When is a bike beyond being worth repairing?
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Berkeley, CA
Posts: 7,389
Bikes: '72 Cilo Pacer, '72 Gitane Gran Tourisme, '72 Peugeot PX10, '73 Speedwell Ti, '74 Peugeot UE-8, '75 Peugeot PR-10L, '80 Colnago Super, '85 De Rosa Pro, '86 Look Equipe 753, '86 Look KG86, '89 Parkpre Team, '90 Parkpre Team MTB, '90 Merlin
Liked 2,699 Times
in
652 Posts
My suggestion,, get a piece of paper and make a list of Everything the the bike needs and add up the cost in Parts ( Chain, tires, tubes, rim tape , brake hoods , new cables, bar tape etc.) Chroming, grease and Paint ,chrome/Aluminum polish , degreasers etc.
Estimate how many hours you will need to do a complete rehab , and Also the Time involved on the Internet and driving around town to hunt down the parts , and (conservative ) charge $5 an hour, and then Quadruple that as everything takes longer than you think.. TOOLS, you need cone wrenches ,bottom bracket tools , chain tools etc.. $$
If the cost of a buying a similar bicycle is less than the Math you just did , trash the bike and go buy another already rideable running bike and enjoy your time cycling around town .
Estimate how many hours you will need to do a complete rehab , and Also the Time involved on the Internet and driving around town to hunt down the parts , and (conservative ) charge $5 an hour, and then Quadruple that as everything takes longer than you think.. TOOLS, you need cone wrenches ,bottom bracket tools , chain tools etc.. $$
If the cost of a buying a similar bicycle is less than the Math you just did , trash the bike and go buy another already rideable running bike and enjoy your time cycling around town .
#27
Polymultiplié
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: South Holland, NL
Posts: 11,238
Bikes: Yes, please.
Liked 5,266 Times
in
1,939 Posts
Case in point: I am currently building up a frame from what once was a chain store bike, which I bought as a parts donor in 2012 or so. Its brethren have ended up in landfills long before that. Yet, it is my size, its geometry is interesting and it's technically sound, so I kept it and now I'll build it.
The plan with these projects is always to keep it cheap and use what I've got. And, as always, I'll be offering up the nicest stuff from my bins, like a set of MAFAC "RAID" brakes, a Stronglight seatpost, a pair of Honjo fenders ... And, as always, I've already bought stuff especially for this build. A nice TA mini front rack is currently on its way from France, as is some leather bar tape from Poland ...
And, as always, I will have spent hundreds of dollars by the time this cheap build is finished. Coming out ahead? Not a chance.
Likes For non-fixie:
#28
Polymultiplié
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: South Holland, NL
Posts: 11,238
Bikes: Yes, please.
Liked 5,266 Times
in
1,939 Posts
Unfortunately for me, those two things are inseparable. If I know I can sell it for a little more than I put into it, I can take on many more projects, doing posh rebuilds of vintage lightweights. If I can't even break even ... then I guess I'm riding more ... or gardening.
Likes For non-fixie:
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Whittier
Posts: 933
Bikes: 1973 Colnago Super, Litespeed Classic , Automoto , Pinarello Gavia TSX,Eddy Merckx Corsa Extra,Eddy Merckx EMX-5 , 1982 Moser SL, Concorde TSX, Vitus 979 KAS. Diamant SLX,60's Meteor
Liked 1,083 Times
in
373 Posts
The point was that sunnyone thought I was some sort of cycling Noob . I gave a very valid reason as to why sometimes bike rebuilding/Rehabing becomes a money pit and sometimes you just got to walk away . So Yes , sometimes you got to do the Math.. I wouldnt pay $1,000 to Repaint an entry level made in Taiwan Bianchi in Celeste green .
Maybe Unless I was Elon Musk rebuilding my paper route bike .
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Whittier
Posts: 933
Bikes: 1973 Colnago Super, Litespeed Classic , Automoto , Pinarello Gavia TSX,Eddy Merckx Corsa Extra,Eddy Merckx EMX-5 , 1982 Moser SL, Concorde TSX, Vitus 979 KAS. Diamant SLX,60's Meteor
Liked 1,083 Times
in
373 Posts
Its a shame what happened to this bike . Classic 1973 Windsor with Original paint, full Campy and rode like a champ.. Except one thing , when I turned the handlebars my size 12 feet with toe XL clips always hit my front wheel, and usually at slow speed making quick turns I made a point of avoiding that , but a few times at slow speed I hit the front wheel and almost fell over .
A friend of mine bugged the sh*t out of me to sell it to him . Which I did. A month later another friend told me that he saw my old Windsor , repainted rattle can dark blue with modern Windsor ( the Chinese Brand) decals and shimano 600 parts ..I was bummed .
#32
The Huffmeister
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: The Le Grande HQ
Posts: 3,132
Bikes: Gängl, Trek 938, Raleigh Professional, Paramount, Allez, Guerciotti, Specialized Stumpjumper, Trek 750, Miyata 1000 < Huffy
Liked 4,008 Times
in
1,618 Posts
#33
Edumacator
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Goose Creek, SC
Posts: 7,570
Bikes: '87 Crestdale, '87 Basso Gap, '92 Rossin Performance EL-OS, 1990 VanTuyl, 1980s Losa, 1985 Trek 670, 1982 AD SLE, 1987 PX10, etc...
Liked 3,596 Times
in
2,259 Posts
Rusted through on the top tube, and bottom bracket area.
But it will be repainted with flowering vines...
__________________
1987 Crest Cannondale, 1987 Basso Gap, 1992 Rossin Performance EL, 1990ish Van Tuyl, 1985 Trek 670, 2003 Pinarello Surprise, 1990ish MBK Atlantique, 1987 Peugeot Competition, 1987 Nishiki Tri-A, 1981 Faggin, 1996 Cannondale M500, 1984 Mercian, 1982 AD SuperLeicht, 1985 Massi (model unknown), 1988 Daccordi Griffe , 1989 Fauxsin MTB, 1981 Ciocc Mockba, 1992 Bianchi Giro, 1977 Colnago Super, 1971 Raleigh International, 1998 Corratec Ap & Dun, 1991 Peugeot Slimestone
1987 Crest Cannondale, 1987 Basso Gap, 1992 Rossin Performance EL, 1990ish Van Tuyl, 1985 Trek 670, 2003 Pinarello Surprise, 1990ish MBK Atlantique, 1987 Peugeot Competition, 1987 Nishiki Tri-A, 1981 Faggin, 1996 Cannondale M500, 1984 Mercian, 1982 AD SuperLeicht, 1985 Massi (model unknown), 1988 Daccordi Griffe , 1989 Fauxsin MTB, 1981 Ciocc Mockba, 1992 Bianchi Giro, 1977 Colnago Super, 1971 Raleigh International, 1998 Corratec Ap & Dun, 1991 Peugeot Slimestone
Likes For jdawginsc:
#34
Wheelman
Join Date: Aug 2021
Location: Putney, London UK
Posts: 1,025
Bikes: 1982 Holdsworth Avanti (531), 1961 Holdsworth Cyclone
Liked 851 Times
in
419 Posts
I'm thinking some of these bikes haven't been made for many years.
So if it's not complete trash don't junk it, if nescessary donate it to somebody who will mend it.
This is a 1961 Holdsworth Cyclone (last year):
It's now almost perfect.
So if it's not complete trash don't junk it, if nescessary donate it to somebody who will mend it.
This is a 1961 Holdsworth Cyclone (last year):
It's now almost perfect.
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada - burrrrr!
Posts: 11,941
Bikes: 1958 Rabeneick 120D, 1968 Legnano Gran Premio, 196? Torpado Professional, 2000 Marinoni Piuma
Likes: 0
Liked 2,019 Times
in
1,065 Posts
For me, a bike is worth restoring (actually street restoration, I don't do chrome plating EVER, but paint and art is not a problem) when it interests me, is a good fit and available cheap. Anyway, this was in rough shape and given to me for free. The interest factor was there (I am a freak for chrome plated stay socks and head tube lugs...
I test rode the bike to ensure it was a good fit and offered a decent ride quality. Once satisfied, I did this and this set me back a few hundred dollars...
Sadly, I don't even ride it. The gearing is just too much for this man's old, worn out legs...
Now, I have to decide if this is a decent fit, a bike of interest and worth the $$$ and effort to street restore...
I test rode the bike to ensure it was a good fit and offered a decent ride quality. Once satisfied, I did this and this set me back a few hundred dollars...
Sadly, I don't even ride it. The gearing is just too much for this man's old, worn out legs...
Now, I have to decide if this is a decent fit, a bike of interest and worth the $$$ and effort to street restore...
__________________
"98% of the bikes I buy are projects".
"98% of the bikes I buy are projects".
Likes For randyjawa:
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: 700 Ft. above sea level.
Posts: 3,330
Bikes: More than there were awhile ago.
Liked 1,443 Times
in
665 Posts
Still, "coming out ahead" isn't the reason for being for most of us on this forum. We just like the look and feel of old bikes. We hate to throw away things that are still "good". We like to prove that newer - or more expensive - isn't always better.
And, as always, I will have spent hundreds of dollars by the time this cheap build is finished. Coming out ahead? Not a chance.
And, as always, I will have spent hundreds of dollars by the time this cheap build is finished. Coming out ahead? Not a chance.
__________________
".....distasteful and easily triggered."
".....distasteful and easily triggered."
Likes For Murray Missile:
#37
The Huffmeister
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: The Le Grande HQ
Posts: 3,132
Bikes: Gängl, Trek 938, Raleigh Professional, Paramount, Allez, Guerciotti, Specialized Stumpjumper, Trek 750, Miyata 1000 < Huffy
Liked 4,008 Times
in
1,618 Posts
A Trek in the garden is worth two in the shop
__________________
There were 135 Confentes, but only one...Huffente!
There were 135 Confentes, but only one...Huffente!
#38
Overdoing projects
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Rotterdam, former republic of the Netherlands
Posts: 2,443
Bikes: Batavus Randonneur GL, Gazelle Orange Excellent, Gazelle Super Licht, Gazelle Grand Tourist, Gazelle Lausanne, Gazelle Tandem, Koga-Miyata SilverAce, Koga-Miyata WorldTraveller
Liked 1,319 Times
in
711 Posts
I think for me is when the frame has obvious structural issues or when it has some proprietary components that are impossible to replace... and I have skipped that rule in the past for really cool bikes.
But the Koga-Miyata RoadAce with the holes in the seat stays and bent chain stay is a good example of the former.
The Gazelle Friiik being an example of the latter. Still on my to-do list for later.
But the Koga-Miyata RoadAce with the holes in the seat stays and bent chain stay is a good example of the former.
The Gazelle Friiik being an example of the latter. Still on my to-do list for later.
#40
Senior Member
When I run out of money. That's when it is beyond repair,
Likes For iab:
#41
Senior Member
There’s two kinds of repair - to the components or to the frame. In either case, if you’re doing the work, labor is free. If it’s done at a bike shop, consult them on the labor cost.
Gauging the repair cost for components is easier - you do research to determine the cost to replace the broken components, either with the same parts or new parts.
Frame repair is more costly and harder to do, as it takes more specialized knowledge and tools. Generally, unless the frame is of very high quality or especially valuable, major frame repair is not worth the effort. Dents are the easiest to fix, while structural damage is generally the hardest. Damage that compromises structural integrity, like crash damage, cracked joints, rust holes or bent tubes, will necessitate major repairs costing in the hundreds to thousands of dollars. It’s essentially like building a new frame, but with all the challenges of dealing with an old frame.
Generally, bikes that have suffered crash damage to the point that it deforms the fork or the frame (or both) are not worth repairing and not safe to ride as-is.
An “in-between” subject are issues like a stuck bottom bracket, stuck stem or seatpost, or ruined threads in the steerer tube or bottom bracket shell. There’s zillions of tutorials on how to remove stuck components - either you do it yourself and put a price on your own time, or you pay a bike store. Ruined threads might be repairable by a store, but in some cases fall into the heading of frame repair.
there’s many twists and turns beyond this basic approach, which other folks exploring those in this thread. But this was my attempt to answer your question as literally as possible.
Gauging the repair cost for components is easier - you do research to determine the cost to replace the broken components, either with the same parts or new parts.
Frame repair is more costly and harder to do, as it takes more specialized knowledge and tools. Generally, unless the frame is of very high quality or especially valuable, major frame repair is not worth the effort. Dents are the easiest to fix, while structural damage is generally the hardest. Damage that compromises structural integrity, like crash damage, cracked joints, rust holes or bent tubes, will necessitate major repairs costing in the hundreds to thousands of dollars. It’s essentially like building a new frame, but with all the challenges of dealing with an old frame.
Generally, bikes that have suffered crash damage to the point that it deforms the fork or the frame (or both) are not worth repairing and not safe to ride as-is.
An “in-between” subject are issues like a stuck bottom bracket, stuck stem or seatpost, or ruined threads in the steerer tube or bottom bracket shell. There’s zillions of tutorials on how to remove stuck components - either you do it yourself and put a price on your own time, or you pay a bike store. Ruined threads might be repairable by a store, but in some cases fall into the heading of frame repair.
there’s many twists and turns beyond this basic approach, which other folks exploring those in this thread. But this was my attempt to answer your question as literally as possible.
__________________
Check out www.djcatnap.com for articles on vintage Japanese & French bicycle restorations, components and history.
Check out www.djcatnap.com for articles on vintage Japanese & French bicycle restorations, components and history.
#42
Junior Member
I was replying to ..".sunnyon"e " Spoken like a rider, not a wrencher" .
The point was that sunnyone thought I was some sort of cycling Noob .
The point was that sunnyone thought I was some sort of cycling Noob .
#43
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada - burrrrr!
Posts: 11,941
Bikes: 1958 Rabeneick 120D, 1968 Legnano Gran Premio, 196? Torpado Professional, 2000 Marinoni Piuma
Likes: 0
Liked 2,019 Times
in
1,065 Posts
I can repair just about anything but some things are just not worth the effort...
__________________
"98% of the bikes I buy are projects".
"98% of the bikes I buy are projects".
#44
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Whittier
Posts: 933
Bikes: 1973 Colnago Super, Litespeed Classic , Automoto , Pinarello Gavia TSX,Eddy Merckx Corsa Extra,Eddy Merckx EMX-5 , 1982 Moser SL, Concorde TSX, Vitus 979 KAS. Diamant SLX,60's Meteor
Liked 1,083 Times
in
373 Posts
I know you’re not a Noob. When it comes to biking, you’re way, way more knowledgable and experienced than I am. What i meant by my probably too terse comment was that you seem to value and enjoy riding more than wrenching. Some cyclists (me included) really enjoy wrenching, especially when restoring cool, older bikes.
Likes For Manny66:
#46
old newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 1,090
Bikes: Specialized Roubaix
Liked 515 Times
in
264 Posts
If I decide to restore the Olmo rather than simply making it rideable are parts for old bikes difficult to find? I mean are there online stores that sell parts or will I need to scrounge each one individually?
Also-how can I find what components were on it originally?
The story on the Olmo is confusing. At one point dad was trying to find crank bearings for it. His Honda motorcycle shop started selling bicycles and parts in addition to motorcycles. None of the bearings in his shop fit. He took it to an old bike shop that used to be in Fort Worth called Mr. Bicycle. He looked it over then said it was a hand built Schwinn Paramount. The bottom bearing set for that fit so that was what we thought it was. Later on we had doubts mainly due to the gussets.
Several years later while looking it over I saw Olmo stamped into the steering head nut.
When I picked the bike up in ‘74 for dad it was old then, maybe from the ‘50s. It looked like had been used for racing since it had sewn tires and some other things I can’t remember.
Also-how can I find what components were on it originally?
The story on the Olmo is confusing. At one point dad was trying to find crank bearings for it. His Honda motorcycle shop started selling bicycles and parts in addition to motorcycles. None of the bearings in his shop fit. He took it to an old bike shop that used to be in Fort Worth called Mr. Bicycle. He looked it over then said it was a hand built Schwinn Paramount. The bottom bearing set for that fit so that was what we thought it was. Later on we had doubts mainly due to the gussets.
Several years later while looking it over I saw Olmo stamped into the steering head nut.
When I picked the bike up in ‘74 for dad it was old then, maybe from the ‘50s. It looked like had been used for racing since it had sewn tires and some other things I can’t remember.
Last edited by pepperbelly; 05-13-24 at 08:26 AM.
#47
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: 700 Ft. above sea level.
Posts: 3,330
Bikes: More than there were awhile ago.
Liked 1,443 Times
in
665 Posts
If you just want to make them functional mechanical parts for most mass produced bikes are pretty easy to find for the most part. It's when you get into reproduction decals for less popular brands or models or mechanical items for the very low production models and one off hand built bikes that it can get tough. It's "usually" not impossible, but it can be expensive.
__________________
".....distasteful and easily triggered."
".....distasteful and easily triggered."
#48
Senior Member
If you just want to make them functional mechanical parts for most mass produced bikes are pretty easy to find for the most part. It's when you get into reproduction decals for less popular brands or models or mechanical items for the very low production models and one off hand built bikes that it can get tough. It's "usually" not impossible, but it can be expensive.
Without seeing a photo of your bikes, I can't say what needs to be replaced and what doesn't. Parts that aren't physically damaged in some way don't need to be replaced. They can usually be cleaned up, lubricated and re-installed. If the chains are rusted solid, replace those. If the tires are worn out and cracked, replace them (and the tubes) also. If you don't have the tools or know-how to dismantle, overhaul, and re-assemble your bikes, either take them to a shop or get ready to spend time teaching yourself how to do the repairs yourself + buying a few necessary tools.
__________________
Check out www.djcatnap.com for articles on vintage Japanese & French bicycle restorations, components and history.
Check out www.djcatnap.com for articles on vintage Japanese & French bicycle restorations, components and history.
Likes For Catnap:
#49
old newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 1,090
Bikes: Specialized Roubaix
Liked 515 Times
in
264 Posts
to simplify, I'd split it between modern parts that will get the bike rolling again vs. matching the original vintage parts that are on it. Vintage Shimano 600 and 105 series parts are common and easy to source on eBay, or via this forum's Classic & Vintage Sales subforum. The modern equivalents can be had from SunRace on Amazon or via your local bike store, generally very affordable (like under $100).
Without seeing a photo of your bikes, I can't say what needs to be replaced and what doesn't. Parts that aren't physically damaged in some way don't need to be replaced. They can usually be cleaned up, lubricated and re-installed. If the chains are rusted solid, replace those. If the tires are worn out and cracked, replace them (and the tubes) also. If you don't have the tools or know-how to dismantle, overhaul, and re-assemble your bikes, either take them to a shop or get ready to spend time teaching yourself how to do the repairs yourself + buying a few necessary tools.
Without seeing a photo of your bikes, I can't say what needs to be replaced and what doesn't. Parts that aren't physically damaged in some way don't need to be replaced. They can usually be cleaned up, lubricated and re-installed. If the chains are rusted solid, replace those. If the tires are worn out and cracked, replace them (and the tubes) also. If you don't have the tools or know-how to dismantle, overhaul, and re-assemble your bikes, either take them to a shop or get ready to spend time teaching yourself how to do the repairs yourself + buying a few necessary tools.
I was thinking about trying to restore it to its original groupset but that would be really expensive.
I think the best thing to do is restore it to riding condition. Tires, tubes, chain definitely need changing but that is expected. I will try to find a vintage Olmo seat post clamp and other small parts but I will keep the Shimano brakes etc.
#50
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 1,600
Bikes: You had me at rusty and Italian!!
Liked 1,185 Times
in
617 Posts
Still, "coming out ahead" isn't the reason for being for most of us on this forum. We just like the look and feel of old bikes. We hate to throw away things that are still "good". We like to prove that newer - or more expensive - isn't always better.
Case in point: I am currently building up a frame from what once was a chain store bike, which I bought as a parts donor in 2012 or so. Its brethren have ended up in landfills long before that. Yet, it is my size, its geometry is interesting and it's technically sound, so I kept it and now I'll build it.
The plan with these projects is always to keep it cheap and use what I've got. And, as always, I'll be offering up the nicest stuff from my bins, like a set of MAFAC "RAID" brakes, a Stronglight seatpost, a pair of Honjo fenders ... And, as always, I've already bought stuff especially for this build. A nice TA mini front rack is currently on its way from France, as is some leather bar tape from Poland ...
And, as always, I will have spent hundreds of dollars by the time this cheap build is finished. Coming out ahead? Not a chance.
Case in point: I am currently building up a frame from what once was a chain store bike, which I bought as a parts donor in 2012 or so. Its brethren have ended up in landfills long before that. Yet, it is my size, its geometry is interesting and it's technically sound, so I kept it and now I'll build it.
The plan with these projects is always to keep it cheap and use what I've got. And, as always, I'll be offering up the nicest stuff from my bins, like a set of MAFAC "RAID" brakes, a Stronglight seatpost, a pair of Honjo fenders ... And, as always, I've already bought stuff especially for this build. A nice TA mini front rack is currently on its way from France, as is some leather bar tape from Poland ...
And, as always, I will have spent hundreds of dollars by the time this cheap build is finished. Coming out ahead? Not a chance.
Also, I would keep the Halfords decals on it because of being peculiar.
Likes For RustyJames: