bike's in the stand and you're doing more major work on the brakes, screw the barrel adjusters all the way back in and reset the cable at the pinch bolt.
The barrel adjusters are there for a reason. Use them for small adjustments, even while riding. When the bike's in the stand and you're doing more major work on the brakes, screw the barrel adjusters all the way back in and reset the cable at the pinch bolt.
#22
Senior Member
Thank you.
But what about pad wear? How do you adjust for that?
By dialing out the barrel adjuster or hooking+rehooking the cable?
But what about pad wear? How do you adjust for that?
By dialing out the barrel adjuster or hooking+rehooking the cable?
#23
Clark W. Griswold
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ,location, location
Posts: 14,066
Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26
Liked 4,271 Times
in
2,851 Posts
Keep in mind folks this is a thread last active in 2022 not a deep zombie cut but a zombie nonetheless.
Likes For veganbikes:
#24
Senior Member
I avoid creating new threads when an existing one is pretty much on the same subject.
Apparently, that's how it's done: "The general ideas are that you start with the barrel adjuster all the way in, as u/ClamOnBass says, and then you adjust the with the barrel adjuster to fine tune and to compensate for pad wear over time."
https://www.******.com/r/bikewrench/...juster_or_the/
Apparently, that's how it's done: "The general ideas are that you start with the barrel adjuster all the way in, as u/ClamOnBass says, and then you adjust the with the barrel adjuster to fine tune and to compensate for pad wear over time."
https://www.******.com/r/bikewrench/...juster_or_the/
#25
Clark W. Griswold
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ,location, location
Posts: 14,066
Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26
Liked 4,271 Times
in
2,851 Posts
I avoid creating new threads when an existing one is pretty much on the same subject.
Apparently, that's how it's done: "The general ideas are that you start with the barrel adjuster all the way in, as u/ClamOnBass says, and then you adjust the with the barrel adjuster to fine tune and to compensate for pad wear over time."
https://www.******.com/r/bikewrench/...juster_or_the/
Apparently, that's how it's done: "The general ideas are that you start with the barrel adjuster all the way in, as u/ClamOnBass says, and then you adjust the with the barrel adjuster to fine tune and to compensate for pad wear over time."
https://www.******.com/r/bikewrench/...juster_or_the/
Keep in mind not trying to be mean or anything this is text on a page with no emotion detectable but I am pretty chill ate some delicious roasted potatoes with some homemade chili oil and watched a funny movie and am posting here.
And personally I prefer Geddy Lee or Marcus Miller on bass to a clam but if that clam is good enough I will give them a shot.
Likes For veganbikes: